The GQP: Trumpist Death Cult

[Judge Roybeanbag 11820]

1 hour ago, Chad Fuck said:

This is a year and a half old.  

Well and the McConnell one was a month old.  But you know what?  They need to be repeated ad nauseam.  Every fucking day.

[Chad Fuck 17758]

Just now, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Well and the McConnell one was a month old.  But you know what?  They need to be repeated ad nauseam.  Every fucking day.

There's just so much fresh stuff that's just as good bad. 

[Judge Roybeanbag 11820]

1 minute ago, Chad Fuck said:

There's just so much fresh stuff that's just as good bad. 

True.  We should build a wall out of them.  A transgression wall.

[HenryJames 66169]

 

[Pancho 44986]

3 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

This is a year and a half old.  

Ehh, still relevant to they ass is sickening. 

[Chad Fuck 17758]

2 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Ehh, still relevant to they ass is sickening. 

No argument from me there.

 

[atomheartbevo 89788]

8 hours ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

What the actual fuck?  He's a straight up traitor to his country and his sycophants will laud him for it.   Lots of cunts.

GOP thinks the Russians have their interests at heart, which they do.

Funny how these guys all grew up and came of age during a time when Congress used to try and root out communists, and when the Russians were seen as the bad guys.  Now they just roll over for them.

[bolverk 29717]

9 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

 

The government of Mississippi has decided that Mississippians are so dumb that they can't be trusted to know the difference between a hamburger and a veggie burger.  So it is now a crime in Mississippi to call a veggie burger a veggie burger. I am not making this up.

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/7/3/20680731/mississippi-veggie-burgers-illegal-meatless-meat


This effort was led by Republican Congressmen Bill Pigott and Vince Mangold. 


“This bill will protect our cattle farmers from having to compete with products not harvested from an animal,” said Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation president Mike McCormick in January when the bill passed in the Mississippi state House.

 

 

Realizing that this post is several hours old and probably well past its expiration date on top of the fact that there are meatier matters to consume, I'm left wondering the Mississippi law's stance is on what to call volk from Hamburg.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

 

[The People’s Elbow 707]

Personally, I’m shocked Slorch, being the righteous beacon of personal responsibility that he is, cowardly disappeared when asked to show his work re: state dependence on federal dollars. 

[High Plains Drifter 11052]

On 6/21/2019 at 12:18 PM, Patrick Bateman said:

Literally running scared....

 

 

I recall texas dems doing this back in the 80s. Fled to OK motel. Can't remember what the issue was about. Maybe some of the old timers around here remember.

 

 

On 7/6/2019 at 11:11 AM, F250 said:

This reminds me that I will be in Victoria soon for a family reunion where the conversations will be about the price of cattle, hay, cotton, and oil. Inevitably aggy football and Jimbo will be brought up. Damn,  I need a good reason to get out of going.

 

 

My advice is to drink heavily.

[Js1 85566]

They did it in 2003 as the Texas GOP was trying to gerrymander them into dust  

[Guest]

8 hours ago, The People’s Elbow said:

Personally, I’m shocked Slorch, being the righteous beacon of personal responsibility that he is, cowardly disappeared when asked to show his work re: state dependence on federal dollars. 

You conveniently ignored the county SNAP maps.

 

keep blathering on though...use your illusion.

Edited July 9, 2019 by slorch

[lemonlime 5503]

Shocking that more people are on SNAP where more people live.  And also typical slorch to only look at SNAP and ignore all the other government aid, which disproportionately goes to the fewer people  corporations who live in the more rural areas. 

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

Shocking that more people are on SNAP where more people live.  And also typical slorch to only look at SNAP and ignore all the other government aid, which disproportionately goes to the fewer people  corporations who live in the more rural areas. 

It is percentages.  You can read, right.

Use your illusion.

Edited July 9, 2019 by slorch

[lemonlime 5503]

21 minutes ago, slorch said:

It is percentages.  You can read, right.

Use your illusion.

So your argument is that the blue counties in red states account for the dependency of red states on blue states?   Interesting proposition.  

[Bojack 2082]

On 7/6/2019 at 8:16 AM, slorch said:

  LOlz.  Aside from New England and Minnesota, the blue counties are a virtual road map of dependency.

Snorch, you said, "aside form New England and Minnesota, the blue counties are a virtual road map of dependency."  Shouldn't you add the most populated parts of California to your exceptions?  The coastal parts, where most people live, are dark blue on the party map and less than 10% on the SNAP map.

[Huckleberry 33091]

34 minutes ago, slorch said:

You conveniently ignored the county SNAP maps.

 

keep blathering on though...use your illusion.

Setting aside your typical MO of dropping some slorch wisdom then coming up with excuses about why you don't provide supporting evidence, please explain what you think the county SNAP maps prove.

Has it occurred to you that the Republican-controlled state governments setting the local laws affecting those urban counties might very well understand that they will be rescued by federal dollars if they underfund similar programs from their own coffers? The fact that urban or what you want to think are liberal areas in Republican States are more in need of federal dollars proves the exact opposite of what you want to believe it proves. It actually reinforces the point that Republican state governments lean on federal dollars to run their states.

1 minute ago, Bojack said:

Snorch, you said, "aside form New England and Minnesota, the blue counties are a virtual road map of dependency."  Shouldn't you add the most populated parts of California to your exceptions?  The coastal parts, where most people live, are dark blue on the party map and less than 10% on the SNAP map.

Exactly. The Democrat states don't depend on federal dollars in the urban/more liberal areas as much as the Republican states. slorch apparently can't get to that second level in his thought process.

Edited July 9, 2019 by Huckleberry

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20486]

10 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

The replies to Greg Abbott's tweet are brutal. 

