Jump to content

Justin Tucker: The new Old Freak Nasty?


Etexhorn13

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Js1 said:

This. Just because you’re paying a woman to cut your hair, doesn’t mean you can motorboat her. You can’t bang the cleaning lady because you’re paying here. Etc. 

A woman who takes money to perform an agreed upon non-sexual service is not automatically a prostitute 

Well then why are her tits so big if she doesn't want me motorboating them?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Lat22 said:

We should let this play out before we cast him aside. Had we done that another time, we’d be winning basketball games. 

We did let it play out.  Beard fucked up and thought he could dictate terms to the university.  The university told him to go fuck himself.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Lat22 said:

We should let this play out before we cast him aside. Had we done that another time, we’d be winning basketball games. 

Last I checked, Tucker wasn't kicking FGs for us anymore.

Frankly Beard can eat shit. When you rep The University, as a leader of one of our primary teams, your leash has very little slack.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Napoleon said:

Apparently YouTube is tracking my Surly thread views.

This was just suggested viewing.

…achieving orgasm without using your hands, you say?

Her facial expression checks out for the stated goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Rimbo said:

What you were doing was neither doubting nor skepticism.

There's a vast, VAST ocean between, "Let's wait for all the facts to come out" (skepticism) and "oh we know women are liars" (what you wrote).

I never said women are liars. Read and understand what i wrote. I said be skeptical because women are no better than men about truth telling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, immamac said:

Maybe I misread the article, but basically he was a freak who got boners and jizzed everywhere during massages enough to get banned from a few places, but then the bans worked and he stopped doing it? 

Seems like a pretty big hit piece after the core of what happened, doesn't excuse the behabior, but belaboring the point generally means it's more about damage/attention than it is about anything else.

“got a boner” makes it seems passive. 

He deliberately exposed himself (by shaking off the towel) and nudged his dick onto the women. And yes, he cummed, too. The core of what happened is just a hair short of forcible assault.

One accusation could be a lie. Two is a hit job. But multiple accusations from multiple women in different parlors at different time?  The benefit of the doubt isnt on Justins side. Thats dirty as fuck and he should be dragged for it. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I hope she takes him to the cleaners in the divorce.

 

13 minutes ago, royiv said:

As long as she doesn’t take him to the spa.

 

11 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

 

Same, same.  (Apparently.)

Prolly want to make that spa first, then cleaners.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Napoleon said:

He’s getting released no matter what. 

True or not, and I think that it is, he’s gone. 

That’s one of the two reasons, if not the only reason, that this is coming out now. He’s gone.

 

2 hours ago, BrazilHorn said:

The Ravens are looking to move on so wanted to release this now so they can release for freakiness/cause and not bear any financial hit.

Tucker was gross and wildly inappropriate but the timing of the piece is definitely interesting.

This doesn't make sense to me. I don't know what his contract situation is, but it's a kicker contract. Also, this is accusations from a decade ago with no evidence that I'm aware of. From a contractual perspective, there's no way that's sufficient to void the contract for behavioral clauses. There has to be some evidence other than just social media accusations. 

Also, he's the franchise's best kicker and the best in the game's history. Why would the franchise want to ruin that legacy at even the very small hope of getting out of a low dollar kicker contract? Especially after only 1 mediocre year. Makes no sense. 

Edited by Hermanator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hermanator said:

 

This doesn't make sense to me. I don't know what his contract situation is, but it's a kicker contract. Also, this is accusations from a decade ago with no evidence that I'm aware of. From a contractual perspective, there's no way that's sufficient to void the contract for behavioral clauses. There has to be some evidence other than just social media accusations. 

I was making an assumption based on him having a shitty season and a relatively expensive (albeit for K) contract. I can see Ravens using this as an opportunity to let him go for cause and just moving on. There is next to no chance that the team wasn't made aware of some of these allegations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BrazilHorn said:

I was making an assumption based on him having a shitty season and a relatively expensive (albeit for K) contract. I can see Ravens using this as an opportunity to let him go for cause and just moving on. There is next to no chance that the team wasn't made aware of some of these allegations.

