Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, cabowabo said:

So they should not have been arrested because they are judges?


Bondi is going to get laughed out of the court room. Not all of us are good little Nazis that roll over for the ICE gestapo. 
 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, cabowabo said:

So they should not have been arrested because they are judges?

Don’t they have the same rights as felonious presidents?

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
16 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Not everyone. Some will have been hanged outside gas stations.

giphy_s.gif?cid=6c09b952808oc22grgdvcrbj

You don't get to opt into that system without being at material risk of things unfolding exactly as they will in such systems.

TLDR: FAFO.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
1 hour ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Twice should be along anytime now to tell us to be patient and let the legal system do its thing.  A furrowed brow should do. 

I will say that these obstruction of immigration charges likely won't hold up, as noted above and elsewhere.

And, yeah, the judge should be permitted to test that by motion to dismiss the indictment.  That whole due process thing that people were so pissed off about.

35 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

 

Cooze.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, 'stache said:

Wut? Judges can and are arrested for crimes. This was because the administration didn't like her ruling. Even if wrong on every level judge's can't be arrested for wrong decisions. Period. This would be a massive generational scandal in any other timeline as would even suggesting that people could be wrongfully sent to an El Salvadorian gulag without due process and made to stay there despite the fact they should neve have been sent in the first place. But here we are, he really could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and nothing would happen.

Yeah, it's intimidation.

Once the indictment is dismissed, suit should be brought for malicious prosecution.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
Just now, TwiceHorn said:

I will say that these obstruction of immigration charges likely won't hold up, as noted above and elsewhere.

And, yeah, the judge should be permitted to test that by motion to dismiss the indictment.  That whole due process thing that people were so pissed off about.

But of course, the point isn't to bring good charges, charges that will stick, etc.

The point is to use the power of "The State," via badge and gun, to harass, intimidate, and terrorize members of the judiciary.  The old "you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride," applied to actual functionaries of the government who are not doing exactly as the regime demands of them.  

Someone needs to start shooting these fuckers when they show up to effectuate an illegal arrest.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

But of course, the point isn't to bring good charges, charges that will stick, etc.

The point is to use the power of "The State," via badge and gun, to harass, intimidate, and terrorize members of the judiciary.  The old "you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride," applied to actual functionaries of the government who are not doing exactly as the regime demands of them.  

Someone needs to start shooting these fuckers when they show up to effectuate an illegal arrest.

Nonetheless, when these actually wrongful, weaponized indictments are brought, the same tools Trump used and abused will be employed to great effect by these defendants.  Something I predicted more than a year ago.

It sucks the double dog dick that these people can beat the rap but not the ride, but at least there's a remedy.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Nonetheless, when these actually wrongful, weaponized indictments are brought, the same tools Trump used and abused will be employed to great effect by these defendants.  Something I predicted more than a year ago.

It sucks the double dog dick that these people can beat the rap but not the ride, but at least there's a remedy.

Until they accidentally get shipped off to some El Salvadorian prison which is apparently the legal equivalent of a black hole.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Nonetheless, when these actually wrongful, weaponized indictments are brought, the same tools Trump used and abused will be employed to great effect by these defendants.  Something I predicted more than a year ago.

It sucks the double dog dick that these people can beat the rap but not the ride, but at least there's a remedy.

There's always a remedy.

mussolini_e_petacci_a_piazzale_loreto_19

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Chuckie Finster said:

There's going to be a time, years from now, where everyone is going to pretend that they were against this administration.

We're not going to forget.

 

IMG_7478.png

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Seems like a big enough story to have its own thread. Not only was the Wisconsin judge arrested today a former judge in New Mexico was arrested for “harboring gang members”

 

image.png.f1badd5531e4959f621c09bbe4a0a2f1.png

That's another one he didn't write.  Demand of the hour.  Fuck you.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, gsoda3 said:

Can the AG be sued? Is she beyond legal reach?

You see, the SCOTUS pulled from their ass a new legal precedent that means republicans cannot be sued or held liable for their actions.  However, all former democratic or ex-republicans can be held liable for republican damages and crimes.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, gsoda3 said:

Can the AG be sued? Is she beyond legal reach?

Most government officials have some form of immunity from suit in their personal capacity.

The AG is sued in official capacity probably every damn day.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Chuckie Finster said:

There's going to be a time, years from now, where everyone is going to pretend that they were against this administration.

We're not going to forget.

