Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Thread

[Gil Bang 26301]

 

[Gil Bang 26301]

1 minute ago, Incredulity said:

You’re way wrong.

no one is buying the I can’t fly crap.

the i testify second crap is a bridge too far.  

Anyone but the most partisan see those demands for what they are.

you're a clown and nobody here (except your socks) takes you for anything else. 

[scottsins 2047]

You’re way wrong.
no one is buying the I can’t fly crap.
the i testify second crap is a bridge too far.  
Anyone but the most partisan see those demands for what they are.

What if...they don’t let her go second, but she shows up to testify anyway? Any conclusion to draw from that? You definitely are making some with your presumed scenario.

[Crusher 127]

4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

That would be a very bad move on their part.

I expect that's exactly what they'll do.

It would be exactly what Grassley should do. The Democrats have gotten exactly what they wanted long enough, a Kavanaugh piñata.

The Ford team are not interested in a real investigation. They just want to stop this nomination at any cost. I don't think she ever wanted to testify.

[MaybeACoordinator 8350]

2 minutes ago, Crusher said:

It would be exactly what Grassley should do. The Democrats have gotten exactly what they wanted long enough, a Kavanaugh piñata.

The Ford team are not interested in a real investigation. They just want to stop this nomination at any cost. I don't think she ever wanted to testify.

Hypothetical: if this actually happened, would you or would you not want her to testify?

[Crusher 127]

6 minutes ago, scottsins said:

 

The fuck are you talking about? Ford WANTED TO BE QUESTIONED BY SENATORS. The SJC is the party that requested female outside counsel. Don’t just make shit up.

 

Horse shit!! If she wanted to testify she would have stepped forward in July. She wanted to stay anonymous until Feinstein doxed her ass.

[Incredulity 11895]

8 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

you're a clown and nobody here (except your socks) takes you for anything else. 

Mr. Ford?

[Jim Tom Pinch 120]

1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Do you think it’s fucked up that those women don’t give a shit that a potential Supreme Court Justice tried to rape someone?

He did? 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

60 Minutes time.

Fuck these assholes 

[Ragnarok 103]

James Woods:

College professor Christine Ford can’t remember the year her “assault” happened, but can remember that she was fifteen. Chances are she won’t be joining the Math Department any time soon.

 

[Jim Tom Pinch 120]

1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

It's a he said/she said.

In this specific instance, the "she" has a lot more credibility than the "he".

It’s cute that you believe this.

[Mole 4345]

16 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

Negged for adding nothing to the board. I'm negging all hahahas on either side from here on out. Bring back [serious]!

lulz

[retread 2951]

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

60 Minutes time.

Fuck these assholes 

^Get her story out there and make Frat Boy give an awkward denial before the vote.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

Just now, retread said:

^Get her story out there and make Frat Boy give an awkward denial before the vote.

Yep. Bottom line is the American people need to hear from her with no bullshit.

[Anastasis 23728]

We are neck deep in bullshit. 60 minutes only gets us eye balls deep.

[Longhorn_Fan68 34108]

Wrong thread

[Crusher 127]

5 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

Hypothetical: if this actually happened, would you or would you not want her to testify?

If I am correct in my theory that she never intended on testifying and this was just a stall / slander tactic by the Dems then fuck her testimony.

On the other hand...

If this accusation actually happened and she really can't remember what year this happened, where it happened , who else was at the party outside that room where this supposed event happened and all of the people who were supposed to be in the room at the time of the event deny being there. Despite all that , this accusation was true.... Well then I would be sorry that she didn't get a chance to testify.

[David Dennison 19581]

10 minutes ago, Jim Tom Pinch said:

It’s cute that you believe this.

Most people do.

 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

1 minute ago, Crusher said:

If I am correct in my theory that she never intended on testifying and this was just a stall / slander tactic by the Dems then fuck her testimony.

On the other hand...

If this accusation actually happened and she really can't remember what year this happened, where it happened , who else was at the party outside that room where this supposed event happened and all of the people who were supposed to be in the room at the time of the event deny being there. Despite all that , this accusation was true.... Well then I would be sorry that she didn't get a chance to testify.

If she never intended to testify, why didn’t the Republicans meet her requests? She was ready to go for Thursday.

Why did she request an FBI investigation? 

Why didnt Kavanaugh request an investigation to clear his name?

[Crusher 127]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Most people do.

 

No they don't.

[bad_teammate 13570]

Do you guys seriously remember the dates and addresses of all the parties you went to in high school?

