Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't get it.  Mark Judge's former girlfriend has separately confirmed that he confessed to the same exact behavior Swetnick has described.   Seems credible enough to warrant a few interviews to look into whether Kavanaugh was part of it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 12:07 AM, Mojo Hand said:

I don't get it.  Mark Judge's former girlfriend has separately confirmed that he confessed to the same exact behavior Swetnick has described.   Seems credible enough to warrant a few interviews to look into whether Kavanaugh was part of it. 

Expand  

Yeah, odd they wouldn’t investigate the most damning allegations with the most witnesses.  It’s almost like they know he’s guilty as fuck.

Posted

https://www.axios.com/kavanaugh-vote-2018-midterms-poll-3db8f6c6-c637-41a8-bbc5-a27bbad3abc3.html

 

  Quote

A majority of people wouldn’t vote to re-elect their senators if they vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh, according to a new Change Research poll. 

By the numbers: After the hearings, 51% of people said they are less likely re-elect their senators. And people found Dr. Christine Blasey Ford more believable (50%) and credible (48%) than Kavanaugh (44% for both.) 50% of people said they will view the Supreme Court as less credible if the Senate confirms Kavanaugh

Expand  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 9/29/2018 at 11:15 PM, Aqua Buddha said:

Maybe bring up his finances during the original hearing?  Maybe ask him during the last hearing about her polygraph, since you know, he made numerous judicial rulings about how valuable they are.  Things like that.

Dude has major holes in his finances and they're asking him about his high school yearbook.

Expand  

The Dems on SJC also gave detailed written questions to Brett to respond to, which he evidently did, and they included his financial and gambling history.  With the power to direct investigation and subpoenas after potentially claiming a chamber of Congress, they would have those written responses to examine for perjury in addition to the obvious lies he told to the American public on Thursday.

Posted (edited)

Kavanaugh lied under oath about Judge's statement being under oath.

 

Kavanaugh lied under oath about getting into Yale on his own. He was a legacy.

Impeachment investigations should begin the day this fucking idiot is sworn in to the SC.

And these are unforced errors. No one asked him about either of those. He offered both of those lies (and many others) under oath just because he wanted to tell them.

Edited by bad_teammate
  • Like 3
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 12:09 AM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Yeah, odd they wouldn’t investigate the most damning allegations with the most witnesses.  It’s almost like they know he’s guilty as fuck.

Expand  

The point of the investigation is to exonerate him of the allegations not find evidence.  The WH can’t ask the fbi to ignore evidence so they are pointing them in the direction to not find any.   The Ramirez Yale story could potentially bring up new info but I think the ford story will end up inconclusive. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 1:24 AM, Nice Guy Eddie said:

The point of the investigation is to exonerate him of the allegations not find evidence.  The WH can’t ask the fbi to ignore evidence so they are pointing them in the direction to not find any.   The Ramirez Yale story could potentially bring up new info but I think the ford story will end up inconclusive. 

Expand  

The linchpin is Mark Judge and his ex-girlfriend who he confided to about the high school gang trains.  It appears both will be interviewed the feds.  Talk to his ex-girlfriend first, then present informed questions to Judge.

Posted

Not sure if this was previously covered but was it ever explained how Dr. Ford was able to fabricate an elaborate story implicating BK, which just happen to mention 3 people that BK’s calendar subsequently shows he frequently attended parties with, and yet BK denies ever meeting Dr. Ford or being at a party with her?

Posted (edited)
  On 9/30/2018 at 1:51 AM, Horn Dog said:

Not sure if this was previously covered but was it ever explained how Dr. Ford was able to fabricate an elaborate story implicating BK, which just happen to mention 3 people that BK’s calendar subsequently shows he frequently attended parties with, and yet BK denies ever meeting Dr. Ford or being at a party with her?

Expand  

He doesn’t deny ever meeting her. 

