2024 CFP Playoffs Round 1: Texas vs. Clemson - 3:00pm on TNT

[Gidnik 3494]

8 hours ago, mdmost said:

In the pantheon of long TD runs at DKR, Blue's was really good. This one was pure sex.

 

whenever someone asks me about my "what if" player, i always say Ramonce. ive never seen anyone like him.

[UTCzech III 2957]

Here is my shitty tape of a tape of a tape copy, but you get a different camera angle at the end...

 

[hornian 5295]

6 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

Our first possession of the third quarter took up almost half the quarter. 14 plays, 71 yards. Had 1st and goal from the 5 and had to settle for a FG. Tough but I’d call that a good start to the half. Then the defense immediately forces a 3 and out and we get the ball back with 5:30 left in the quarter up 31-0. We immediately go 3 and out with the patented low line drive punt from Kern allowing for Clemson to start from their own 45. 4 plays, 55 yards, TD. We get the ball back. 16 yard pass to Helm, Golden PI for 15 yards, Blue run for 8 yards. 2nd and 2 and we get our first penalty of the game which basically kills the drive. Ends on the 4th and 2 incomplete pass.

Lose the quarter 7-3.

Ok, cool. 
Hook ‘Em

[randomhorn 2230]

1 hour ago, UTCzech III said:

Here is my shitty tape of a tape of a tape copy, but you get a different camera angle at the end...

 

Ah the good old days of playing on painted concrete 

[Richter 2420]

13 hours ago, taybo20 said:

I think I saw @immamac at the game. I was like 15 seats away. But I was too afraid to say anything. Surly royalty is not to be trifled with.

Probably just a different hobo

[Sgt Hulk 14457]

AI is wild. But this had me howling 

 

 

[Sgt Hulk 14457]

1 hour ago, Gidnik said:

whenever someone asks me about my "what if" player, i always say Ramonce. ive never seen anyone like him.

Same same. Watching him was a thing of beauty. He will forever be the what if. 

[TOR 6131]

16 minutes ago, randomhorn said:

Ah the good old days of playing on painted concrete 

Tully Stadium holla!

[Deej 77841]

14 hours ago, JesusSweatDuck said:

I was shocked how early their fans left. A big group left at halftime 

Pussies, just like their coach.

[Wilcox Cummingtonite 3644]

10 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

Our first possession of the third quarter took up almost half the quarter. 14 plays, 71 yards. Had 1st and goal from the 5 and had to settle for a FG. Tough but I’d call that a good start to the half. Then the defense immediately forces a 3 and out and we get the ball back with 5:30 left in the quarter up 31-0. We immediately go 3 and out with the patented low line drive punt from Kern allowing for Clemson to start from their own 45. 4 plays, 55 yards, TD. We get the ball back. 16 yard pass to Helm, Golden PI for 15 yards, Blue run for 8 yards. 2nd and 2 and we get our first penalty of the game which basically kills the drive. Ends on the 4th and 2 incomplete pass.

Lose the quarter 7-3.

[Deej 77841]

4 hours ago, Gidnik said:

whenever someone asks me about my "what if" player, i always say Ramonce. ive never seen anyone like him.

He ran like he had a backpack full of weed and was running from the cops.

[JesusSweatDuck 18120]

They're dating for those that don't know

 

[Leanderman 2367]

"You lose it in here snatch? More tongue, less teeth."

If you find my truck keys in there. let me know?  

[CurlyDumps 4661]

16 hours ago, OU Sucks said:

Looks like it:

 

Looks like more stupid fake shit on Twitter.  This goober claims "Chip Brown said this grrrr!" and posts a random screenshot of ESPN.com?

That just looks like a screenshot of his stats to date or something.  It's not even 9 fucking catches!

Nobody predicted Helm would only have 9 catches. 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by CurlyDumps

[cochamps 1886]

12 hours ago, hookem48 said:

If you're going to play man vs a qb that can run you better not let him loose

I would argue that a long run or two from Klubnick would not be worse than getting gashed on a bunch of intermediate passes wth lots of YAC.  I agree with the post regarding pussy zone D.

[DigglerontheHoof 21552]

33 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

Looks like more stupid fake shit on Twitter.  This goober claims "Chip Brown said this grrrr!" and posts a random screenshot of ESPN.com?

That just looks like a screenshot of his stats to date or something.  It's not even 9 fucking catches!

