Comic Relief: Satirical Tweets and Memes

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

 

[PRONG HORN 3219]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 11 by PRONG HORN

[PRONG HORN 3219]

[Longhorn_Fan68 34104]

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]

[YGIFS 19458]

3 hours ago, brakeman said:

Man, that scary dude at the door from "Poltergeist" has really put on a lotta weight in eternity.  

[US183 163]

[Longhorn_Fan68 34104]

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[Frank Drebin 5837]

 

[US183 163]

[brakeman 28749]

 

[Longhorn_Fan68 34104]

48 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

 

[Brisketexan 106889]

 

Party that called Mexicans invaders and vermin for years shocked when dozens are slaughtered in El Paso.

You know, if we’re taking about things that actually happened, and innocent people who actually died. And the guy who stoked the rhetoric…amped it up in response. Fuck him and fuck you. You reap what you sow.

[Frank Drebin 5837]

 

[Brisketexan 106889]

 

“Mexicans are invaders.”
Man inspired by that exact rhetoric murders 23 Hispanics in El Paso.
Frank Drebin’s concern for hateful political rhetoric when it’s brown people being slaughtered: 0.0%.

[Longhorn_Fan68 34104]

7 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

 

so what does it say that the shooter was a member of his party? don't think that meme works so well in that case

[Frank Drebin 5837]

5 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

so what does it say that the shooter was a member of his party? don't think that meme works so well in that case

I wouldn’t be so sure of that.  He donated to Act Blue.  Penn has a closed primary system.  If he registered to vote GOP it’s pretty obvious why.  

[Brisketexan 106889]

I wouldn’t be so sure of that.  He donated to Act Blue.  Penn has a closed primary system.  If he registered to vote GOP it’s pretty obvious why.  

Already debunked. Keep repeating the lies. I know they keep you warm.
I’m so glad to hear of your newly found concern for “hateful rhetoric.” Shame you weren’t concerned about it before it killed two dozen in El Paso, ten in Buffalo, eleven in Pittsburgh. Gosh, it’s just AMAZING that you just now concluded that rhetoric can incite violence….when it’s your god who ends up in its sights. When it’s browns, blacks, and Jews….crickets.

[Longhorn_Fan68 34104]

11 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

I wouldn’t be so sure of that.  He donated to Act Blue.  Penn has a closed primary system.  If he registered to vote GOP it’s pretty obvious why.  

different person. but sure, please continue

[Frank Drebin 5837]

20 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

different person. but sure, please continue

Reuters says he did. 
 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/heres-what-we-know-about-thomas-matthew-crooks-suspected-trump-rally-shooter-2024-07-14/

[Frank Drebin 5837]

26 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Already debunked. Keep repeating the lies. I know they keep you warm.
I’m so glad to hear of your newly found concern for “hateful rhetoric.” Shame you weren’t concerned about it before it killed two dozen in El Paso, ten in Buffalo, eleven in Pittsburgh. Gosh, it’s just AMAZING that you just now concluded that rhetoric can incite violence….when it’s your god who ends up in its sights. When it’s browns, blacks, and Jews….crickets.

You’re very defensive.  The rhetoric your mentally deranged ass spews is directly responsible for this this shit.  Go fuck yourself. You’re as big of a piece of shit as any MAGA.  Own it.  Can’t wait for November.  

[Brisketexan 106889]

You’re very defensive.  The rhetoric your mentally deranged ass spews is directly responsible for this this shit.  Go fuck yourself. You’re as big of a piece of shit as any MAGA.  Own it.  Can’t wait for November.  

Where was your concern for violent rhetoric when over 40 minorities were murdered in three separate events?
Hmmm????

Fuck off, you hypocritical piece of shit. You REWARD the man for spouting shit that actually got people killed, and NOW you’re concerned about the “rhetoric” of people calling out a man whose words have gotten people killed as being a bad guy? Fucking. RICH.

You are a hypocritical piece of shit, and being confronted with that truth hurts.

[Frank Drebin 5837]

2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Where was your concern for violent rhetoric when over 40 minorities were murdered in three separate events?
Hmmm????

Fuck off, you hypocritical piece of shit. You REWARD the man for spouting shit that actually got people killed, and NOW you’re concerned about the “rhetoric” of people calling out a man whose words have gotten people killed as being a bad guy? Fucking. RICH.

You are a hypocritical piece of shit, and being confronted with that truth hurts.

You say a lot of hateful and personal shit to me.  I usually ignore it.  You are a mentally deranged and insufferable nut.  No wonder your kids require an ocean of separation from you.  

Edited July 14 by Frank Drebin

[Frank Drebin 5837]

39 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Already debunked. Keep repeating the lies. I know they keep you warm.
I’m so glad to hear of your newly found concern for “hateful rhetoric.” Shame you weren’t concerned about it before it killed two dozen in El Paso, ten in Buffalo, eleven in Pittsburgh. Gosh, it’s just AMAZING that you just now concluded that rhetoric can incite violence….when it’s your god who ends up in its sights. When it’s browns, blacks, and Jews….crickets.

