Running Alt-Right Thread of Mockery and Hypocrisy

[NameAlreadyInUse 5111]

If his own words are to believed he’s been threatened with fines by his imagination. That’s some scary ass shit right there. 

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

Just now, Chrispy said:

Create as many words as you choose, but I will not be conscripted into saying them. 

Haha. Hahahaha hahahah. Hah ha ha.  

[Chrispy 132]

1 minute ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

It’s weird, it’s like when airplanes got invented and therefore the word airpllane has to get created, and some people are like, wtf is the new made up word, I’m not going to use it. 

Also, one does not have to use pronouns to talk about people if one doesn’t choose to do so. 

This whole thread is dumb. 

No, it’s like changing the name of an airplane and making one call it something else. It’s ridiculous. 

[bad_teammate 13191]

 

16 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

I disagree, but you’re certainly entitled to your opinion. He’s absolutely been threatened with fines, as has his institution. You can dismiss it as fantasy, but it’s jusy not the case. 

Who threatened him? You should be able to answer that question.

14 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

Create as many words as you choose, but I will not be conscripted into saying them. 

Great, no one is trying to.

12 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

No, it’s like changing the name of an airplane and making one call it something else. It’s ridiculous. 

What English pronoun exists to singularly refer to someone who is neither male nor female?

[NameAlreadyInUse 5111]

20 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

No, it’s like changing the name of an airplane and making one call it something else. It’s ridiculous. 

Ok I see the disconnect now. You are one of those people who doesn’t want to acknowledge that trans people exist. I’ll stop engaging now. 

[Chrispy 132]

7 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

 

Who threatened him? You should be able to answer that question.

Great, no one is trying to.

What English pronoun exists to singularly refer to someone who is neither male nor female?

The strongly worded letters he received from the university referenced the Ontario Human Rights Code. 

They couldn’t if they wanted to. 

Hermaphrodite? 

[bad_teammate 13191]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

The strongly worded letters he received from the university referenced the Ontario Human Rights Code. 

Who threatened to fine him? Be Precise In Your Speech (Rule #10)

Quote

Hermaphrodite? 

That word already has a meaning that has nothing to do with gender or sexual identity. It is a scientific descriptor of someone's physical attributes. And it's not even a pronoun.

I'll ask again:

What English pronoun exists to singularly refer to someone who is neither male nor female?

 

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

On 5/5/2018 at 11:55 AM, Chrispy said:

I will, life is good. I’m about to go play golf and guess what? I don’t have to ask my master! Can you believe it? Good day sir, oh excuse me, I mean good day they. 

You’re about to go play golf. Well good for you.  Dipwad.  

[Chrispy 132]

7 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

Ok I see the disconnect now. You are one of those people who doesn’t want to acknowledge that trans people exist. I’ll stop engaging now. 

I acknowledge they exist, I only find the 50 or so gender neutral pronouns silly. 

Edited May 6, 2018 by Chrispy

[Chrispy 132]

1 minute ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

You’re about to go play golf. Well good for you.  Dipwad.  

That was yesterday, was a good time.

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

Go fuck Yourself, swam.  

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

And take your tainted knee with ya. 

[Chrispy 132]

3 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Who threatened to fine him? Be Precise In Your Speech (Rule #10)

That word already has a meaning that has nothing to do with gender or sexual identity. It is a scientific descriptor of someone's physical attributes. And it's not even a pronoun.

I'll ask again:

What English pronoun exists to singularly refer to someone who is neither male nor female?

 

The OHRC. 

I realize it’s not a pronoun. In modern English? Please enlighten me. 

[Chrispy 132]

3 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Go fuck Yourself, swam.  

Huh? 

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

Ok maybe I’m wrong. Maybe you jus LOOK like him. 

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

Just.  Aw fuck it.  

[bad_teammate 13191]

I'm about to drink beer. I'm about to play golf. Let me share with you all the details of my unremarkable life!

8 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

I acknowledge they exist, I only find the 50 or so gender neutral pronouns silly. 

Which ones are not silly?

2 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

The OHRC. 

No, they haven't. You're lying.

If you're not lying, please source your assertion that the OHRC has threatened to fine Jordan Peterson.

Quote

I realize it’s not a pronoun. In modern English? Please enlighten me. 

Yes, in Modern English.

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

Lulz.  Ok. 

[bad_teammate 13191]

Here's the bill in question.

