Jump to content

The GQP: Trumpist Death Cult

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Biff Tannen

    1459

  • atomheartbevo

    1395

  • tx 3 putt

    1329

  • Brisketexan

    1194

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

aggie08
aggie08

This is such unbridled horseshit. I live in fucking California, and I'm not sure if I've ever seen a Fuck Trump shirt/flag/bumper sticker/whatever in person. I can't go a day without seeing Let's Go B

Jive Turkey
Jive Turkey

Did not have former Skid Row lead singer Sebastian Bach talking shit to MAGA cult members on my bingo card. But here we are.  

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

Yep. I was a George Will/Ronald Reagan/Al Laffer conservative.  I genuinely thought that if you cut taxes for the upper classes, then they would spend and invest and the economic result of that w

Posted Images

TDunk

TDunk 590

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Glad to see Republicans are openly shitting on the Bible and the teachings of Jesus as we head into Easter.

Like it matters. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
crash_davis

crash_davis 23470

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Red Five said:

She has resting despair face. She looks permanently unhappy.

She wasn't right between the ears before. She went from Gavin to Orange Jr and ended up looking like coked out/meth whore. All that toxic Trump family drama did a number on her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 106899

Posted
Posted

To remind us where we are (the main thread topic), the GQP is a fascist cult, and they are taking us to shitland.  See this piece on how they are part of a global right wing authoritarian trend: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/20/fascism-is-everywhere-on-the-march-and-its-trump-who-sets-the-pace

Quote

The comforting conceit that Donald Trump is an unpleasant yet passing American aberration, often heard during his 2017-21 presidency, is harder to believe than ever after his Iowa caucus landslide victory last week. As matters stand, Trump is on course to win a third consecutive Republican presidential nomination and a possible second White House term.

The bigger, worldwide picture is more alarming still. Far from being an exception to the rule, Trump reflects, amplifies and popularises a regressive global trend towards authoritarian, totalitarian, dictatorial, nationalistic and religiously, ethnically and culturally majoritarian forms of rightwing governance.

To put it more simply, fascism is once more on the march – and liberal democracy risks being trampled under its marauding boots. Is this a disagreeable hiccup, a passing phase? Or does it herald the start of a post-democratic age?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
royiv

royiv 9791

Posted
Posted
On 3/23/2024 at 1:07 AM, tx 3 putt said:

If you have a college degree and openly support trump, you should eat a bullet 

 

Traffic on the football board would take an awfully big hit.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
staboner

staboner 5084

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

I wanted to punch my TV last night during that interview on 60 Minutes.  Gah, Gym is a beating.

whats funny is he can't even make eye contact for one fucking second in that clip. Just so much BS. 

tumblr_n4td3eIa3Z1t0g055o4_250.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pescado_Rojo

Pescado_Rojo 19587

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, bolverk said:

That sagging left forearm, those lopsided fake boobs, those swollen fish lips, those soulless dead eyes. Is it too late to put her in this year's celebrity death pool?

at least the mugshot thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrickHorn

BrickHorn 18447

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 3/25/2024 at 9:06 AM, crash_davis said:

She is not well. 

 

How it started.

1200x0.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=b5ec169c0df41b

 

 

How it's going.

is-this-the-combination-of-ozempic-cocai

That before-and-after photo set nicely illustrates the core characteristic of today’s right wing: mental health issues indulged. The party is just a giant co-enabler group, its members constantly reinforcing each other's unhealthy behaviors and thought patterns. They’ve let themselves go, mentally, and they’re dragging the whole country down with them.

No one in the party is going to intervene on Guilfoyle’s behalf. No one will help. They will just nod along and encourage her to keep accelerating towards a bad end. 

Edited by BrickHorn
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 106899

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Smax said:

 

Just show that video to any jew who is fucking stupid enough to vote MAGA.  And I don't just mean Trump, I mean anyone aligned with that movement.  THEY HAVE TOLD US WHAT THEY INTEND TO DO.  FUCKING BELIEVE THEM.

