Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Droppin receipts on not even your own posts is some real bitchassness.

I bet you yell scoreboard to Michigan fans as you drive out of the parking lot. Oh wait.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, DroppedNuts said:

Will Howard threw for 300 yards on you. lol. Looks like I was right.  

Your offense scored 21 points, even with form tackling the pass rush. And you have the nerve to tell us that. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Their attention has focused to notre dame so much he’s hanging out on our board the next morning 

Well, even his family hates him, so he has a lot of free time. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

We schemed to take away Smith (4) and we were hugely successful there.  He had 3 yards receiving.  We knew that would open up Egbuka (5/51).  Not too bad.  Tate was a problem (7/87).  In short, tOSU did a good job of taking what we gave them in the passing game.  The Henderson screen was a bust and a near-backbreaker.  I can't believe we couldn't sniff that out.

They couldn't run hardly any more than we could.

28-14 doesn't tell the story, that last 7 was ridiculous.  C'est la vie.  ("That's life" for our low-IQ Buckeye visitors.)  Now pound sand.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

~1/3 of OSU’s pass total happened on the last play of the 1st half.

It’s actually amazing that it wasn’t reviewed as “lineman downfield,” because on initial viewing, that was the first thing I thought, as I saw three down field blockers. I just couldn’t verify if the RB was behind the LOS at the time. The 3 OL were at least +5 downfield and that call is on the Side Judge. I was at my BIL’s (non-football guy, but UT Alum), so he wouldn’t understand why I would want to review a play/DVR for my conscious. I did holler it at the TV though, which I then had to explain the rule.

Hook’em!!!

Posted
~1/3 of OSU’s pass total happened on the last play of the 1st half.

It’s actually amazing that it wasn’t reviewed as “lineman downfield,” because on initial viewing, that was the first thing I thought, as I saw three down field blockers. I just couldn’t verify if the RB was behind the LOS at the time. The 3 OL were at least +5 downfield and that call is on the Side Judge. I was at my BIL’s (non-football guy, but UT Alum), so he wouldn’t understand why I would want to review a play/DVR for my conscious. I did holler it at the TV though, which I then had to explain the rule.

Hook’em!!!

Old man rant - 72 hours ago, weather threats of snowy/ice conditions in D/FW, wife insisted that my son and I stay home (driving from SA), so she assumed we’d want to go watch the game at my BIL’s house!

Hell, if I ain’t physically at the game, she knows I’m a “wreck” and would rather pace back and forth in front of my bedroom TV (actual better clarity) than holler after most plays in the living room. I am NOT a hospitable game watching guest! I like to think I know too much and they can hear me, according to my wife.

Hook’em!!!
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

We schemed to take away Smith (4) and we were hugely successful there.  He had 3 yards receiving.  We knew that would open up Egbuka (5/51).  Not too bad.  Tate was a problem (7/87).  In short, tOSU did a good job of taking what we gave them in the passing game.  The Henderson screen was a bust and a near-backbreaker.  I can't believe we couldn't sniff that out.

They couldn't run hardly any more than we could.

28-14 doesn't tell the story, that last 7 was ridiculous.  C'est la vie.  ("That's life" for our low-IQ Buckeye visitors.)  Now pound sand.

As time ran out I was thinking about it being a two TD loss but that the score not being indicative of the game. Two very evenly matched teams. Momentum swung back and forth and it came down to who made the most mistakes and unfortunately that was us

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BestInCoubtry said:

Correct you schemed to take away smith and Emeka but unfortunately our talent is way deeper than yours.   You didn’t have answers for Tate, Scott, Tre, Judkins and Howard.   Was not impressed either your d line.  
 

losers 28-14

You live in Ohio.  Advantage, us.  Fuck you.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BestInCoubtry said:

Correct you schemed to take away smith and Emeka but unfortunately our talent is way deeper than yours.   You didn’t have answers for Tate, Scott, Tre, Judkins and Howard.   Was not impressed either your d line.  
 

losers 28-14

Wish our Oline tackled as well as yours 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, BestInCoubtry said:

Your football team hasn’t won anything in 20 years.  Advantage everyone else. 

A national title isn't anything?  You keep making this mistake.  You're an idiot.

Posted
On 1/9/2025 at 4:23 AM, BestNCountry said:

Big brain.   no one said you are Indiana.  
 

It almost sounds like you’ve done something more meaningfully than the Alamo bowl in last 20 years.  

In case anyone’s wondering, this doofus is NOT my sock.

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, DroppedNuts said:

Will Howard had 300 yards lmao.   Remember all that talk about your defense?  28-14

Came back to say receipt lol 

You’re a fucking idiot and have no idea what you’re watching. 

Posted
5 hours ago, msucolt45 said:


Old man rant - 72 hours ago, weather threats of snowy/ice conditions in D/FW, wife insisted that my son and I stay home (driving from SA), so she assumed we’d want to go watch the game at my BIL’s house!

Hell, if I ain’t physically at the game, she knows I’m a “wreck” and would rather pace back and forth in front of my bedroom TV (actual better clarity) than holler after most plays in the living room. I am NOT a hospitable game watching guest! I like to think I know too much and they can hear me, according to my wife.

Hook’em!!!

That's so odd man. You're a freak. I'm just glad there is nobody else who behaves like this on Surly.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, msucolt45 said:

~1/3 of OSU’s pass total happened on the last play of the 1st half.

It’s actually amazing that it wasn’t reviewed as “lineman downfield,” because on initial viewing, that was the first thing I thought, as I saw three down field blockers. I just couldn’t verify if the RB was behind the LOS at the time. The 3 OL were at least +5 downfield and that call is on the Side Judge. I was at my BIL’s (non-football guy, but UT Alum), so he wouldn’t understand why I would want to review a play/DVR for my conscious. I did holler it at the TV though, which I then had to explain the rule.

Hook’em!!!

Henderson caught the ball on the 20.  The LOS was the 25.  Lineman can be downfield in that circumstance.  Anyway, you can’t review something to 5row a flag except for potential targeting. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...