Jump to content

Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Thread

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Yuk
Yuk

No, you guys went Republican to ethnonationalist.

Bozo_Casanova
Bozo_Casanova

When Georgetown Prep sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're

TexArcher
TexArcher

In 2016 I was a moderate.  Socially liberal, fiscally conservative, but not quite a libertarian.  I would have considered voting for Kasich had he won the nomination. Now?  I will probably never

Chuckie Finster

Chuckie Finster 22598

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

How to be a "journalist" in 2019:

(1) Report a "bombshell"

(2) Get lots of clicks on your website

(3) Generate the outrage you are seeking

(4) Quietly "correct/update" the story with the actual facts so as to cover your ass

(5) Rinse

(6) Repeat

Ignore step 4 if you work for Fox News.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29213

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

How to be a "journalist" in 2019:

(1) Report a "bombshell"

(2) Get lots of clicks on your website

(3) Generate the outrage you are seeking

(4) Quietly "correct/update" the story with the actual facts so as to cover your ass

(5) Rinse

(6) Repeat

Hey Johnny, how nice of you to show up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29213

Posted
Posted
Just now, Johnny Sack said:

I will now show myself out of Texags.com politics West

What a shame. Please don't go shoving your dick in random women's faces out in that big world though. I know you think guys like you should be able to get away with things like that and that they're just harmless hijinks, but that's frowned upon these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Incredulity

Incredulity 11541

Posted
Posted
Just now, wildcat09 said:

What a shame. Please don't go shoving your dick in random women's faces out in that big world though. I know you think guys like you should be able to get away with things like that and that they're just harmless hijinks, but that's frowned upon these days.

Says the guy with an avatar of a dick wearing a dick hat eating a dick.

It's like rain....

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14243

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tantric superman said:

Was listening to the Commentary Podcast this afternoon and J. Podhoretz simply thought it was unbelievable that one could place their Johnson in an unknowing woman's hand. 

So I am walking around the office today and don't think anything could be easier, especially if you are drunk as a skunk. 

Plus:

1428516335-1428506326-siliconvalleydickj

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Judge Roybeanbag

Judge Roybeanbag 11802

Posted
Posted

Maybe republican nominees to the Supreme Court would stop being accused of sexual assault and harassment if the republicans would, you know, start nominating qualified judges who haven’t been accused of sexual assaults or harassment.  I don’t recall this being an issue with many recent democrat nominees.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Incredulity

Incredulity 11541

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Maybe republican nominees to the Supreme Court would stop being accused of sexual assault and harassment if the republicans would, you know, start nominating qualified judges who haven’t been accused of sexual assaults or harassment.  I don’t recall this being an issue with many recent democrat nominees.  

Just wait.  

The debasement will continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Maybe republican nominees to the Supreme Court would stop being accused of sexual assault and harassment if the republicans would, you know, start nominating qualified judges who haven’t been accused of sexual assaults or harassment.  I don’t recall this being an issue with many recent democrat nominees.  

Well the majority of the most recent democrat nominees have been women.  After what has been revealed about the New York Times debacle if you still believe Kavanaugh sexually assaulted or harassed anyone you are either a political hack or an idiot or, if you post in this thread, probably both.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29213

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Revolution512 said:

Witness tampering.....that’s not newsworthy. Dems really should move on from this one.  

We have to consider the possibility that Brierbart paid her to say this. You know, exactly what they tried to do when the Roy Moore allegations came to light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18646

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Well the majority of the most recent democrat nominees have been women.  After what has been revealed about the New York Times debacle if you still believe Kavanaugh sexually assaulted or harassed anyone you are either a political hack or an idiot or, if you post in this thread, probably both.

He absolutely did every single thing he's been accused of.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12791

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, EMAWesome said:

Well the majority of the most recent democrat nominees have been women.  After what has been revealed about the New York Times debacle if you still believe Kavanaugh sexually assaulted or harassed anyone you are either a political hack or an idiot or, if you post in this thread, probably both.

So, that being said, you post in this thread. Are you a political hack, or an idiot, or both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85085

Posted
Posted
On 9/16/2019 at 9:07 PM, Hank Scorpio said:

 

 

Despicable.

But also, Schumer is now a scaredy bitch because they think Kav lost them the Senate in 2018.  And with very winnable races in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia (x2), NC, Maine, Iowa, Texas and possibly Kansas, they are going to play it very conservative until November 2020. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45538

Posted
Posted

We know Kavanaugh perjured himself multiple times under oath in front of Congress.  That alone is grounds for impeachment.  I won't say the rest of it doesn't matter, because it does, but he is unqualified for the position and needs to be removed from the bench.

His defenders can fuck right off.  I wonder how it feels to have no moral compass, no sense of duty or honor, and no respect for this country or its founding principles?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14243

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, BNB said:

I heard someone say that he can only be impeached for something he has done since becoming a supreme. Is that true?

Since impeachment is a political process I would think it is up to the House (who would impeach) to decide what is impeachable and the Senate whether to convict (remove).  Just like the President.  I haven't researched this, though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SquishMitten

SquishMitten 10397

Posted
Posted
On 9/15/2019 at 2:54 PM, DixonHur said:

Hypothetical question for the lawyers.  

If a SCOTUS justice is impeached, is there a system in place to reverse / relitigate any decisions where he/she was the deciding vote?

They can't just go back and change the ruling in the original suit, but if another case comes through the Court, they can reverse the precedent that was set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...