Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, fuggled said:

Also in that Colorado ruling, the judge is saying Alien Enemies Act likely doesn't apply.

 

Court:  AEA likely doesn't apply

Dotard:  I likely don't give one flying fuck what you say and you aren't going to do anything about it.

Posted

Wow, this is almost hard to believe but nothing should surprise me anymore.  If I'm understanding this correctly, AFTER a restraining order was issued to ICE not to deport 3 individuals, ICE handed them over to DOD who then deported them.  ICE just submitted in court tonight that DOD isn't a defendant so they didn't violate the TRO.

 

  • Rage+1 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, fuggled said:

Wow, this is almost hard to believe but nothing should surprise me anymore.  If I'm understanding this correctly, AFTER a restraining order was issued to ICE not to deport 3 individuals, ICE handed them over to DOD who then deported them.  ICE just submitted in court tonight that DOD isn't a defendant so they didn't violate the TRO.

 

Unlike some of these TROs and injunctions, that one contained the magic language:

Defendants, and all of their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors, assigns, and persons acting in concert or participation with them are hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from:

Judges need to sharpen up their orders here, that's standard shit.

Posted
28 minutes ago, fuggled said:

And in other news, maybe they're getting close to an agreement regarding Abrego Garcia?  Maybe not? Who knows. 

 

 

Xinis' order of yesterday, denying almost all of the government's objections to discovery, citing bad faith, and ordering answers.  https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/100/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

I think you are correct, the government is just going to back down rather than push it much further.

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Unlike some of these TROs and injunctions, that one contained the magic language:

Defendants, and all of their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors, assigns, and persons acting in concert or participation with them are hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from:

Judges need to sharpen up their orders here, that's standard shit.

Digging around, the lawyer that signed the response, Mary Larakers, is a UH and St. Mary's graduate.  She has been employed in the government since 2017, so she's likely just a civil servant.

But the administration has put her in an awful place.  That "no DHS personnel aboard" and "DHS did not direct DOD to deport" is pretty clearly saying the only things favorable to DHS in that situation.  I'd be looking for another job is I was Ms. Larakers.  Yikes.

Posted
10 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Xinis' order of yesterday, denying almost all of the government's objections to discovery, citing bad faith, and ordering answers.  https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/100/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

I think you are correct, the government is just going to back down rather than push it much further.

 

Maybe. But if Abrego's legal team is willing to agree to stop pursuing discovery, I have to think the agreement from the government is going to be broader than just "ask him to be returned". The only way I gave up this bit of leverage is if not only do we have an agreement to get him returned, but also to not deport him again upon return. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Maybe. But if Abrego's legal team is willing to agree to stop pursuing discovery, I have to think the agreement from the government is going to be broader than just "ask him to be returned". The only way I gave up this bit of leverage is if not only do we have an agreement to get him returned, but also to not deport him again upon return. 

At this point, we need to assume we are all Native Americans as far as treaties and deals are concerned. Don’t trust and over verify.

Tl;Dr this administration cannot be trusted in any word or deed.
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
18 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Maybe. But if Abrego's legal team is willing to agree to stop pursuing discovery, I have to think the agreement from the government is going to be broader than just "ask him to be returned". The only way I gave up this bit of leverage is if not only do we have an agreement to get him returned, but also to not deport him again upon return. 

Right.  Don't know how far the gubmint is going to go, but if the plaintiffs agreed to it, there seems to be something very good in it for Abrego Garcia.

Maybe, given the abusive and capricious use of power everywhere in this, the gubmint has decided this isn't the greatest test case for executive foreign relations and national security power.

Also, in the judge's discovery order, there was an allusion to some discussion with El Salvador.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Yeah, no, I'm not gonna start feeling optimistic until Abrego-Garcia is the first of many to actually receive substantive due process. The courts can huff and puff, but they're only ever heeded by the trumpist fascists when it suits them.

Hell, even the goddamn nazis took great pains to stay within the bounds of their legal system. We are on uncharted waters and I couldn't agree more with the "we are native Americans negotiating with Andrew Jackson" sentiment.

Posted

A second judge has ordered the Trump administration to return a second man from El Salvador who was blocked from deportation for different reasons (it violated a prior court settlement).

 

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Can media stop using “deported”? When someone is deported they get back to their country of origin and are free. They aren’t sent to a completely different country and put in a slave labor prison indefinitely with no apparent ability to challenge or even limit their time in prison. 
 

Edited to add that this is only the second person we’re hearing about. How many others? I believe I read 280 or so individuals were sent to CECOT but we only have names for 237. There was at least one individual swept up and now there’s no record of where he is or even if he’s alive. We’ve already heard about multiple US Citizens being detained. This is the grossest shit our country has done since Japanese internment

 

There are over 100 men who were sent to CECOT outside the AEA authority.  They were sent there, according to DHS, under typical INA processes but there is no clear legal basis for holding them in El Salvador. 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/inside-the-fight-to-return-the-other-men-trump-sent-to-cecot

From the article, here's one guy who agreed to go back to Venezuela and withdrew his asylum claim, but not he's sitting in a prison camp.