There is no mention of pronouns or compelled speech of any kind. It's not even a molehill. It's a mountain made out of a spec of dust.

Here's the summary:

Quote

SUMMARY

 

This enactment amends the Canadian Human Rights Act to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination.

 

The enactment also amends the Criminal Code to extend the protection against hate propaganda set out in that Act to any section of the public that is distinguished by gender identity or expression and to clearly set out that evidence that an offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on gender identity or expression constitutes an aggravating circumstance that a court must take into consideration when it imposes a sentence.

 

[Chrispy 132]

12 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

I'm about to drink beer. I'm about to play golf. Let me share with you all the details of my unremarkable life!

Which ones are not silly?

No, they haven't. You're lying.

If you're not lying, please source your assertion that the OHRC has threatened to fine Jordan Peterson.

Yes, in Modern English.

I’ve found that our language has functioned very well with the amount of pronouns we currently have, these newly created ones are silly and unnecessary. 

The university wrote Peterson two stern letters demanding him to comply for fear of retribution from the OHRC, I’m not sure how else to explain this to you. 

I asked you to enlighten me on the singular pronoun. Also, who is that hideous woman?

[Chrispy 132]

12 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Here's the bill in question.

There is no mention of pronouns or compelled speech of any kind. It's not even a molehill. It's a mountain made out of a spec of dust.

Here's the summary:

 

Scary shit. 

[bad_teammate 13191]

4 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

I’ve found that our language has functioned very well with the amount of pronouns we currently have, these newly created ones are silly and unnecessary. 

It hasn't functioned well for those who do not identify as either male or female, people who are not represented by the current singular pronouns.

What is the negative impact on your life that comes with the addition of gender-neutral pronouns?
 

Quote

The university wrote Peterson two stern letters demanding him to comply for fear of retribution from the OHRC, I’m not sure how else to explain this to you. 

So the university threatened to fine him?

You said the OHRC threatened to fine him. Were you lying?

Quote

I asked you to enlighten me on the singular pronoun. Also, who is that hideous woman?

There is not one commonly used at this point, which is why I asked you for one. You said that the use of gender-neutral pronouns is like referring to airplanes as something other than "airplane"; changing an existing word.

That's Ashley Todd, a conservative who falsely claimed victimhood, carving a backwards B onto her face and inventing a story about how a roving gang of blacks did it for Barack Obama. A fake victim, like you and Jordan Peterson.

[David Dennison 18850]

10 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

Scary shit. 

Hyperbole diminishes the strength of your argument.

[Chrispy 132]

4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Hyperbole diminishes the strength of your argument.

You’re probably correct. Still, I’m thankful for the constitution so we can avoid this mess.

[Chrispy 132]

9 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

It hasn't functioned well for those who do not identify as either male or female, people who are not represented by the current singular pronouns.

What is the negative impact on your life that comes with the addition of gender-neutral pronouns?
 

So the university threatened to fine him?

You said the OHRC threatened to fine him. Were you lying?

There is not one commonly used at this point, which is why I asked you for one. You said that the use of gender-neutral pronouns is like referring to airplanes as something other than "airplane"; changing an existing word.

That's Ashley Todd, a conservative who falsely claimed victimhood, carving a backwards B onto her face and inventing a story about how a roving gang of blacks did it for Barack Obama. A fake victim, like you and Jordan Peterson.

There’s only two genders, that’s the point. I’ll call them whatever they want, but creating a gender is comical. 

They threatened the university and was a shot across the bow to Peterson, the implication was crystal clear. He’s said as much. 

I’m not a victim, I live in the greatest country on earth and can avoid such nonsense as our neighbors up north. What’s not to love? 

[David Dennison 18850]

2 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

There’s only two genders, that’s the point. I’ll call them whatever they want, but creating a gender is comical. 

They threatened the university and was a shot across the bow to Peterson, the implication was crystal clear. He’s said as much. 

I’m not a victim, I live in the greatest country on earth and can avoid such nonsense as our neighbors up north. What’s not to love? 

That's one opinion.

[Chrispy 132]

6 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

That's one opinion.

Lulz. 

[David Dennison 18850]

Just now, Chrispy said:

Lulz. 

And there's the problem. You don't take transgendered folks or their issues seriously.

 

[Chrispy 132]

3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

And there's the problem. You don't take transgendered folks or their issues seriously.

 

No, I think gender dysphoria is a real issue that needs to be tackled. 

