Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Rose all day for you. We can do a keg of it.

Ok Hugo. Offer is standing. And I’ll be in Austin and Baton Rouge for the LSU games.

Jury duty sucks.



Just start spouting a bunch of MAGA stuff. You’ll get set loose in no time.
Posted

I’ll bring some scotch.  Having just made the trip to DC to watch our abortion of a team lay an egg I am hesitant to commit to the LSU series, but I think I am going to go....  I just hope coach Leach can turn this shit show around his first year!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


I’ve been selling this for a year and a half now - ledge, whiskey, watch it all fall apart.

Damn, you’re like ALL the gay.

NTTAWWT.

I mean, I'm that guy that brings champagne to tailgates

Posted

These protesters are clearly being paid. I’m sure the cops know which ones are going to start talking shit, but they have to wait it out. Those dorks probably have dried up Elmer’s Glue on there face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
These protesters are clearly being paid. I’m sure the cops know which ones are going to start talking shit, but they have to wait it out. Those dorks probably have dried up Elmer’s Glue on there face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You should consider posting less.
Posted
6 minutes ago, Stros said:

These protesters are clearly being paid. I’m sure the cops know which ones are going to start talking shit, but they have to wait it out. Those dorks probably have dried up Elmer’s Glue on there face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

All the cops need to do is profile the women with bowl cuts. 

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted

So this is all much ado aboot nothin'? Crazy Kavanaugh (pledge name) is gettin' in! WOoo

Posted
40 minutes ago, Stros said:

These protesters are clearly being paid. I’m sure the cops know which ones are going to start talking shit, but they have to wait it out. Those dorks probably have dried up Elmer’s Glue on there face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DmWKYz2U0AEYB5F.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Well I see the knuckle dragging circle jerk trolls from the scat site has decided to pay us a visit (repping each other as well).

 

Yay.

Edited by DDD Dad
Posted
What difference does it make if they're getting paid?

A whore wouldn’t be a whore if she didn’t get paid for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Stros said:


A whore wouldn’t be a whore if she didn’t get paid for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'll stop paying your mom.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Well I see the knuckle dragging circle jerk trolls from the scat site has decided to pay us a visit (repping each other as well).
 
Yay.

Sorry I decided to come into your safe space. It will be ok around 2040 when the judge retires.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Stros said:


Sorry I decided to come into your safe space. It will be ok around 2040 when the judge retires.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Be sure to come back when you lose Thomas under a Democratic president.

That should be fun.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Stros said:


Sorry I decided to come into your safe space. It will be ok around 2040 when the judge retires.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Since we're breaking norms now and stealing seats, the next democrat Congress and president can just raise the amount of judges and appoint two more. 

Edited by Yuk
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Stros said:


Sorry I decided to come into your safe space. It will be ok around 2040 when the judge retires.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're welcome to play here; just try adding something of value instead of mindless trolling.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Why don't you provide some of your patented "research" on the issue?

So a guy says that George Soros is paying protesters and its up to us to disprove it? 

Posted
20 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

What difference does it make if they're getting paid?

The Democrats would have you believe this is a spontaneous outbreak of concerned citizens who are sincerely troubled by Kavanaugh.  Instead it is basically another day at the office for these people.  This is what they do for a career.  All these people really are are semi-pro lobbyists who don't know what the fuck they are lobbying for. 

Posted
Be sure to come back when you lose Thomas under a Democratic president.
That should be fun.

It will come back around for the dems at some point. I just hope they don’t go full board socialism by then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I am a Liberal Feminist Lawyer.  Here's why Democrats Should Support Judge Kavanaugh.

 

Sometimes a superstar is just a superstar. That is the case with Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who had long been considered the most qualified nominee for the Supreme Court if Republicans secured the White House. The Senate should confirm him.

I have argued 35 cases before the Supreme Court, more than any other woman. I worked in the Solicitor General’s Office for 13 years during the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations. Because I am a liberal Democrat and feminist, I expect my friends on the left will criticize me for speaking up for Kavanaugh. But we all benefit from having smart, qualified and engaged judges on our highest court, regardless of the administration that nominates them.

What happened to Merrick Garland was a disgrace. His nomination was the Democratic equivalent of Kavanaugh’s. Garland, too, is brilliant, admired, experienced, sober and humane. Indeed, Kavanaugh himself called Garland “supremely qualified” for the Supreme Court. That he made that statement while Garland’s nomination was pending—and was the subject of intense partisan warfare—says a great deal about Kavanaugh’s character.

