Русский корабль - иди нахуй

[Laxtonto 13324]

I know they have a website keeping track of equipment losses, but has anyone then piggybacked off of this to make a rolling counter of the actual cost in today's rubles/dollars/pounds of the equipment losses Russia has sustained.

 

I am really interested to see how much they have essentially erased from their economy much less how much it would cost to refit or replace..

[ShaggyBevo RIP 3873]

1 minute ago, Gatorubet said:

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

He'll be like Hitler learning the Bismarck was sunk from the BBC.

[Pods 7637]

2 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

Раз, два, три, Not it.

[Chad Fuck 18161]

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

[NAVY 6970]

Putin going to be photographed with even more and larger cylindrical objects to counter this propaganda disaster 

ohz nyet 

[elfenix 34756]

6 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

how long is that table?

[Chad Fuck 18161]

how long is that table?

Not long enough.

[ShaggyBevo RIP 3873]

https://i.imgur.com/ChiqJI0.jpg

[686 3461]

princess Leia has bigger boobs

Yeah but that Finnish PM seems like she’s into some kinky / fun shit.

[The Dog 44862]

22 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

"Comrade! There has been an incident aboard the naval vessel Moskva, but our brave sailors are getting the issue under control."

And tell him nothing else.

Edited April 14, 2022 by The Dog

[F250 29203]

Fucking Putin.

[Gatorubet 30757]

2 minutes ago, The Dog said:

"Comrade! There has been an incident aboard the naval vessel Moskva, but our brave sailors are getting the issue under control."

And tell him nothing else.

[Chad Fuck 18161]

Fucking Putin.

Nope. He’s riding this ship all the way down.

[atomheartbevo 90664]

25 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

[atomheartbevo 90664]

[F250 29203]

6 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Either option ends like this.

 

[Trey3216 15452]

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

Less than two months ago, the Russian Navy was facing off against Irish fishermen.

What a long few months.

Prepared them for being capture towed by farmers. 

[Gatorubet 30757]

19 minutes ago, F250 said:

Fucking Putin.

Nope. New conscripts coming.

 

[RDCanecutter 26908]

6 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

Yep, there is blood in the water, and plenty of countries would like to settle some scores.

My bet is that for two cents, the Poles would swarm into Russia with a rusty bayonet in one hand, and a bottle of wodka in the other.

[Gatorubet 30757]

55 minutes ago, Laxtonto said:

I am really interested to see how much they have essentially erased from their economy much less how much it would cost to refit or replace..

 

[Left Coast 879]

1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

Speaking of crying, how’d you like to be the one assigned to tell Putin his Black Sea Flagship named after Russia’s capital was sunk?

[RDCanecutter 26908]

4 hours ago, ABSR said:

The US Navy likely still uses Morse code in flashing light communications.   At least we did in the 90’s.   Not often, but signalmen trained on it.

But yes the Morse code thing makes no sense. For radio or other comms they would have used.

Is commo concentrated in one part of a ship? I wonder if there is a missile-explosion-sized hole where the fancier systems sat?

[Mantis Toboggan, MD 1520]

In the history of the world has a Navy lost a naval battle against an opponent that has no Navy?

[TexasEd 8266]

On 4/12/2022 at 10:07 PM, atomheartbevo said:

 

 

On 4/12/2022 at 10:12 PM, InkaUtexas said:

Been waiting on this. I wonder who would fly them. 

Those are the normal aircraft deployed with that class of ship, it carries a lot of Marines and their pilots fly those aircraft.

Edited April 14, 2022 by TexasEd

[InkaUtexas 26924]

1 hour ago, TexasEd said:

 

Those are the normal aircraft deployed with that class of ship, it carries a lot of Marines and their pilots fly those aircraft.

Sorry my man, I know that. the discussion was about transferring weapons. My bad if I was not clear. 

[Superhero 9029]

2 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

Not long enough.

So sayeth South Austin's mom

[InkaUtexas 26924]

From my dad. SF dude. good sense of humor. I know others have already done this, but he just knocked it out. 

Fuck em. Bomb Odessa and find out. 

[InkaUtexas 26924]

Feel free to post. Told him it was pretty damn good. 

[956 Worldwide 35598]

Sinking of the Moskva is huge beyond the immediate theatre impact.  The whole Russian navy only had three operational. Losing a capital ship seriously degrades their theoretical power projection capability.

[Constant 6888]

 

[Hefeweizen 5445]

3 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

Feel free to post. Told him it was pretty damn good. 

Better than pretty good, he has potential.

[MNLonghornFUKM 8985]

From my dad. SF dude. good sense of humor. I know others have already done this, but he just knocked it out. 
Fuck em. Bomb Odessa and find out. 

[Homercles 10206]

8 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

That seems to be a pretty glaring design flaw no?

Yeah all it takes is one of these guys to blow the whole thing up

[BehoId, The Underminer! 11669]

6 hours ago, Mantis Toboggan, MD said:

In the history of the world has a Navy lost a naval battle against an opponent that has no Navy?

