Jump to content

Planet X

Dropout

By Dropout
in Daily Texan

 Share

Recommended Posts

Dropout

Dropout 355

Posted
Posted

https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/2/17922984/planet-nine-x-distant-solar-system-object-the-goblin-tg387

This orbit is particularly enticing since it puts TG387 in a select group of distant Solar System objects that all point to the possible existence of Planet X. Right now, there are 14 far-out space rocks that all share similar orbit patterns, suggesting that this planet is out there. Their paths are all super elongated, and they all cluster together in the same area when they approach the Sun. Plus, their orbits are all tilted alike, and they point in the same general direction, as if something big has pushed them into similar places. These objects are the strongest lines of evidence astronomers have for Planet X, and finding a new one that matches this pattern reinforces that idea that this planet is more than just a theory.

 

The idea of Planet X or Nibiru has always intrigued me. Interested to see what you smart assholes think. Is this a crazy conspiracy or something that will be very real real soon? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted

Planet x is for the tin foilers.

Read Magicians of the Gods by Graham Hancock, he's done some interesting research on ancient civilizations and the great flood. His theory is that the great flood was caused by a comet impact, and we pass a comet stream at regular intervals and it kind of re-sets human civilization. 

Start at 1:44:00 where him and Randall Carlson sit around and blow Joe Rogains weed-numbed mind.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trey3216

Trey3216 15349

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dropout said:

https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/2/17922984/planet-nine-x-distant-solar-system-object-the-goblin-tg387

This orbit is particularly enticing since it puts TG387 in a select group of distant Solar System objects that all point to the possible existence of Planet X. Right now, there are 14 far-out space rocks that all share similar orbit patterns, suggesting that this planet is out there. Their paths are all super elongated, and they all cluster together in the same area when they approach the Sun. Plus, their orbits are all tilted alike, and they point in the same general direction, as if something big has pushed them into similar places. These objects are the strongest lines of evidence astronomers have for Planet X, and finding a new one that matches this pattern reinforces that idea that this planet is more than just a theory.

 

The idea of Planet X or Nibiru has always intrigued me. Interested to see what you smart assholes think. Is this a crazy conspiracy or something that will be very real real soon? 

It’s just earth in another dimension.   You’ll get there to find out you support OUsux instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Helobious

Helobious 9462

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Zavala said:

Planet x is for the tin foilers.

Read Magicians of the Gods by Graham Hancock, he's done some interesting research on ancient civilizations and the great flood. His theory is that the great flood was caused by a comet impact, and we pass a comet stream at regular intervals and it kind of re-sets human civilization. 

Start at 1:44:00 where him and Randall Carlson sit around and blow Joe Rogains weed-numbed mind.

 

For some reason I watched one of his podcast vids a few weeks ago where one of his guests was talking about Netflix. Rogan had absolutely no understanding of the difference between profit and valuation. It was incredible to hear a 50 year old man have that explained to him. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Helobious said:

For some reason I watched one of his podcast vids a few weeks ago where one of his guests was talking about Netflix. Rogan had absolutely no understanding of the difference between profit and valuation. It was incredible to hear a 50 year old man have that explained to him. 

Dude, weed! Rogan has decent comedy though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holliday

Doc Holliday 199

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Helobious said:

For some reason I watched one of his podcast vids a few weeks ago where one of his guests was talking about Netflix. Rogan had absolutely no understanding of the difference between profit and valuation. It was incredible to hear a 50 year old man have that explained to him. 

or he knows his audience and his audience is dumb AF?

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HenryJames

HenryJames 66132

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Zavala said:

Planet x is for the tin foilers.

Read Magicians of the Gods by Graham Hancock, he's done some interesting research on ancient civilizations and the great flood. His theory is that the great flood was caused by a comet impact, and we pass a comet stream at regular intervals and it kind of re-sets human civilization. 

Start at 1:44:00 where him and Randall Carlson sit around and blow Joe Rogains weed-numbed mind.

