Jump to content
Required Reading for any Longhorn ×

Русский корабль - иди нахуй

Eastwood

By Eastwood
in Daily Texan

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • atomheartbevo

    8626

  • MillerEP

    7300

  • Schulz2.0

    3649

  • InkaUtexas

    3012

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

AUS-97HORN
AUS-97HORN

For the love of Christ woman,  stop posting the same fucking thing every 20 mins just to make your neurotic self feel better.     Bring something useful to the thread other than your inane babbli

closetohumping
closetohumping
InkaUtexas
InkaUtexas

I volunteered today. Log/Admin role to replace people for 30-60 days. The operation is in the west, or should the Orcs win will be pulled back behind the NATO wall. Either way the humanitarian effort

Posted Images

utee94

utee94 15865

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, MillerEP said:

 

Oh wow, Nissan fears that the war in Ukraine "may become more serious" than the scores of thousands of people that have already been slaughtered and/or kidnapped?  Wow, thanks for all the concern, Nissan.

Also, go fuck yourself, Nissan.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Auto Driller

Auto Driller 2506

Posted
Posted

Even though I don’t speak Russian, I can sense the desperation in their voices. They’re now saying things like “we can rebuild our economy” instead of “the sanctions didn’t work, we’re stronger than ever”. Sorry guys. You fucked around and now you’re going to find out. 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105383

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, Auto Driller said:

Even though I don’t speak Russian, I can sense the desperation in their voices. They’re now saying things like “we can rebuild our economy” instead of “the sanctions didn’t work, we’re stronger than ever”. Sorry guys. You fucked around and now you’re going to find out. 

Do you know what the rest of the world should do, though?

Hurt them more.  Hurt them much, much, much more.  When you have your opponent in pain.....double down.   Finish them.

  • Hook 'Em 11
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pops

pops 7007

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Trey3216 said:

That would be a 3 day 'war'.  

Wouldn't take close to that long. These guys are getting their shit pushed in by our salvage/surplus shit. A legit nato offensive would ruin them in hours. Our biggest problem would be Poland not turning off all coms and continuing to pummel their ass after Russia surrendered.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trey3216

Trey3216 15366

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pops said:

Wouldn't take close to that long. These guys are getting their shit pushed in by our salvage/surplus shit. A legit nato offensive would ruin them in hours. Our biggest problem would be Poland not turning off all coms and continuing to pummel their ass after Russia surrendered.  

Not doubting that.  I’m mocking Putin’s ideas that this would be a 3 day war, when in reality, a coordinated NATO finish job on this would most undoubtedly be.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RDCanecutter

RDCanecutter 26475

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, pops said:

Wouldn't take close to that long. These guys are getting their shit pushed in by our salvage/surplus shit. A legit nato offensive would ruin them in hours. Our biggest problem would be Poland not turning off all coms and continuing to pummel their ass after Russia surrendered.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Lithuanian_occupation_of_Moscow#:~:text=The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth occupation,boyars led by Mikhail Saltykov.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pops

pops 7007

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

And lets not forget the hurt the Poles put on them in the 1920's. And that was with over half their army still stuck in France. Would not be 3 days, but take nukes off the table and yeah, we own them. 

Honestly.... and I know you can't take the risk because even a blind squirrel finds a nut, but looking at the personnel and equipment Russia is using I would be surprised if they have a single nuke capable of firing. They can't change tires. How the fuck are they supposed to maintain a nuclear arsenal?   They are the biggest paper tiger in the history of the world

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dimyh

dimyh 1874

Posted
Posted

 

The attack on the mall was with KH 22 missiles which were older Soviet tech that even Ukraine discontinued. They were originally designed as anti-ship missiles for use against aircraft carriers. So Russia is reaching really deep in their old warchest at this point. Still fucking dangerous but I'm curious how much they have got stockpiled before they have to start rolling out some trebuchets.

 

https://www.euronews.com/2022/06/12/russia-increasingly-relying-on-heavy-soviet-era-missiles-western-defence-officials-claim

Russia increasingly relying on heavy Soviet-era missiles, Western defence officials claim 

By Euronews  with AP  •  Updated: 12/06/2022
Elena Holovko sits among debris outside her house damaged after a missile strike in Druzhkivka, eastern Ukraine, 5 June 2022
Elena Holovko sits among debris outside her house damaged after a missile strike in Druzhkivka, eastern Ukraine, 5 June 2022   -   Copyright  AP Photo/Bernat Armangue
 

Russian forces are increasingly relying on heavy Soviet-era weapons that can cause mass casualties and significant collateral damage in their bid to make headway in capturing eastern Ukraine.

Fierce, prolonged fighting is depleting resources on both sides, according to British and US defence officials.

Russian bombers are thought to have been launching hefty 1960s-era anti-ship missiles in Ukraine, the UK Defence Ministry said on Saturday.

The Kh-22 missiles, with a reported range of 1,000 kilometres, were primarily designed to destroy aircraft carriers and can carry a nuclear warhead. 

When used in ground attacks with conventional warheads, they "are highly inaccurate and therefore can cause severe collateral damage and casualties," the ministry said.

It is unclear how many Kh-22s Russia has in its arsenal. By 2006, Ukraine has scrapped 423 missiles it inherited from the Soviet Union after deciding to decommission the weapon.

Both sides have expended large amounts of weaponry in what has become a grinding war of attrition for the eastern region of coal mines and factories known as the Donbas, placing huge strains on their resources and stockpiles.

Russia is likely using the 5.5-tonne anti-ship missiles because it is running short of more precise modern missiles, the UK ministry said. It gave no details of where exactly such missiles are thought to have been deployed.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rimbo

Rimbo 26136

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, pops said:

Wouldn't take close to that long. These guys are getting their shit pushed in by our salvage/surplus shit. A legit nato offensive would ruin them in hours. Our biggest problem would be Poland not turning off all coms and continuing to pummel their ass after Russia surrendered.  

Why would that be a problem?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rimbo

Rimbo 26136

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, pops said:

Honestly.... and I know you can't take the risk because even a blind squirrel finds a nut, but looking at the personnel and equipment Russia is using I would be surprised if they have a single nuke capable of firing. They can't change tires. How the fuck are they supposed to maintain a nuclear arsenal?   They are the biggest paper tiger in the history of the world

Part of the reason why their conventional army is in shit condition is that they've been spending the money to keep their nukes well-maintained.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89810

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, dimyh said:

The Kh-22 missiles, with a reported range of 1,000 kilometres, were primarily designed to destroy aircraft carriers and can carry a nuclear warhead. 

When used in ground attacks with conventional warheads, they "are highly inaccurate and therefore can cause severe collateral damage and casualties," the ministry said.

Given how they keep hitting settlements without any Ukrainian soldiers around, this is all by design.

But you would think at some point somebody would say "we should save everything in case they take Kherson!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...