[Js1 85566]

 

[The People’s Elbow 707]

18 hours ago, slorch said:

You conveniently ignored the county SNAP maps.

 

keep blathering on though...use your illusion.

Weak deflection. Only thing I’m not ignoring is your unwillingness (or inability) to show your work.

Come on, man, it’s easy — just pull your argument up by its bootstraps.

[Pancho 44986]

16 hours ago, Js1 said:

 

Christ these people are fucking insane.

[atomheartbevo 89788]

14 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Christ these people are fucking insane.

Not enough safe spaces for them.  

[JimmyJames 12271]

SNAP is basically a wal mart subsidy nowadays.

“Yeah snap! Yeah wal mart! Boo poor people.” 

 - slorch 

[David Dennison 18946]

2 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

SNAP is basically a wal mart subsidy nowadays.

“Yeah snap! Yeah wal mart! Boo poor people.” 

 - slorch 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/15-dollar-minimum-wage-would-give-a-raise-to-27-million-federal-government-concludes/

This is nuts in a country as wealthy as the United States.

Capital distribution in this country is all fucked up.

[JimmyJames 12271]

Wal mart minimum wage employees use their snap benefits to buy groceries at, where? 

Wal mart! 

Wal mart wins. The federal government loses. And slorch rages on on message boards like this one about the free loaders who are failing to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. Whatever the hell that means anyway. 

yes obviously it’s the poor who are scamming us. 

[wildcat09 29379]

Just now, JimmyJames said:

Wal mart minimum wage employees use their snap benefits to buy groceries at, where? 

Wal mart! 

Wal mart wins. The federal government loses. And slorch rages on on message boards like this one about the free loaders who are failing to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. Whatever the hell that means anyway. 

yes obviously it’s the poor who are scamming us. 

Meanwhile Chase gets paid a processing fee.

[wildcat09 29379]

17 hours ago, Js1 said:

 

At least this guy's wife knows her Republican husband is a sexual predator and is trying to protect other women. I guess that's something?

[JimmyJames 12271]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/15-dollar-minimum-wage-would-give-a-raise-to-27-million-federal-government-concludes/

This is nuts in a country as wealthy as the United States.

Capital distribution in this country is all fucked up.

Bingo! No whammies! I’d like to solve the puzzle now Pat. 

[David Dennison 18946]

2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Meanwhile Chase gets paid a processing fee.

And borrows your money at .5 to 1% while charging you ten to twenty times that to borrow theirs.

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/15-dollar-minimum-wage-would-give-a-raise-to-27-million-federal-government-concludes/

This is nuts in a country as wealthy as the United States.

Capital distribution in this country is all fucked up.

The argument that raising the minimum wage will lead to automation and human job losses is complete bullshit. Which costs more, some dude taking orders at the drive through, or some dude hired to fix the automatic drive through that just broke down again.

Edited July 10, 2019 by JimmyJames

[Pancho 44986]

 

[YChang 3462]

I'm glad the article called out a more neutrally worded poll from CNN and the results are still the same—cause the other one is very biased in its question design. 

Edited July 10, 2019 by YChang

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

 

[Bama Chick 28596]

What the what?

 

[TDunk 590]

32 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

What the what?

 

 

He's a man named Lindsey.  And he supports a man named Kim.  

[Brisketexan 105319]

5 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

When you realize that this country is populated by a bunch of evil fucks, this all makes sense.

[HenryJames 66169]

 

[Post Oak 20262]

23 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

 

Well they know what they're doing. I'll give them that

[gmr548 16613]

Just on a quick eyeball, blue hubs loke coastal California, Oregon, and Washington South Florida, etc are less dependent than the rural, red portions of their states. In fact, in general, what that map shows is that major populatuon centers have generally lower SNAP enrollment than rural areas.

The county map argument is dumb on a lot of levels, but if you're going to make an argument with a map, learn how to read one.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[SuingToGetAMessageBoard? 3861]

 

[SuingToGetAMessageBoard? 3861]

jesus fuck.  there's a thousand of these.  after i posted i realized the date said 2015, so i thought i must have seen old news.  nope, it's just tennessee loves to make i ❤️ u notes to forrest so often a mix up can happen.

 

[Bozo_Casanova 26540]

You conveniently ignored the county SNAP maps.
 
keep blathering on though...use your illusion.

leaving aside the fact that the map does not entirely support your point, you conveniently ignored what was pointed out to you: taken as a component of the balance of payments, SNAP is insignificant. SNAP isn’t shit, and yet you would begrudge poor children food while you ignore the vast majority of spending on the truly “dependent”. What the hell point were you making again?

Show your work, slorch.

[David Dennison 18946]

6 minutes ago, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

jesus fuck.  there's a thousand of these.  after i posted i realized the date said 2015, so i thought i must have seen old news.  nope, it's just tennessee loves to make i ❤️ u notes to forrest so often a mix up can happen.

 

Wow.

[Js1 85566]

Isreal 

 

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20486]

 

No word on why McCarthy and almost every other Republican voted to allow ISPs to sell our personal data for profit back in the spring of 2017.

 

[Lurch 5931]

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20486]

12 minutes ago, Lurch said:

 

 

So if a) "Right side of history" is the most morally idiotic phrase of modern times and B) Ben Shapiro puts out a book of that title then c) via the transitive property of social media idiocy, Ben Shapiro is the most morally idiotic person of modern times.  

Do I have that right?

Edited July 12, 2019 by Horn Under a Bad Sign

[Lurch 5931]

The math checks out

[HornOnTheBayou 8945]

43 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

 

So if a) "Right side of history" is the most morally idiotic phrase of modern times and B) Ben Shapiro puts out a book of that title then c) via the transitive property of social media idiocy, Ben Shapiro is the most morally idiotic person of modern times.  

Do I have that right?