Русский корабль - иди нахуй

[956 Worldwide 34466]

1 minute ago, statsman said:

Which is not at all what I posted. 

This is exactly what “the West is ready to fight to the last Ukrainian” implies.  

[BehoId, The Underminer! 11668]

of all the wars to think appeasement is going to work, this is probably the worst example.  putin has made it very clear he wants to get the gang back together.  no indication ukraine would be the end of the line.

[statsman 5428]

Quote

This is exactly what “the West is ready to fight to the last Ukrainian” implies.  

 

No. Ukraine putting up a fight helps NATO. They are using weapons almost as good as NATO would use, and they obviously have fewer troops than NATO would apply. It serves as a future deterrent to Russia. (And China). 

Russia’s attack strengthened the NATO alliance. 

The point is- the west is helped by the Ukrainians fighting. Yet, the west is not supplying troops. There is something cynical about this calculation and I’m not proud of it. That said, as I posted above, as long as Ukraine wants to fight, I want us to support them. 

Edited August 11, 2022 by statsman

[cactusflinthead 27595]

So you want a full fledged WW3? NATO unleashed and the full weight of the west behind it?

What the hell are you thinking? 

[ShaggyBevo RIP 3868]

I think people may be getting their swing wing SU-24s confused with T-160s. Correct me if I'm wrong, we've only seen TU-160s and TU-95s using ALCMs from way outside Ukraine mostly over the Caspian. 
But I would love to be wrong, especially as I think Russia just finished(?) modernizing them. 

This is looking to be the case.

Reports the high voltage power line towers between Zaporizhzhia NPP and Crimea are starting to fall over.

[956 Worldwide 34466]

1 hour ago, Fico said:

I think people may be getting their swing wing SU-24s confused with T-160s. Correct me if I'm wrong, we've only seen TU-160s and TU-95s using ALCMs from way outside Ukraine mostly over the Caspian. 

But I would love to be wrong, especially as I think Russia just finished(?) modernizing them. 

Yep, and the Su-24 is used in Russian naval aviation and from that operating base.  
 

As long as Russia has guided ALCMs, it makes no sense to use their strategic aviation over Ukrainian territory.  They don’t have air superiority and they don’t want to lose those assets, which is why they are standing off.  

[Gengs1 2583]

I recall reading somewhere that there is only 1 water plant that feeds Crimea with drinkable water since they cannot get it there, would be a shame if Ukrainians took it out, the exodus would be a lot more then now.

 

seems like power lines to Crimea are magically falling down, would be a shame if water production was halted 

Edited August 11, 2022 by Gengs1

[Parliament 14143]

1 hour ago, NoRagrets said:

Good article about Kherson and Ukrainian strategic badassery.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-seeks-to-squeeze-russian-troops-as-it-girds-for-battle-for-kherson-11660210201?mod=mhp

The audacity of Ukraine is incredible.  George Washington is smiling.

 

 

[SydneyCarton 47924]

2 hours ago, statsman said:

Lots of stupid fucking words 

Just so we're clear, over 90% of Ukranian people want to fucking fight, and don't want to compromise on any aspect of their territorial lines, yet here you come talking about how they should settle for less to "save them more suffering." Who are you, their fucking den mother? They want to fight. Zelensky said he needed bullets, not a ride out of Ukraine, and his citizens have matched him in resolve and purpose every step of the way, while Russian rapes, loots, and pillaging everything in it's path after violating sovereign borders out of greed. But you think Ukraine should just shut up and take it to "save more lives." How fucking condescending and dense are you? Because it seems like quite a bit. Nevermind that appeasing Russia now is just assuring they'll continue the same behavior with their neighbors years and decades down the road, which is more suffering, more raping, more horrifying atrocities on innocents, more stealing children and taking them to filtration camps. I'll tell you, "Less Rape Now but More Rape Later" is pretty odd strategy for a guy who seems so outraged at the suffering. 

1 hour ago, grazinhorn said:

I find little to disagree with in terms of your thought process.  This whole thing sucks, and identifying the optimal route out of the war is super challenging.  Much could still go very wrong, and not just for the Ukrainian people.