This long ago stopped being about "politics."  It is about survival in the face of a murderous cult -- and for those fucking pathetic cult members, including people on this site, who say "well, I don't believe those things, and wouldn't take part in killing non-christians," you are actually a necessary part of that system: you support, enable, and - importantly - empower the people who WILL do so.  "I don't believe in killing non-Christians....I just vote for people who do so" is not the absolution you think it is, you nazi pieces of shit.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47203

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Just show that video to any jew who is fucking stupid enough to vote MAGA.  And I don't just mean Trump, I mean anyone aligned with that movement.  THEY HAVE TOLD US WHAT THEY INTEND TO DO.  FUCKING BELIEVE THEM.

This long ago stopped being about "politics."  It is about survival in the face of a murderous cult -- and for those fucking pathetic cult members, including people on this site, who say "well, I don't believe those things, and wouldn't take part in killing non-christians," you are actually a necessary part of that system: you support, enable, and - importantly - empower the people who WILL do so.  "I don't believe in killing non-Christians....I just vote for people who do so" is not the absolution you think it is, you nazi pieces of shit.

At this point I could write every concluding paragraph for you.  $5 a pop if you want to save a little time.  Hit my DMs.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32595

Posted
Posted

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-rncs-fundraising-hole-is-even-deeper-than-it-looks?ref=home?ref=home

 

Quote

It’s no secret that the Republican National Committee is in dire financial straits. But what’s less known is just how bad that situation really is.

On the surface, the RNC currently has more than $11 million on hand for this upcoming election cycle. While that’s less than half of what the Democratic National Committee has in the bank at the moment—and far less than the $77 million the RNC had on hand at this point in the 2020 cycle—the RNC has pointed to fundraising numbers in recent months to suggest the party has turned a corner after a historically bad stretch last year.

 

Quote

However, a close examination of the RNC’s recent financial statements reveals that those numbers are hiding some holes. A lot of the RNC’s recent fundraising—millions of dollars of it—is unusable for political spending. Instead, that money can only support a limited range of activities.

(As luck would have it, much of that money can be spent on Donald Trump’s legal bills, potentially even to help pay down the judgments against him.)

 

Quote

An analysis of the RNC’s various bank accounts indicates that the national party’s financial status, which the GOP has been desperately trying to paint in a positive light, is even worse than it already seemed.

In response to questions from The Daily Beast, the RNC provided statements from a spokesperson and the organization’s new chair, former North Carolina GOP chairman Michael Whatley.

“The Trump campaign and RNC will raise the money, deploy the necessary assets, and win because President Trump will secure the border, make American families more prosperous, and make our nation respected on the world stage,” the spokesperson’s statement said.

 

Spoiler

“Republicans will fight in every state to turn out the vote and will utilize every legal process to get voters to the polls and chase ballots across the country,” Whatley said in his statement. “We will take advantage of mail voting while fighting in court to make the practice more secure as we work to re-elect President Donald J. Trump in November.”

While neither statement directly addressed the fundraising disparities, an RNC representative noted that the party had used a great deal of its segregated funds this cycle to mount more than 40 election lawsuits around the country. Those efforts, the person acknowledged, require a sustained financial commitment. But at this point it’s unclear whether the RNC can keep up the pace without sacrificing other political priorities.

National parties like the RNC and DNC don’t just have one bank account; they also maintain segregated funds for specially designated expenses—conventions, buildings and maintenance, and legal or recount expenses—which can also be funded by donors. Those accounts, sometimes called “Cromnibus” accounts, are subject to a separate set of rules, and while many of those regulations are still not set in stone, one of them is crystal clear: That money cannot be spent on political activity.