[Longhorn_Fan68 34108]

Do you guys seriously remember the dates and addresses of all the parties you went to in high school?

Yes, because they only went to one and it was magical like in those moving pictures

[Incredulity 11895]

14 minutes ago, scottsins said:

 

What if...they don’t let her go second, but she shows up to testify anyway? Any conclusion to draw from that? You definitely are making some with your presumed scenario.

 

She should.

and let the outcome be what it may.  I have said many time in this thread all it takes for Kavanaugh to be done is a even fairly circumstantial piece of evidence.

Her and her handlers dictating the terms and schedule of the Senate is pretty lame.

As stated, I go second and I can’t get to DC before Thursday is fucking ridiculous. 

[David Dennison 19581]

1 minute ago, Incredulity said:

She should.

and let the outcome be what it may.  I have said many time in this thread all it takes for Kavanaugh to be done is a even fairly circumstantial piece of evidence.

Her and her handlers dictating the terms and schedule of the Senate is pretty lame.

As stated, I go second and I can’t get to DC before Thursday is fucking ridiculous. 

It's working.

 

[Crusher 127]

 

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

If she never intended to testify, why didn’t the Republicans meet her requests? She was ready to go for Thursday.

Why did she request an FBI investigation? 

Why didnt Kavanaugh request an investigation to clear his name?

Your obviously not that much of a dolt. I have read your posts around here and at Shaggy. You are a smart guy.  So I will answer your question. With several questions..

Do you really think it would have ended there with just Thursday? No more ridiculous demands? No Senators asking questions? No Kavanaugh in the room. What happened to be able to face your accuser? Then the most egregious demand...he testifies first?  That is straight from the USSR playbook.

 

[bad_teammate 13570]

1 minute ago, Crusher said:

 

Your obviously not that much of a dolt. I have read your posts around here and at Shaggy. You are a smart guy.  So I will answer your question. With several questions..

Do you really think it would have ended there with just Thursday? No more ridiculous demands? No Senators asking questions? No Kavanaugh in the room. What happened to be able to face your accuser? Then the most egregious demand...he testifies first?  That is straight from the USSR playbook.

 

Ridiculous demands like, "Give me some time to get there and get ready." and "I don't want to sit at the same table as the guy who tried to rape me."

Just absurd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Incredulity 11895]

A legit 60 min piece would be a truncated Senate hearing.  I don’t think they run a one sided puff piece.

[hobbes2702 13521]

2 minutes ago, Crusher said:

 

Your obviously not that much of a dolt. I have read your posts around here and at Shaggy. You are a smart guy.  So I will answer your question. With several questions..

Do you really think it would have ended there with just Thursday? No more ridiculous demands? No Senators asking questions? No Kavanaugh in the room. What happened to be able to face your accuser? Then the most egregious demand...he testifies first?  That is straight from the USSR playbook.

 

Well this isn’t a trial so...

[David Dennison 19581]

Again, let's all remember that Mitch McConnell doesn't have the votes.

Also, if this is voted out of committee, there is nothing stopping the Democrats from having their own hearing before the floor vote.

That would be some good tee vee.

[FondrenRoad 4378]

2 hours ago, EMAWesome said:

Two words--Keith Ellison.

You mean another guy who is going to go down in disgrace and will certainly resign if, in his case, an alleged video is produced?  And will probably go down from it anyway now that his ex is actually talking?  That Keith Ellison?

That's the big difference here.  The Dems will jettison their shitty men.  The GOP celebrates theirs.

It would be refreshing if you'd just come clean and say that you want men to be able to abuse and assault women.  You not only want Ellison to get a pass on abuse, you want him to be allowed to abuse.  You want the same for Kavanaugh.  You wanted the same for Roy Moore.  You love that Trump grabs pussies.

[Incredulity 11895]

1 minute ago, bad_teammate said:

Ridiculous demands like, "Give me some time to get there and get ready." and "I don't want to sit at the same table as the guy who tried to rape me."

Just absurd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The demand isn’t same table dickwad, its same room.

Disingenuous.

[Crusher 127]

1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

Well this isn’t a trial so...

I disagree. Especially if it is broadcast for the public. 

[bad_teammate 13570]

Just now, Incredulity said:

The demand isn’t same table dickwad, its same room.

Disingenuous.

It's weird to you that someone has demands regarding how close they are to someone that they believe sexually assaulted them?

[hobbes2702 13521]

Just now, Crusher said:

I disagree. Especially if it is broadcast for the public. 