In fact says he may of.

http://www.businessinsider.com/kavanaugh-doesnt-remember-christine-ford-supreme-court-2018-9

  • "I may have met her," Kavanaugh said. "We did not travel in the same social circles."
Edited by Incredulity
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 1:51 AM, Horn Dog said:

Not sure if this was previously covered but was it ever explained how Dr. Ford was able to fabricate an elaborate story implicating BK, which just happen to mention 3 people that BK’s calendar subsequently shows he frequently attended parties with, and yet BK denies ever meeting Dr. Ford or being at a party with her?

Expand  

Liberal satan magic?

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 1:51 AM, Horn Dog said:

Not sure if this was previously covered but was it ever explained how Dr. Ford was able to fabricate an elaborate story implicating BK, which just happen to mention 3 people that BK’s calendar subsequently shows he frequently attended parties with, and yet BK denies ever meeting Dr. Ford or being at a party with her?

Expand  

Not just that, but the woman who allegedly drove Dr. Ford from the party says she never even met Kavanaugh.

Posted (edited)

This is an excellent article, called My Rapist Apologized. Full text below (via The Atlantic).

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by austingirl
  • Like 2
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 1:51 AM, Horn Dog said:

Not sure if this was previously covered but was it ever explained how Dr. Ford was able to fabricate an elaborate story implicating BK, which just happen to mention 3 people that BK’s calendar subsequently shows he frequently attended parties with, and yet BK denies ever meeting Dr. Ford or being at a party with her?

Expand  

The explanation is that November is coming. 

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:33 AM, Mack Tripper said:

So much for the independence of the FBI. We're living under a got damn authoritarian regime. 

Expand  

The FBI is independent in criminal investigations.  This is a background check of a sitting judge.  

 I agree this looks incredibly shitty but I think Hillary is safe.

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 1:56 AM, Incredulity said:

He doesn’t deny ever meeting her. 

In fact says he may of.

http://www.businessinsider.com/kavanaugh-doesnt-remember-christine-ford-supreme-court-2018-9

  • "I may have met her," Kavanaugh said. "We did not travel in the same social circles."
Expand  

So they did not travel in the same social circles, nor was he at a party with her, yet her fabricated memory included 3 people his personal calendar, which she had no knowledge of, shows he frequently partied with.  Do i have that correct?

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:36 AM, Horn Dog said:

So they did not travel in the same social circles, nor was he at a party with her, yet her fabricated memory included 3 people his personal calendar, which she had no knowledge of, shows he frequently partied with.  Do i have that correct?

Expand  

Not sure.

 I am only offering feedback on what I understand to be incorrect from your post.

IMPO there has been very little analysis or debate about exactly how familiar they were with each other in this timeframe. I haven’t heard any rebuttal to his claim that they were not close.  

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:36 AM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The FBI is independent in criminal investigations.  This is a background check of a sitting judge.  

Expand  

There shouldn't be a difference. How can the FBI conduct a legitimate background check if the President and his comrades tell the FBI what they can and can't do? 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:43 AM, Incredulity said:

Not sure.

 I am only offering feedback on what I understand to be incorrect from your post.

IMPO there has been very little analysis or debate about exactly how familiar they were with each other in this timeframe. I haven’t heard any rebuttal to his claim that they were not close.  

Expand  

I appreciate your input.  I just find that she mentions those 3 people, and his calendar mentioning those same 3 to be one hell of a coincidence.  Also, didn’t Dr. Ford say she was dating one of his friends?  

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:43 AM, Incredulity said:

Not sure.

 I am only offering feedback on what I understand to be incorrect from your post.

IMPO there has been very little analysis or debate about exactly how familiar they were with each other in this timeframe. I haven’t heard any rebuttal to his claim that they were not close.  

Expand  

If I grab a bitch from the bar, shove her out the back door, and try to rape her in the alley, we wouldn’t be familiar with each other.