The Daily Beast’s analysis of Federal Election Commission filings found that, of the roughly $22.3 million that the RNC has reported raising this year, more than $8 million of it—about 36 percent—cannot be used for political expenses. (At this same point in 2020, the money in the RNC’s Cromnibus accounts accounted for less than 10 percent—$7.5 million—of the total $77 million cash on hand.)

That means that one of every three dollars the RNC has raised this year went into its auxiliary accounts, with the “legal” account alone receiving more than $4 million. By way of comparison, the DNC has reported about $34 million in receipts this year, with roughly $4 million of it—less than 12 percent—directed into its segregated Cromnibus accounts.

The pattern holds true over the last year. Between the beginning of 2023 and the end of February, the DNC raised a total $154 million, with $22.4 million of it in the segregated accounts, FEC filings show. Over the same period, the RNC received less money overall—$109.5 million—with more of it going to its non-political accounts, $24.7 million. (A portion of the segregated account totals reflect outside earnings—such as through interest and dividends—but those amounts are comparatively minimal.)

The upshot is that while the DNC’s cash advantage has allowed the party to build up its main stash to fuel political activities, the RNC’s financial strains could continue to multiply in unexpected ways as the 2024 election approaches.

While it’s typical for national parties to raise heavily for their segregated accounts throughout election cycles—taking advantage of the higher contribution limits—federal reporting guidelines make it difficult for the public to see how much money is in those funds versus the party’s general political account. That distinction is especially significant for the RNC this year.

The party is navigating a cash crunch brought on by a combination of poor fundraising and heavy spending, while facing the prospect of devoting major resources to help shore up down-ballot candidates, financially troubled state parties, and its presidential nominee, Trump—who himself faces a fundraising crisis after siphoning tens of millions of dollars from supporters to fund his snowballing personal legal bills.

This pinch seems particularly tight when it comes to the RNC’s “legal” account. The party has already committed to an aggressive so-called “election integrity” effort, which will be helmed by Trump’s election-denying attorney Christina Bobb. That project involves recruiting poll-watchers and preparing an army of “thousands of lawyers to challenge ballots and bring lawsuits,” The Washington Post reported last week.

Those legal efforts—a concession to Trump’s demands—seem almost certain to go off the rails, according to a person with knowledge of the RNC’s plans, especially after the ouster of longtime RNC chair Ronna McDaniel.

“They’re going to get a lot more aggressive in their kooky lawsuits, like the one filed in Nevada on the crazy theory that counties have more registered voters than there should be,” the person said. (An election official in one of those counties is under indictment for his involvement in Trump’s fake elector scheme in 2020.)

“Under Ronna, that spending was far more strategic,” the source said, pointing to successful legal interventions in Georgia, New York City, and Arizona, where the RNC won a monumental voting rights case that went all the way to the Supreme Court.

“But the election challenges could destroy the RNC financially,” the source continued, “especially if the adults in the room lose control and you see a bunch of frivolous lawsuits, with penalties and sanctions. And [new RNC chair Michael] Whatley, who’s pigeonholed himself as the election integrity guy, he’ll be blamed.”

Financial filings show that the RNC is bulking up those legal funds at the expense of its political operation.

In January, the RNC touted a $12 million haul—an amount that Fox News characterized as showing that the committee was “coming quickly out of the gate” for the 2024 election year. FEC filings show that the overall total was really about $11.6 million, with around $5.3 million of that amount going to the segregated accounts—including nearly $3.2 million to the RNC’s “legal” fund.

Most of that $3.2 million came from one source. On Jan. 5, after weeks of bad fundraising headlines, the National Republican Congressional Committee—the official political arm of the House GOP—transferred a flat $2 million to the RNC’s legal account, in support of the RNC’s “Election Integrity Project.” The other $1.2 million came from a handful of GOP megadonors.

That happened again in February, with the RNC reporting a total $10.7 million raised, with $7.8 million going into its general account. The remaining $2.8 million was earmarked by megadonors for the other accounts, about half of it—$1.2 million—routed to the legal fund.

