Jump to content

Русский корабль - иди нахуй

Eastwood

By Eastwood
in Daily Texan

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • atomheartbevo

    8668

  • MillerEP

    7334

  • Schulz2.0

    3660

  • InkaUtexas

    3054

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

AUS-97HORN
AUS-97HORN

For the love of Christ woman,  stop posting the same fucking thing every 20 mins just to make your neurotic self feel better.     Bring something useful to the thread other than your inane babbli

closetohumping
closetohumping
InkaUtexas
InkaUtexas

I volunteered today. Log/Admin role to replace people for 30-60 days. The operation is in the west, or should the Orcs win will be pulled back behind the NATO wall. Either way the humanitarian effort

Posted Images

SL Xpress

SL Xpress 7609

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Not sure how you cut off a facility like you're talking about, but I can only imagine some stupendous buried Soviet bunker built over the last 70 years that would make a Bond villain blush. I've got to think it likely has its own redundant power supply/communications and is buried a mile underground with all sorts of food storage and shit.

 

I don't know about all that, but one thing I feel sure it has is a really loooooooong table.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BillyGoatHill

BillyGoatHill 4421

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

image.thumb.png.9aff2af0cb3558dc9e1a0b8a775d6838.png

And to be fair, he said is there anyone like a "more successful" Stauffenberg. He did qualify it... Can we have a guy like that guy only but not really that guy?  Lol I laughed.

I should have highlighted RUSSIAN HISTORY vs Russian. Just pointing out the obvious that Von Stauffenberg was from the Fatherland. (And I too thought of the Animal House connection after posting 😁 )

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Buzzrock

Buzzrock 15136

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chewbacca said:

Everyone has been trying to get him to negotiate.  He won't, short of Ukraine agreeing to disarm and submit to Russian rule.  Macron talked to him for 90 minutes today.

So then disarm and submit to Russian rule, for now. It’s better than everyone dying. This is how WWI started. 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BamaATL

BamaATL 16593

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Not sure how you cut off a facility like you're talking about, but I can only imagine some stupendous buried Soviet bunker built over the last 70 years that would make a Bond villain blush. I've got to think it likely has its own redundant power supply/communications and is buried a mile underground with all sorts of food storage and shit.

I just wonder if its enough to just cut him off, use the facility as a de facto prison while he is toppled.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rimbo

Rimbo 27035

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

Credible source enough for you?

 

 

That's literally the same source.

Now, the fact that "Ace of Aces" thinks the AP and the US government are "not credible sources" at this time makes said poster look extremely Sus to me.

Who's payin' you to post here, Ass of Asses?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SL Xpress

SL Xpress 7609

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Buzzrock said:

So then disarm and submit to Russian rule, for now. It’s better than everyone dying. This is how WWI started. 

You're right. Everyone should disarm and submit to Russian rule so we don't have to worry about any more war from Putin.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicole44

Nicole44 22315

Posted
Posted
Just now, Rimbo said:

That's literally the same source.

Now, the fact that "Ace of Aces" thinks the AP and the US government are "not credible sources" at this time makes said poster look extremely Sus to me.

Who's payin' you to post here, Ass of Asses?

I’m so confused…sigh….

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macanudo

Macanudo 13327

Posted
Posted

Has there been any reason why the Ukrainians haven't rained down hellfire on that convoy? I realize they lack the air power to do it but overhead shots show a ton of wooded areas around it.   How hard is it to launch a coordinated attack from both sides of the road with Javelins?  They don't need to take out the whole convoy.   Just wreck havoc and take out some of the vehicles, especially toward the front and rear.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 30338

Posted
Posted (edited)

Serious question here:

As a child of the 80s and as scary as some aspects of the Cold War were, like waking up in a cold sweat at the age of 12 after watching "The Day After", there was always some degree of reassurance that Soviet leadership had some sort of intricate decision-making process. It was murky as shit, and I never fully understood it (still don't as I'm not a student of the USSR). But there was always that term Kremlinology that was thrown around that made me feel like there were always ongoing consultations/debates among mysterious committees which led Soviet actions. And, after all, the Russians really did seem to love their children too when it came to nuclear annihilation, which is why we survived it.

In this case, are all decisions made at the whim of a single man? Are there some sort of internal checks and balances like what appeared to be the case in Soviet times? Because, if not, this actually might be more dangerous.