[David Dennison 18850]

4 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

No, I think gender dysphoria is a real issue that needs to be tackled. 

That doesn't mean that the choice of gender is binary. There is a third choice.

[Chrispy 132]

Just now, David Dennison said:

That doesn't mean that the choice of gender is binary. There is a third choice.

What’s the 3rd choice and how do they procreate? 

[David Dennison 18850]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

What’s the 3rd choice and how do they procreate? 

People can be gender neutral and procreate, just like men who identify as women and women who identify as men can procreate.

 

[Chrispy 132]

Just now, David Dennison said:

People can be gender neutral and procreate, just like men who identify as women and women who identify as men can procreate.

 

So they’re still physically the gender they claim not to be? 

[David Dennison 18850]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

So they’re still physically the gender they claim not to be? 

Sure. Transgender people don't always transition.

[Chrispy 132]

3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Sure. Transgender people don't always transition.

So they’re physically male and mentally a female? How is that a new gender? 

[David Dennison 18850]

3 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

So they’re physically male and mentally a female? How is that a new gender? 

The third gender is neutral. Not identifying as male or female.

 

[simplicity 9]

2 hours ago, Chrispy said:

I disagree, but you’re certainly entitled to your opinion. He’s absolutely been threatened with fines, as has his institution. You can dismiss it as fantasy, but it’s jusy not the case. 

It's amazing how stupid you are.

[Chrispy 132]

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

The third gender is neutral. Not identifying as male or female.

 

But physically, they are one or the other correct? 

[Chrispy 132]

1 minute ago, simplicity said:

It's amazing how stupid you are.

How insightful. 

[David Dennison 18850]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

But physically, they are one or the other correct? 

If they choose to be. I'm sure there's a way to transition to neither. 

[simplicity 9]

4 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

How insightful. 

More insightful than anything you've posted in this thread.

[Chrispy 132]

7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

If they choose to be. I'm sure there's a way to transition to neither. 

Ok, that’s what I figured. Thanks. 

[Chrispy 132]

3 minutes ago, simplicity said:

More insightful than anything you've posted in this thread.

Oh come on, you can do better than that. Really try to hurt me this time. 

[simplicity 9]

I'm not trying to hurt you, I'm just dropping by to tell you you're wrong.

[Chrispy 132]

4 minutes ago, simplicity said:

I'm not trying to hurt you, I'm just dropping by to tell you you're wrong.

Enlighten me.

[bad_teammate 13191]

At the end of the day, Chrispy, your argument is that there are only two genders. You dance around it with a bunch of other shit, but your objection to the expansion of pronouns is not about the dilution of the language, but it is really about a desire to oppose LGBT activists and assert a traditionalist worldview.

And THAT is why Jordan Peterson is garbage. All he is, at the end of it, is a regressive conservative fuddy duddy. He can dress it up in all the psychobabble Jungian bullshit he tries to (and fails), but the alt.right and regressive garbage (Chrispy) love him because he reinforces a worldview stuck in a fantasy version of 1950.

[Judge Roybeanbag 11819]

Shut the fuck up and go fall in a water hazard ya goddamned waterhead. 

[Chrispy 132]

20 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

At the end of the day, Chrispy, your argument is that there are only two genders. You dance around it with a bunch of other shit, but your objection to the expansion of pronouns is not about the dilution of the language, but it is really about a desire to oppose LGBT activists and assert a traditionalist worldview.

And THAT is why Jordan Peterson is garbage. All he is, at the end of it, is a regressive conservative fuddy duddy. He can dress it up in all the psychobabble Jungian bullshit he tries to (and fails), but the alt.right and regressive garbage (Chrispy) love him because he reinforces a worldview stuck in a fantasy version of 1950.

Sure, I believe one’s chromosomes dictates whether they are male or female in the womb and that it can’t be reversed. However, I have no ill will towards the LGBT community at all, I say live and let live. If a biological male wants me to call him a female, I’ll indulge her and not think twice about it. 

No, this is about speech for me. Once it goes beyond asking and into the realm compulsion, that I simply will not put up with. Also, the 1950’s seemed like they sucked, so no thanks. 

[Chrispy 132]

34 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Shut the fuck up and go fall in a water hazard ya goddamned waterhead. 

Again, that was yesterday. Bless your heart.

[Brian Fantana 6680]

Still waiting on that source BT asked for.