I find pretty much everything to disagree with in his thought process. 

41 minutes ago, statsman said:

Cactus, gents and atomheart, I don’t disagree with any of your comments. My problem is that I am chagrined by the truth of the comment “the west is prepared to fight to the last Ukrainian”. Not proud of that. 

How about "Ukraine is ready to fight to the last Ukrainian? Does that not mean shit to you?

I love how you touch upon nuclear weapons, and then completely ignore the fact that by us "doing more" in this instance is exactly what gets battlefield nukes detonated, and more people dead, as well as probably more ruined landscape and irradiated air blown to neighboring countries. You lament there isn't an offramp where Ukraine just eats shit and Russia gets away scot free, but you're ashamed we aren't taking a stronger position which increases the chances of nuclear attack and astronomically higher body counts? Talk about two concepts in direct contradiction with one another. Do you have Cognitive Dissonance tattoo'd on your ass? 

[Parliament 14143]

Take a breath, Man.  As much as we disagree with Statsman's conclusion, his logic is valid.  This thread is just so awesomely cool, and acrimony can kill it.  I'm saying this as your friend.  I hope you understand that.

[SydneyCarton 47924]

10 minutes ago, Parliament said:

Take a breath, Man.  As much as we disagree with Statsman's conclusion, his logic is valid.  This thread is just so awesomely cool, and acrimony can kill it.  I'm saying this as your friend.  I hope you understand that.

Don't let my profuse use of profanity and imagery fool you, I'm not a pot boiling over here. I was going to just be dismissive of his bad takes, but honestly this isn't the first time he's come on this thread wringing his hands over his view of how things should be going, while entirely dismissing the wants and desires of the people who are actually suffering. While, at the same time...being upset at the US and NATO for not taking a path that would potentially create much more suffering?

He should take his emotional and logically flawed musings to an entirely new thread where he can plead his case to the board, if this is going to be the case. You're right, this is a great thread and shouldn't be sullied by the equivalent of a kid walking into the middle of a movie and asking questions. 

I will say, however, that his logic is not valid, unless by valid you mean "everyone is entitled to an opinion no matter how poor." We've seen this pattern time and again, and the answer is always that appeasement leads to further trouble down the line, inevitably. Does this situation suck? Absolutely. Does appeasing Russia inevitably lead to more deaths and loss of lives at a later date? Also Absolutely. It's like the guy is still surprised Hitler didn't stop with Poland. Who could have imagined?!?!

Edited August 11, 2022 by SydneyCarton

[Chad Fuck 17575]

38 minutes ago, Parliament said:

The audacity of Ukraine is incredible.  George Washington is smiling.

 

 

Zelensky is an acknowledged pro of reading his audience.  He knows exactly which notes to hit for each country he goes to, it's not just the US.

But reaching back for the Revolutionary album?  And playing that old hit Saratoga?  That's masterful.

[cactusflinthead 27595]

15 minutes ago, Parliament said:

his logic is valid

Exactly fucking where in that convoluted mess did he have a logical argument about anything?

 

[Parliament 14143]

8 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

Zelensky is an acknowledged pro of reading his audience.  He knows exactly which notes to hit for each country he goes to, it's not just the US.

But reaching back for the Revolutionary album?  And playing that old hit Saratoga?  That's masterful.

Until the Monday after the invasion started, it sounded more like The Battle of Termopylea.  I like the Saratoga much better.  These guitar riffs just rock.

[Rimbo 25791]

3 hours ago, statsman said:

I guess we’re approaching 6 months? The Russian assumption was that some combination of overwhelming Russian power, welcoming by Ukrainians, and instability of Ukrainian government and armed forces would allow them to take over in days, creating a fait accompli before the west had time to respond?

There is no doubt that the Ukrainian response is remarkable. Russia badly miscalculated just about everything. 

I have to admit that I am very much disheartened by the savagery of the Russian troops and leadership. They are willing to sacrifice their own indiscriminately, and even more ready to assault, torture and murder Ukrainian soldiers and civilians. And to despoil the land for generations. 