Edit: @956 Worldwide

Edited by bolverk
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Ace of Aces

The Ace of Aces 5377

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

That's literally the same source.

Now, the fact that "Ace of Aces" thinks the AP and the US government are "not credible sources" at this time makes said poster look extremely Sus to me.

Who's payin' you to post here, Ass of Asses?

AP literally replied to that tweet saying there was no detectable rise in radiation. We have enough shit to worry about than worrying about radiation poisoning that isn’t happening. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicole44

Nicole44 22315

Posted
Posted
Just now, Macanudo said:

Has there been any reason why the Ukrainians haven't rained down hellfire on that convoy? I realize they lack the air power to do it but overhead shots show a ton of wooded areas around it.   How hard is it to launch a coordinated attack from both sides of the road with Javelins?  They don't need to take out the whole convoy.   Just wreck havoc and take out some of the vehicles, especially toward the front and rear.  

I don’t know either! I know they need more javelins and drones and most of the expert say drones are the best way to take that convoy out

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BillyGoatHill

BillyGoatHill 4421

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SL Xpress said:

What do you think the purpose of the UN should be?

Not quite sure what you are asking....UN has been in the Soviet and now Russia pockets ( and many other countries not tied to the US or our close allies) for years. I am in no way taking Russia's side on this, but the UN has been and still is a waste of corruption throughout the years and has literally been a thorn in the US side. Should have kicked ALL of those diplomats (many spies) and their diplomatic immunity out of New York and the country years ago. 

  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
phdhorn

phdhorn 6225

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Constant said:

jennifer-lawrence-thumbs-up.gif

Sure, he'll blink once or twice, look up, and say, "Well why the shit didn't ya SAY so?  Holy shit, no one asked me until now!  Sure!  I'll get right on that!  Meanwhile, can you turn on Jeopardy?  I wanna see if those new hosts are any good.  Thanks!"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rimbo

Rimbo 27035

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Ace of Aces said:

AP literally replied to that tweet saying there was no detectable rise in radiation. We have enough shit to worry about than worrying about radiation poisoning that isn’t happening. 

like the fire in my pants

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
InkaUtexas

InkaUtexas 26902

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillyGoatHill said:

Not quite sure what you are asking....UN has been in the Soviet and now Russia pockets ( and many other countries not tied to the US or our close allies) for years. I am in no way taking Russia's side on this, but the UN has been and still is a waste of corruption throughout the years and has literally been a thorn in the US side. Should have kicked ALL of those diplomats (many spies) and their diplomatic immunity out of New York and the country years ago. 

And make them pay their damn parking tickets. 

  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BamaATL

BamaATL 16593

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Serious question here:

As a child of the 80s and as scary as some aspects of the Cold War were, like waking up in a cold sweat at the age of 12 after watching "The Day After", there was always some degree of reassurance that Soviet leadership had some sort of intricate decision-making process. It was murky as shit, and I never fully understood it (still don't as I'm not a student of the USSR). But there was always that term Kremlinology that was thrown around that made me feel like there were always ongoing consultations/debates among mysterious committees which led Soviet actions. And, after all, the Russians really did seem to love their children too when it came to nuclear annihilation, which is why we survived it.

In this case, are all decisions made at the whim of a single man? Are there some sort of internal checks and balances like what appeared to be the case in Soviet times? Because, if not, this actually might be more dangerous.

A great question, and I don't have a great answer.  It's entirely unclear, at least at the public level.  I'm sure our intel operations have a good sense of this situation, but they certainly aren't going to tell us, let alone the enemy.  You are correct, to my understanding, that in the Soviet days they had rigorous protocols and safety measures.  Problem is, that was 30 plus years ago.  Could Putin have changed all this, certainly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pescado_Rojo

Pescado_Rojo 19587

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

Has there been any reason why the Ukrainians haven't rained down hellfire on that convoy? I realize they lack the air power to do it but overhead shots show a ton of wooded areas around it.   How hard is it to launch a coordinated attack from both sides of the road with Javelins?  They don't need to take out the whole convoy.   Just wreck havoc and take out some of the vehicles, especially toward the front and rear.  

 The Russians must have a security perimeter pushed far enough out that the Javelins would be out of range. I have no idea the range of a Javelin, but surely some Russian commander does, right? Those vehicles had crews that were issued guns I assume. Maybe not…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...