Jump to content

Dallas officer kills man after mistaking apartment for her own, police say

'stache

By 'stache
in Daily Texan

 Share

Recommended Posts

Helobious

Helobious 9448

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, AUS-97HORN said:

she was only convicted 5 years ago. htf was she up for parole on a murder conviction?

 

 

oooo   forgot that she was given 10 years, but somehow eligible for parole after just 5.    nice to see shes got at least 2 more years behind bars.  but that original sentence was bullshit. it should have been 15+ and more like 20

In Texas for a 3G offense (most severe cases), you’re only eligible for parole after serving at least 50% of your time, provided you weren’t sentenced LWOP or death. For other crimes you can be eligible for parole earlier, but as a general rule if you’re sentenced to prison time you’re gonna have to serve at least half of the sentence behind bars. A lot of parolees get locked up again anyway, the parole system is pretty fucked and designed to make people fail. 
 

This bitch deserved it though. 

Edited by Helobious
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Constant
Constant

First off I’d like to say that I’m heartbroken for the Jean family. As a parent myself, I hope Mr. Jean’s father and mother find some peace in the outcome. They appear to be a wonderful family that ra

SubliminalHorn
SubliminalHorn

Just relax the throat and stay in rhythm 

4th&Five
4th&Five

Posted Images

Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105096

Posted
Posted
Just now, C-Man said:

It's Peyton Yager reporting -- are we sure the numbers are accurate?

They probably are.  Guyger didn't appear (obviously) and she wasn't even represented by counsel (she surely can't afford a lawyer).  So, this was a "trial" against an opponent that had already forfeited. The plaintiff just had to put on evidence sufficient to get the damages awarded.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
royiv

royiv 9289

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, shadow_operative2.0 said:

 

 

Too bad the family won’t ever see a dime. Guyger is judgement proof and since cops don’t have professional liability insurance, this is all for show.

Also, this:

Quote

An attorney for the family said a favorable verdict also sends a message to other officers about thinking before they pull the trigger.

Kenan Thompson Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31451

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

They probably are.  Guyger didn't appear (obviously) and she wasn't even represented by counsel (she surely can't afford a lawyer).  So, this was a "trial" against an opponent that had already forfeited. The plaintiff just had to put on evidence sufficient to get the damages awarded.

In more "on the job" cases, I believe City of Dallas provides attorneys and some coverage through Texas Municipal League.  Maybe that's changed or TML has declined coverage given the recent spate of cop foolishness in Dallas and elsewhere in the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21802

Posted
  • Author
Posted
41 minutes ago, 4th and 5 said:

I still remain confident I could have gotten her off given the unique circumstances of her case. Her attorney was average at best.

Would it be the "oopsie poopsie" defense?

"She entered the wrong apartment and started blasting at shadows killing a man, but c'mon, it was just a big mistake. Haven't you all made mistakes? This morning I accidentally put shaving cream in my hair instead of mousse. Same thing here. She accidentally shot bullets at shadows by mistake. We're all human, right?" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deej

Deej 76759

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Would it be the "oopsie poopsie" defense?

"She entered the wrong apartment and started blasting at shadows killing a man, but c'mon, it was just a big mistake. Haven't you all made mistakes? This morning I accidentally put shaving cream in my hair instead of mousse. Same thing here. She accidentally shot bullets at shadows by mistake. We're all human, right?" 

Thought he was a deer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blotto

Blotto 23498

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, shadow_operative2.0 said:

@C-Man was referring to this. 

She fulfills the number one major responsibility of a local TV news personality, which is to be hot as fuck. I might actually watch the news (on mute) if she was in the austin metro area. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rex Kramer

Rex Kramer 1335

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Blotto said:

She fulfills the number one major responsibility of a local TV news personality, which is to be hot as fuck. I might actually watch the news (on mute) if she was in the austin metro area. 

image.thumb.jpeg.654755b81a8d4dd1f00a3f697dfe6401.jpeg

She could fulfill a lot of responsibilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
High Plains Drifter

High Plains Drifter 11036

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

They probably are.  Guyger didn't appear (obviously) and she wasn't even represented by counsel (she surely can't afford a lawyer).  So, this was a "trial" against an opponent that had already forfeited. The plaintiff just had to put on evidence sufficient to get the damages awarded.

 

14 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

In more "on the job" cases, I believe City of Dallas provides attorneys and some coverage through Texas Municipal League.  Maybe that's changed or TML has declined coverage given the recent spate of cop foolishness in Dallas and elsewhere in the state.

 

City pays right? Why wouldn't they provide defense council?

Or no because she wasn't on duty?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31451

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

City was dismissed as a defendant, so not on the hook.

Well, that was independent "failure to train" liability.

I think he's thinking some species of respondent superior, employer liability for employee's actions within the scope of employment.  But that doesn't apply to civil rights cases like this.

So, there's no automatic liability for cities here.  They have to voluntarily assume it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
royiv

royiv 9289

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

I doubt the Jean family would do this, but with that kind of judgment, if they kept it alive (it will only last 10 years unless they take some action), they could destitute Guyger periodically for the rest of her life.

Because that worked out so well for the Goldman family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...