Jump to content

Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Thread


Hugo Stiglitz

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if there is a legal difference between lying under oath to Congress or lying to the FBI with respect to severity of violation?   Main reason I would want all involved parties, including the witness, to testify/talk to FBI is to get everything on record and subject to prosecution in the event that later facts prove one party was lying.  If Kavanaugh is later proved to be lying, he needs to be impeached.  If Dr. Ford or Mr. Judge are later proved to be lying, they need to be facing jail time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Yep.  Nothing but a delay tactic.  

Not really, she’s just using the little leverage she has.  Grassley has made it perfectly clear she has until 10AM Friday to decide if she’s going to show up on Monday.

I’d expect her answer on that around 9:30AM Friday. 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Not really, she just using the little leverage she has.  Grassley has made it perfectly clear she has until 10AM Friday to decide if she’s going to show up on Monday.

I’d expect her answer on that around 9:30AM Friday. 

Honestly, she has until Monday. They can't turn her down now if she says yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Honestly, she has until Monday. They can't turn her down now if she says yes.

If the Republicans are going to be assholes about this, she should go on 60 Minutes Sunday with her therapist who can possibly corroborate her story years before Trump came near the presidency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s really not even worth discussing but the republicans rush to confirm this asshole should in history for all time be compared to their delay of even giving Merrick Garland, an actual decent human being a/k/a a not a piece of shit, a cowardly act where they even refused to even going on record with a vote.

This should forever put them in the shithole category formerly reserved for other pieces of shit in American History like Benedict Arnold, Nazi sympathizers, etc. It’s really who they are and history will judge them, and their sychopants on this board, accordingly. 

Fuck em. 

  • Like 7
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

You’re talking shit about the Biden Rule?

When did Biden or anyone else besides Benedict mitch ever deny giving someone even a hearing to vote? Name it asshole. If they wanted to vote him down, fine. They were too much of a bunch of assmunching cowards to do even that. Much like you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

When did Biden or anyone else besides Benedict mitch ever deny giving someone even a hearing to vote? Name it asshole. If they wanted to vote him down, fine. They were too much of a bunch of assmunching cowards to do even that. Much like you. 

Multiple article III judges nominated by Bush in his last year had the clock run out on their nominations by Harry Reid.  Guess those didn’t count.    

All article III judges have the exact same constitutional advice and consent roles for the senate.  So there is no difference.  

The Supreme Court isn’t different.  And if you think Reid lets Bush get hearings and a vote on Ginsbergs replacement if she croaked in March 2008, then you are just too stupid to reason with.  Reid Merricked district and appellate court judges.  No way he allows a more important scotus vote. 

You and every other dem didn’t give a shit about Garland until trump won. Because you were all so confident Hillary would win and nominate a more liberal judge.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Multiple article III judges nominated by Bush in his last year had the clock run out on their nominations by Harry Reid.  Guess those didn’t count.    

All article III judges have the exact same constitutional advice and consent roles for the senate.  So there is no difference.  

The Supreme Court isn’t different.  And if you think Reid lets Bush get hearings and a vote on Ginsbergs replacement if she croaked in March 2008, then you are just too stupid to reason with.  Reid Merricked district and appellate court judges.  No way he allows a more important scotus vote. 

You and every other dem didn’t give a shit about Garland until trump won. Because you were all so confident Hillary would win and nominate a more liberal judge.  

It's cool. Payback is going to be a bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

Multiple article III judges nominated by Bush in his last year had the clock run out on their nominations by Harry Reid.  Guess those didn’t count.    

All article III judges have the exact same constitutional advice and consent roles for the senate.  So there is no difference.  

The Supreme Court isn’t different.  And if you think Reid lets Bush get hearings and a vote on Ginsbergs replacement if she croaked in March 2008, then you are just too stupid to reason with.  Reid Merricked district and appellate court judges.  No way he allows a more important scotus vote. 

You and every other dem didn’t give a shit about Garland until trump won. Because you were all so confident Hillary would win and nominate a more liberal judge.  

Here’s the thing asshole, I’m not a dem. Not even close. I used to be Republican. Until the party got completely taken over by a gang of criminals.

You are ok with a gang of criminals running your party because it benefits you financially. Congratulations, you are just as worthless and amoral as they are. Your entire existence is ultimately meaningless and contributes nothing to society. 

And you’re about to lose. So fuck you. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

Here’s the thing asshole, I’m not a dem. Not even close. I used to be Republican. Until the party got completely taken over by a gang of criminals.

You are ok with a gang of criminals running your party because it benefits you financially. Congratulations, you are just as worthless and amoral as they are. Your entire existence is ultimately meaningless and contributes nothing to society. 

And you’re about to lose. So fuck you. 

Yeah.  You’re full of shit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

No error. I was being sarcastic. Your lame brief argument which said absolutely nothing sucked. So if my sarcasm wasn’t clear, well there it is.  Sorry it wasn’t clear to you. 

When did you stop being a Republican?

And what caused it?

Because you post like a very committed liberal Democrat.  

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Here’s the thing asshole, I’m not a dem. Not even close. I used to be Republican. Until the party got completely taken over by a gang of criminals.

You are ok with a gang of criminals running your party because it benefits you financially. Congratulations, you are just as worthless and amoral as they are. Your entire existence is ultimately meaningless and contributes nothing to society. 

And you’re about to lose. So fuck you. 

The fact that you cant see the far left is far more dangerous than the GOP leads me to believe you were never a Republican 

  • Like 4
  • Fuck You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

When did you stop being a Republican?

And what caused it?

Because you post like a very committed liberal Democrat.  