 

rolling_eyes_neil_degrasse_tyson.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holliday

Doc Holliday 199

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, bernorange said:

Isn't the naming choice of 9 or X just a matter of including or excluding Pluto from the club?  If a huge planet is found with an extreme elliptical orbit, it would lend credence to the possibility of celestial events as described by Sitchin, et al.

I think they should start naming it RRR because that makes sense (and alliteration )

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Viper

Viper 12109

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, bernorange said:

Isn't the naming choice of 9 or X just a matter of including or excluding Pluto from the club?  If a huge planet is found with an extreme elliptical orbit, it would lend credence to the possibility of celestial events as described by Sitchin, et al.

naming-wise yes, but the existence of planet 9 doesn't reflect on the wacky theories of Sitchin and others who theorized that a mysterious unknown planet crosses into the inner solar system every 3,600 years. None of the evidence about planet 9 suggests that. Sitchin also believe in ancient aliens visiting Earth and many other outlandish theories with no evidence. Nothing should be done to encourage or validate his claims which is why referring to this as planet x, is a bad idea. There's also the fact that “Planet X”  was first coined by  UFO believer Nancy Lieder in 1995. She claimed that she aliens from Zeta Reticuli has implanted a device in her brain, and through it warned her that the Hale-Bopp comet was in fact a Planet X that would hit Earth in 1997 or pass near enough to cause a global disaster. 

Edited by Viper
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hate

Hate 20116

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Viper said:

Planet X is tinfoil, the article shouldn't call it planet x, as it legitimizes the loons too much

The article is about planet 9, which is very much in the mainstream and seems likely to be found in the very near future. 

I don't understand how we can have been able to find planes in other solar systems light years away, but we can't find a planet 5 times the size of Earth that is "relatively" close.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

rolling_eyes_neil_degrasse_tyson.gif

A Texas MA. Nice. Death by black hole was his best book I think. 

I'm sure even he would be open to hearing the comet impact flood theory, especially since it has been widely accepted in the past 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Viper

Viper 12109

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hate said:

I don't understand how we can have been able to find planes in other solar systems light years away, but we can't find a planet 5 times the size of Earth that is "relatively" close.  

Because we find planets in other solar system by looking at stars, which are easy to find since they give off their own light. A planet in the oort cloud would only give off light reflected by the sun, which would be very minimal at that distance. It's far enough away that its elliptical would be very large meaning it moves very slowly and thus would be hard to distinguish from everything else in the background. It's very likely we've already "seen" it, i.e. have it in pictures taken, we just haven't realized it yet.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted
Just now, Hate said:

I don't understand how we can have been able to find planes in other solar systems light years away, but we can't find a planet 5 times the size of Earth that is "relatively" close.  

Earth is kind of small. Lots of fuckin' dust in the way between us and this theoretical planet.

They have never seen it. The planets existence is only inferred from other objects in the belt using computer models.

Electric universe and plasma cosmology could help explain why the crazy planet x headlines are misleading.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bernorange

bernorange 8362

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Viper said:

... the existence of planet 9 doesn't reflect on the wacky theories of Sitchin and others who theorized that a mysterious unknown planet crosses into the inner solar system every 3,600 years. None of the evidence about planet 9 suggests that. ...

I didn't mean to suggest that if a Planet 9 was found, it would validate Sitchin *literally*.  But if a Planet 9 is found, and it is massive enough to affect the orbits of significantly sized rocks that we have to date observed, then it's possible for it to have sent a large rock into the solar system and possibly colliding with "tiamat" and so on (even if Sitchin isn't correct about the periodicity or even location of the orbital intersect of Planet 9/X to our solar system).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hate

Hate 20116

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Viper said:

Because we find planets in other solar system by looking at stars, which are easy to find since they give off their own light. A planet in the oort cloud would only give off light reflected by the sun, which would be very minimal at that distance. It's far enough away that its elliptical would be very large meaning it moves very slowly and thus would be hard to distinguish from everything else in the background. It's very likely we've already "seen" it, i.e. have it in pictures taken, we just haven't realized it yet.

