Jump to content

Cruz vs Beto

Washpark

By Washpark
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

horncyclist

horncyclist 1391

Posted
Posted

Here's 538's summary of the race. Has nice explanations of their model and how they rat the various polls and consider other factors. Also lists other prominent election predictors, Cook, Sabato. Cook still has it as a tossup for what it's worth.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2018-midterm-election-forecast/senate/texas/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 13.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Hank Scorpio
Hank Scorpio

I'm sorry, look at all these old fucking goblins at this thing:  Let's go one by one:  Beatrice She has not missed a single city council meeting or church bingo in 35 years. S

Born to Run
Born to Run

I’ve heard this bullshit my entire life, hell I used to believe the myth that Republicans were all about “faith in the common man succeeding when unimpeded by the govt.” Left alone business and humani

austingirl
austingirl

I do volunteer work for Beto's campaign (surprise!). I get called a "libtard" on a regular basis and get a lot of responses that are just "#MAGA!" and the like, but I also hear a lot of "who is Beto?"

GRHorn

GRHorn 105

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, horncyclist said:

He's very close. Nate Silver was in an article a day or two ago talking about how the media is fucking no up polling again. In his model, Beto went from 1 in 3 chance to a 1 in 5 chance in the last month or so. That's not that huge of a change but the media narrative has been Beto is done.

What is 7 points in terms of votes?

I was curious about this comparison and looked up some numbers. How much did 2016 Presidential polls vary from the actual outcome in some of the battleground and surprise Trump states. The first number is the RCP average for that state before the election, the 2nd is the actual result. 

Michigan- Clinton +3.4—> Trump 0.3

Florida- Trump 0.2–> Trump 1.2

Ohio- Trump 3.5–> Trump 8.1

Wisconsin- Clinton 6.5–> Trump 0.7

Pennsylvania- Clinton 1.9–> Trump 0.7

So out of the 5, you had one that had a seven point swing. In Wisconsin Clinton actually stayed at 46%, Trump just gained some undecideds and votes off Johnson and Stein. I would think it would be harder to flip in just a two person race, but who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhorn_Fan68

Longhorn_Fan68 34108

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

There is no way to really predict this election. 

There’s too much uncertainty in the variables with regards to turnout and unlikely voters.  Additionally, state polling is notoriously sketchy. 

IMO the best indicator is the performances in the special elections over the past year.

Agreed. if 2016 didn't convince you that traditional polling is obviously not a good indicator anymore, then well, I don't know what to tell you. There is obviously a different electorate when traditionally conservative states start electing trans representatives over good ole boys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47295

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

Agreed. if 2016 didn't convince you that traditional polling is obviously not a good indicator anymore, then well, I don't know what to tell you. There is obviously a different electorate when traditionally conservative states start electing trans representatives over good ole boys. 

I think "traditional polling" doesn't even mean anything any more.  Obviously, land lines are not a good means for accessing a reasonable cross section of the population.  Then again, neither is the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SimonBolivar

SimonBolivar 11067

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GRHorn said:

In Wisconsin Clinton actually stayed at 46%, Trump just gained some undecideds and votes off Johnson and Stein. I would think it would be harder to flip in just a two person race, but who knows?

Or  those who were embarrassed to admit they voted for Trump to pollsters who were Trump voters all along.

 

I've donated to Beto and I'm voting for Beto, but he ain't winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted

I remember the backlash Cruz got from the Trumpkins when he pulled that stunt at the 2016 convention.  

They went full meltdown on him.

He will never get elected in Texas again they said.  

No way he keeps his Senate seat in 2018 they said.  

It’s remarkable how short sighted and forgetful the Trumpublicans are. 

Now they need him more than ever. 

Why? Because reasons.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16704

Posted
Posted
I remember the backlash Cruz got from the Trumpkins when he pulled that stunt at the 2016 convention.  
They went full meltdown on him.
He will never get elected in Texas again they said.  
No way he keeps his Senate seat in 2018 they said.  
It’s remarkable how short sighted and forgetful the Trumpublicans are. 
Now they need him more than ever. 
Why? Because reasons.
Aggy is as aggy does.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
horncyclist

horncyclist 1391

Posted
Posted

Dreamers have pretty solid support in Texas.

https://www.texasmonthly.com/politics/texans-support-citizenship-children-brought-country-illegally-poll-says/

But a new Quinnipiac Poll found 55 percent of self-identified Texas Republicans supported allowing these so-called Dreamers to stay in the United States with a path to citizenship. Overall, 71 percent of Texans who responded to the poll backed the idea of allowing these young people to stay in the country. Ninety percent of the Democrats surveyed supported the Dreamers, but the strong support crossed ethnic and racial lines, as well as age groups, the survey showed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16704

Posted
Posted
Cruz has had some pretty effective ads in Houston (and I'm not a Cruz guy).  The voting against Hurricane Harvey relief is pretty damning.
Again, not a Cruz supporter here but I think Ted wins this one 55-45.  Maybe 54-46.
Trump got 52 percent of the vote in the general, and we haven't seen any polls with Cruz past that as far as I know. I highly doubt Cruz improves on that number. He isn't going to attract independents in droves and Beto certainly has an enthusiasm advantage. Cruz probably does win, but I'm thinking something along the lines of 50-52 to 45-48. It's still close enough that Beto could pull some sort of 50-48 type upset though.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

The beauty of the race is that even if Cruz wins, the GOP loses, because they had to divert resources to keep him alive that would've otherwise gone to other battlegrounds.

Win or lose, Beto built a revitalized Democratic infrastructure throughout the entire state of Texas.  That will pay massive dividends down the road if it’s not squandered.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EuroHorn

EuroHorn 3295

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Win or lose, Beto built a revitalized Democratic infrastructure throughout the entire state of Texas.  That will pay massive dividends down the road if it’s not squandered.

I think aggy said something like this when they lost to Clemson 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 26249

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, smwhorn said:

Cruz has had some pretty effective ads in Houston (and I'm not a Cruz guy).  The voting against Hurricane Harvey relief is pretty damning.

Again, not a Cruz supporter here but I think Ted wins this one 55-45.  Maybe 54-46.

Only if you're a complete simpleton and fail to consider what else was (and wasn't) in that bill. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, troph said:

If it’s not squandered.

It’s not a dem infrastructure, it’s one candidates. What he and the party do with it is uncertain at best.

This is where I land as well. How many once-in-a-generation charismatic personalities will the D machine get? This turn out, this excitement, this cash influx, this grassroots, this GOTV, the volunteers, the resources, the energy and time...it's not just going to be given to just any Boring Tom Democrat, Old Dick Establishment D or Wild Harry Socialist. Especially if Beto loses and a lot of the middle ground folks who invested and helped think "dang, i put in a lot of energy, time and money. I won't be doing that again unless it's for the RIGHT person who can win".

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...