Jump to content

New Orleans New Years Terror Attack [15 dead, 20+ critical/injured]


Wally Fairway

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, F250 said:

As I recall, the scandal was that she was playing with Vince Gill's pecker while they were still married to their ex-spouses.

….allegedly…. but given that both Vince and Amy were their spouses’ big financial resource (and divorce the last bite at the money apple), the fact that lawyers for their exes went after them with any salacious claim that would help them in the court of public opinion - and perhaps help get more $ in a better settlement - isn’t that far-fetched a guess either.   But I don’t give a shit if they did.  They seem like soulmates and very much in love for a long time. That is about the best thing you can find in life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

….allegedly…. but given that both Vince and Amy were their spouses’ big financial resource (and divorce the last bite at the money apple), the fact that lawyers for their exes went after them with any salacious claim that would help them in the court of public opinion - and perhaps help get more $ in a better settlement - isn’t that far-fetched a guess either.   But I don’t give a shit if they did.  They seem like soulmates and very much in love for a long time. That is about the best thing you can find in life.

fucking lawyers.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Sounds like this mosque getting some attention might be a silver lining.  All jokes aside, this is probably the only bit of radical propaganda this guy has ever spoken.  I don't think there could possibly be anything else noteworthy about the leadership at this particular mosque regarding potential terror threats.  

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BillyGoatHill said:

Someone here is claiming to have been her girl toy out on the road. Still waiting for pics/Love's Truck Stop food receipts for confirmation.

 

200.gif

Amy Grant is definitely stopping at Petro. Iron Skillet rules.

  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jkates said:

This is the dumbest critique of Art Bell but it's prevalent. At the end of the day, people need to stop acting like Art Bell's job is to be some kind of truth cop. He gives his guests a platform to speak, and it’s up to us to listen critically and think for ourselves. Isn’t that how it should be?

  1. Who Decides What’s "Misinformation"? This word gets thrown around way too much these days. What’s called “misinformation” today might turn out to be true tomorrow (or at least worth considering). Tons of ideas that were once mocked are now common knowledge.

  2. Hearing Different Opinions is Valuable: Art Bell's radio program is all about bringing on guests with different perspectives. Some agree with the mainstream; some don’t. So what? That’s the point! You don’t have to agree with everything, but hearing different sides is how you grow.

  3. Free Speech, Anyone? It’s a radio show, not a fact-checking newsroom. The beauty of Art Bell's style is that it’s just open conversation. If he pushed back on every little thing, it’d feel fake and scripted. Let people talk, and let the audience figure it out.

  4. The Audience is Not Dumb: This is the internet. People know how to Google. If they hear something wild on the radio, they can dig deeper and decide for themselves. Art Bell's listeners aren’t all mindless drones.

  5. Experts Disagree All the Time: A lot of Art Bell’s guests are legit experts or people with unique experiences. Just because their opinions don’t match the mainstream doesn’t mean they’re wrong. Sometimes, going against the grain is what moves things forward.

  6. Avoiding Echo Chambers: Shutting down certain ideas just because they’re “controversial” is how you end up in an echo chamber. Art Bell’s "Coast to Coast AM" is one of the few places left where people can explore weird or unpopular opinions.

  7. Intent Matters: Misinformation and disinformation aren’t the same thing. Disinformation is about lying on purpose, and most of Art Bell’s guests aren’t out here trying to deceive anyone. They’re just sharing what they know or believe.

  8. Talking About Controversial Stuff is How We Learn: When guests say something spicy, it sparks conversations and debates. That’s how ideas get tested and refined. Shutting it all down would just make people suspicious anyway.

 

When put another way . . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Helobious said:

Hell of a world we live in. It can be a mass shooting, a bombing, an attack like this. None of it is shocking at all anymore, doesn’t even matter the culprit or the reason. Already feels like this story is losing steam. 

We as a nation don't give a single fuck about classrooms of children getting mowed down by gunmen. Haven't for more than a decade. Why would this be any different?