Nobody predicted Helm would only have 9 catches. 

 

Must've fooled Helm b/c he seemed to make a direct reference to someone in that press room about a perceived slight. 

[JesusSweatDuck 18120]

39 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

Looks like more stupid fake shit on Twitter.  This goober claims "Chip Brown said this grrrr!" and posts a random screenshot of ESPN.com?

That just looks like a screenshot of his stats to date or something.  It's not even 9 fucking catches!

Nobody predicted Helm would only have 9 catches. 

 

Hey Chip, you're up early after your bender

[JGrayDBU 376]

24 minutes ago, cochamps said:

I would argue that a long run or two from Klubnick would not be worse than getting gashed on a bunch of intermediate passes wth lots of YAC.  I agree with the post regarding pussy zone D.

agree completely.  it appears  our D coordinator was afraid VY was walking out there and would run an 80 yard TD against us?  Is that the choice our D coordinator is making?  

 

if our Coordinator is that worried about Cade, how about a spy?  Can you have a spy with man-to-man?  math?  one spy, 4 rushers, that leaves 6 to cover the receivers.  isn't 6 DBs and LBs enough to cover 4 receivers plus a tight end plus a RB?  

I know I must be oversimplifying this.  We still have the best athletes in the country on our D, which is considered the #2 best D in the country and we sit there in this stupid, soft Zone like we don't have athletes who can run with and cover the opposing receivers.  Up front, our 4 DL can beat any 5 OL to pressure the QB on a fairly regular basis, I believe.   

What am I missing? 

 

[Had Enough 2123]

We are as equipped as just about anyone from a depth perspective to run; however, that’s a risky proposition.  It does make the QBs reads simpler.  And 1 on 1 catches are fairly common.

Our S played downhill pretty aggressively.  With that comes some risk.

[RockyMountainHighHorn 928]

13 minutes ago, JGrayDBU said:

agree completely.  it appears  our D coordinator was afraid VY was walking out there and would run an 80 yard TD against us?  Is that the choice our D coordinator is making?  

 

if our Coordinator is that worried about Cade, how about a spy?  Can you have a spy with man-to-man?  math?  one spy, 4 rushers, that leaves 6 to cover the receivers.  isn't 6 DBs and LBs enough to cover 4 receivers plus a tight end plus a RB?  

I know I must be oversimplifying this.  We still have the best athletes in the country on our D, which is considered the #2 best D in the country and we sit there in this stupid, soft Zone like we don't have athletes who can run with and cover the opposing receivers.  Up front, our 4 DL can beat any 5 OL to pressure the QB on a fairly regular basis, I believe.   

What am I missing? 

 

Is that you Jerry gray? Looking for a job again? 

[Pancho 46327]

🤘🏾

 

 

[honolulu horn 6232]

10 hours ago, Gidnik said:

whenever someone asks me about my "what if" player, i always say Ramonce. ive never seen anyone like him.

I think of Ramonce and I think of Butch Hadnot. That guy was unstoppable. 

 

[SOBMarcos 57]

Cade Klubnik makes me moist…only Clemson quarterback that ever did that

[Dahobbs 18326]

1 hour ago, cochamps said:

I would argue that a long run or two from Klubnick would not be worse than getting gashed on a bunch of intermediate passes wth lots of YAC.  I agree with the post regarding pussy zone D.

 

51 minutes ago, JGrayDBU said:

agree completely.  it appears  our D coordinator was afraid VY was walking out there and would run an 80 yard TD against us?  Is that the choice our D coordinator is making?  

 

if our Coordinator is that worried about Cade, how about a spy?  Can you have a spy with man-to-man?  math?  one spy, 4 rushers, that leaves 6 to cover the receivers.  isn't 6 DBs and LBs enough to cover 4 receivers plus a tight end plus a RB?  

I know I must be oversimplifying this.  We still have the best athletes in the country on our D, which is considered the #2 best D in the country and we sit there in this stupid, soft Zone like we don't have athletes who can run with and cover the opposing receivers.  Up front, our 4 DL can beat any 5 OL to pressure the QB on a fairly regular basis, I believe.   

What am I missing? 