Plus, there are the nukes. The nukes are the reason the west is holding back full support. Because of the nukes, if Russia is successful with indiscriminate bombing and civilian slaughter, western armies will not send troops in support. Because of the nukes, the western support comes with strings attached. 

I find myself a little disturbed by my happiness in the reports of dead Russian soldiers, but it is balanced by my disgust of the Russian murderous cruelty to civilians and captured POWs. I have been downvoted here for prior expressions of desire for a truce, even one that surrenders territory to Russia. My motive is a wish for an end to the Ukrainian suffering, and a fear that Russia can and will get more barbaric, using their nuclear threat as a backstop against western retaliation. It seems to me, that unless Putin were to die, the likely outcomes are either a protracted vicious war of attrition (with Ukrainian civilians doing most of the attriting), or a brutal Russian victory. I don’t see NATO openly joining in as long as Russia doesn’t expand (NATO needs to make it clear that if Russia expands, we are coming in). 

I can see even a bad truce as superior to either outcome noted above. That said, I don’t get a vote. As long as the Ukrainians are willing to keep fighting on, I support arming them as much as possible. I also support helping any Ukrainians that wish to relocate outside the country for the duration. I marvel at their willingness to endure as much as they have so far, and it’s not my place to tell them that it’s too much. 

Sanctions are good, but I don’t have delusions about them. As soon as Putin dies, a new leadership in Russia will state that Putin was driving everything, they (the new guys) are reasonable and let’s negotiate those sanctions away and do business. Of course, the western business leaders will want to do business. I hope some international body does an accounting of costs (property, injuries, lives) and makes reparations a requirement for sanction lifting. 

Ten years after the war, I expect us all to be working with Russians again. I’m sure they will tell us that we only heard one side of the story, that there is more to it. In our minds, we’ll be remembering the pregnant mother shot on the bridge, fleeing, the little girl with her legs blown off, but we’ll be silent, because it’s our job and what’s the point after all? (Somehow, the “Fawlty Towers” episode where they are exhorted to not mention the war to the German tourists won’t be as funny). They’ll say they were victims of Putin as much as anyone and we’ll probably nod along in agreement that that guy was an asshole. 

Thanks for bearing with me on this long post. I’m just trying to figure out how this ends (a Putin death seems like the simplest route to the least pain), and disheartened by the cost (more in lives and innocence than in dollars) of getting there. 

In response to the portion I just bolded: Then you don't understand what Russia's overall goals are. Their goals are to steal what they can, sign a truce once the West loses the stomach for the losses and savagery, re-arm, then do it again. And again. And again.

They won't stop this until they are beaten. Ukraine and Poland understand this.

If we sign a truce now, we only guarantee the next invasion, the next set of atrocities. There's a word for this kind of policy: Appeasement. We already know it doesn't work in these situations.

We must support Ukraine until Russia is completely defeated and disarmed. Then, we must ensure Russia is never able to arm itself again. Changing the leadership won't change Russia's geopolitical goals; these have always been the goals of Moscow.

Only through total victory will Eastern Europe be safe.

[statsman 5428]

That would be a great point if I actually advocated for appeasement. I didn’t. 

I recognized that this war will end in one of three ways:

1. Russia wins. 
2. Ukraine wins

3. Some negotiated situation. 

Nobody is ever happy with negotiated outcomes, yet that’s how a bunch of wars end. We’re six months in to a war,  proxy for us, real for Ukraine. A whole lot of lives have been wasted or ruined and a whole lot more will be before we get to ending 1, 2, or 3. 

Im rooting for Ukraine as much, or more, than any of you. I’m as disgusted by Russia as any of you. I don’t think my rooting will have any impact on the outcome. 

[Brisketexan 104683]

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

All a bad truce does, including conceding some territory to Putin, is provide some breathing room for Putin to prepare for another go at Ukraine. 

Putin is not reasonable.  Russia took territory in 2014   It wasn’t enough for them, they wanted Ukraine’s oil and gas and people.  

