Jump to content

Don Lemon has a bit of a PR pickle

Parliament

By Parliament
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

cactusflinthead

cactusflinthead 27594

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

Jesus, I’ve been over this with my stalker Jimmy. VMW told me about some bet on Shaggy between him and (Atx71 maybe?) about the 2016 election. I think the guy posts here as Dennison now. Anyway, I lurked that site for the laughs and then joined Surly for the same reason. I was completely unaware of the hive mentality prior to posting in this sub forum. 

uh huh. well done. 7/10 passing. still  not buying it. you were at the old place and this is a new name. shame is not good for the soul

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pancho

Pancho 44487

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

Don Lemon in trouble with conservatives for telling the truth and not being Politically Correct.

The irony...

Conservaties are so tired of being politically correct.  Lemon comes at them not being politically correct and they are upset.

 

Typical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chrispy

Chrispy 132

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, cactusflinthead said:

uh huh. well done. 7/10 passing. still  not buying it. you were at the old place and this is a new name. shame is not good for the soul

I was Teddy Duchamp on Shaggy, I had about two posts total. I was getting married and having children at the time, so Shaggy was somewhat forgettable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

 

Quote

 

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/10/2/16396612/las-vegas-mass-shooting-terrorism-islam - "In fact, between 2001 and 2015, more Americans were killed by homegrown right-wing extremists than by Islamist terrorists, according to a study by New America, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, DC."

 

Domestic_terrorism_incidents_by_type.png

 

As reported by the libcucks at Cato: https://www.cato.org/blog/gao-weighs-countering-violent-extremism

The Investigative Fund is a nonprofit operated by The Nation magazine, an obviously leftist group. I can't find their database, but you ought never get your data (which is actually, as best I can tell, being withheld) from activists with an agenda. The only database I can look it is an obvious fraud.

Here is their report: https://www.theinvestigativefund.org/investigation/2017/06/22/home-hate/

It's entitled "Home Is Where the Hate Is". So we'll just assume they're not going to unbiased reporting. Since they're The Nation, who would believe them anyway? Their very first citation of a terrorism event occurs here:

Quote

It was a strange place to make his point. The only Islamist terror attack in Pennsylvania over the past 15 years was committed by Edward Archer, a mentally ill man who shot and injured a police officer in early 2016, later telling investigators that he pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. Far-right episodes of violent extremism were far more common.

Just two years before Trump’s Pennsylvania speech, anti-government radical Eric Matthew Frein ambushed two police officers in the township of Blooming Grove, killing one and wounding another, then led law enforcement authorities on a 48-day manhunt in the woods. (He was sentenced to death in April.)

Here is the wiki link to the police attack. Frein was not a member of any terrorist organization. No political activism is described. He isn't believed to have any political involvement at all. This is what it says:

Quote

Frein was described by police as a "self-taught survivalist" with a grudge against law enforcement personnel.

So not terrorism to any normal person. Just a guy who went nuts.

So their very first piece of evidence is wrong, and obviously so. I won't read any farther because I don't have to. If you believe this nonsense I will not have a conversation with you. I will simply ask you again, please show me some data. 

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blotto

Blotto 23434

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Paul Wesley said:

Shouldn't thread title be "in a pickle," and not "has a pickle?"

Maybe OP was distracted by his anger at Lemon for being all uppity.  

It's likely that Parliament was referring to a "Pleasurably Rockhard" pickle...nttawwt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Continental Op

Continental Op 3934

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

The irony...

Conservaties are so tired of being politically correct.  Lemon comes at them not being politically correct and they are upset.

 

Typical. 

No no no... They're not tired of that kind of political correctness.  They're tired of the kind of political correctness where you can't just walk around saying the n word all the time.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WBT

WBT 20422

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

"In fact, between 2001 and 2015, more Americans were killed by homegrown right-wing extremists than by Islamist terrorists, according to a study by New America, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, DC."

 

So, 2001 non-inclusive?  Are we fully amortized from that yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted

These are the words Don Lemon used:

Quote

“So,” he said, “we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them. There is no travel ban on them. There is no ban — you know, they had the Muslim ban. There is no white-guy ban. So what do we do about that?”

1. WE NEED TO STOP DEMONIZING PEOPLE AND DEMONIZE WHITE MEN!!!!LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!111.