You directly participate, and gleefully revel, in hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.  It’s this whole piece of shit board.  Where most regular posters should be committed to a mental institution and never let out.  Radicalized nuts. The lot of you.  

[Brisketexan 106889]

You say a lot of hateful and personal shit to me.  I usually ignore it.  You are a mentally deranged and insufferable nut.  No wonder your kids require an ocean of separation from you.  

Cite for us your concern and condemnation of the hateful rhetoric that led to over forty actual murders.

I’ll wait.

How is it hateful to point out that simple truth: hateful political rhetoric, from your guy and your team, spurred on 40 murders. You had no concerns about that rhetoric. In fact, you support and are voting for the person who spews that rhetoric. Only today, after an attempted assassination attempt against that same man, which may or may not have been spurred on by any rhetoric, have you discovered that gee, maybe murderous and demonizing rhetoric can be bad.

I’m sorry that “saying true things about you” is “hateful.” Have you looked into not being an evil piece of shit who rewards people for encouraging the murder of minorities? You should do that.

Oh, and the boy’s been next to me all afternoon, just watched the Euro. He thinks that the “hateful rhetoric” pearl clutching by the people who have spent the last decade demonizing minorities to the point of spurring on their murders is pretty laughable as well.

[Frank Drebin 5837]

6 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Cite for us your concern and condemnation of the hateful rhetoric that led to over forty actual murders.

I’ll wait.

How is it hateful to point out that simple truth: hateful political rhetoric, for. Your guy and your team, spurred on 40 murders. You had no concerns about that rhetoric. In fact, you support and are voting for the person who spews that rhetoric. Only today, after an attempted assassination attempt against that same man, which may or may not have been spurred on my any rhetoric, have you discovered that gee, maybe murderous and demonizing rhetoric can be bad.

I’m sorry that “saying true things about you” is “hateful.” Have you looked into not being an evil piece of shit who rewards people for encouraging the murder of minorities? You should do that.

You actively participate in hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.  Just like you accuse trump of doing.  You and trump are morally equivalent.  He lacks your sanctimoniousness.  

Edited July 14 by Frank Drebin

[Brisketexan 106889]

You actively participate in hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.  Just like you accuse trump of doing.  You and trump are morally equivalent.  He lacks your sanctimoniousness.  

Cite. Your. Prior. Condemnation.

When forty people were murdered in three terrorist attacks. Show us your concern for hateful rhetoric then. Or did you just MAGICALLY discover your concern today? Was it hidden in a drawer, maybe under an old sweater?

And you’ll be voting for the guy who regularly and still practices that rhetoric. Revenge. Retribution. Those are ACTUAL campaign themes he has stated. His words, not mine. And you SUPPORT those. Right now. Today. You support them.

You have no high ground. You are just upset that I shine the light of plain truth on you. What you see is ugly, so you have to deflect, and blame me for…simply saying what is true about you. What a wretched place to be as a human. I understand why you’d be so uncomfortable and defensive.

[Frank Drebin 5837]

25 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Cite. Your. Prior. Condemnation.

When forty people were murdered in three terrorist attacks. Show us your concern for hateful rhetoric then. Or did you just MAGICALLY discover your concern today? Was it hidden in a drawer, maybe under an old sweater?

And you’ll be voting for the guy who regularly and still practices that rhetoric. Revenge. Retribution. Those are ACTUAL campaign themes he has stated. His words, not mine. And you SUPPORT those. Right now. Today. You support them.

You have no high ground. You are just upset that I shine the light of plain truth on you. What you see is ugly, so you have to deflect, and blame me for…simply saying what is true about you. What a wretched place to be as a human. I understand why you’d be so uncomfortable and defensive.

You can’t even deny your active participation in hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.  So at worst I’ve allegedly stayed silent on other’s hateful rhetoric? And your proof is a lack of posts on a politics board I haven’t posted on in years?  Before all or most of those incidents. In your sick, twisted mind you somehow think it’s a gotcha on me.  Seek help. 
 

 

Edited July 14 by Frank Drebin

[NeverMarryAStripper 22294]

 

[fattyflattie 4640]

1 hour ago, Frank Drebin said:

Can’t wait for November.  

Word. Watching the mental decline of so many posters over the last years has been unbelievable. Curious how the next 4 will treat them. 

[NeverMarryAStripper 22294]

Most of us will be locked in camps without internet

[fattyflattie 4640]

2 minutes ago, NeverMarryAStripper said:

Most of us will be locked in camps without internet

No, I was talking about real life.  Not Briskets fear porn fantasies.  

[F250 29199]

Worst satire thread on the internet.

[bolverk 30323]

Surly Farms remembers.

[YGIFS 19458]

Okay, there's a lot of talk about camps with no internet but also porn fantasies.  Dammit, which version are we getting?  What's the cell signal situation for just 360/480 viewing at these re-education facilities?  

A lot of the kid's background did lean into a typical lone-wolf shooter.  White, alienated, conservative, bullied, below average intelligence, familiar with firearms but not competent, angry, frustrated, etc.  This one will be different because the SS/FBI won't release his social media/posting behavior because it may encourage copy-cats.  Which of course, will only feed conspiracy theories on both sides due to the absence of facts.  

