Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, kingkoopa6 said:

Head up face forward the whole time

IMG_7516.gif

IMG_7516.gif

Face forward into a defenseless receiver's head.  Targeting.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Steelers Roll Left said:

The targeting no call was definitely missed by the refs live.  Not sure how they missed it in the replay

Nope face mask to face mask.  Didn’t lead with crown of the helmet. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Pot roast is going, black eyed peas simmering, cornbread, mashed potatoes and okra all ready to go in the oven/on the stove…. Time to sit down with the big guns and destress…

That was BULLSHIT.

 

image.jpg

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, ClubWhatever said:

How was the one on Bond INT not targeting?  He was completely defenseless and the db made forcible contact to his head.  Definition of targeting.

Exactly. Everyone harping on Taafe but it was not called on Bond. At least the shit refs were consistent 

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

It definitely could have been targeting. But they didn't call a very similar type of contact with the face mask to the helmet earlier in the game against ASU. Would have been absolute robbery if they called it there and they knew it. 

on the interception our guy was hit with a launched shoulder to helmet IIRC.   No call then too.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ClubWhatever said:

How was the one on Bond INT not targeting?  He was completely defenseless and the db made forcible contact to his head.  Definition of targeting.

That is part of the reason they didnt call it on us at the end of the game

Posted

Wasn’t targeting on Taaffe. Didn’t launch or lower his helmet. Simple fact of helmet to helmet contact does not make it a penalty 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RexWilson said:

Had to look it up

 

NCAA rule
Rule 9-3-2b of the NCAA states that a teammate cannot grasp, pull, or lift the ball carrier to assist in forward progress. The penalty for violating this rule is a five-yard penalty with three-and-one enforcement.

Now do the one for offensive holding and tell me if they call that. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

They didnt want to decide the game on that play. It was targeting. It was helmet to helmet. Them not calling that was the most shocking thing of the day after the way they had officiated up to that point in ASU's favor. 

If you look at the rule, a few posts back, the refs got it right. Clean straight up hit. No intention to maim. Great stop, btw

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hondo said:

Serious question - is it legal to carry your own guy like that?

 

1 hour ago, RexWilson said:

Had to look it up

 

NCAA rule
Rule 9-3-2b of the NCAA states that a teammate cannot grasp, pull, or lift the ball carrier to assist in forward progress. The penalty for violating this rule is a five-yard penalty with three-and-one enforcement.

That answers my question.  It was super obvious.  How could they miss that?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

It definitely could have been targeting. But they didn't call a very similar type of contact with the face mask to the helmet earlier in the game against ASU. Would have been absolute robbery if they called it there and they knew it. 

Correct. It is a judgment call. They could have called it. But there was also justification for not calling it. Too often people think helmet to helmet means automatic targeting. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

This OsU game holy shit 

Perfect. They’ll come to Dallas overconfident and this wild and crazy season will keep rollin on for us 🤘 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nivek said:

on the interception our guy was hit with a launched shoulder to helmet IIRC.   No call then too.

That's what I was talking about. Bond's g face got hit directly by the safeties' shoulder and facemask. They reviewed it and no call. Those hits were too similar, with Bond being in an even more defenseless position, to call it on Taafe after letting the other one go earlier. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:
42 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

With Burt missing 2 field goals, one to win the game, how do we get him out of the game before next game?

Plant drugs in his car and call the cops on him.

Maybe he just needs one stiff drink to loosen him up before a big kick.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Bodowned said:

Watching this OSU game…Sark needs to move off the run game early next week if it starts looking like Georgia / ASU 2.0. These guys are going to put up points and we can’t waste any drives getting behind the sticks.

If we can control the LOS and keep our D off the field. A good mixture is still the best bet. Sark called the right plays at the right time today. Will need to do it even harder next week. Quinn needs to get his long ball shit together. Coulda had two add'l long TD passes if he hadn't underthrown/thrown behind two receivers

Posted
1 minute ago, The Longest Horn said:

When I saw Quinn load up to throw it deep on 4th and 13 I about wanted to vomit. Glad he put it on the money. 🤘🏻🤘🏻

why doesn't he do that in the 2nd and 3rd quarters??

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...