 

Guys, Clemson abused man coverage the few times we went to it (pick route for Td anyone?). This team plays zone. It plays zone a lot. It usually plays zone really well. We had some busts in coverage that were unusual combined with off games from Taaffee and Malik. Plus, the refs were allowing a lot of physical contact between DBs and receivers so long as it wasn't jersey tugs. Malik didn't respond well to the physical play and push offs. And all of that was made worse by our pass rush disappearing in the second half. But what this wasn't about was our team playing "pussy zone D" (this wasn't soft underneath coverage leading to a bunch of easy throws and YAC) or just needing to play man.  We had one DB get physically beat (Malik). One DB that was just lost in coverage (Guilbeau). And one safety that wasn't his usual reliable self (Taaffee).  It happens. Guys just need to respond and play better next time. I have faith they will. 

[Hookem2147 22037]

Apologies if this has already been pointed out but Clemson’s defensive call on the play that basically ended any hopes of a comeback was hilariously bad. I can see why Peter Woods might want to transfer if they are using him as a spy in these situations.

 

[CurlyDumps 4661]

When I was watching that play live I didn't notice the spies, but I couldn't believe that DB #20 just bailed on covering Blue and gave him all that cushy space to easily convert.

Edited 1 hour ago by CurlyDumps

[Dahobbs 18326]

15 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Apologies if this has already been pointed out but Clemson’s defensive call on the play that basically ended any hopes of a comeback was hilariously bad. I can see why Peter Woods might want to transfer if they are using him as a spy in these situations.

 

My best guess on the thought process there is that the two spies would also play our screen game, which they probably anticipated us going to on third and long. 

[NorthLoop 14484]

18 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Apologies if this has already been pointed out but Clemson’s defensive call on the play that basically ended any hopes of a comeback was hilariously bad. I can see why Peter Woods might want to transfer if they are using him as a spy in these situations.

 

Catches the ball 2 yards past the line to gain.... "it's gonna be close" 

[NorthLoop 14484]

One of the great things about that Ramonce run vs OSU was that a large chunk of fans had left the stadium by halftime, and yet it was still at top 5 loudest moment at DKR. 

[shakahorn 1658]

1 hour ago, JGrayDBU said:

agree completely.  it appears  our D coordinator was afraid VY was walking out there and would run an 80 yard TD against us?  Is that the choice our D coordinator is making?  

 

if our Coordinator is that worried about Cade, how about a spy?  Can you have a spy with man-to-man?  math?  one spy, 4 rushers, that leaves 6 to cover the receivers.  isn't 6 DBs and LBs enough to cover 4 receivers plus a tight end plus a RB?  

I know I must be oversimplifying this.  We still have the best athletes in the country on our D, which is considered the #2 best D in the country and we sit there in this stupid, soft Zone like we don't have athletes who can run with and cover the opposing receivers.  Up front, our 4 DL can beat any 5 OL to pressure the QB on a fairly regular basis, I believe.   

What am I missing? 

 

We had a spy on Klubnik on a vast majority of the plays.  Mostly Hill and Lefau.

[Thatguy 9371]

On 12/22/2024 at 9:33 AM, taybo20 said:

I think I saw @immamac at the game. I was like 15 seats away. But I was too afraid to say anything. Surly royalty is not to be trifled with.

@immamac is a solid dude. You should've said hello. 

[Valmy77 13626]

1 hour ago, honolulu horn said:

I think of Ramonce and I think of Butch Hadnot. That guy was unstoppable. 

Oh he was extremely stoppable once defenses started keying on him.

But in 1990 nobody saw him coming. It was awesome.

[Darth Tron 1158]

15 hours ago, JGrayDBU said:

Of course dude.  I decided on his name as a handle because of the hit that knocked Bo Jackson out of the 1984 game in Austin and half the season, but more importantly, the best interception in college football history to that point, the int. against Auburn in Auburn in 1983. 

I don't know if we talked about DBU before Gray, but we definitely talked about DBU at some point years later and it was in large part because of Jerry Gray. 

The best factoid ever IMO is that ESPN deleted the 1984 Jerry Gray hit because of Bo's celebrity status?  or famous 4.2 40 combine?

Who knows but it's gone from the ESPN version.  Nobody can accurately describe the play, but I will give it a shot.  Gray is on the opposite side of the field as Bo is running and appears to be headed for a TD.  Gray runs faster than Bo ever has across the field probably at least 70 yards, takes a perfect angle,  and hits Bo so hard it either separated or broke his shoulder. 

 

Great stuff! 

 

 

Here you are, good sir.

[Davis Lane 6007]

22 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

@immamac is a solid dude. You should've said hello.