Will there be a jury deciding if someone goes to jail for a crime? It’s not a trial. Arguing such makes you look really fucking stupid.

[Crusher 127]

6 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Ridiculous demands like, "Give me some time to get there and get ready." and "I don't want to sit at the same table as the guy who tried to rape me."

Just absurd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Suddenly she can't fly... Better hope that the investigators aren't looking into whether or not she has taken a flight since 1983.

Edited September 22, 2018 by Crusher

[David Dennison 19581]

Just now, Crusher said:

Suddenly she can't fly... Better hope that the investigators aren't loo

You do know that there's going to be a hearing before the floor vote one way or another, right?

[dOUblewide 101]

12 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Do you guys seriously remember the dates and addresses of all the parties you went to in high school?

Well if someone attempted to rape me I am pretty sure I would remember the date and location.

And if not Id just go look it up in the police report b/c I know what to do when someone is assaulted. You go to LE.

Trying to adjudicate sexual assault via congressional testimony or using social media has got to be the dumbest thing we are teaching young people. 

She should travel to Maryland and file a police report. 

[David Dennison 19581]

Just now, dOUblewide said:

Well if someone attempted to rape me I am pretty sure I would remember the date and location.

And if not Id just go look it up in the police report b/c I know what to do when someone is assaulted. You go to LE.

Trying to adjudicate sexual assault via congressional testimony or using social media has got to be the dumbest thing we are teaching young people. 

She should travel to Maryland and file a police report. 

She asked the FBI to look into it. 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

You do know that there's going to be a hearing before the floor vote one way or another, right?

It will be a miracle if a confirmation vote is ever taken on Kavanaugh

[Crusher 127]

3 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Will there be a jury deciding if someone goes to jail for a crime? It’s not a trial. Arguing such makes you look really fucking stupid.

The jury will be public opinion of course. People will make up their own minds. At this point I think most already have.

[David Dennison 19581]

Just now, Crusher said:

The jury will be public opinion of course. People will make up their own minds. At this point I think most already have.

Yep. 

The Democrats have done outstanding work.

[dOUblewide 101]

Just now, David Dennison said:

She asked the FBI to look into it. 

Not as a criminal matter. That's MD's jurisdiction. 

The FBI would look into from a background check standpoint....the problem is their process doesn't typically look back more than 10 years. 

[bad_teammate 13570]

6 minutes ago, Crusher said:

Suddenly she can't fly... Better hope that the investigators aren't looking into whether or not she has taken a flight since 1983.

Suddenly? Was she jet setting around the world at some point?

[hobbes2702 13521]

2 minutes ago, Crusher said:

The jury will be public opinion of course. People will make up their own minds. At this point I think most already have.

So you’re saying it’s not a trial and the normal rules of procedure don’t apply? Glad you’re getting it now. 

[Johnny Sack 8397]

7 minutes ago, Crusher said:

Suddenly she can't fly... Better hope that the investigators aren't looking into whether or not she has taken a flight since 1983.

She apparently did an internship in Hawaii. Guess she took a boat.  

She has no intention of testifying.  This is bullshit delay tactics. Nothing more.  

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

Me thinks there’s a lot of other embarrassing shit in Kavanaugh’s past that is going to come out if they proceed with this nomination.

That’s why they didn’t want the FBI to investigate this. 

[David Dennison 19581]

1 minute ago, dOUblewide said:

Not as a criminal matter. That's MD's jurisdiction. 

The FBI would look into from a background check standpoint....the problem is their process doesn't typically look back more than 10 years. 

So what? They have the resources and the expertise to conduct an background investigation. There's literally no reason for them not to.

[David Dennison 19581]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

She apparently did an internship in Hawaii. Guess she took a boat.  

She has no intention of testifying.  This is bullshit delay tactics. Nothing more.  

You really don't understand what's happening, do you?

[Incredulity 11895]

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Me thinks there’s a lot of other embarrassing shit in Kavanaugh’s past that is going to come out if they proceed with this nomination.

That’s why they didn’t want the FBI to investigate this. 

You really are that simple.

 

 

Edited September 22, 2018 by Incredulity

[hobbes2702 13521]

Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Me thinks there’s a lot of other embarrassing shit in Kavanaugh’s past that is going to come out if they proceed with this nomination.

That’s why they didn’t want the FBI to investigate this. 

Like “no means yes and yes means anal”. We don’t even need the background check for evidence of this dude being a piece of shit.