Jump to content

Justin Tucker: The new Old Freak Nasty?


Etexhorn13

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, royiv said:

Tell you what, do a little experiment starting tomorrow where you whip out your dick and use it to touch every woman you see out and about. Report back on how that goes for you.

What manner of stupidity leads you to posit an isomorphism between paying for a personal service from a licensed practitioner and assaulting random females?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Js1 said:

Also Reddit, et al is saying he and Amanda are in the middle of a divorce?

That's probably why it came out.  It got dug up. 

https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/ravens-justin-tucker-and-wife-amanda-bass-relationship-timeline/

 

The couple met while attending the University of Texas in Houston. 😟

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Steel Shank said:

Also, the chicks working at a high end spa/massage place are going to be way hotter than at some skanky place, which explains blowing his mangunk all over the place without them touching him.

The worst thing about this is, think of all the masseuse who worked on him whom he didn't try to harass.

maxresdefault.jpg

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tex Long said:

What manner of stupidity leads you to posit an isomorphism between paying for a personal service from a licensed practitioner and assaulting random females?

So it’s okay to assault a woman if you’re paying her for a service? Dude, it’s never okay to expose yourself or touch someone with your genitalia without the other person’s consent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, royiv said:

So it’s okay to assault a woman if you’re paying her for a service? Dude, it’s never okay to expose yourself or touch someone with your genitalia without the other person’s consent. 

This. Just because you’re paying a woman to cut your hair, doesn’t mean you can motorboat her. You can’t bang the cleaning lady because you’re paying here. Etc. 

A woman who takes money to perform an agreed upon non-sexual service is not automatically a prostitute 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, royiv said:

Dude, it’s never okay to expose yourself or touch someone with your genitalia without the other person’s consent. 

When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tex Long said:

What manner of stupidity leads you to posit an isomorphism between paying for a personal service from a licensed practitioner and assaulting random females?

isomorphism”

That’s a new one for me. 
Thanks Tex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I misread the article, but basically he was a freak who got boners and jizzed everywhere during massages enough to get banned from a few places, but then the bans worked and he stopped doing it? 

Seems like a pretty big hit piece after the core of what happened, doesn't excuse the behabior, but belaboring the point generally means it's more about damage/attention than it is about anything else.

Also, if you want to do this kind of shit just hire a professional don't do it to random massage therapists, that's lame and stupid. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, immamac said:

Also, if you want to do this kind of shit just hire a professional don't do it to random massage therapists, that's lame and stupid.

As others have said, it's a power/fetish/fantasy thing. They're going to be so turned on by seeing it that of course they'll want to participate. I imagine it would ruin the thrill and danger factor if there was agreed upon consent beforehand.

So, yeah, pretty lame and stupid.

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Tex Long said:

I'm not quite sure how harmful seeing a penis, or even being touched by one is, so I also have a bit of a problem referring to the viewers or the touchees as "victims".

One of the more off-putting sentences that I've read on here in awhile.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aggie08 said:

One of the more off-putting sentences that I've read on here in awhile.

Any alleged heterosexual man here would scream bloody murder if someone rubbed their penis on them without consent. But it’s okay if you do it to women, that’s what they’re there for. Especially if they’re pretty or are nice to you 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, BrazilHorn said:

The Ravens are looking to move on so wanted to release this now so they can release for freakiness/cause and not bear any financial hit.

Tucker was gross and wildly inappropriate but the timing of the piece is definitely interesting.

Rumors about it for years, and then an actual article comes out about it after his worst season ever. Kind of feels like the Ravens kept it in their back pocket

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Vic Mackey said:

.3b941c63a29b4b1fc395a66b5d39945d.jpg

The picture of Roethlisberger reminds me of a story from a buddy in Pittsburgh. A girl friend of his and some other friends and him are hanging out at a bar and Roethlisberger shows up. He eventually gets her to leave with him. Takes her to a nice hotel and has a "standby" room always available. Anyways, they go up to the room and she goes in the bathroom to freshen up. She comes out and Roethlisberger is standing at the edge of the bed with no clothes on stroking his dick and looks at her and says "where do you want it?" 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Tex Long said:

First, "skeptic" means "doubt", not "denial". Second, the females in the discussion are accusers, alleging they have been harmed and accusing Tucker of harming them. I'm not quite sure how harmful seeing a penis, or even being touched by one is, so I also have a bit of a problem referring to the viewers or the touchees as "victims".

 

Good to know someone could flash your wife/daughter/mom and you wouldn’t be upset about it or think the flasher did anything wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, txhorns said:

I do this kind of stuff to my wife all of the time.  If this is true hopefully he gets released or retires and fades into obscurity.

He’s getting released no matter what. 

True or not, and I think that it is, he’s gone. 

That’s one of the two reasons, if not the only reason, that this is coming out now. He’s gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Steel Shank said:

Also, the chicks working at a high end spa/massage place are going to be way hotter than at some skanky place, which explains blowing his mangunk all over the place without them touching him.

My assumption based on the counter-measures the women would take during the massage is that he would rub one out after the massage was over and the masseuse had left the room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...