The Exocet in Falklands that got the British ship is pretty close.  

[The Dog 44862]

 

[Scheiss Meister 8473]

5 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

Feel free to post. Told him it was pretty damn good. 

It's very damn good.  Slightly reminiscent of the Willie and Joe cartoons in style, and definitely the same flavor.  Tell your dad he knocked it out of the park.

[Laxtonto 13324]

3 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

Sounds like the purge continues. 

 

If I was the dude that was in charge of the Navy I would be worried..

[Schulz2.0 29283]

https://www.npr.org/2022/04/13/1092091451/ukrainians-have-arrived-at-the-u-s-mexico-border-by-the-thousands

[Chad Fuck 18161]

 

That’s a shame.

He’s doing all of Stalins plays, and they’re going to fuck him the same way.

[Bevo 13903]

So what is the end game here? Let's assume Russia keeps getting its ass pushed in. Putin isn't going to allow Russia to be defeated by Ukraine, give up Donbas and Crimea and say never mind to the Russian people. And hoping that the Russian government is overthrown or collapses is a fool's game: It may happen but it isn't something that can be relied on. So will Putin use tactical nukes on Kyiv to force the war to end? What would be NATO's response to the escalation? Obviously, the West could invade Russia but there would likely be consequences and even if it was successful, the West wouldn't leave Russia in anarchy. And we aren't going to use nukes. What would Russia's response be to counter?

[Auto Driller 2567]

Putin cares about retaining power above all else. Using nukes is almost a guarantee that he loses that power - either because he’s dead through MAD or by the entire world invading to depose him. The standard Russian playbook in this case is to continue ratcheting up the purges and accusations of traitors.

[KYHorn 17618]

 

 

[NorthLoop 14504]

9 minutes ago, Auto Driller said:

Putin cares about retaining power above all else. Using nukes is almost a guarantee that he loses that power - either because he’s dead through MAD or by the entire world invading to depose him. The standard Russian playbook in this case is to continue ratcheting up the purges and accusations of traitors.

I'm worried that he has deluded himself into believing that there's no way he ever loses power, and that his #1 focus now is to save face. That could mean nuking Kyiv or worse. 

[Deej 77856]

48 minutes ago, Scheiss Meister said:

It's very damn good.  Slightly reminiscent of the Willie and Joe cartoons in style, and definitely the same flavor.  Tell your dad he knocked it out of the park.

 

[ShaggyBevo RIP 3873]

53 minutes ago, Laxtonto said:

Sounds like the purge continues. 

 

If I was the dude that was in charge of the Navy I would be worried..

Black Sea commander has been 'relieved'

[BabaYaga 15629]

lol - for those that get the reference

 

[Chad Fuck 18161]

37 minutes ago, Auto Driller said:

Putin cares about retaining power above all else. Using nukes is almost a guarantee that he loses that power - either because he’s dead through MAD or by the entire world invading to depose him. The standard Russian playbook in this case is to continue ratcheting up the purges and accusations of traitors.

This.  "We were betrayed by these assholes that I'm killing off, otherwise we'd all be drinking champagne in Kyiv right now!"  Feeds on the "they're out to get us" myth and also bolsters Puton's personal mythology via "Only I can save you from all these traitors I'm finding."  

 

[BabaYaga 15629]

3 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

This.  "We were betrayed by these assholes that I'm killing off, otherwise we'd all be drinking champagne in Kyiv right now!"  Feeds on the "they're out to get us" myth and also bolsters Puton's personal mythology via "Only I can save you from all these traitors I'm finding."  

 

Military purges in the face of defeat is as old as men picking up sticks to try and kill one another.  Recent examples besides Hitler/Stalin and Saddam in Iraq, China in the 80's, even Syria and Uganda.  

As for nukes, we have to remember Russia use is not as a last resort.  It's a battlefield, tactical response written into their military doctrine.  Been that way for decades.  For use when as "escalation" need to be "de-escalated"

Quote

"in response to large-scale aggression utilizing conventional weapons in situations critical to the national security of the Russian Federation." It also explicitly states for the first time that Russia "reserves the right" to use nuclear weapons to respond to all "weapons of mass destruction" attacks. Furthermore, the doctrine reaffirms Russia's negative security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon states and reiterates Russia's extension of its nuclear umbrella to its allies.

 

[Chad Fuck 18161]

3 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

Military purges in the face of defeat is as old as men picking up sticks to try and kill one another.  Recent examples besides Hitler/Stalin and Saddam in Iraq, China in the 80's, even Syria and Uganda.  

As for nukes, we have to remember Russia use is not as a last resort.  It's a battlefield, tactical response written into their military doctrine.  Been that way for decades.  For use when as "escalation" need to be "de-escalated"

 

Well, I don't think we can rely on Russia to rely on their military doctrine.  That's pretty clear by now.

The doctrine is what one guy says it is.  And Putin is definitely the kind of guy who could say "burn it all down" if it came to that.  I mean, that's essentially what he's doing conventionally.  

[elfenix 34756]

nsiap