By comparison, the comparatively flush DNC has raised a slim amount to its Cromnibus coffers, stuffing most of its money into its general account. The segregated accounts will see more surges in donations from the DNC’s joint fundraising machine, but it appears that, at least right now, the DNC hasn’t been sweating the bottom line.

That level of comfort seemed apparent last month, when the DNC hauled in $16.6 million, raising only about $214,000 for its other three accounts, FEC records show. This means that, while the DNC already has a significant leg-up in the cash-on-hand department, the lead is even larger when it comes to the funds that can be used for the actual political campaign.

This disparity could compound as costs increase over time, potentially setting up a cash crisis at the wire for the RNC. And while the national party has pledged not to pay Trump’s personal legal bills, their new joint fundraising agreement prioritizes his Save America leadership PAC, where the majority of disbursements go towards Trump’s stable of attorneys.

But it’s not just the legal fund—the RNC and DNC have also raised millions of dollars for two other segregated accounts, and will continue to do so throughout the year. Those other funds are the “convention” account—which the RNC will draw from to put on the Republican National Convention this July in Milwaukee, Wisconsin—along with what’s known as the “building” or “headquarters” fund, which covers costs associated with physical locations, like rent, purchases, and maintenance.

There’s a side benefit to fundraising for these accounts—higher annual contribution limits. The limit on a segregated account is three times higher than the general fund, allowing one person to cut a $123,900 check to each of those three extra accounts. The RNC collected a number of these maximum contributions from megadonors in both January and February, while the DNC kept that powder dry—and still outraised the Republican Party.

But the FEC has issued only limited guidance on how national parties report this activity, making it difficult for the public, candidates, and outside observers to get a clear sense of how that money is raised and spent.

For instance, while the DNC shows how much it has raised for its segregated funds overall, it’s often hard to tell how much went into each of those accounts specifically—a lot of those DNC receipts lack the line-item transparency that the RNC provides in its reports.

Brendan Fischer, deputy executive director of watchdog group Documented, told The Daily Beast that it’s “nearly impossible” to get a full and clear picture of how those accounts are operating.

“What you would expect to see is a clear breakdown of how much each account has raised and spent, the same way that every other political committee reports those numbers. But the FEC’s guidance is so minimal and the reporting practices so inconsistent that it is nearly impossible for the public to track the millions of dollars flowing into and out of these accounts,” Fischer said.

Shanna Ports, senior counsel for campaign finance at nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, echoed Fischer’s frustration.

“You have to spend so much time spotting the connections, and when you do you can’t even tell what’s happening,” Ports told The Daily Beast.

That might change this year. Ports’ group, CLC, sued the FEC to force a rulemaking for these accounts, a move that the agency appears to be taking up after years of resistance. But judging by the comments the FEC has received so far, neither party is exactly clamoring for transparency.

“That’s the crux of our lawsuit, to force the FEC to take action and address the realities of reporting and provide insight into how committees are using these segregated accounts,” Ports said. “It would be very helpful if the FEC promulgated these changes so someone can look at a report and tell how much money is available for political expenses and how much is held elsewhere. Members of the public, candidates, academics, journalists—they’d all benefit from that.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hornius Emeritus

Hornius Emeritus 12804

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-rncs-fundraising-hole-is-even-deeper-than-it-looks?ref=home?ref=home

 

 

 

 

  Hide contents

“Republicans will fight in every state to turn out the vote and will utilize every legal process to get voters to the polls and chase ballots across the country,” Whatley said in his statement. “We will take advantage of mail voting while fighting in court to make the practice more secure as we work to re-elect President Donald J. Trump in November.”

While neither statement directly addressed the fundraising disparities, an RNC representative noted that the party had used a great deal of its segregated funds this cycle to mount more than 40 election lawsuits around the country. Those efforts, the person acknowledged, require a sustained financial commitment. But at this point it’s unclear whether the RNC can keep up the pace without sacrificing other political priorities.

