aggy Passes UT as #1 Most Valuable CFB Program

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20932]

Latest FORBES most valuable program rankings are out.  A&M and Texas #1 and #2.


https://volswire.usatoday.com/lists/a-look-at-college-footballs-most-valuable-teams-as-conference-expansion-unfolds/

 How is Clemson #25 after so much success? How is Arkansas more valuable than USC?

 

[Vito Andolini 9454]

I never paid attention to this when first posted, but isn’t the “latest” list offered in the article a Forbes list from 2019?

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20932]

2 minutes ago, Vito Andolini said:

I never paid attention to this when first posted, but isn’t the “latest” list offered in the article a Forbes list from 2019?

Article is dated July 4, 2022, no? 

[utee94 16091]

3 minutes ago, Vito Andolini said:

I never paid attention to this when first posted, but isn’t the “latest” list offered in the article a Forbes list from 2019?

From this link residing in the piece HUABS linked

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2019/09/12/college-football-most-valuable-clemson-texas-am/?sh=2b24c7d1a2e7

 

Quote

across the three most recent seasons for which financial data is available: 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18).

 

Edited July 5, 2022 by utee94

[Vito Andolini 9454]

15 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Article is dated July 4, 2022, no? 

The Volswire article is from yesterday, but as UTEE posted, the data seems to be a few years old. Why the Vols dude decided the old news was worthy of a new article, who knows. 

Edited July 5, 2022 by Vito Andolini

[TwiceHorn 32087]

1 hour ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Latest FORBES most valuable program rankings are out.  A&M and Texas #1 and #2.


https://volswire.usatoday.com/lists/a-look-at-college-footballs-most-valuable-teams-as-conference-expansion-unfolds/

 How is Clemson #25 after so much success? How is Arkansas more valuable than USC?

 

Probably the biggest single differentiator in there, after TV revenue, is sales of licensed products. Texas is at a disadvantage on TV revenue compared to SEC schools, so is USC and the rest of the PAC12.  After that, it's sales of licensed stuff.

USC just isn't that big a brand, anymore, if it ever was.  Clemson never was.  Arkansas has the SEC head start, plus they sell a lot of gear to all the arkies.

Also, the Forbes list cited, that makes up the bulk of the article, is from 2019 and averages the prior three years.

Edited July 5, 2022 by TwiceHorn

[DalTxHornFan 3130]

32 minutes ago, utee94 said:

From this link residing in the piece HUABS linked

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2019/09/12/college-football-most-valuable-clemson-texas-am/?sh=2b24c7d1a2e7

 

 

Paging @Randolph Duke to decipher and debunk this ranking.

[utee94 16091]

 

23 minutes ago, Vito Andolini said:

The Volswire article is from yesterday, but as UTEE posted, the data seems to be a few years old. Why the Vols dude decided the old news was worthy of a new article, who knows. 

I guess the headline provides the reasoning, that because of the shakeups in realignment, they wanted to take a look at the various schools' financial value and viability.  But since the data's so old, it's really not particularly illuminating.

[Randolph Duke 4034]

35 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

Paging @Randolph Duke to decipher and debunk this ranking.

Generally speaking, the more valuable teams are able to generate sufficient revenues to meet expenses.