Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Probably hard to know yet but curious how many of ours will bounce and how many we will need to complete a roster. I’m guessing we will need at least 6-7 portals.

I'm hoping we take the best 2-3 from Xavier and keep the best 2-3 from our current team.

That'll be a heck of a starting point and then just fill in the blanks from there.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Probably hard to know yet but curious how many of ours will bounce and how many we will need to complete a roster. I’m guessing we will need at least 6-7 portals.

I think Tre Johnson is probably gone. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Js1 said:

Kristen Wiig No GIF by The Lonely Island

On a more serious note - I think Pryor and Weaver can for sure be retained. I'm not sure what eligibility looks like for a lot of these guys like Kaluma, Shedrick and Mark (who I'd all take back).

I wish Onyema the best. I hope like hell Miller doesn't keep Pope around. Larry and Kent need to move on. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, ztejas said:

On a more serious note - I think Pryor and Weaver can for sure be retained. I'm not sure what eligibility looks like for a lot of these guys like Kaluma, Shedrick and Mark (who I'd all take back).

I wish Onyema the best. I hope like hell Miller doesn't keep Pope around. Larry and Kent need to move on. 

Larry, Kent, Shedrick and Kaluma are out of eligibility. Somehow Mark has another year? Or so the $9.95ers implied.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, ztejas said:

On a more serious note - I think Pryor and Weaver can for sure be retained. I'm not sure what eligibility looks like for a lot of these guys like Kaluma, Shedrick and Mark (who I'd all take back).

I wish Onyema the best. I hope like hell Miller doesn't keep Pope around. Larry and Kent need to move on. 

I will say that Onyema was serviceable at the very end of the season - he at least learned how to dribble the basketball without immediately turning it over. His development from the beginning of the 2023-24 season to now has been massive. Not because he's really good now, but because he was borderline unplayable when he first got to Texas.

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MuellerHorn said:

I will say that Onyema was serviceable at the very end of the season - he at least learned how to dribble the basketball without immediately turning it over. His development from the beginning of the 2023-24 season to now has been massive. Not because he's really good now, but because he was borderline unplayable when he first got to Texas.

If he wants to stick around and ride the bench then whatever. If he's our 2nd string 5 in '26 then the Miller era is off to a rocky start. 

9 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Larry, Kent, Shedrick and Kaluma are out of eligibility. Somehow Mark has another year? Or so the $9.95ers implied.

I'd love to keep Mark. He seriously showed his quality the few weeks of the season. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ztejas said:

If he wants to stick around and ride the bench then whatever. If he's our 2nd string 5 in '26 then the Miller era is off to a rocky start. 

I'd love to keep Mark. He seriously showed his quality the few weeks of the season. 

For sure. Onyema should not be getting meaningful minutes consistently. I was just saying he got a lot better.

I agree with you on Mark. But I doubt he stays if he wants to be a starting 1.

Posted
1 minute ago, MuellerHorn said:

For sure. Onyema should not be getting meaningful minutes consistently. I was just saying he got a lot better.

I agree with you on Mark. But I doubt he stays if he wants to be a starting 1.

Yeah I think Mark is gone. 

Which is why I led with Pryor and Weaver. I think those are the 2 that Miller both should keep and could keep. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
16 hours ago, ATXbronco said:

247's transfer portal ratings 2025:

https://247sports.com/season/2025-basketball/transferportaltop/

 

And I just learned there is a Campbell Fighting Camel.

image.png.3ab857272e892983ef8c721ce2c666d2.png

image.thumb.png.465df977de1ebe764db07a72a6c15237.png

 

image.png.f31435ec7e8f7560aec179a00f8123a9.png

I actually kinda like it.  Have no idea why it would be a thing in the USA, but it's still sort of cool.