To bring it back to comic relief/satirical memes.  How in the fucking fuck has there not been a Mr. Blonde meme holding that ear, singing "Can you hear me now?"  This country used to mean something! 

[David Dennison 19534]

1 hour ago, Frank Drebin said:

You’re very defensive.  The rhetoric your mentally deranged ass spews is directly responsible for this this shit.  Go fuck yourself. You’re as big of a piece of shit as any MAGA.  Own it.  Can’t wait for November.  

LOL u mad.

[Brisketexan 106889]

1 hour ago, Frank Drebin said:

You can’t even deny your active participation in hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.  So at worst I’ve allegedly stayed silent on other’s hateful rhetoric? And your proof is a lack of posts on a politics board I haven’t posted on in years?  Before all or most of those incidents. In your sick, twisted mind you somehow think it’s a gotcha on me.  Seek help. 
 

 

Yes....clearly my numerous posts over the past several years sounding the alarm about how Trump and MAGA's stochastic terrorism is....actually stochastic terrorism, resulting in violence and death (actual results, no projection) is...."hateful rhetoric."  Let's paraphrase that so even MAGA's can understand: "Calling practitioners of hateful rhetoric out IS hateful rhetoric, and inspires violence against them!"  That's your position.

My main goal is for the fucking violent fascists to stop being violent fascists.  When the don't, my goal is to protect the rest of humanity and the Republic.  So, for example, it is not hateful rhetoric to call for a response, with force, against people who were actively attacking the US Capitol and the men defending it with their lives.  Calling to defend against force with force is not hateful rhetoric.  I have not called for any innocent person to be eliminated simply because of the beliefs they hold, or the ethnicity they are, or how they voted (things your god king has done, repeatedly).  

Self-defense against violence is not a call for violence.  It is a call for defense.  If MAGA would stand the fuck down, and stop inciting murders against others (again, murders which have actually happened....a situation that has caused you zero concern), I would have no call for using force as a defense against them.

The rule is "don't start no shit, won't be no shit."  MAGA not only starts shit, but is excitedly promising to start more (revenge...retribution....we brown folks are invaders....the opposition is vermin).  If they would stop that shit, then they'd just be plain old folks with whom I disagree on some things.  You know, the way it was for most of my fucking life, and the way I'd much prefer it to be and stay.

So, no.  I do not "participate in hateful rhetoric."  I call for responding to same.  And for meeting violence and threats of violence in kind.  Don't start no shit.  Won't be no shit.  You don't get to fucking hose the world down with a flamethrower, and then label those who suggest fighting fire with fire as arsonists.

[bolverk 30323]

8 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Yes....clearly my numerous posts over the past several years sounding the alarm about how Trump and MAGA's stochastic terrorism is....actually stochastic terrorism, resulting in violence and death (actual results, no projection) is...."hateful rhetoric."  Let's paraphrase that so even MAGA's can understand: "Calling practitioners of hateful rhetoric out IS hateful rhetoric, and inspires violence against them!"  That's your position.

My main goal is for the fucking violent fascists to stop being violent fascists.  When the don't, my goal is to protect the rest of humanity and the Republic.  So, for example, it is not hateful rhetoric to call for a response, with force, against people who were actively attacking the US Capitol and the men defending it with their lives.  Calling to defend against force with force is not hateful rhetoric.  I have not called for any innocent person to be eliminated simply because of the beliefs they hold, or the ethnicity they are, or how they voted (things your god king has done, repeatedly).  

Self-defense against violence is not a call for violence.  It is a call for defense.  If MAGA would stand the fuck down, and stop inciting murders against others (again, murders which have actually happened....a situation that has caused you zero concern), I would have no call for using force as a defense against them.

The rule is "don't start no shit, won't be no shit."  MAGA not only starts shit, but is excitedly promising to start more (revenge...retribution....we brown folks are invaders....the opposition is vermin).  If they would stop that shit, then they'd just be plain old folks with whom I disagree on some things.  You know, the way it was for most of my fucking life, and the way I'd much prefer it to be and stay.

So, no.  I do not "participate in hateful rhetoric."  I call for responding to same.  And for meeting violence and threats of violence in kind.  Don't start no shit.  Won't be no shit.  You don't get to fucking hose the world down with a flamethrower, and then label those who suggest fighting fire with fire as arsonists.

Even supposedly benign rhetoric includes veiled threats of violence. I guess gun-toting, church-going guys like Johnny ignore what their party leadership says, or people like him are just fucking liars.

Heritage Foundation: "[We are] in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

[brakeman 28749]

[Dutchrudder 11243]

[Scheiss Meister 8468]

16 hours ago, Frank Drebin said:

You can’t even deny your active participation in hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.  So at worst I’ve allegedly stayed silent on other’s hateful rhetoric? And your proof is a lack of posts on a politics board I haven’t posted on in years?  Before all or most of those incidents. In your sick, twisted mind you somehow think it’s a gotcha on me.  Seek help. 
 

 

Bitch, you're just mad because the dog you starved and abused then let off the chain hoping it would attack the neighbors bit you instead.  Shut up.

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]

[brakeman 28749]