Sure why not. 

My first doubts started when I learned the Iraq war justification didn’t hold water. Yet I still voted for W anyway.

I was all set to vote for McCain when the economy collapsed. I figured at that point the country needed new blood. 

I was torn between Obama and Romney but felt Romney was out of touch as an elite so I voted for Obama. In hindsight that was probably a mistake.

Fast forward to 2016. I hated Hillary, but that was outweighed by my fear for what I felt Trump might do to this Country as president, i.e. tear it apart and weaken it. And unlike many of my liberal friends, I believed that Trump could actually win the thing. 

So I supported Bernie. Not because I believed in what he was saying, but because I believed he was the best chance to prevent Trump from becoming President and seriously weakening and endangering this Country.

And I believe I was right.

If you go back to Kevin’s scat site you will see that before Trump became president I occasionally posted in other forums but almost never posted in the Cloak Room. 

Since then I have posted quite a great deal. Not because I’m a dem, and not because I’m a Republican, but because I fear what Trump is currently doing to this Country.

Does that answer your question? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

 

Sure why not. 

My first doubts started when I learned the Iraq war justification didn’t hold water. Yet I still voted for W anyway.

I was all set to vote for McCain when the economy collapsed. I figured at that point the country needed new blood. 

I was torn between Obama and Romney but felt Romney was out of touch as an elite so I voted for Obama. In hindsight that was probably a mistake.

Fast forward to 2016. I hated Hillary, but that was outweighed by my fear for what I felt Trump might do to this Country as president, i.e. tear it apart and weaken it. And unlike many of my liberal friends, I believed that Trump could actually win the thing. 

So I supported Bernie. Not because I believed in what he was saying, but because I believed he was the best chance to prevent Trump from becoming President and seriously weakening and endangering this Country.

And I believe I was right.

If you go back to Kevin’s scat site you will see that before Trump became president I occasionally posted in other forums but almost never posted in the Cloak Room. 

Since then I have posted quite a great deal. Not because I’m a dem, and not because I’m a Republican, but because I fear what Trump is currently doing to this Country.

Does that answer your question? 

Tell it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was torn between Obama and Romney but felt Romney was out of touch as an elite so I voted for Obama. In hindsight that was probably a mistake.

 

I voted for Romney and in hindsight should have voted for Obama. Let’s just swap and feel better about our 2012 mistakes.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2018 at 1:29 PM, yaqdum said:

this cat is interesting.  he clearly chose that pic to appear as annoying as possible.  his task is to wave red flags and get people to charge them.  that pic is perfect to set him up.

his great fear, of course, is being ignored.  his job depends on not being ignored.

 

So would you assholes please ignore him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Sure why not. 
My first doubts started when I learned the Iraq war justification didn’t hold water. Yet I still voted for W anyway.
I was all set to vote for McCain when the economy collapsed. I figured at that point the country needed new blood. 
I was torn between Obama and Romney but felt Romney was out of touch as an elite so I voted for Obama. In hindsight that was probably a mistake.
Fast forward to 2016. I hated Hillary, but that was outweighed by my fear for what I felt Trump might do to this Country as president, i.e. tear it apart and weaken it. And unlike many of my liberal friends, I believed that Trump could actually win the thing. 
So I supported Bernie. Not because I believed in what he was saying, but because I believed he was the best chance to prevent Trump from becoming President and seriously weakening and endangering this Country.
And I believe I was right.
If you go back to Kevin’s scat site you will see that before Trump became president I occasionally posted in other forums but almost never posted in the Cloak Room. 
Since then I have posted quite a great deal. Not because I’m a dem, and not because I’m a Republican, but because I fear what Trump is currently doing to this Country.
Does that answer your question? 

You were a Republican on the West Mall on Hornfans, if I recall correctly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Sure why not. 
My first doubts started when I learned the Iraq war justification didn’t hold water. Yet I still voted for W anyway.
I was all set to vote for McCain when the economy collapsed. I figured at that point the country needed new blood. 
I was torn between Obama and Romney but felt Romney was out of touch as an elite so I voted for Obama. In hindsight that was probably a mistake.
Fast forward to 2016. I hated Hillary, but that was outweighed by my fear for what I felt Trump might do to this Country as president, i.e. tear it apart and weaken it. And unlike many of my liberal friends, I believed that Trump could actually win the thing. 
So I supported Bernie. Not because I believed in what he was saying, but because I believed he was the best chance to prevent Trump from becoming President and seriously weakening and endangering this Country.
And I believe I was right.
If you go back to Kevin’s scat site you will see that before Trump became president I occasionally posted in other forums but almost never posted in the Cloak Room. 
Since then I have posted quite a great deal. Not because I’m a dem, and not because I’m a Republican, but because I fear what Trump is currently doing to this Country.
Does that answer your question? 

So you went from a Republican to a socialist?
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

John Dean just told Cuomo that Dr Ford should go on 60 Minutes Sunday night and do the hearing on Monday.

Her testimony will be powerful, whether on CBS or in front of the Judiciary Committee. Both appearances would be very damaging to the Rs, assuming she's credible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

John Dean just told Cuomo that Dr Ford should go on 60 Minutes Sunday night and do the hearing on Monday.

Her testimony will be powerful, whether on CBS or in front of the Judiciary Committee. Both appearances would be very damaging to the Rs, assuming she's credible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:


You were a Republican on the West Mall on Hornfans, if I recall correctly.

I don’t recall ever posting on that forum of hornfans, but if I did, I’m sure it was as a Republican. I occasionally posted on that site, and that was where I leaned politically at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...