Jump to content

The Donald Trump Jr. thread

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 693
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

jimmyjazz
jimmyjazz
Paul Wesley
Paul Wesley

Every time I see Trump Jr. in the news - and every time I see this thread bumped to the top - I think that it must have been really unfortunate and sad for him to have been the child of a morally bank

tx 3 putt
tx 3 putt

😂😂😂😂

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
C-Man

C-Man 27777

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
I didn't think it was possible for anyone to be dumber than Dotard but here we are.

It’s like Multiplicity. Fred Trump was seemingly pretty sharp. Offspring Dotard was less so and Dotard Jr is like the third or fourth version of Michael Keaton.

giphy.gif
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
smuggs

smuggs 9397

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

 

 

Gather round everyone - the phony news guy with a hair piece who sells mail-order Brain Force Ultra neural activator tincture is telling us he's definitely not on coke.

 

 

Edited by smuggs
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 28198

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, C-Man said:

And it's perfectly normal to call your father by his last name

When Jr was in college his father hit him in the face in front of his friends because he was not in a coat and tie when trump came to get him for a Yankees game. Dude is broken

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 26230

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

When Jr was in college his father hit him in the face in front of his friends because he was not in a coat and tie when trump came to get him for a Yankees game. Dude is broken

I've heard that story too.  Jr. was wearing a Yankee jacket and cap...like a normal person going to a game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
royiv

royiv 9776

Posted
Posted
On 3/10/2022 at 7:46 PM, brown water said:

I rarely give DJT the benefit of the doubt but I’m keeping an open mind that punching Jr in the face was for more substantive reasons. And also don’t care if it wasn’t. 

Even he realizes all of his offspring have punchable faces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19511

Posted
Posted
On 3/10/2022 at 7:52 PM, Sawbonz said:

When Jr was in college his father hit him in the face in front of his friends because he was not in a coat and tie when trump came to get him for a Yankees game. Dude is broken

From the New Yorker (and other places.  Google has lots of returns):

Quote

When Trump, Jr., was twelve, his father left his mother, Ivana, for a much younger woman, Marla Maples. It has been widely reported that Trump, Jr., stopped talking to his father for a time after that. They reportedly had some run-ins later on, too, when Trump, Jr., was enrolled at the University of Pennsylvania. “Don Jr. opened the door, wearing a Yankee jersey,” Scott Melker, one of his former classmates, wrote on Facebook last year, describing what happened on one occasion when Trump came to take his son to a Yankees game. “Without saying a word, his father slapped him across the face, knocking him to the floor in front of all of his classmates. He simply said “put on a suit and meet me outside,’ and closed the door.” (The Trumps have denied this account.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jive Turkey said:

string him up.  treasonous traitor.

 

Not gonna read the text transcripts, just gonna infuriate me.  But I didn't have to try to picture Don, Jr. in a bathroom with some staffer at 1am with crazy hand gestures saying shit like, 'Oh man, let me tell you something.  I gotta way forward for my father.  Okay, hear me out.  Okay, so here's how we get it to a state-by-state House vote.  Wait, hang on.  Let's do another rail first.  Actually, I'm feeling pretty wired...let'd do halfsies."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Foosters

Foosters 18268

Posted
Posted (edited)

Am I wrong or up to this point, hasn't the defense been "we thought there were valid allegations of fraud, and we just wanted to make sure that everything was on the up and up."

This shows they came up with the plan first and found the facts to justify later.

Edited by Foosters
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28928

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Foosters said:

Am I wrong or up to this point, hasn't the defesne been "we thought there were valid allegations of fraud, and we just wanted to make sure that everything was on the up and up."

This shows they came up with the plan first and found the facts to justify later.

Backward thinking is how ideologues work. We call them “conclusions” because they come at the end of a thought process. That’s the intellectual approach. You start with a subject, admit, “I don’t know,” then study all the facts and evidence and then you arrive at a conclusion.

But the ideologue works backwards. They start with the conclusion and then look for justifications for their pre-determined belief. ‘I know I believe X so now let’s look for reasons to justify that belief.’ They literally are thinking backwards.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Am I wrong or up to this point, hasn't the defense been "we thought there were valid allegations of fraud, and we just wanted to make sure that everything was on the up and up."

This shows they came up with the plan first and found the facts to justify later.

Only if you believe in the liberal conspiracy of the chronological order of time.  Then yes, it would appear there's some disconnect in their portrayal of the fact pattern.  But again, Fake Times!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 106874

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, elfenix said:

the "those aren't my drugs" of text messages

 

Yes, it's definitely less incriminating to send a message of "Hey Mark, see the attached email about how we should murder Mike Pence and cancel the election.  We should look into whether that's feasible."

Dumbest.  Fucking.  Timeline.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34744

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Yes, it's definitely less incriminating to send a message of "Hey Mark, see the attached email about how we should murder Mike Pence and cancel the election.  We should look into whether that's feasible."

Dumbest.  Fucking.  Timeline.

it says right there in my profile that retweets aren't an endorsement! 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28928

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, elfenix said:

the "those aren't my drugs" of text messages

 

It’s probably true because Don Jr. is too fucking stupid to come up with the idea on his own. All he knows is that lying and cheating and bullshitting is the family’s business model.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4th&Five

4th&Five 41985

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

It’s probably true because Don Jr. is too fucking stupid to come up with the idea on his own. All he knows is that lying and cheating and bullshitting is the family’s business model.

47310e18-74f2-4bf6-a5ac-17a539bde85e_tex

Edited by 4th&Five
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3089

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WhatTheBuck said:

It’s probably true because Don Jr. is too fucking stupid to come up with the idea on his own. All he knows is that lying and cheating and bullshitting is the family’s business model.

That would be extraordinarily obnoxious to fwd a shit load of essentially chain letters to the wh chief of staff. So it's definitely possible. 

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28928

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

This seems like smoking gun evidence of conspiracy to me. Seems big.

But I'm sure nothing will happen. 

Like the Trump Tower meeting with the Russians who were promising to deliver dirt on Hillary? (There not a chance in hell that King Don didn’t know that was happening. That’s collusion. That’s not a legal term. But it’s definitely a criminal conspiracy with a hostile foreign power and should’ve been grounds for hanging let alone impeachment and removal from office).

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6982

Posted
Posted

As Votes Were Still Being Counted in 2020, Eldest Trump Son Messaged White House to Say That Trumps Had Attained “Operational Control” Over Levers of American Democracy in a Way That Ensured a Trump Victory Regardless of Voters’ Wishes https://cnn.com/2022/04/08/politics/donald-trump-jr-meadows-text/index.html.

 

That may be the kill shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...