It's a really weird school. Worked with a guy that did a semester there. Liberty/Baylor vibes.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

2023 had 175 players in the portal

2024 had 291 players

2025 had more than 700 on the first fucking day.  Anyone who thinks this is in any way good for college sports is a fucking goon.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

2023 had 175 players in the portal

2024 had 291 players

2025 had more than 700 on the first fucking day.  Anyone who thinks this is in any way good for college sports is a fucking goon.

It's great for schools with money, so I'll allow it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

It's great for schools with money, so I'll allow it.

I feel the schools with money only have so long to work this system in their favor until a restructuring 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Sbbruin said:

2023 had 175 players in the portal

2024 had 291 players

2025 had more than 700 on the first fucking day.  Anyone who thinks this is in any way good for college sports is a fucking goon.

It's fine if you treat a pro sports model like it is actually pro sports.  They need to make some changes but I do think we may have seen the last of the Cinderella's in March.  That is sad.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, BurgleBro said:

I feel the schools with money only have so long to work this system in their favor until a restructuring 

Probably, but I wonder how soon things will change when the schools that stand to benefit the least have the most money and power.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Revolution512 said:

but I do think we may have seen the last of the Cinderella's in March.

There was an 11 seed in the Final Four last season. Two years ago the FF was total chaos. 

It's still college basketball. You only need like 8 guys and it's a single elim tournament. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ztejas said:

There was an 11 seed in the Final Four last season. Two years ago the FF was total chaos. 

It's still college basketball. You only need like 8 guys and it's a single elim tournament. 

Soon it’s gonna be like women’s bball, mostly all chalk. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, David Dennison said:

It's great for schools with money, so I'll allow it.

But is it good for the sport?  Not at all.  If you just have mercenaries going to the highest bidder every year, it’s worse than the NBA.  At least you can lock in the contractual certainty Ii. the NBA.  And the NBA sucks if you ask me.  And this is from a Lakers fan, a team well positioned to take advantage of the NBA system.  The Texas of the NBA if you will.  Obviously a lot more than the Texas of the NBA.  But the tourney is so exciting.  And this year we have the fewest low seeds in the sweet sixteen in years.  Snooze.

Edited by Sbbruin
  • Like 4
Posted
8 hours ago, Sbbruin said:

But is it good for the sport?  Not at all.  If you just have mercenaries going to the highest bidder every year, it’s worse than the NBA.  At least you can lock in the contractual certainty Ii. the NBA.  And the NBA sucks if you ask me.  And this is from a Lakers fan, a team well positioned to take advantage of the NBA system.  The Texas of the NBA if you will.  Obviously a lot more than the Texas of the NBA.  But the tourney is so exciting.  And this year we have the fewest low seeds in the sweet sixteen in years.  Snooze.

Snooze but ratings are pretty high. 

Posted
10 hours ago, ztejas said:

There was an 11 seed in the Final Four last season. Two years ago the FF was total chaos. 

It's still college basketball. You only need like 8 guys and it's a single elim tournament. 

Recency bias is fun!

10 hours ago, kingkoopa6 said:

Soon it’s gonna be like women’s bball, mostly all chalk. 

Wbb is the way it is because the talent pool is so thin compared to mbb, not because of economics.

  • Like 1
Posted

The thing is, it isn't just the big D-1 schools that have rich alumni.  With NIL, now any school that has the will to compete can play with the big boys. There is nothing stopping a school like Harvard or Princeton or even Rice from throwing some big money at basketball and immediately dominating.  Kind of like UNLV of the early 90s, except legally.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Js1 said:

It’s so sad how the portal and playing players legally is ruining the once proud sport of coaches blocking transfers out of spite and only big name programs with shoe deals paying under the table! 

Sure but a lot of the 1200* will be left without a scholarship 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Sure but a lot of the 1200* will be left without a scholarship 

And maybe that will cure all these kids jumping into the portal. Once 400 kids get nothing then they might not jump in the portal so fast. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
5 hours ago, txexlonghorn23 said:

It makes sense, but man he would be progress so much with Miller than he did with Terry.

he'd certainly learn to work/move more without the ball and likely get many better looks on offense.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...