Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, troph said:

I think she may either be mad because her man loves some “shemale” porn or she’s infatuated with the “ladyboys” herself.  
 

her illustrious state is finally top five in something … infatuation with trans porn.  

But there is really good news my Texas brothers !!! Y’all are #1 !!!

image.thumb.png.6adc7f8a27702a84ba388d874e60daf1.png

Looking at you El Paso and Brownsville. NTTIAWWT

Posted
5 minutes ago, Loch Ness Monster said:

Few random things I saw:

Screenshot_20240801_232951_Chrome.thumb.jpg.e555737eb8247ad4a128ae557dced85a.jpgScreenshot_20240726_122104_TikTok.thumb.jpg.f2ef2a7aec3bff6416e3466038b90c7a.jpgScreenshot_20240726_111217_Chrome.jpg.74a22d47a7c20f66b91ddec32201a1a1.jpg

I've driven by some Jo Gotta Go signs lately and found myself chuckling.  You fucking wanted it, now you fucking got it, good work dipshits.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

I've driven by some Jo Gotta Go signs lately and found myself chuckling.  You fucking wanted it, now you fucking got it, good work dipshits.  

And I’m already seeing Kamala signs, which seems pretty fucking fast. I know people are joking that this has been planned for a long time, but the zoom calls, fundraising drives, etc. feel like in the level of Obama.

Posted

Harris' background poses quite the conundrum for the GQP.  On the one hand, she's black, so full demonization.  On the other, Indian/Asian and what they would probably call a model minority despite the brownness.

I had wondered how they were going to handle this and if it could possibly work in their favor.  Should have known the answer was badly.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Harris' background poses quite the conundrum for the GQP.  On the one hand, she's black, so full demonization.  On the other, Indian/Asian and what they would probably call a model minority despite the brownness.

I had wondered how they were going to handle this and if it could possibly work in their favor.  Should have known the answer was badly.

Seeing the GOP completely short circuiting on the idea of someone with more than one ethnic background or identity was an incredible mass self-report

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Captainant said:

Seeing the GOP completely short circuiting on the idea of someone with more than one ethnic background or identity was an incredible mass self-report

It's been very eye-opening. Like watching a group of people completely flip the fuck out over someone being left-handed or something. "Wait... Did y'all not know this is a thing?"

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Red Five said:

It's been very eye-opening. Like watching a group of people completely flip the fuck out over someone being left-handed or something. "Wait... Did y'all not know this is a thing?"

Well, they're fucking weird.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
2 hours ago, speed817 said:

English isn't even the official language in the US...

You begin to see what is wrong with America. Here we should have the freedom to speak the language we impose on our fellow citizens. We can fill the prisons with lawyers who use Latin and MAGAs who don't really speak much of anything.

1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Plus apparently she is Indian not black so why are Ebonics involved all?

Speaking of old and out of touch, when's the last time anyone referred to Ebonics?

I've only become aware of Loomer recently. She's a parody of what has become the right. A comedian could use some of her lines to evoke laughter. Any possibility she's a performance artist knowingly getting in on the grift?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Harris' background poses quite the conundrum for the GQP.  On the one hand, she's black, so full demonization.  On the other, Indian/Asian and what they would probably call a model minority despite the brownness.

I had wondered how they were going to handle this and if it could possibly work in their favor.  Should have known the answer was badly.


they will Soon begin demonizing Indians 

Posted
17 hours ago, RDCanecutter said:

Lara Loomer definitely says "between you and I."

No she doesn’t. She says all the quiet parts out loud. She blasts her racist crap to everyone and she’s damn proud of herself.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Post Oak said:

 

Yep Stalin loved his family.  

ei4apkrrxfla1.thumb.jpg.0e66e4911960fd9c14303978eb056eef.jpg

Stalin was 5’5”, how short was the guy they edited out? Stalin looks to have a foot on him. Or maybe Stalin wore lifts like DeSantis or Trump.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Been taking lessons from Un?

300 yard drives followed by 140 yard pw?


140 yards should be a 60 degree lob wedge, if you’re a player 

Posted

140 yards should be a 60 degree lob wedge, if you’re a player 

Trump hits his drives about 180-190 yards based on the DeChambeau challenge. He ain’t hitting PW 140 yards.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
If he was actually decent at golf we’d see videos of him playing all over Fox. 

He’s not bad — for a 78-year-old fat fuck.
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, C-Man said:


He’s not bad — for a 78-year-old fat fuck.

My dad is 75ish, shoots his age or better about half the time. He stays in old man ‘shape’ 

sr tees 

Posted
9 minutes ago, C-Man said:


Trump hits his drives about 180-190 yards based on the DeChambeau challenge. He ain’t hitting PW 140 yards.

How much shorter are the ladies' tees?

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

 

So I asked Chat GPT to calculate the odds — this is 1 in a million weird. To calculate the odds of making back-to-back eagles on two par fours, we need to consider the probability of making an eagle on a single par four and then use this probability to find the odds of achieving this twice in a row. ### Probability of an Eagle on a Par Four 1. **Average Golfer**: The probability of making an eagle on a par four is extremely low for the average golfer. Eagles are rare events, typically more likely for professional golfers. 2. **Professional Golfer**: Even for professional golfers, the probability of making an eagle on a par four is quite low, possibly around 1% (or 0.01) or less, depending on the golfer and the specific hole conditions. ### Calculating Back-to-Back Eagles Assuming a probability \( p \) of making an eagle on a single par four, the probability of making back-to-back eagles on two par fours is: \[ p^2 \] ### Example Calculations - **Average Golfer (0.001 probability per hole)**: \[ p = 0.001 \implies p^2 = (0.001)^2 = 0.000001 \] Thus, the odds are 1 in 1,000,000. - **Professional Golfer (0.01 probability per hole)**: \[ p = 0.01 \implies p^2 = (0.01)^2 = 0.0001 \] Thus, the odds are 1 in 10,000. These calculations highlight how rare back-to-back eagles are, even for professional golfers, due to the low probability of achieving an eagle on any given par four.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3


×
×
  • Create New...