The only outcome that doesn’t set up another Russian invasion in the future is fully kicking them out of Ukraine and wrecking the Russian economy and military   

The fact that Russia is kidnapping Ukrainian kids and taking them back to Russia, and publicly boasting on the official Russian state TV that they will raise these kids right speaks to the very evil and batshit craziness of Putin and Russian society.

This.  Mentioned it much earlier in the thread, but as someone whose entire career has been "adversarial conflict and resolution of same," there are some adversaries who demonstrate a pattern of conduct that indicates that a negotiated good-faith resolution will not solve the problem.  Instead, you have to just knuckle down, and defeat them.  This is that sort of situation.  Putin has made that abundantly clear, and any other take is wishcasting, because war sucks, it inflicts massive human suffering, and when nuclear powers are involved, it's extra scary.  But it's still the truth.

1 hour ago, statsman said:

Cactus, gents and atomheart, I don’t disagree with any of your comments. My problem is that I am chagrined by the truth of the comment “the west is prepared to fight to the last Ukrainian”. Not proud of that. 

Except.....

1 hour ago, cactusflinthead said:

We're not pushing them to the front line. They asked us for support. We are giving it. If they want to throw on the brakes that's up to them. But, the opposite is true. They want more from us. 

1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Every indication is that Ukrainians want to fight.  How patronizing is it to suggest that they are our puppets and just need us to stop helping them so they can come to their senses and sign a bad treaty? 

 

1 hour ago, statsman said:

No. Ukraine putting up a fight helps NATO. They are using weapons almost as good as NATO would use, and they obviously have fewer troops than NATO would apply. It serves as a future deterrent to Russia. (And China). 

Russia’s attack strengthened the NATO alliance. 

The point is- the west is helped by the Ukrainians fighting. Yet, the west is not supplying troops. There is something cynical about this calculation and I’m not proud of it. That said, as I posted above, as long as Ukraine wants to fight, I want us to support them. 

Damn right we're not supplying troops, because that is a DIRECT war between the US and Russia, and....

1 hour ago, cactusflinthead said:

So you want a full fledged WW3? NATO unleashed and the full weight of the west behind it?

What the hell are you thinking? 

Ukraine WANTS to fight.  Russia is a bad and dangerous actor that needs to be dealt with.  The US etc. doing so directly creates a heightened risk of the kind of escalation that could risk hundreds of millions of lives.

We are walking EXACTLY the right line.  Ukraine will forever be in debt to the West for giving them to the tools to turn their will to fight and rage against an invader into results and freedom for them.  And the free world will forever be in debt to Ukraine for spending their blood in this fight.  The ledger will be even when all is said and done.

[SydneyCarton 47924]

6 minutes ago, statsman said:

That would be a great point if I actually advocated for appeasement. I didn’t. 

I recognized that this war will end in one of three ways:

1. Russia wins. 
2. Ukraine wins

3. Some negotiated situation. 

Nobody is ever happy with negotiated outcomes, yet that’s how a bunch of wars end. We’re six months in to a war,  proxy for us, real for Ukraine. A whole lot of lives have been wasted or ruined and a whole lot more will be before we get to ending 1, 2, or 3. 

Im rooting for Ukraine as much, or more, than any of you. I’m as disgusted by Russia as any of you. I don’t think my rooting will have any impact on the outcome. 

You LITERALLY said that a bad truce (#3) was superior than any outcome above. That is a direct quite. That is the definition of you ADVOCATING for a negotiated truce. 

You claim to be rooting for Ukraine potentially more than any of us, but you're doing so in a way that doesn't respect the wants and wishes of the actual Ukrainian people. Honestly, it sounds like you'd be ok with all of this if Russia was JUST a LITTLE less Rapey And Murdery while they were invading another land and deliberately targeting and killing innocent civilians. 

Edited August 11, 2022 by SydneyCarton

[Rimbo 25791]

1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Every indication is that Ukrainians want to fight.  How patronizing is it to suggest that they are our puppets and just need us to stop helping them so they can come to their senses and sign a bad treaty? 