 

post maga, lashes for every maga voter or anyone that wore that stupid cap. only way this country can heal 

Edited by tx 3 putt
Posted
22 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Most government officials have some form of immunity from suit in their personal capacity.

The AG is sued in official capacity probably every damn day.

Is there any entity able to bring criminal charges against the AG?

Posted
45 minutes ago, gsoda3 said:

Is there any entity able to bring criminal charges against the AG?

Any prosecutorial body, state or federal, theoretically could bring charges against the AG.  Federally, that's rather impracticable, because the AG ultimately controls charging decisions if the chain of command is followed.  The conflict of interest there would demand a Special Counsel and even then.

But the AG is going to have a lot of immunity for things resembling the official duties of the office, like charging people.

Posted
20 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Any prosecutorial body, state or federal, theoretically could bring charges against the AG.  Federally, that's rather impracticable, because the AG ultimately controls charging decisions if the chain of command is followed.  The conflict of interest there would demand a Special Counsel and even then.

But the AG is going to have a lot of immunity for things resembling the official duties of the office, like charging people.

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, freyguy said:

so ICE = Gestapo

Gravy Gestapo. Doxx them.

even if that should never ever happen cause hey I get it is problematic (not as much as having a fucking felon as president), all ICE folk are pieces of shit. 

An ice warrant is not good enough. You need a warrant signed by a fed judge. That’s the law. Everyone else can get fucked cause they’re wrong.

Obey the 4th or kneel before the 2nd. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, cabowabo said:

So they should not have been arrested because they are judges?

If you’re too stupid too understand the law then shut the fuck up

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, achooloco said:

If you’re too stupid too understand the law then shut the fuck up

Lighten up bro. Maybe you should go key a few Teslas to blow off steam. 

  • Fuck You 10
Posted

Ya'll realize that the Fox News crowd is being served this on a silver platter about "corrupt judges" and they're eating it up, right?   Half of this country doesn't give a shit about the rule of law, due process or anything else except what Dear Leader says  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted

Kind of interesting.  One of the articles I read said that a judge was indicted by DOJ for something similar, but the charges were dismissed once the judge agreed to submit herself to the state's judicial conduct commission.

I'd be interested to see how that turns out.

Posted
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Yeah, it's intimidation.

Once the indictment is dismissed, suit should be brought for malicious prosecution.

Lol they can bring a suit, that will be indefinitely delayed by the fascists because the courts invariably favor fascism over justice by way of never ending delay. See: US V Trump

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, cabowabo said:

Lighten up bro. Maybe you should go key a few Teslas to blow off steam. 

They are literally locking up judges for following the law. Citizens for literally being brown. Get fucked dumtard.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Someone needs to start shooting these fuckers when they show up to effectuate an illegal arrest.

Why not you brisket?

  • Fuck You 1
Posted

y’all being played.  they know this will get tossed, but it’ll have served its purpose of distracting the minions glare at Trump for their now shittier lives, empty pantry and unemployment onto an already suspect judiciary he’s been subverting since day 1 and before.  
 

pay no mind to the squirrels…

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

https://apnews.com/article/immigration-judge-arrested-7997186bbca5730e70a25f2347e631f6
 

OK. So she snuck the guy out the back door of the court to avoid ICE detention? Hardy arrest worthy. Maybe some form of censure. And everyone shiuld certainly start popping caps in the feds. Whatever it takes. 

Nope. She correctly called out a bullshit ice admin warrant that has no legal binding effect. The dotard anti constitution pieces of shit are  100% wrong on this. They can bitch but  No fed judge warrant, no legal warrant. This makes sense since today those fucking traitors published the Doj paper saying ice admin warrants curtailed the 4th amendment.
 

they’re wrong. Fuck them. Exercise you’re second amendment 

Posted
1 minute ago, achooloco said:

Nope. She correctly called out a bullshit ice admin warrant that has no legal binding effect. The dotard anti constitution pieces of shit are  100% wrong on this. They can bitch but  No fed judge warrant, no legal warrant. This makes sense since today those fucking traitors published the Doj paper saying ice admin warrants curtailed the 4th amendment.
 

they’re wrong. Fuck them. Exercise you’re second amendment 

Ok. I trust yall cr lawyers. ICE admin warrants are invalid and I am sure have been for some time. I don’t know the ins and outs but if yall ready to kick off this civil war, lfg. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Ok. I trust yall cr lawyers. ICE admin warrants are invalid and I am sure have been for some time. I don’t know the ins and outs but if yall ready to kick off this civil war, lfg. 

Are you being facetious?



×
×
  • Create New...