Quote

Miguel entered the United States in 2021, Gloria told TPM. He’s had a few run-ins with the law: in 2023, he was charged in Pennsylvania with retail theft. The New York Post called Vaamondes Barrios a “migrant squatter” in a story last year after he was arrested at a building in the Bronx while police were investigating a report of a man with a gun; a weapons possession charge was later dropped.

In some ways, he exemplifies how the administration’s plan to indefinitely confine people in a Salvadoran detention camp flattens the complexity of each case. Miguel Vaamondes Barrios had agreed to be removed to Venezuela, per documents reviewed by TPM, and agreed to withdraw an asylum claim.

Because the government sent him to CECOT, there remains an open question about whose custody he is in and who can secure his release. Gloria Vaamondes Barrios has sought legal counsel, but is proceeding pro se in a habeas lawsuit she brought in Brooklyn federal court on March 31.

 

Posted
16 hours ago, fuggled said:

Wow, this is almost hard to believe but nothing should surprise me anymore.  If I'm understanding this correctly, AFTER a restraining order was issued to ICE not to deport 3 individuals, ICE handed them over to DOD who then deported them.  ICE just submitted in court tonight that DOD isn't a defendant so they didn't violate the TRO.

 

Like I said, hope all these pieces of shit just following orders never have a good nights sleep and burn In hell sooner rather than later. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, Pancho said:

IMG_0058.jpeg

"They won't explain why."

Dudes.  Here's the cheat code, and it applies to literally everything happening right now: is it a fucking dickish, totally assholish thing to do?  Yes? Well then, THAT'S WHY THEY'RE DOING IT.

The operating principle of our government is "be randomly mean assholes.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
23 hours ago, Captainant said:

Yeah, no, I'm not gonna start feeling optimistic until Abrego-Garcia is the first of many to actually receive substantive due process. The courts can huff and puff, but they're only ever heeded by the trumpist fascists when it suits them.

Hell, even the goddamn nazis took great pains to stay within the bounds of their legal system. We are on uncharted waters and I couldn't agree more with the "we are native Americans negotiating with Andrew Jackson" sentiment.

I think you meant to say procedural due process. 

Posted
On 4/24/2025 at 11:08 AM, fuggled said:

 

There are over 100 men who were sent to CECOT outside the AEA authority.  They were sent there, according to DHS, under typical INA processes but there is no clear legal basis for holding them in El Salvador. 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/inside-the-fight-to-return-the-other-men-trump-sent-to-cecot

From the article, here's one guy who agreed to go back to Venezuela and withdrew his asylum claim, but not he's sitting in a prison camp.

 

The article says his wife is going pro se on the habeas action. That seems very ill advised considered how shady the other side seems to be acting in some/all? of the other cases. I’m surprised there isn’t a big firm or two taking on all of these cases in some form or fashion. And likely for free or very reduced cost. Immigration attorneys, in my opinion and experience, are by far the most passionate of our profession. They aren’t chasing money, it’s truly a calling for them. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

Yeah, I’m waiting to see more on that. Because at face value, it seems very very bad.

From what I gather, the allegation is that she told the dude and his attorney to leave her courtroom through a side door, after somehow being made aware that there were ICE agents in the courthouse coming for him.

I don’t think that’s illegal. Is his attorney also guilty of obstructing an investigation? What if I have a client that I know is going to get arrested if they show up for a hearing that I could attend for them myself, and I tell them “just stay home, I’ll make the appearance for you” … is that illegal?

Posted
19 hours ago, Pancho said:

IMG_0058.jpeg

request: a quick search before posting

this incident happened a week ago tonight and he was released saturday morning

it's still a story but when it's already resolved it should be posted as such imho

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Lots of people in this administration should face long prison sentences 

 

 

it suspiciously sounds like the State Department at one time was trying to "facilitate his return". So, you know, it can be done.

Edited by yoladu
Posted
5 hours ago, SquishMitten said:

Yeah, I’m waiting to see more on that. Because at face value, it seems very very bad.

From what I gather, the allegation is that she told the dude and his attorney to leave her courtroom through a side door, after somehow being made aware that there were ICE agents in the courthouse coming for him.

I don’t think that’s illegal. Is his attorney also guilty of obstructing an investigation? What if I have a client that I know is going to get arrested if they show up for a hearing that I could attend for them myself, and I tell them “just stay home, I’ll make the appearance for you” … is that illegal?

Since when does legality have anything to do with what Trump does or doesn’t do?



×
×
  • Create New...