There's a certain nationalist bigotry in criticisms of US policy, that the critics have to deny other country's their agency to make the criticisms. People who think the CIA overthrew Allende in Chile are among these; while the CIA helped a little bit, Allende would've been overthrown had the US never been involved. You have to be impressively ignorant of everything that was happening in Chile to make that claim.

"US will fight to the last Ukrainian" is another great example of this. We are helping Ukrainians win their war. They are not fighting ours. But it is in everyone's best interests that Ukraine wins.

Everyone except Russia, of course.

[atomheartbevo 89464]

 

 

[Rimbo 25791]

7 minutes ago, statsman said:

That would be a great point if I actually advocated for appeasement. I didn’t. 

You can't advocate for Appeasement, then claim you didn't.

Or do you just not understand that what you did advocate for is the literal definition of Appeasement?

[atomheartbevo 89464]

2 hours ago, Fico said:

I think people may be getting their swing wing SU-24s confused with T-160s. Correct me if I'm wrong, we've only seen TU-160s and TU-95s using ALCMs from way outside Ukraine mostly over the Caspian. 

But I would love to be wrong, especially as I think Russia just finished(?) modernizing them. 

 

[Fico 1743]

1 hour ago, statsman said:

 

No. Ukraine putting up a fight helps NATO. They are using weapons almost as good as NATO would use, and they obviously have fewer troops than NATO would apply. It serves as a future deterrent to Russia. (And China). 

Russia’s attack strengthened the NATO alliance. 

The point is- the west is helped by the Ukrainians fighting. Yet, the west is not supplying troops. There is something cynical about this calculation and I’m not proud of it. That said, as I posted above, as long as Ukraine wants to fight, I want us to support them. 

This is not the Red Army sitting on far bank of the Vistula during the Warsaw Uprising. 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

 

[Captainant 27479]

Just now, atomheartbevo said:

 

that's a HUGE blow to the russian air force either way. EIGHT fucking aircraft destroyed??? That's HUGE! Especially when they can't exactly requisition more materiel 

[Chad Fuck 17575]

4 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

 

 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

 

[956 Worldwide 34466]

20 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

There's a certain nationalist bigotry in criticisms of US policy, that the critics have to deny other country's their agency to make the criticisms. People who think the CIA overthrew Allende in Chile are among these; while the CIA helped a little bit, Allende would've been overthrown had the US never been involved. You have to be impressively ignorant of everything that was happening in Chile to make that claim.

"US will fight to the last Ukrainian" is another great example of this. We are helping Ukrainians win their war. They are not fighting ours. But it is in everyone's best interests that Ukraine wins.

Everyone except Russia, of course.

One of the ways to tell if you’re reading trash about this conflict is if the explainer and pontificator doesn’t cite a single Ukrainian but spends a lot of time talking about memos from James Baker or quoting Putin at the Munich Security Conference in 2008. 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

28 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

There's a certain nationalist bigotry in criticisms of US policy, that the critics have to deny other country's their agency to make the criticisms. People who think the CIA overthrew Allende in Chile are among these; while the CIA helped a little bit, Allende would've been overthrown had the US never been involved. You have to be impressively ignorant of everything that was happening in Chile to make that claim.

"US will fight to the last Ukrainian" is another great example of this. We are helping Ukrainians win their war. They are not fighting ours. But it is in everyone's best interests that Ukraine wins.

Everyone except Russia, of course.

All of this.  And there are plenty of instances in history where the US engaged in actions that directly led to wars, proxy or otherwise, but this isn’t one of them, and so it’s annoying that it gets brought up. 

This isn’t even a situation like 1940/1941 when the US worked to cut off Japan from oil and gas, which would cripple Japan’s military, as well as the choke point we created with the Philippines.  While we didn’t fire shots at the Japanese, from the Japanese perspective, we crippled them the same as if 6 months or a year later we had directly put their troop transports and support ships on the bottom of the ocean.  Doesn’t justify it, but the Japanese had something tangible in their minds to justify it, unlike the Russians who are just being greedy assholes.