But unless the Democrats want to stand on the principle of an eye for an eye—and I don’t think they should—folks should stop pretending that Kavanaugh or his record is the issue. He is supremely qualified. Although this fact is distressing, Republicans control both the White House and Senate. In comparable circumstances, when President Barack Obama was in office, our party appointed two justices to the Supreme Court.

I first met Kavanaugh in 2009, shortly after I left the Solicitor General’s Office. He spontaneously emailed to say he liked an article I had written for The Green Bag, an irreverent legal magazine, about my experience arguing in front of the Supreme Court. I had just started my own appellate practice, and his note was extremely thoughtful.

Months later, I asked Kavanaugh to join a panel at Georgetown Law School to review a film about college debate. He responded that he knew nothing about debate but nevertheless was happy to help. When a law student asked him how debate had shaped his career, he answered: “I actually never debated, but I did play football, and the two are basically the same.” He then offered this advice: “Practice, learn to get along with all of your teammates, learn from your mistakes, and have fun.” It was clear that judge cared about mentoring and teaching law students and was invested in helping others to succeed.

Since then, I’ve kept in regular contact with the judge, mostly to talk about kids and work-life balance, including the challenges I’ve had as a woman trying to raise two children while practicing law. Kavanaugh is a great listener, and one of the warmest, friendliest and kindest individuals I know. And other than my former boss, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, I know of no other judge who stands out for hiring female law clerks. My profession is overrun with men, and unless institutions like the Supreme Court do more to hire women, the upper echelons of my profession will never fully include women.

I do not have a single litmus test for a nominee. My standard is whether the nominee is unquestionably well-qualified, brilliant, has integrity and is within the mainstream of legal thought. Kavanaugh easily meets those criteria. I have no insight into his views on Roe v. Wade—something extremely important to me as a liberal, female Democrat and mother of a teenage girl. But whatever he decides on Roe, I know it will be because he believes the Constitution requires that result.

It’s easy to forget that the 41 Republican senators who voted to confirm Ginsburg knew she was a solid vote in favor of Roe, but nonetheless voted for her because of her overwhelming qualifications. Just as a Democratic nominee with similar credentials and mainstream legal views deserves to be confirmed, so too does Kavanaugh—not because he will come out the way I want in each case or even most cases, but because he will do the job with dignity, intelligence, empathy and integrity.

Democrats should quit attacking Kavanaugh—full stop. It is unbecoming to block him simply because they want to, and they risk alienating intelligent people who see the obvious: He is the most qualified conservative for the job.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I can’t compete with a photo of a woman getting handed cash. 

But the money is probably for an abortion and not to protest 

Has Vic been in the DC area?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Stros said:


It will come back around for the dems at some point. I just hope they don’t go full board socialism by then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd love to see the right try to take away socialist programs from Trump voters. The howling and wailing would be very entertaining.

Posted
The Democrats would have you believe this is a spontaneous outbreak of concerned citizens who are sincerely troubled by Kavanaugh.  Instead it is basically another day at the office for these people.  This is what they do for a career.  All these people really are are semi-pro lobbyists who don't know what the fuck they are lobbying for. 
Sounds awesome. How do I sign up?
Posted
14 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

The Democrats would have you believe this is a spontaneous outbreak of concerned citizens who are sincerely troubled by Kavanaugh.  Instead it is basically another day at the office for these people.  This is what they do for a career.  All these people really are are semi-pro lobbyists who don't know what the fuck they are lobbying for. 

So what?

Have you seen his dismal polls? The public is not exactly behind this nomination. In fact, the opposite looks to be true.

Posted (edited)

It’s like I haven’t seen countless pro-Kavanaugh ads paid for by NRA blood money.

But these paid protesters are the real problem 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Fuck You 1
Posted

Leahy may have a hold of something here.  The judge gets squirrelly and evasive using glaringly parsed words and Grassley is obviously uneasy and defensive.  The SCOTUS pick may be covering up a slight bit of lying from the past.  

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

It’s like I haven’t seen countless of pro-Kavanaugh ads paid for by NRA blood money.

But these paid protesters are the real problem 

Conservatives don't mind paying for protesters or lobbyists as long as it's for stuff they like. Just like they don't care about government spending as long as it's spent on things they like.

That's why it's so funny when they pretend to be above politics. 

Posted

I think Leahy has hit on a fault line for those specific documents. I hope that it's followed up on by other senators. Kavanaugh has lied under oath before, they need to keep grilling him on that.



×
×
  • Create New...