Jump to content

Justin Tucker: The new Old Freak Nasty?


Etexhorn13

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Rimbo said:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I hope she takes him to the cleaners in the divorce.

 

3 hours ago, Scuba Saba said:

I never said women are liars. Read and understand what i wrote. I said be skeptical because women are no better than men about truth telling. 

Dude, I've got an 11 year old in the house; when I wanna hear fallacious stupid justifications, I'll ask her why she hasn't cleaned up her room. Don't need to see that from you here.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rimbo said:

 

Dude, I've got an 11 year old in the house; when I wanna hear fallacious stupid justifications, I'll ask her why she hasn't cleaned up her room. Don't need to see that from you here.

Dude, sorry you can't hold up your end of the debate. Regarding your 11 year old, hope she goes to a good school and learns something, not going to get it from you.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scuba Saba said:

Dude, sorry you can't hold up your end of the debate. Regarding your 11 year old, hope she goes to a good school and learns something, not going to get it from you.   

star trek sweartrek GIF

LOL

Lol at you pretending you have a brain above an 11 year old's and fewer than 6 sexual assault convictions.

Anyway, it's been fun mocking you; into the ignore list you go. Bye now!

Edited by Rimbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Tex Long said:

First, "skeptic" means "doubt", not "denial". Second, the females in the discussion are accusers, alleging they have been harmed and accusing Tucker of harming them. I'm not quite sure how harmful seeing a penis, or even being touched by one is, so I also have a bit of a problem referring to the viewers or the touchees as "victims".

It's also troubling that an anonymous group comes forward for some unknown reason, alleging themselves to have been harmed in a period ranging from 13 to 8 years ago. I probably ought to go back and reread the article, but I missed what it is they want to happen. 

The last, relatively scant, part of the story quotes and identifies other  females who claim that Tucker has been their client in the much more recent past and that they have seen no improper activities from him. As is often the case, it's not remotely clear what actually happened.

All things considered, I'm on the skeptical side here. Reckon I'm just gonna see how this story plays out.

 

Hey - any Baltimorians here? What can you tell us about the Baltimore Banner? 

Literally 0.0% you say "hey is it that bad if some guy rubs his hard cock on you without your consent" if this story was about Brent Venables or some aggy. Get your fucking priorities straight. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...