That makes sense.  Thanks for the response.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 11 months later...
Viper

Viper 12109

Posted
Posted

What if it's not a planet but a bowling ball sized black hole?

https://gizmodo.com/what-if-planet-nine-is-a-bowling-ball-size-black-hole-1838527880

Quote

Some of the most distant rocks in our solar system act in a way that suggests there’s some massive object out there we haven’t been able to see. A planet? Maybe. But why not a small black hole?

That’s a scenario a pair of scientists describe in a new paper. Of course, they recognize that a planet is more likely than an ancient black hole unlike any we’ve directly observed. But they simply want astronomers to think creatively while hunting for whatever this hypothetical object, often called Planet Nine, might be.

 
 

“By simply focusing on the concept of a planet, you restrict the experimental search that you’re undertaking,” James Unwin, one of the study’s authors and an assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, told Gizmodo. “Once you start thinking about more exotic objects, like primordial black holes, you think in different ways. We advocate that rather than just looking for it in visible light, maybe look for in gamma rays. Or cosmic rays.”

Past Neptune, the motion of rocky objects seems to be disturbed by something with a mass about five to 15 times that of Earth. Scientists have tentatively named this object Planet Nine and are hunting for it. But this isn’t not the only planet-mass gravitational anomaly in the galaxy. Scientists have detected short warps to incoming starlight, perhaps from planet-sized objects bending their gravity. Maybe they’re rogue planets—or maybe they’re tiny black holes.

 
 

“Primordial black holes” are a class of proposed objects that formed as a result of the chaotic early days of the universe. Like any other black hole, they would be incredibly dense regions where gravity warps space so much that light cannot escape. But these would weigh far less than stars, since they weren’t formed out of stars like the black holes we’ve actually observed—they would have formed out of places of leftover extra density in the rapidly expanding early universe. (And no, they wouldn’t contribute significantly to dark matter, the mysterious stuff that seems to comprise the lion’s share of the universe’s mass.)

Unwin and his collaborator Jakub Scholtz, a junior research fellow at the Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology at Durham University, proposed that perhaps a primordial black hole whizzed by, interacted with the solar system’s other members, and became trapped in an orbit. I asked Uniwn and Scholtz whether such an object would evaporate from tiny physical effects called Hawking radiation; they said that no, even a five-Earth-mass black hole would last for a very long time, far longer than the age of the universe.

If the planet really were a primordial black hole, rather than a planet-sized mass of regular matter, then it would be no use trying to find it with typical planet-searching means. A figure in the paper, shared above, demonstrates that a five-Earth-mass black hole could fit in the palm of your hand (yes, this encounter would kill you), and a 10-Earth-mass black hole would be the size of a bowling ball. Finding it would require a dedicated telescope search looking for a source that present-day gamma ray telescopes aren’t used to seeing—a source of high-energy radiation moving quickly across the sky.

Planet Nine hunter Konstantin Batygin didn’t rule out the idea that it might actually be something more exotic. “Planet Nine could be a five-Earth-mass hamburger, and the math would still work out right. Of course, a hamburger has a comparable albedo,” or how much light it reflects, “to a planet, but a black hole the size of your wallet is a bit harder to find,” he told Gizmodo in an email. He wrote that the scenario is a stretch but not entirely implausible, and a black hole becomes an interesting potential target if Planet Nine goes unfound by typical deep surveys and if the strange motion of the trans-Neptunian objects persists.

Something is causing unexpected behavior in the distant solar system, whatever it may be. A primordial black hole is not the most obvious nor the most likely choice—but hey, science is about keeping an open mind and letting experiments disprove hypotheses. If there really is a massive object out there, even if it’s a planet, it would be “quite a shocker,” Scholtz said.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...
Somnio

Somnio 751

Posted
Posted

It exists, and will cause a pole reversal of Earth.  The ensuing chaos will set humanity back a millennia at least.

That's what the global stay at home orders are really about.  Covid-19 is just a cover story.

Nibiru is becoming more visible around the globe, and TPTB are trying to conceal the truth as long as possible.

The end is nigh, folks.  Very fucking nigh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...