National parties like the RNC and DNC don’t just have one bank account; they also maintain segregated funds for specially designated expenses—conventions, buildings and maintenance, and legal or recount expenses—which can also be funded by donors. Those accounts, sometimes called “Cromnibus” accounts, are subject to a separate set of rules, and while many of those regulations are still not set in stone, one of them is crystal clear: That money cannot be spent on political activity.

The Daily Beast’s analysis of Federal Election Commission filings found that, of the roughly $22.3 million that the RNC has reported raising this year, more than $8 million of it—about 36 percent—cannot be used for political expenses. (At this same point in 2020, the money in the RNC’s Cromnibus accounts accounted for less than 10 percent—$7.5 million—of the total $77 million cash on hand.)

That means that one of every three dollars the RNC has raised this year went into its auxiliary accounts, with the “legal” account alone receiving more than $4 million. By way of comparison, the DNC has reported about $34 million in receipts this year, with roughly $4 million of it—less than 12 percent—directed into its segregated Cromnibus accounts.

The pattern holds true over the last year. Between the beginning of 2023 and the end of February, the DNC raised a total $154 million, with $22.4 million of it in the segregated accounts, FEC filings show. Over the same period, the RNC received less money overall—$109.5 million—with more of it going to its non-political accounts, $24.7 million. (A portion of the segregated account totals reflect outside earnings—such as through interest and dividends—but those amounts are comparatively minimal.)

The upshot is that while the DNC’s cash advantage has allowed the party to build up its main stash to fuel political activities, the RNC’s financial strains could continue to multiply in unexpected ways as the 2024 election approaches.

While it’s typical for national parties to raise heavily for their segregated accounts throughout election cycles—taking advantage of the higher contribution limits—federal reporting guidelines make it difficult for the public to see how much money is in those funds versus the party’s general political account. That distinction is especially significant for the RNC this year.

The party is navigating a cash crunch brought on by a combination of poor fundraising and heavy spending, while facing the prospect of devoting major resources to help shore up down-ballot candidates, financially troubled state parties, and its presidential nominee, Trump—who himself faces a fundraising crisis after siphoning tens of millions of dollars from supporters to fund his snowballing personal legal bills.

This pinch seems particularly tight when it comes to the RNC’s “legal” account. The party has already committed to an aggressive so-called “election integrity” effort, which will be helmed by Trump’s election-denying attorney Christina Bobb. That project involves recruiting poll-watchers and preparing an army of “thousands of lawyers to challenge ballots and bring lawsuits,” The Washington Post reported last week.

Those legal efforts—a concession to Trump’s demands—seem almost certain to go off the rails, according to a person with knowledge of the RNC’s plans, especially after the ouster of longtime RNC chair Ronna McDaniel.

“They’re going to get a lot more aggressive in their kooky lawsuits, like the one filed in Nevada on the crazy theory that counties have more registered voters than there should be,” the person said. (An election official in one of those counties is under indictment for his involvement in Trump’s fake elector scheme in 2020.)

“Under Ronna, that spending was far more strategic,” the source said, pointing to successful legal interventions in Georgia, New York City, and Arizona, where the RNC won a monumental voting rights case that went all the way to the Supreme Court.

“But the election challenges could destroy the RNC financially,” the source continued, “especially if the adults in the room lose control and you see a bunch of frivolous lawsuits, with penalties and sanctions. And [new RNC chair Michael] Whatley, who’s pigeonholed himself as the election integrity guy, he’ll be blamed.”

Financial filings show that the RNC is bulking up those legal funds at the expense of its political operation.

In January, the RNC touted a $12 million haul—an amount that Fox News characterized as showing that the committee was “coming quickly out of the gate” for the 2024 election year. FEC filings show that the overall total was really about $11.6 million, with around $5.3 million of that amount going to the segregated accounts—including nearly $3.2 million to the RNC’s “legal” fund.

