Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

YOURE DESTROYING MY GOOD NAME.  THIS WHOLE EFFORT HAS BEEN A CALCULATED HIT ABOUT THE 2016 ELECTIONS.  IF I COULD, I WOULD GET ON TOP OF, AND HOLD EVERY DEMOCRAT IN HERE DOWN UNTIL THEY AGREED WITH ME.  

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, BrickHorn said:

Yes.  This is how it’s done.  You make the witness comfortable, get them to drop their guard and start opening up.  Then you use their own testimony against them.  It’s cross examination 101.  

How does that work when the questionee is a psych prof?

Posted
Just now, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

I don't want a SCOTUS justice being this openly partisan.  "This is a political hit by people mad about Trump's election in 2016" etc.  I've never seen a judge repeat generic party lines .  Sad.

should be disqualifying by itself, imo

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, hobbes2702 said:

Wait wait wait, an accused rapist just said “what goes around comes around”? You couldn’t write this shit in Hollywood lol

We're seeing exactly why he was Trump's pick. 

Posted (edited)

ONE OF MY FRIENDS WAS A WOMAN.  A WOMAN WHO WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED.  SHE WAS IN HER 30s WHEN SHE TOLD ME.  THEREFORE I COULD NOT BE A RAPIST.  AS I TOLD FRIENDS PRIVATELY, I WOULD HOLD DOWN EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT UNTIL THEY SEE MY POINT.  MY MOM WAS A TRAILBLAZER.  I DID NOT RAPE ANYONE. 

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

No shit, he sounds like he knows he’s not going to be confirmed.  

He's performing for Trump now. Trump will probably make him the new Deputy Attorney General. Good people and all taht

 



×
×
  • Create New...