Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

Will Howard threw for 500+ more yards, had more passing TDs, more running TDs, fewer picks, was sacked 17 fewer times and won a national championship. It's not debatable at all. 

Go Ahead Yes GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Did you expect a guy who tore ACL, LCL, and damaged his PCL(not enough to require surgery on that specific ligament) to return by beginning of season?

Yes

Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

Gibson right now is a net negative on the field. If Baxter is really looking at midseason then 100% need transfer rb 

1 hour ago, HenryJames said:

What if a true freshman can improve?

Star freshmen are few and far between and becoming more common, But dismissing them because they don’t become stars their first year of playing college ball is surly tradition and short minded. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hookem10 said:

Star freshmen are few and far between and becoming more common, But dismissing them because they don’t become stars their first year of playing college ball is surly tradition and short minded. 

Mma Reaction Pack GIF by UFC

Posted
14 minutes ago, Hookem10 said:

Star freshmen are few and far between and becoming more common, But dismissing them because they don’t become stars their first year of playing college ball is surly tradition and short minded. 

It is a bit different by position. Rb is one of the few that you usually see those flashes, if they are going to be great. That does not mean a freshman that looked like a freshman cannot improve. It just means the ceiling might not be 1st team All-conference/All-American type player or the odds of that happening are long. They can still be a serviceable player. Baxter's health being a legitimate concern and a room that looks more solid than dynamic at this point, I can definitely see why people would argue for the need for a portal RB. Perhaps one of the freshmen will show those flashes with the football in their hands in practice and quell some worries. The one concern from last year is blocking from that group. It was generally poor last year. Baxter was kind of unicorn in that area as freshman. Not sure you can count on a freshman blocking in year 1, even if Baxter proved it is possible. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Nope said:

RB benefits the most from a running threat at QB

There are a few things that can change the Run game. 

1. Mobile Qb

2. Pocket presence. Not to get into a Quinn debate, but I think Manning can be better in the pocket. Keep Texas out of those 2nd and 15 situations, that are drive killers.

3. The Deep ball. Manning showed himself to be much more of gun slinger. That is a bit of double-edged sword, but I think safeties will be less aggressive firing downhill with Manning taking snaps. 

3. Maybe Texas gets a better blocking out of a TE

4. With Conner and Majors out, there is possibility we finally see "Big Humans" we have been promised. More downhill OL, instead of OZ centric. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

It is a bit different by position. Rb is one of the few that you usually see those flashes, if they are going to be great. That does not mean a freshman that looked like a freshman cannot improve. It just means the ceiling might not be 1st team All-conference/All-American type player or the odds of that happening are long. They can still be a serviceable player. Baxter's health being a legitimate concern and a room that looks more solid than dynamic at this point, I can definitely see why people would argue for the need for a portal RB. Perhaps one of the freshmen will show those flashes with the football in their hands in practice and quell some worries. The one concern from last year is blocking from that group. It was generally poor last year. Baxter was kind of unicorn in that area as freshman. Not sure you can count on a freshman blocking in year 1, even if Baxter proved it is possible. 

For sure, my opinion is he’s flashed enough to deserve some grace of getting better. I just think it’s funny to dismiss him as a young player that should be passed up cause he wasn’t a star his first year. We should always be good with today’s rules at every position anyway with portal and recruiting. Hopefully he develops into something. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Star freshmen are few and far between and becoming more common, But dismissing them because they don’t become stars their first year of playing college ball is surly tradition and short minded. 

I’m not saying he should be kicked off the team. I’m saying that going to Ohio State game one with the same RB room as the end of 2024, but minus Blue (and plus two true freshmen) probably isn’t a great idea.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Five said:


I’m not saying he should be kicked off the team. I’m saying that going to Ohio State game one with the same RB room as the end of 2024, but minus Blue (and plus two true freshmen) probably isn’t a great idea.

Look, we all read between the lines of your post. I’m not saying I agree with executing him on the 50 yard line, but…

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, chainsaw said:

I don't like that at all.

Recall this past year we played 10 games (and almost 11) after "midseason".

Coupling recovering from major injury with conditioning...having a "fresh" back ready to go for the second half of the season and the post-season is ideal.

Edited by MirrOlure
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, Red Five said:


I’m not saying he should be kicked off the team. I’m saying that going to Ohio State game one with the same RB room as the end of 2024, but minus Blue (and plus two true freshmen) probably isn’t a great idea.

You need to relax man, he was just a freshmen. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Red Five said:


I’m not saying he should be kicked off the team. I’m saying that going to Ohio State game one with the same RB room as the end of 2024, but minus Blue (and plus two true freshmen) probably isn’t a great idea.

I meant Gibson with a year of weight room and conditioning with added experience could be a star this year. We’ll see 

Posted
5 hours ago, Fondren & Main said:

Kinda like how Wisner became the number 1 back.  I like the cut of your jib.

The Wire Omar GIF


Wisner went from special teams player to filling in as RB1. Imagine what he could be if he kept on this development curve. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

What does he bring of value? That’s the question. 