Most of that $3.2 million came from one source. On Jan. 5, after weeks of bad fundraising headlines, the National Republican Congressional Committee—the official political arm of the House GOP—transferred a flat $2 million to the RNC’s legal account, in support of the RNC’s “Election Integrity Project.” The other $1.2 million came from a handful of GOP megadonors.

That happened again in February, with the RNC reporting a total $10.7 million raised, with $7.8 million going into its general account. The remaining $2.8 million was earmarked by megadonors for the other accounts, about half of it—$1.2 million—routed to the legal fund.

By comparison, the comparatively flush DNC has raised a slim amount to its Cromnibus coffers, stuffing most of its money into its general account. The segregated accounts will see more surges in donations from the DNC’s joint fundraising machine, but it appears that, at least right now, the DNC hasn’t been sweating the bottom line.

That level of comfort seemed apparent last month, when the DNC hauled in $16.6 million, raising only about $214,000 for its other three accounts, FEC records show. This means that, while the DNC already has a significant leg-up in the cash-on-hand department, the lead is even larger when it comes to the funds that can be used for the actual political campaign.

This disparity could compound as costs increase over time, potentially setting up a cash crisis at the wire for the RNC. And while the national party has pledged not to pay Trump’s personal legal bills, their new joint fundraising agreement prioritizes his Save America leadership PAC, where the majority of disbursements go towards Trump’s stable of attorneys.

But it’s not just the legal fund—the RNC and DNC have also raised millions of dollars for two other segregated accounts, and will continue to do so throughout the year. Those other funds are the “convention” account—which the RNC will draw from to put on the Republican National Convention this July in Milwaukee, Wisconsin—along with what’s known as the “building” or “headquarters” fund, which covers costs associated with physical locations, like rent, purchases, and maintenance.

There’s a side benefit to fundraising for these accounts—higher annual contribution limits. The limit on a segregated account is three times higher than the general fund, allowing one person to cut a $123,900 check to each of those three extra accounts. The RNC collected a number of these maximum contributions from megadonors in both January and February, while the DNC kept that powder dry—and still outraised the Republican Party.

But the FEC has issued only limited guidance on how national parties report this activity, making it difficult for the public, candidates, and outside observers to get a clear sense of how that money is raised and spent.

For instance, while the DNC shows how much it has raised for its segregated funds overall, it’s often hard to tell how much went into each of those accounts specifically—a lot of those DNC receipts lack the line-item transparency that the RNC provides in its reports.

Brendan Fischer, deputy executive director of watchdog group Documented, told The Daily Beast that it’s “nearly impossible” to get a full and clear picture of how those accounts are operating.

“What you would expect to see is a clear breakdown of how much each account has raised and spent, the same way that every other political committee reports those numbers. But the FEC’s guidance is so minimal and the reporting practices so inconsistent that it is nearly impossible for the public to track the millions of dollars flowing into and out of these accounts,” Fischer said.

Shanna Ports, senior counsel for campaign finance at nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, echoed Fischer’s frustration.

“You have to spend so much time spotting the connections, and when you do you can’t even tell what’s happening,” Ports told The Daily Beast.

That might change this year. Ports’ group, CLC, sued the FEC to force a rulemaking for these accounts, a move that the agency appears to be taking up after years of resistance. But judging by the comments the FEC has received so far, neither party is exactly clamoring for transparency.

“That’s the crux of our lawsuit, to force the FEC to take action and address the realities of reporting and provide insight into how committees are using these segregated accounts,” Ports said. “It would be very helpful if the FEC promulgated these changes so someone can look at a report and tell how much money is available for political expenses and how much is held elsewhere. Members of the public, candidates, academics, journalists—they’d all benefit from that.”

 




All of that seems rather immaterial when some guy like Jeff Yass can basically fart out one billion dollars and buy a political party.

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... đŸ€«995đŸ€« ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...