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

The best representation of Rogan on this board is probably Rex. His brain is so broken by Islamophobic hatred that he's become fucking PRONG HORN's biggest white knight because Rex is too stupid and lacks the critical thinking skills to form his own opinion, so he just sponges off whatever poster is posting shit that makes him feel the best feelings in his micropenis.

I don’t listen to Rogan. I’m not a Pronghorn white knight. You and Captain are ultra critical and dismissive of his embedded tweets, because you so desperately want to be contrarian in your case, and forward thinking in Captain’s case. I had you both on Ignore for much of ‘24 and took you off to start the new year. When Pronghorn posts an embedded video, you two Pavlov’s dogs come sprinting. You’ll attack the author of the tweet in foolish attempt to discredit, and Captain will make a Russian plant remark. Like clockwork. 

I watch the content of the videos. Y’all ignore it, every time. It’s a played out, tired tactic. And calling me Islamophobic is absolutely the same as me calling you antisemitic. It’s not productive whatsoever. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

I watch the content of the videos. Y’all ignore it, every time. It’s a played out, tired tactic. And calling me Islamophobic is absolutely the same as me calling you antisemitic. It’s not productive whatsoever. 

Where does calling people antisemitic pedophiles fall on your hypocrisy scale?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

I see Thursday Night Ana made an appearance last night.

 

21 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

Seems like the Vegas guy may have really been an accident. Dude was apparently a big Trumper. Seems to me there's a decent-to-strong possibility he was also an Elon fan, rented a Cybertruck because he thought they're cool, and was planning to go camp in the desert and shoot off a bunch of fireworks. Then the Cybertruck caught fire because, well, they just do that sometimes, or perhaps fumes were leaking from the camping fuel he had in the back and ignited.

Of course, from the "it was intentional" angle, he is divorced. 

 

15 hours ago, Anastasis said:

That one held together for all of about 5 seconds. 

 

 

Sounds like someone needs some cranberry juice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bolverk said:

Where does calling people antisemitic pedophiles fall on your hypocrisy scale?

High to quite high?  That’d be an odd descriptor. Not sure I ever used that one, at least not in the same insult. I called someone in one of these arguments a “pederast” as a poor joke from a movie quote, and apologized for it. And, we are all hypocrites. 

38 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

“I habitually absorb obvious propaganda” is a weird flex. 

When it’s clear propaganda I don’t reference it. When it’s terrible people protesting causes that I detest, and it’s clear from the video, I comment - typically when the clowns inevitably try and discredit the messengers whilst ignoring the content. I suspect you’ll say it’s all propaganda and well, you’re wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

When it’s clear propaganda I don’t reference it. When it’s terrible people protesting causes that I detest, and it’s clear from the video, I comment - typically when the clowns inevitably try and discredit the messengers whilst ignoring the content. I suspect you’ll say it’s all propaganda and well, you’re wrong. 

Dude click through the profiles he posts and look at some of their other tweets and posts. They're nearly all anti-vaxxers, #PLANDEMIC truthers, so-called Jan6 patriots, and folks retweeting tucker carlson. I don't think those sorts of people are good sources of information, as they have already thoroughly demonstrated their scorn for facts.

I know you think it's all bullshit because you looked at one link and it was fine, but man you gotta have more than one level of curiosity and critical thought. Pronghorn posts and incredible deluge of bullshit, some of it is deleted/moderated on by fucking TWITTER just hours after he posts it even.

 

Anyways, can you stop thread shitting Rex? I thought you stopped caring about this pages ago. 

Edited by Captainant
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Dude click through the profiles he posts and look at some of their other tweets and posts. They're nearly all anti-vaxxers, #PLANDEMIC truthers, so-called Jan6 patriots, and folks retweeting tucker carlson. I don't think those sorts of people are good sources of information, as they have already thoroughly demonstrated their scorn for facts.

I know you think it's all bullshit because you looked at one link and it was fine, but man you gotta have more than one level of curiosity and critical thought. Pronghorn posts and incredible deluge of bullshit, some of it is deleted/moderated on by fucking TWITTER just hours after he posts it even.