In fact, in this instance, it was our relative lack of action after Russia’s invasion of Crimea that led to February of 2022. In their mind, Ukraine belongs to them, and Ukraine’s old and gas was a threat to their exports to Europe, none of which justifies what they’ve done, but had we done more after 2014, Putin might have hesitated.

Now Putin has no way out.

[956 Worldwide 34466]

27 minutes ago, Captainant said:

that's a HUGE blow to the russian air force either way. EIGHT fucking aircraft destroyed??? That's HUGE! Especially when they can't exactly requisition more materiel 

This might very well make their fixed-wing combat naval aviation defunct for all purposes in the Black Sea region. They’ll have to redirect assets from other fleets if they want to stand it up again. 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

8 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

This might very well make their fixed-wing combat naval aviation defunct for all purposes in the Black Sea region. They’ll have to redirect assets from other fleets if they want to stand it up again. 

I’m just picturing those hundreds or even thousands of Russians that are fleeing Crimea, and what they are going to tell their friends and relatives about why they had to flee.  That psychological blow is far larger than any lost aircraft.

And this is in reference to Belarus last night.

 

[Rimbo 25791]

I should add that not all, or even most, criticism of US policy is based in nationalist bigotry that denies other countries' and peoples' agency.

Just from that peculiar hardcore who think Noam Chomsky is smart about anything other than Math, and whenever something terrible happens look to the West first for explanation.

Ukrainians aren't our puppets or tools. They are our allies. We are working together towards and outcome that helps all of us, but they themselves first and foremost.

[Captainant 27479]

14 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

This might very well make their fixed-wing combat naval aviation defunct for all purposes in the Black Sea region. They’ll have to redirect assets from other fleets if they want to stand it up again. 

I really am curious for after this conflict is over to learn more about the raid. The Ukrainians (as far as we know) committed a few missiles and some special forces to achieve a tactical knockout blow for russias air units in the region, and are adding a ton of stress to their strategic operations. 

Between this and sinking the Moskva, russia really won't have any antiair capacity left in the region, which bodes well for Ukraine's Crimean and Kherson offensives

[DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt 12301]

it seems weird to me that losing 8 planes would bring them to their knees. 8 doesn't seem like a lot.

putin starting this war has to be the greatest military blunder ever, right?*

*i am not a military historian.

[atomheartbevo 89464]

5 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

Ukrainians aren't our puppets or tools. They are our allies. We are working together towards and outcome that helps all of us, but they themselves first and foremost.

And if there weren’t nukes involved, we’d be doing a lot more. A loss in Ukraine from an invasion Russia made should not cross the threshold of a national security threat to Russia, justifying a nuclear response, but unfortunately Putin is a very mentally ill man who doesn’t see it that way.

Speaking of kindred spirits

 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

Just now, DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt said:

it seems weird to me that losing 8 planes would bring them to their knees. 8 doesn't seem like a lot.

putin starting this war has to be the greatest military blunder ever, right?*

*i am not a military historian.

They have been a paper Tiger so it stands to reason their Air Force is shit (they never even achieved air superiority) and It keeps forcing them to dig older stuff out of storage.  Speaking of older stuff in storage..

 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

 

[atomheartbevo 89464]

How soon until she meets a middle-aged American online and gets a new hubby and couple of more kids?

Looks more like morning attire than mourning attire.

edit: she’s even wearing ducking tennis shoes

https://m.vk.com/photo-67889960_457270291?list=wall-67889960_59502&from=post

Edited August 11, 2022 by atomheartbevo

[atomheartbevo 89464]

Edited August 11, 2022 by atomheartbevo

[KYHorn 16865]

21 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Nice article. Interesting info:

Most of the aircraft destruction is in the revetments – ironically used to protect aircraft from events like this. If only the Russian’s used HAS’s (Hardened Air Shelters) – they may not be feeling the pain. The good news is, they are.

The revetments have given up three Su-24’s and three Su-30’s. A further Su-24 is destroyed at the eastern maintenance minor workshop shed.

And this is where it all gets interesting.

The actual targets.

Two minor workshop sheds have been totally targeted and destroyed. Moreover, two other areas that were targeted – or appeared to have been – were general parking areas used for vehicles and equipment.