I looked it up and it's a 4 for 24 with 17.5 guaranteed and a 5.5 bonus. He's 1 year in. The dead cap hit is only 7.7 mil right now. 

That's nothing in today's cap. Dak makes 60 mil a year. If he's doing this shit Jerry Jones should be hiring a whole team of investigators to follow him around 24/7. 

It makes no sense for this low of a contract. Especially for only 1 mediocre season, and especially when there's just heresay and no proof. This isn't enough to get out of the 7.7 mil dead cap hit anyway. The Ravens did not intentionally leak this for cap reasons. They need way more evidence to terminate the contract for cause. 

Edited by Hermanator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ABZ said:

The picture of Roethlisberger reminds me of a story from a buddy in Pittsburgh. A girl friend of his and some other friends and him are hanging out at a bar and Roethlisberger shows up. He eventually gets her to leave with him. Takes her to a nice hotel and has a "standby" room always available. Anyways, they go up to the room and she goes in the bathroom to freshen up. She comes out and Roethlisberger is standing at the edge of the bed with no clothes on stroking his dick and looks at her and says "where do you want it?" 

th?id=OIP.1YxStf3w3T9FbMjKYNc4bAHaEA&pid=Api&P=0&h=220

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

I looked it up and it's a 4 for 24 with 17.5 guaranteed and a 5.5 bonus. He's 1 year in. The dead cap hit is only 7.7 mil right now. 

That's nothing in today's cap. Dak makes 60 mil a year. If he's doing this shit Jerry Jones should be hiring a whole team of investigators to follow him around 24/7. 

It makes no sense for this low of a contract. Especially for only 1 mediocre season, and especially when there's just heresay and no proof. This isn't enough to get out of the 7.7 mil dead cap hit anyway. The Ravens did not intentionally leak this for cap reasons. They need way more evidence to terminate the contract for cause. 

high quality GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

JFC, how hard is it to just rub one out in the privacy of your own home and move on with your life. 

I would like to see the specific language from the parlors contract that explicitly prohibits customers from releasing ejaculate on to the equipment. Are you not allowed to sweat? How do we know the batter in question was left by the accused. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TejasPedro said:

I would like to see the specific language from the parlors contract that explicitly prohibits customers from releasing ejaculate on to the equipment. Are you not allowed to sweat? How do we know the batter in question was left by the accused. 

George Costanza Seinfeld GIF

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Helobious said:

Rumors about it for years, and then an actual article comes out about it after his worst season ever. Kind of feels like the Ravens kept it in their back pocket

If rumors of the divorce are true, I could see the nudge for this story to make the mainstream originating with her divorce lawyer. Seems more likely than the ravens electing to destroy the reputation of one of their more well known and successful players. 

2 hours ago, Napoleon said:

…achieving orgasm without using your hands, you say?

Who’s ever even heard of such a thing?

image.gif.2dcd4f54ac986586d0533fcb90e45970.gif

Did you just dox Jerseyman with a photo? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, freyguy said:

We did let it play out.  Beard fucked up and thought he could dictate terms to the university.  The university told him to go fuck himself.

Er Ah? Just exactly what terms did he try to dictate? Seems that UT did not like its efforts at virtue signaling rebuffed and fired him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lat22 said:

We should let this play out before we cast him aside. Had we done that another time, we’d be winning basketball games. 

I almost went blind from all the virtue signaling before I saw words of sanity. Well said. 

  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Scuba Saba said:

Er Ah? Just exactly what terms did he try to dictate? Seems that UT did not like its efforts at virtue signaling rebuffed and fired him.  

Do your own research.  It's been beaten to death on the Chris Beard thread, dug up, and re-beaten again.

I'm coining that phrase now...re-beating a dead horse.  Or simply, giving it an old fashioned Tucker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Condoning multiple sexual assault allegations= virtue signaling 

It’s easy to tell the mouth breathers apart from the normies - they will excuse any and all behavior in the name of winning. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, freyguy said:

Do your own research.  It's been beaten to death on the Chris Beard thread, dug up, and re-beaten again.

I'm coining that phrase now...re-beating a dead horse.  Or simply, giving it an old fashioned Tucker.

So you don't know.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...