Bondi adjacent, but equally dumbass, if not more.

• 
• Ron Filipkowski @RonFilipkowski

Like I said previously, usually her incompetence is able to defeat her malevolence.

• 8:12 PM · Feb 11, 2026

10 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said:

Is any member going to vote against impeaching Bondi and thereby telling her that it's ok that she's keeping the Epstein files secret?

Mike Johnson is on record saying he believes the DOJ is in compliance with the law in same sense the POTUS is on record saying Renee Good viciously ran over Jonathan Ross.

Not that I disagree with you. Dems should empty the playbook of every offensive weapon, but there will be a shitload of Pubs who won't say it's OK to keep the Epstein files secret, but say they believe she's in compliance.

Just for kicks I went to Fox News on my phone and there is zero mention of Bondi.

For all the dog and pony shows Jordan and Comer put Democrats and Biden Administration officials through, they always maintained some sense of decorum, despite ridiculous questions.

But no, not this cunt.

24 minutes ago, tx ind said:

Too soon?

16 minutes ago, tx ind said:

Just for kicks I went to Fox News on my phone and there is zero mention of Bondi.

You now have to throw your phone into a nuclear reactor

Anybody still laboring under the misapprehension that Pam Bondi is “the people’s lawyer.”

5 hours ago, Satchel said:

Flipping through her oppo research on each Democrat while completely ignoring their questions…she’s awful.

5 hours ago, Red Five said:

I listened for a little bit. She was being asked fair, relevant questions and was responding basically with “go fuck yourself”.

What can she be charged with here, in addition to impeaching her?

4 hours ago, South Austin said:

Being a cunt.

She gave off major Matt Damon Kavanaugh hearing energy

4 minutes ago, Satchel said:

Anybody still laboring under the misapprehension that Pam Bondi is “the people’s lawyer.”

You misunderstand which people she’s the lawyer for

6 minutes ago, randomhorn said:

You misunderstand which people she’s the lawyer for

To the extent the Epstein Class can be known as people.

• 
• MONETARY MAYHEM @MONETARY_MAYHEM

When you’re ruled by satanic child trafficking pedophiles but the Dow Jones industrial average is over 50,000

• 8:51 PM · Feb 11, 2026

• 
• Christopher Wiggins @cwnewser.bsky.social

A Reuters photographer captured this image of a page from Pam Bondi's "burn book," which she used to counter any questions from Democratic lawmakers during an unhinged hearing today.

It looks like the DOJ monitored members of Congress’s searches of the unredacted Epstein files.

Just wow.

• 11:06 PM · Feb 11, 2026

2 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

• 
• Christopher Wiggins @cwnewser.bsky.social

A Reuters photographer captured this image of a page from Pam Bondi's "burn book," which she used to counter any questions from Democratic lawmakers during an unhinged hearing today.

It looks like the DOJ monitored members of Congress’s searches of the unredacted Epstein files.

Just wow.

• 11:06 PM · Feb 11, 2026

Evidently not getting paid enough to get her nails filled. Fake ass bitch.

1 hour ago, Ghost of LL said:

Here's the play. It's so simple it will never be followed because the Democrats are dumb.

Introduce articles of impeachment against Pam Bondi. One article--failing and refusing to adhere to the statute requiring the release of the Epstein files within 30 days. That's it. It's undeniable. The statute was passed unanimously. It's undeniable that the DOJ is not following the law.

Is anybody in the House going to vote against that article? Nobody voted against the release of the Epstein files. Now is anybody going to vote against impeaching Bondi when she is refusing to abide by the statute that each member voted to pass just a few months ago? Is any member going to vote against impeaching Bondi and thereby telling her that it's ok that she's keeping the Epstein files secret?

I don't think so.

So then it goes to the Senate. And are any of them going to vote against conviction?

I don't think so.

And that's what you need. You need to set that precedent--we're going to impeach and convict some people.

Next up--Kristi Noem. Because once you've impeached and convicted one cabinet secretary, it's less earth-shattering to impeach and convict a second. And then a third. And then, ultimately . . . well, ultimately that frog is good and boiled.

You’d think it wasn’t a thing by twitters top search results…

But it is if you switch to latest. Good job twitter hiding shit once again.

Edited February 12Feb 12 by Covri

I did not see a clip but I read that while being questioned about the Epstein Files and child sex trafficking, Bondi responded by shouting the DOW, Nasdaq and S&P are all up. Is that fucking true?

1 minute ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

I did not see a clip but I read that while being questioned about the Epstein Files and child sex trafficking, Bondi responded by shouting the DOW, Nasdaq and S&P are all up. Is that fucking true?