It is strange that the two large munitions areas and the fuel depots were also not targeted. And to be honest, if an aircraft has been destroyed on the main flightline, I suspect this is from secondary explosions and fire rather than a direct strike as there is no crater present. Why wasn’t this area targeted?

The area around the parking revetments is dotted with small craters, possibly from debris. But they do look more like explosive craters rather than that caused by falling debris.

...

There is still no conclusive evidence as to what was used in this attack.

I’ve always thought a Ukrainian SF mission – which I didn’t want to say in the other blog as it was still a recent event and there was a slight OPSEC concern with me to be honest. The Ukrainian armed forces have stated it was a SF mission also.

However, the craters visible do point to a missile strike, with a good friend betting a ATACMS strike.

I’m still torn.

Maybe the maintenance sheds held more than scrap parts of aircraft to keep the main line going from day to day. I’d like to say the Russians aren’t that stupid – but since March, they’ve clearly shown they are.

[MillerEP 30339]

56 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

I should add that not all, or even most, criticism of US policy is based in nationalist bigotry that denies other countries' and peoples' agency.

Just from that peculiar hardcore who think Noam Chomsky is smart about anything other than Math, and whenever something terrible happens look to the West first for explanation.

Ukrainians aren't our puppets or tools. They are our allies. We are working together towards and outcome that helps all of us, but they themselves first and foremost.

Y'all are all correct a thousand percent and I agree. However, having argued this point to Russian stooges/trolls on the internet they live in a whole other world. They claim this is a US Proxy war because they have all been told that the US manufactured the revolution of dignity and that the Euromaidan to unseat Yanukovych was a CIA op. So their entire manufactured excuse to invade Ukraine and create a fake insurgency in the East was in order to restore the pre-Euromaidan (i.e. Putin's puppet) government.

So when you see people calling it a proxy war, it's JUST as likely that they're believers in this conspiracy theory narrative and not necessarily because of national bigotry.

Edited August 11, 2022 by MillerEP

[InkaUtexas 25534]

Hiya. Just want to say Fuck Putin. And concerning the widow above. Would not bang. If I go out I expect the widow to wear something better than that. 

Now can we get back to talking shit about Russia vs. Chile? 

[Trey3216 15325]

3 hours ago, statsman said:

 

No. Ukraine putting up a fight helps NATO. They are using weapons almost as good as NATO would use, and they obviously have fewer troops than NATO would apply. It serves as a future deterrent to Russia. (And China). 

Russia’s attack strengthened the NATO alliance. 

The point is- the west is helped by the Ukrainians fighting. Yet, the west is not supplying troops. There is something cynical about this calculation and I’m not proud of it. That said, as I posted above, as long as Ukraine wants to fight, I want us to support them. 

You think France would have given the colonies troops if they had vastly superior weapons compared to the British that they could use solely to arm the Yanks?  Not a chance.  They'd have spent $$ on transporting the shit here, and let us fight it out ourselves.  Unfortunately, that was not the case in the late 18th century.   It is the case now.  

[MillerEP 30339]

 

[Rimbo 25791]

9 minutes ago, MillerEP said:

Y'all are all correct a thousand percent and I agree. However, having argued this point to Russian stooges/trolls on the internet they live in a whole other world. They claim this is a US Proxy war because they have all been told that the US manufactured the revolution of dignity and that the Euromaidan to unseat Yanukovych was a CIA op. So their entire manufactured excuse to invade Ukraine and create a fake insurgency in the East was in order to restore the pre-Euromaidan (i.e. Putin's puppet) government.

So when you see people calling it a proxy war, it's JUST as likely that they're believers in this conspiracy theory narrative and not necessarily because of national bigotry.

Well, this is how the Russian trolls work, to drive a wedge between the Left and Right with lies they're already inclined to believe.

[Podrick's Magic Cock 191]

RATS

[MillerEP 30339]

 

[MillerEP 30339]

 

[Parliament 14143]

8 minutes ago, MillerEP said:

 

Not great, not terrible.