What does any assistant coach bring of value? It's a retarded question. What value did Kenny Baker bring in the NFL as an assistant?

Edited by BurntOrange&White
  • Fuck You 3
Posted
27 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

What does any assistant coach bring of value? It's a retarded question. What value did Kenny Baker bring in the NFL as an assistant?

A proper answer would be something like below you stupid fuck. 

4 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

 

The guy is a young hustler. He paid his way through the first part of his college while working. He was homeless for part of high school, in fucking Compton. He’s spent his last few years grinding as a talent and recruiting analyst which is low pay, long hours thankless shit. 

An added hand holder in the RB room and with recruits on Gameday and visit days seems worthwhile. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
2 hours ago, closetojumping said:

 

The guy is a young hustler. He paid his way through the first part of his college while playing football. He was homeless for part of high school, in fucking Compton. He’s spent his last few years grinding as a talent and recruiting analyst which is low pay, long hours thankless shit. 

An added hand holder in the RB room and with recruits on Gameday and visit days seems worthwhile. 

So no relation to the Dallas Garretts.  Got it.  
 

 

Southern California has been good to us for running backs. Maybe he has a decent network

Posted
The guy is a young hustler. He paid his way through the first part of his college while playing football. He was homeless for part of high school, in fucking Compton. He’s spent his last few years grinding as a talent and recruiting analyst which is low pay, long hours thankless shit. 


With any luck, he’s got the grail already.
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

"With any luck, he’s got the grail already."

I have a lot of respect for this guy already for what he has accomplished in life. I wish him the best of luck, and "Hook 'Em Baby".

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 2/21/2025 at 11:03 AM, Red Five said:

Gibson right now is a net negative on the field. If Baxter is really looking at midseason then 100% need a portal RB.

True freshman, high pedigree, fills a very specific role in the room...can improve for sure but net negative?

IMG_0488.thumb.jpeg.584a04c5f09a1b1aeb31e5bd9b361b44.jpeg

Jason Mantzoukas Come On Man GIF by LoveIndieFilms

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

It's pretty self explanatory why he was hired

Every single person on this board is well aware that you have exactly zero insight into the program.  Your relentless attempts to come over the top to denigrate others in an effort to prop yourself up fail miserably time after time.  Just lurk like the rest of us that only know things once in a blue moon.  

Edited by Tree Fidy
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Haha 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, NoName said:

True freshman, high pedigree, fills a very specific role in the room...can improve for sure but net negative?

IMG_0488.thumb.jpeg.584a04c5f09a1b1aeb31e5bd9b361b44.jpeg

Jason Mantzoukas Come On Man GIF by LoveIndieFilms

Agree that “net negative” is a bit harsh for a true freshman, but your stat source sucks. 3 fumbles on 81 touches is problematic.

image.thumb.png.9773626dabf5301aafad6f9aceca9235.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Tree Fidy said:

Every single person on this board is well aware that you have exactly zero insight to the program.  Your relentless attempts to come over the top to denigrate others in an effort to prop yourself up fail miserably time after time.  Just lurk line the rest of us that only know things once in a blue moon.  

 

Listen, I took posting 101 my freshman year of college and advanced posting my second year, plus I have over 20 years of experience. If there is one thing that I have learned, it is to immediately jump in balls-deep with a cat pic and a hot take.

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NoName said:

True freshman, high pedigree, fills a very specific role in the room...can improve for sure but net negative?

IMG_0488.thumb.jpeg.584a04c5f09a1b1aeb31e5bd9b361b44.jpeg

Jason Mantzoukas Come On Man GIF by LoveIndieFilms

He became unplayable due to fumbling and nonexistent pass blocking. 

Hey I like the guy and I'm pulling for him. But if it's just Wisner, Gibson, and two true freshmen to start the year, then my only point was that I would want a portal add there.

Edit: But, this was all based on an Anwar Richardson report that Baxter is aiming for midseason. Which means he'll probably be 100% in June.

Edited by Red Five
Posted
3 hours ago, SuperSport said:

Agree that “net negative” is a bit harsh for a true freshman, but your stat source sucks. 3 fumbles on 81 touches is problematic.

image.thumb.png.9773626dabf5301aafad6f9aceca9235.png

Realllly bad fumble luck to lose 5/7 fumbles from those two but 1/12 for bilden and Ewers

6%of fumbles lost by the rest of the team TOTAL, minus Sorrell (1/15)

71% of fumbles lost by Blue and Gibson

Fumble luck is random but that's super super super bad luck for both of them.

2 hours ago, Red Five said:

He became unplayable due to fumbling and nonexistent pass blocking. 

Hey I like the guy and I'm pulling for him. But if it's just Wisner, Gibson, and two true freshmen to start the year, then my only point was that I would want a portal add there.

Edit: But, this was all based on an Anwar Richardson report that Baxter is aiming for midseason. Which means he'll probably be 100% in June.

Wait. A 5'10" true freshman is bad in pass pro?

Season 9 What GIF by The Office

I just think people have way way way too high of an expectation for true freshman, especially after seeing Baxter last year.

I see what you are saying but net negative is way too strong.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...