Yes. Look back a page or trumps America thread.

4 minutes ago, Covri said:

Yes. Look back a page or trumps America thread.

unbelievable

She was asked a pretty straightforward question about the relationship between Trump and Epstein, and she responded with "This is all a distraction from the great things Trump has done. Everyone knows he did nothing wrong."

These fucking people all talk like him now and it's infuriating.

22 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

unbelievable

It’s even better, she said the Dow was over 50,000 dollars.

Raskin should have said, "You can talk about that in one of your Cabinet meetings where you flatter the President, but the American people and this Congress has questions for you about the Epstein files, and you will answer them."

Edited February 12Feb 12 by TwiceHorn

5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Raskin should have said, "You can talk about that in one of your Cabinet meetings where you flatter the President, but the American people and this Congress has questions for you about the Epstein files, and you will answer them."

"Have you ever let the president grab you by the pussy because you think he's a star?"

12 minutes ago, bluto said:

It’s even better, she said the Dow was over 50,000 dollars.

Oh my God. She thinks the DOW is measured in dollars?

6 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

Oh my God. She thinks the DOW is measured in dollars?

You know those hats traders wear every time the dow hits/approaches another milestone? Someone needs to make a bunch of Dow $50,000 hats. Make it so...

15 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

Oh my God. She thinks the DOW is measured in dollars?

Dumb bitch

It’s Ameros right?

26 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

"Have you ever let the president grab you by the pussy because you think he's a star?"

‘I’d let him finger my butthole and call me Ivanka if he wants.’

Aand fuck the media, all the headlines “combative hearing” “bondi and reps clash” “heated exchanges”…. You absolute gutless shit heads, call it what it was, an absolute disgraceful performance

• 
• Robert Barnes @barnes_law

We got to see today what happened if we made Legally Blond the Attorney General.

• 9:43 PM · Feb 11, 2026

28 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

‘I’d let him finger my butthole

You think his hand is bruised NOW.

5 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

• 
• Robert Barnes @barnes_law

We got to see today what happened if we made Legally Blond the Attorney General.

• 9:43 PM · Feb 11, 2026

I'm not sure if I ever heard her voice before, especially in any length, but she sounds a lot like Parker Posey’s character in White Lotus. Kept waiting for Lorazepam Bondi to pop a pill while flipping through her little burn book.

• 
• April Ajoy @aprilajoyr

If Pam Bondi was a waitress:

• 12:15 AM · Feb 12, 2026

33 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

• 
• Robert Barnes @barnes_law

We got to see today what happened if we made Legally Blond the Attorney General.

• 9:43 PM · Feb 11, 2026

Elle would never

1 hour ago, bluto said:

Aand fuck the media, all the headlines “combative hearing” “bondi and reps clash” “heated exchanges”…. You absolute gutless shit heads, call it what it was, an absolute disgraceful performance

The media are those he installed, who he gave access, or billionaire owned. Yeah, fuck the media. The honest ones left when they were given the choice of letting his admin oversee their work before release or hitting the road. Real transparency.

3 hours ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

I did not see a clip but I read that while being questioned about the Epstein Files and child sex trafficking, Bondi responded by shouting the DOW, Nasdaq and S&P are all up. Is that fucking true?

Was she stating that rape is lucrative? Bold strategy cotton.

1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Elle would never

It's almost like he hasn't watched the movie. I wonder why

2 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

• 
• Robert Barnes @barnes_law

We got to see today what happened if we made Legally Blond the Attorney General.

• 9:43 PM · Feb 11, 2026

That's not fair at all. She was actually a smart and competent lawyer in the movie.

Edited February 12Feb 12 by safe sex

https://www.threads.com/@cwebbonline/post/DUpI2CqEQWj?xmt=AQF0P3qOsbBNqHaAa4y0XXt3_g6fn99kYRHDzyaNZUI9FuRFLh8PA3IK5j1KKX3iQkISwfU&slof=1

4 hours ago, bolverk said:

I'm not sure if I ever heard her voice before, especially in any length, but she sounds a lot like Parker Posey’s character in White Lotus. Kept waiting for Lorazepam Bondi to pop a pill while flipping through her little burn book.

Parker Posey ... I think you've found the perfect annoying bitch to play Bondi in the movies that will be made about this shit.

4 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

• 
• Robert Barnes @barnes_law

We got to see today what happened if we made Legally Blond the Attorney General.