Posted

If Kavanaugh gets nominated and confirmed, that will be the death nell of John Marshall’s power grab in marbury v. Madison. The constitution does not give the court the power to strike down laws. Marshall said they did and for 200 years for whatever reason we’ve tolerated that. If a shithead like cavanaugh gets on the court, that shit ends because no one will respect it anymore.

hell maybe that’s a good thing. 

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:45 AM, Mack Tripper said:

There shouldn't be a difference. How can the FBI conduct a legitimate background check if the President and his comrades tell the FBI what they can and can't do? 

Expand  

The FBI is conducting the investigation at the WH “request”

Here’s a thread on what this should mean:

 

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 2:48 AM, Horn Dog said:

I appreciate your input.  I just find that she mentions those 3 people, and his calendar mentioning those same 3 to be one hell of a coincidence.  Also, didn’t Dr. Ford say she was dating one of his friends?  

Expand  
  Quote

Whether Kavanaugh and
Blasey Knew Each Other
STATEMENT FROM BLASEY
During my freshman and sophomore school years, when I was 14 and 15 years old, my group of friends intersected with Brett and his friends.

STATEMENT FROM KAVANAUGH
She and I did not travel in the same social circles. It is possible that we met at some point at some events, although I do not recall that.

Judge Kavanaugh said he did not know Dr. Blasey, but Dr. Blasey said she went out with one of his good friends and attended four or five parties where Judge Kavanaugh was present.


Chris Garrett

Dr. Blasey revealed during questioning Thursday that she “went out with” Mr. Garrett, known to his friends as “Squi,” for a few months, and that he was her primary connection to Judge Kavanaugh. Mr. Garrett, who appears nearly a dozen times on Judge Kavanaugh’s summer calendar, has not made any public comments.

Expand  

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/09/28/us/politics/kavanaugh-ford-testimony-investigation.html

Posted

The saddest part of this whole thing is how much Trump has normalized lying.  It shouldn't matter what the FBI "investigation" does or doesn't find. 

He has literally been lying his ass off in his sworn testimony before the Senate.  You'd think that would be frowned upon during a SCOTUS appointee's job interview.

Posted
  On 9/30/2018 at 3:04 AM, conVINCEd said:

If you’re ok with that, you suck as a human being.

Expand  

The fuck are you taking about.  By pointing out that some fictional rape scenario isn’t the same as what is alleged in the Kavanaugh accusation I am somehow OK with rape?  Jesus you’re unspooled.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
  On 9/30/2018 at 3:21 AM, DixonHur said:

The saddest part of this whole thing is how much Trump has normalized lying.  It shouldn't matter what the FBI "investigation" does or doesn't find. 

He has literally been lying his ass off in his sworn testimony before the Senate.  You'd think that would be frowned upon during a SCOTUS appointee's job interview.

Expand  

Are you 16?  Trump definitely lies, but the truth has been optional in DC forever.

Edited by Incredulity
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 9/30/2018 at 3:18 AM, Mack Tripper said:

And where the hell is Avenatti? He needs to bring it tout fucking suite.

 

Expand  

As someone who'd like to see Kavanaugh confirmed, I think the more of Avenatti we see the better.  And the more we hear from Ms Swetnick the better.

 

Oh.  I'd also like to hear more from Sheldon's boy in Rhode Island.

Edited by MixtyMotions
Posted

I think he's had a superior record as a judge.  I think he's smart.

Like Senator Sasse I don't think a judge's job is policy.  I think he has tried to interpret law, and has done an excellent job of it.  I don't think he is an ideologue.

I think he's the best choice for Dems from the "List".

I am reminded of Scalia's request to Obama.  He said that he wanted somebody smart.  He knew that he was going to get a Lefty.  So  he wanted a smart, intellectually honest Lefty.  He said he wanted Elerna Kagan.  We want Kagans and Kavanaughs, not Thomases and Sotomayors.



×
×
  • Create New...