2. There was no "muslim ban".

3. White men are not the biggest threat.

I can easily identify a group that is a far larger threat if you'd like, Don, you may even know a few of them. I mean, since we're talking facts since you're a CNN anchor who would never put out #fakenews, would you Don? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cactusflinthead

cactusflinthead 27594

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

CNN is getting destroyed and Don Lemon is a big reason why, that was my only point. 

don't look now but your posting is causing a drop in your rep. Not that it really matters. I got into a neg war last week and made peace with the other person. IT CAN BE DONE. I was determined to go down to the negative range if that was what it took. Rep, serious bidness. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chrispy

Chrispy 132

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:

don't look now but your posting is causing a drop in your rep. Not that it really matters. I got into a neg war last week and made peace with the other person. IT CAN BE DONE. I was determined to go down to the negative range if that was what it took. Rep, serious bidness. 

 

Oh, that’s just my stalker Jimmyjames. He downvotes all of my posts for some reason, but I’m cool with it if it makes him feel better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

I have no idea who any of those people are, but I want to say that I’ve heard the name Swam before. I’m guessing those guys didn’t huff the lefty paint either. 

You say you lurked the shag and somehow want us to believe that you might have heard the name Swam before? Ok chief.

And whatever happened to your fencepost neighbor buddy VMW? Did you decide to retire that handle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

Oh, that’s just my stalker Jimmyjames. He downvotes all of my posts for some reason, but I’m cool with it if it makes him feel better. 

Only when you engage in obvious troll mode like you are currently doing in this thread. 

Glad your cool with it. It doesn’t make me feel better or worse though. It’s just the internet after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18661

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

These are the words Don Lemon used:

1. WE NEED TO STOP DEMONIZING PEOPLE AND DEMONIZE WHITE MEN!!!!LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!111.

2. There was no "muslim ban".

3. White men are not the biggest threat.

I can easily identify a group that is a far larger threat if you'd like, Don, you may even know a few of them. I mean, since we're talking facts since you're a CNN anchor who would never put out #fakenews, would you Don? 

Identify the bigger threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

27 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

The irony...

Conservaties are so tired of being politically correct.  Lemon comes at them not being politically correct and they are upset.

 

Typical. 

Hell yeah, grow some balls and be truthful, but if you're just gonna end it there and not provide evidence to back it up, well you look racist. 

It's racists to say that black people love to kill white people, but add evidence 

 "Killings of blacks by whites and whites by blacks accounted for about 12 percent of the roughly 6,000 homicides last year in which police had information about the race of both victim and killer – a slight increase from around 11 percent in 2014. About 15.8 percent of white victims were killed by blacks last year, and 8.6 percent of black victims were killed by whites."

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers

so don't get your panties in a wad when people bitch about it.

Edited by workswithseed
Stuff that wouldn't fit my theme
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chrispy

Chrispy 132

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

You say you lurked the shag and somehow want us to believe that you might have heard the name Swam before? Ok chief.

And whatever happened to your fencepost neighbor buddy VMW? Did you decide to retire that handle?

I lurked some, but not the cloak room. VMW was banned and he said he’s done with Surly. I’ll call him and we’ll discuss the crazy lefty posts sometimes, but that’s about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexArcher

TexArcher 37520

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, DaysOff said:

Good lord the liberal echo chamber on this board.

Lemon is awful, CNN is awful, and everyone posting on this thread is awful (except me).

Lemon is pretty awful.  But his comment that precipitated this thread wasn't wrong.

(and I'm not a liberal)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6674

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

I lurked some, but not the cloak room. VMW was banned and he said he’s done with Surly. I’ll call him and we’ll discuss the crazy lefty posts sometimes, but that’s about it. 

You talk about posters on a messageboard when you call your friend to catch up? Bullfuckingshit. Or you’re a pathetic loser. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cactusflinthead

cactusflinthead 27594

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Does anyone throwing out "statistically speaking" want to show their math?

There's an inherent problem with the reporting of the events. Paddock had a motive, but because the FBI is reluctant to name him as a gun nut that was fearful of them being taken it remains ambiguous. 

The very definition of a mass shooting is questionable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cactusflinthead

cactusflinthead 27594

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Let’s be real. 

The only reason this is a story is because Don Lemon is black.

If Wolf Blitzer or Cuomo said it no one would give a fuck.

Disagree. Any talking head that points a finger at homegrown terrorism is going to catch flak.

Edit: him being black does turbocharge it.

Edited by cactusflinthead
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pancho

Pancho 44487

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

 

Hell yeah, grow some balls and be truthful, but if you're just gonna end it there and not provide evidence to back it up, well you look racist. 

