Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

There are plenty of people willing to make any accusation they can in hopes to stop Kavanaugh.  Colorado and Rhode Island accusations are prime examples.

You know those were probably planted right? Those allegations were not reported by journalists but from the republicans in the committee in an effort to discredit the credible allegations.

They even changed the Wikipedia definition of Devil’s Triangle to match Kavanaugh drinking game bullshit.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Great theory except the RI claim was brought forth by Sheldon Whitehouse who is.... wait for it.... a Democrat.

 

maybe the FBI should investigate his loyalties, since he is planting accusations for the Republicans.

My bad on that point, for some reason I thought Whitehouse was a republican.  Either way, it doesn't change the scenario.  Whitehouse was contacted by an anonymous male "friend" of the alledged victim.

It's been assume bunk since the get go.  Hell the news only lasted like a page on here.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

You know those were probably planted right? Those allegations were not reported by journalists but from the republicans in the committee in an effort to discredit the credible allegations.

They even changed the Wikipedia definition of Devil’s Triangle to match Kavanaugh drinking game bullshit.

Your Soros talking points are FUCKED.

Sheldon Whitehouse isn’t an R dipshit.

Edited by Incredulity
Posted
1 minute ago, Incredulity said:

Your Soros talking points are FUCKED.

Sheldon Whitehouse isn’t an R dipshit.

Lol. We've made it to Soros.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

My bad on that point, for some reason I thought Whitehouse was a republican.  Either way, it doesn't change the scenario.  Whitehouse was contacted by an anonymous male "friend" of the alledged victim.

It's been assume bunk since the get go.  Hell the news only lasted like a page on here.

Yeah and all the usual characters broke their necks licking their own balls that their were now five, five, five claims.

 

No matter what Kavanaugh is footnoted 5 time accused from here to eternity.

Edited by Incredulity
Posted

I like how Incredulity never actually has an answer for anything of substance.  Just smart ass comments.  That's a sure sign of a losing argument.  He's just trolling.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Your Soros talking points are FUCKED.

Sheldon Whitehouse isn’t a R dipshit.

The call came into Whitehouse’s office but that story hasn’t been corroborated or vetted by journalists or anyone else.  

Posted
1 minute ago, DixonHur said:

I like how Incredulity never actually has an answer for anything of substance.  Just smart ass comments.  That's a sure sign of a losing argument.  He's just trolling.  

Whats your question of substance?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Yeah and all the usual characters broke their necks licking their own balls that their were now five, five, five claims.

At first, yes, but like I said, unlike the Trump nut lickers on the board, the "usual characters" came around quickly when facts were presented.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The call came into Whitehouse’s office but that story hasn’t been corroborated or vetted by journalists or anyone else.  

So your saying the loon who has apologized is a Republican operative?

Posted
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I have no idea. And I know you’re just trolling so I’m going to stop responding to you.

Whenever you accuse me of trolling I take it as a badge of honor.

why don’t you now post one or your longcat “research” posts that you TOTALLY thought up yourself.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

I'm perfectly calm. You're the one crying about a single neg after already giving a retaliatory one. Get over yourself, you're not that important, you just happened to be the first person to repost that after my post.

 

OK, if you say you're calm I'll believe you.  But let's see if you can restrain yourself from replying so you can have the last word.  If I'm as unimportant as you say, you won't bother.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Lets start with your mother.

I fully trust her judgement after spawning you.

Deflect, deflect, I know you are right so this is my dumb attempt to not admit it! /end translation

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted

You guys should have stopped reading Incredulity's posts after his staggeringly retarded but Obama on like page 5 of this thread. Idk why any of you continue to engage with that window licking dipshit.

  • Like 4
Posted
7 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

The WH/FBI/SJC leaking IMMEDIATELY is a great sign lol

How should it be handled? It’s clear they limited the scope so much the “investigation” would have been concluded really fast, like as early as Monday.  McConnell rushes to vote the next morning.  Game over. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

How should it be handled? It’s clear they limited the scope so much the “investigation” would have been concluded really fast, like as early as Monday.  McConnell rushes to vote the next morning.  Game over. 

Flake, Murkowski and Collins decide.

Posted
Just now, bad_teammate said:

They will vote yes. Kavanaugh fills the seat. Dems eat shit for 30+ years because they're cowards.

What were they supposed to do differently here?  They can't stop this confirmation if all the R's are on board.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, deech said:

What were they supposed to do differently here?  They can't stop this confirmation if all the R's are on board.

 

Maybe bring up his finances during the original hearing?  Maybe ask him during the last hearing about her polygraph, since you know, he made numerous judicial rulings about how valuable they are.  Things like that.

Dude has major holes in his finances and they're asking him about his high school yearbook.

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Nivek said:

Deflect, deflect, I know you are right so this is my dumb attempt to not admit it! /end translation

I guess your too stupid to see its a disingenuous question.

Would, “blue ribbon bi-partisan fact finding panel” be the answer you want?

Posted
23 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

You guys should have stopped reading Incredulity's posts after his staggeringly retarded but Obama on like page 5 of this thread. Idk why any of you continue to engage with that window licking dipshit.

Crushed.

I thought we could be besties.

So mark you off the Thanksgiving invitation list?

Posted
1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

Incredulity is a poor man’s Anastasis.

 

1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

Incredulity has a discernible worldview and is more intellectually honest.

You two are so adorable. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Maybe bring up his finances during the original hearing?  Maybe ask him during the last hearing about her polygraph, since you know, he made numerous judicial rulings about how valuable they are.  Things like that.

Dude has major holes in his finances and they're asking him about his high school yearbook.

Here’s why they didn’t talk finances:  It would have no effect on public opinion.  Finances are complicated and boring.  This is political warfare and the only thing that moves the needle is to get him to lie about shit EVERYONE knows isn’t true like boof’d, Devil’s Triangle, FFFFF.

If the finances were brought up he’d lie about that too but there would be no way for the average citizen to fact check that shit.

All of us know Devil’s Triangle isn’t a drinking game and he lied his ass off about it. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

I guess your too stupid to see its a disingenuous question.

Would, “blue ribbon bi-partisan fact finding panel” be the answer you want?

*You're, you fucking ape.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, deech said:

What were they supposed to do differently here?  They can't stop this confirmation if all the R's are on board.

Their questioning of Kavanaugh was pathetic. They let him yell over them. They didn't press him nearly hard enough. They didn't interrupt/mock Graham during his pathetic display. They aren't pounding the war drums in the press over this.

It's also about what they won't do in the future:
- They won't add justices to the SC to make up for the stolen Garland seat and this sham
- They won't seek to impeach Kavanaugh or Trump

Posted

Mr. Kavanaugh, could you please explain what you meant by "Dirty Sanchez?"

Sanchez was a gardener.  He was filthy.

Anything else that term might imply?

We shit on his face.

Why?

Because he was a filthy gardener.

And what does "rusty trombone" mean?

Our friend Rusty.  He was a musician.

He played the trombone I presume.

No sir.  Cello.

[The Senator will now yield]

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

SNL should have a woman play Kavanaugh tonight and read his hissy fit word for fucking word.

That’s actually a pretty good idea. At least his pathetic opening “speech” which was actually a screaming embarrassing screed unworthy of anyone who ever wants any respect at all from anyone to hold office. If he had been interviewing for a job for them, our criminal drug dealers would have shot him for such a performance as someone wholly unreliable and a completely incompetent fool. 

That this guy who is a complete joke is a republican nominee for the Supreme Court simply confirms my opinion that the party as we used to know it is now completely dead, is a precursor to a nazi style party, and must be stopped at all costs. 

  • Like 4


×
×
  • Create New...