 

Anyways, can you stop thread shitting Rex? I thought you stopped caring about this pages ago. 

I don’t doubt his embedded tweets have not held up to scrutiny - sometimes. But, a lot of them (and dare I say the majority of them) do, and y’all will happily throw the entire baby out with the bath water, largely because it does fit your political narratives, and you can’t even admit that  

I never would’ve re-entered the thread had Fantana not called me a Rogan Bro Islamaphobe, incapabale of critical thought.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Anyways, can you stop thread shitting Rex? I thought you stopped caring about this pages ago. 

I'm trying to catch up on latest and 1/3 of the damn thread is some Amy Grant tangent.  I think we're past the point of calling out thread shitting.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

Two major events on New Years and we have a thread about Joe Rogan and pr0nghorns twitter usage.

And it is not even the off season.

 

48 minutes ago, Skipper said:

I'm trying to catch up on latest and 1/3 of the damn thread is some Amy Grant tangent.  I think we're past the point of calling out thread shitting.


 

image.gif.185326459e07ed54613fa9d384423104.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rex Kramer said:

I don’t listen to Rogan. I’m not a Pronghorn white knight. You and Captain are ultra critical and dismissive of his embedded tweets, because you so desperately want to be contrarian in your case, and forward thinking in Captain’s case. I had you both on Ignore for much of ‘24 and took you off to start the new year. When Pronghorn posts an embedded video, you two Pavlov’s dogs come sprinting. You’ll attack the author of the tweet in foolish attempt to discredit, and Captain will make a Russian plant remark. Like clockwork. 

I watch the content of the videos. Y’all ignore it, every time. It’s a played out, tired tactic. And calling me Islamophobic is absolutely the same as me calling you antisemitic. It’s not productive whatsoever. 

The point wasn't that you're a Rogan listener, it's that you're just like him. You definitely are a pronghorn white knight. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that 95% of his posting is twitter ragebait slop from various Nazi-adjacent accounts and starts posting every day around 8AM Moscow time. Of course I go after the source, dumbass, that's how you verify the sources of information that you consume. As has already been mentioned, proudly telling everyone you just guzzle all the slop uncritically is not a flex and you should be embarrassed to admit it in front of everyone.

Also, no, it's not the same, at all, but I've given up trying to get it through your thick fucking skull so please shut the fuck up and put me back on ignore, it was much better that way.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ted Lange said:

The NYE attacks were obviously a distraction to keep people in NJ from taking pictures of drones (that were actually commercial airplanes) 

Supposed manifesto from the LV terrorist floating around. No idea the veracity of the sources involved, but if it is legit it’s directly fucking drone aligned. Talk about drones, war crime coverups in Afghanistan, etc. what a world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Supposed manifesto from the LV terrorist floating around. No idea the veracity of the sources involved, but if it is legit it’s directly fucking drone aligned. Talk about drones, war crime coverups in Afghanistan, etc. what a world. 

It was released on the Shawn Ryan show, who is apparently some chud with a podcast. I'm pretty skeptical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to believe that an insignificant "explosion" with zero damage to anything but the driver and the vehicle itself is part of some mass conspiracy.  I mean, we're all living in a post-Vegas-cybertruck-explosion world now, aren't we?  One guy didn't pull this off on his own, that's for sure.   

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

Also bomb was so amateur some badass SF dude would not have made it.

This is the real head scratcher in my mind. Seems like this guy could have rigged the batteries to explode and set off a bunch of secondaries in the bed. But he swallows a bullet and sets off some fireworks? That shit feels either very rushed or very fucking lazy for an operator. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Samson's Wig said:

I'm inclined to believe that an insignificant "explosion" with zero damage to anything but the driver and the vehicle itself is part of some mass conspiracy.  I mean, we're all living in a post-Vegas-cybertruck-explosion world now, aren't we?  One guy didn't pull this off on his own, that's for sure.   

I read that firework fuel can't melt or explode steel (or whatever the fuck cybertrucks are made up of). It was an inside job. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...