It's racists to say that black people love to kill white people, but add evidence 

 "Killings of blacks by whites and whites by blacks accounted for about 12 percent of the roughly 6,000 homicides last year in which police had information about the race of both victim and killer – a slight increase from around 11 percent in 2014. About 15.8 percent of white victims were killed by blacks last year, and 8.6 percent of black victims were killed by whites."

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers

so don't get your panties in a wad when people bitch about it.

Wtf are you talking about here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cactusflinthead

cactusflinthead 27594

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

Like I said, put some stats and there would be less rabble about it.

therein lies the rub. as I said a couple of minutes ago we can't even agree on the stats therefore they are lacking at best. I maintain that Paddock had a clear motive, the FBI and the LV Police decline to say he did. so there. They only released the case files after a court order and redacted as much as they could get away with. Plausible deniability baby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23357

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

He asked for stats, not photos.

i think I’m gonna call up an old buddy of mine and discuss this internet thread with him to get his take. I’ll report back what he says. 

The stats are so easy to find.

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/09/12/study-shows-two-thirds-us-terrorism-tied-right-wing-extremists

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The stats are so easy to find.

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/09/12/study-shows-two-thirds-us-terrorism-tied-right-wing-extremists

Yeah I was just joshing ya. I’m like trump that way. Always cracking jokes.

So I called up my buddy to discuss this thread with him. His response? Why the fuck are you calling me to discuss a thread on the internet. I told him I thought that was the new thing to do and he hung up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chrispy

Chrispy 132

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

You talk about posters on a messageboard when you call your friend to catch up? Bullfuckingshit. Or you’re a pathetic loser. 

Sometimes, sure. Talking about football usually leads to conversations about Surly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cactusflinthead

cactusflinthead 27594

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chrispy said:

I was Teddy Duchamp on Shaggy, I had about two posts total. I was getting married and having children at the time, so Shaggy was somewhat forgettable. 

y'know not all of us deleted our accounts over at the scat porn relic. I looked up Teddy Duchamp over there and what did I find. A grand total of 17 posts. I also looked at who were the visitors to his page, that would be me and VMW. That tends to lend credence to Jimmy rather than you, 

I am going to post the last known post of Teddy Duchamp in its entirety

11-11-2016, 12:02 PM#194
fucktardreputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png
Join Date
May 2011
Posts
17
 
 
Quote Originally Posted by Vince_McCoy_Williams View Post
I made the bet, no he cannot return ever. What's the point of a bet if nothing is at stake. Bye felicia.
The point is that every single time he posts, he'll know you have his balls in a jar on your mantle. I can't imagine him having so little pride that he'd continue to post, but it would be comedy gold. C'mon Vince_McCoy_Williams, you and I both know you want to bring him back and rub this shit in his face.
 
 
Now why would you cite VMW? Is there a particular reason why you would want to cite him rather than the others in that nut kicking fiesta? perhaps to add some value to his comments? Color me shocked.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted (edited)

The SPLC article refers directly back to the UMD database discussed in post 89.

Hugo I'm not trying to insult you but do you know you are making a fool of yourself? If you have a cause you're the opposition's best recruiting tool. I don't know what they pay you but they're not getting their money's worth.

Edited by Thetexashammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chrispy

Chrispy 132

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:

y'know not all of us deleted our accounts over at the scat porn relic. I looked up Teddy Duchamp over there and what did I find. A grand total of 17 posts. I also looked at who were the visitors to his page, that would be me and VMW. That tends to lend credence to Jimmy rather than you, 

I am going to post the last known post of Teddy Duchamp in its entirety

11-11-2016, 12:02 PM#194
fucktardreputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_pos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png reputation_highpos.png
Join Date
May 2011
Posts
17
 
 
Quote Originally Posted by Vince_McCoy_Williams View Post
I made the bet, no he cannot return ever. What's the point of a bet if nothing is at stake. Bye felicia.
The point is that every single time he posts, he'll know you have his balls in a jar on your mantle. I can't imagine him having so little pride that he'd continue to post, but it would be comedy gold. C'mon Vince_McCoy_Williams, you and I both know you want to bring him back and rub this shit in his face.
 
 
Now why would you cite VMW? Is there a particular reason why you would want to cite him rather than the others in that nut kicking fiesta? perhaps to add some value to his comments? Color me shocked.

17, wow. I thought it was less, but yes that’s me. I Remember posting something about the movie Heavyweights one time also. But like I said, VMW and I have been friends for many years. 

Also, I remember him actually not being very pleased that I wanted that guy to be unbanned. Ah, memory lane.

Edited by Chrispy
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...