• 9:43 PM · Feb 11, 2026

Um I don’t think he understood that movie

Edited February 12Feb 12 by Sawbonz
Edit saw it was covered

1 hour ago, Patricio Swayze said:

https://www.threads.com/@cwebbonline/post/DUpI2CqEQWj?xmt=AQF0P3qOsbBNqHaAa4y0XXt3_g6fn99kYRHDzyaNZUI9FuRFLh8PA3IK5j1KKX3iQkISwfU&slof=1

Good gawd.

10 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Raskin should have said, "You can talk about that in one of your Cabinet meetings where you flatter the President, but the American people and this Congress has questions for you about the Epstein files, and you will answer them."

Then we cut the cord on a lamp, split the wires, and attach one end to each hand? Put the plug in a dimmer switch to show superior humanity to the witness?

Now, Generalissimo Bondi, the inquisitor has a few questions and wants the truth.

9 hours ago, bluto said:

Aand fuck the media, all the headlines “combative hearing” “bondi and reps clash” “heated exchanges”…. You absolute gutless shit heads, call it what it was, an absolute disgraceful performance

• 
• PsyopAnime @PsyopAnime

I am so fucking sick of these people.

• 12:28 AM · Feb 12, 2026

https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-figures-call-for-pam-bondi-to-resign-after-wild-congress-meltdown-on-jeffrey-epstein/

16 hours ago, Ghost of LL said:

Here's the play. It's so simple it will never be followed because the Democrats are dumb.

Introduce articles of impeachment against Pam Bondi. One article--failing and refusing to adhere to the statute requiring the release of the Epstein files within 30 days. That's it. It's undeniable. The statute was passed unanimously. It's undeniable that the DOJ is not following the law.

Is anybody in the House going to vote against that article? Nobody voted against the release of the Epstein files. Now is anybody going to vote against impeaching Bondi when she is refusing to abide by the statute that each member voted to pass just a few months ago? Is any member going to vote against impeaching Bondi and thereby telling her that it's ok that she's keeping the Epstein files secret?

I don't think so.

So then it goes to the Senate. And are any of them going to vote against conviction?

I don't think so.

And that's what you need. You need to set that precedent--we're going to impeach and convict some people.

Next up--Kristi Noem. Because once you've impeached and convicted one cabinet secretary, it's less earth-shattering to impeach and convict a second. And then a third. And then, ultimately . . . well, ultimately that frog is good and boiled.

1.) Yes they will. It will be viewed as an attack on Trump, most R's will not do it.

2.) Yes, most of the senate will vote against conviction. This is wish casting.

Edited to add: If there was any kind of willingness or feeling or consideration of compliance the way you're suggesting, she would have been held in contempt yesterday.

Edited February 12Feb 12 by SydneyCarton

Man, the optimist in me feels like we have to be approaching critical decision time for all of these toadies. Either cling on to Trump's balls, take your blind loyalty and ass kissing meters to 11, and pray that MAGA "wins" and you don't go down with the ship. Or, bail now and take the book deal.

22 hours ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Big Freddie got Fingered energy from Pam.

I kind of miss Tom Green

19 hours ago, Ghost of LL said:

Here's the play. It's so simple it will never be followed because the Democrats are dumb.

Introduce articles of impeachment against Pam Bondi. One article--failing and refusing to adhere to the statute requiring the release of the Epstein files within 30 days. That's it. It's undeniable. The statute was passed unanimously. It's undeniable that the DOJ is not following the law.

Is anybody in the House going to vote against that article? Nobody voted against the release of the Epstein files. Now is anybody going to vote against impeaching Bondi when she is refusing to abide by the statute that each member voted to pass just a few months ago? Is any member going to vote against impeaching Bondi and thereby telling her that it's ok that she's keeping the Epstein files secret?

I don't think so.

So then it goes to the Senate. And are any of them going to vote against conviction?

I don't think so.

And that's what you need. You need to set that precedent--we're going to impeach and convict some people.

Next up--Kristi Noem. Because once you've impeached and convicted one cabinet secretary, it's less earth-shattering to impeach and convict a second. And then a third. And then, ultimately . . . well, ultimately that frog is good and boiled.

Send this to the House Dems. Might as well give them a playbook if they are too stupid to figure it out themselves.

Just now, Biff Tannen said:

Send this to the House Dems. Might as well give them a playbook if they are too stupid to figure it out themselves.

The majority of voters care more about schools cutting off kids dicks and “creeping sharia.” Sick and tired of hearing what message might work for the political left in this country. The answer is nothing. The majority is too stupid and bigoted to ever fix this shit.

Edited February 12Feb 12 by 'stache

First, why are we still rolling with an inaccurate thread title? Does that request have to be in the form of an aggy yell?

Second 💀💀💀