Big 10 too stupid to understand the CCG rules they wrote

[ButtFumble 5161]

Just now, David Dennison said:

The SEC is the best option if you care about Texas sports.

Academically, well . . . 

wouldn't it be just as good or better for Texas to ahve a schedule that kept OU as an annual game in the Big 12 (yet OU in the other division) and kept Tech and the  chopped off two other schools so that Texas can go out and schedule a team from the SEC, PAC 12, ACC or Big 10 or ND in the OOC because fans actually give a shit about that Vs being locked into playing SEC SEC SEC (or any other conference's dregs) every year in order to get a couple of good games every so often

as was said in several other threads Texas will be playing Georgia before aggy plays Georgia and Texas has games with LSU, Alabama and others....having two more OOC games makes it where Texas can do more of that while not being stuck playing the teams they do not want to play regularly

it is like the ND model in the ACC only playing a couple of extra conference games each year to make scheduling not exceedingly difficult

it is the best of all worlds...and it works for the other teams in the conference as well if they are not stupid about how they schedule

[David Dennison 18694]

7 minutes ago, ButtFumble said:

wouldn't it be just as good or better for Texas to ahve a schedule that kept OU as an annual game in the Big 12 (yet OU in the other division) and kept Tech and the  chopped off two other schools so that Texas can go out and schedule a team from the SEC, PAC 12, ACC or Big 10 or ND in the OOC because fans actually give a shit about that Vs being locked into playing SEC SEC SEC (or any other conference's dregs) every year in order to get a couple of good games every so often

as was said in several other threads Texas will be playing Georgia before aggy plays Georgia and Texas has games with LSU, Alabama and others....having two more OOC games makes it where Texas can do more of that while not being stuck playing the teams they do not want to play regularly

it is like the ND model in the ACC only playing a couple of extra conference games each year to make scheduling not exceedingly difficult

it is the best of all worlds...and it works for the other teams in the conference as well if they are not stupid about how they schedule

I guess, but I would much rather play the SEC west every year (even if it means playing aggy) than every current team in the Big XII not named Oklahoma.

[ButtFumble 5161]

39 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I guess, but I would much rather play the SEC west every year (even if it means playing aggy) than every current team in the Big XII not named Oklahoma.

you are ignoring the fact that if Texas and OU (or Texas and any other team) join the SEC SEC SEC then pretty much immediately Alabama and Auburn move to the SEC SEC SEC East East East ....and more than likely Missouri gets moved west as well

so you would be looking at LSU, aggy, Mississippi, Ole' Miss, Texas, OU, Arkansas, Missouri and the even with 9 conference games you will still go 8 years between seeing the east teams as a home game

does your dick really get hard to being in that division back with aggy's shit in order to get LSU on the schedule every year.....not to mention Missouri would start up crying about Texas (even though they actually did not in the Big 12 and really did not until after they were out of the Big 12 and they just joined in with the other fucking losers crying about Texas) and Arkansas would start crying as well

so you have aggy, Arkansas, and Missouri right back crying about Texas and them the Mississippi teams that cheat as bad as everyone but Auburn and that have the shittiest academics (if you are trying to give a fuck about that) and LSU.....that would cry about being stuck with the Big 12 east and losing out on all of their old SEC SEC SEC games because of Texas

so 4 teams crying about Texas, OU and the Mississippi sisters while the other division has Auburn, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, SC and Florida plus the easy Vandy win and  the usually easy UK win

that is a fucked division for Texas and Texas does not need the bullshit of the SEC SEC SEC to end up with that

Edited December 8, 2018 by ButtFumble

[David Dennison 18694]

1 minute ago, ButtFumble said:

you are ignoring the fact that if Texas and OU (or Texas and any other team) join the SEC SEC SEC then pretty much immediately Alabama and Auburn move to the SEC SEC SEC East East East ....and more than likely Missouri gets moved west as well

so you would be looking at LSU, aggy, Mississippi, Ole' Miss, Texas, OU, Arkansas, Missouri and the even with 9 conference games you will still go 8 years between seeing the east teams as a home game

does your dick really get hard to being in that division back with aggy's shit in order to get LSU on the schedule every year.....not to mention Missouri would start up crying about Texas (even though they actually did not in the Big 12 and really did not until after they were out of the Big 12 and they just joined in with the other fucking losers crying about Texas) and Arkansas would start crying as well

so you have aggy, Arkansas, and Missouri right back crying about Texas and them the Mississippi teams that cheat as bad as everyone but Auburn and that have the shittiest academics (if you are trying to give a fuck about that) and LSU.....that would cry about being stuck with the Big 12 east and losing out on all of their old SEC SEC SEC games because of Texas

so 4 teams crying about Texas, OU and the Mississippi sisters while the other division has Auburn, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, SC and Florida plus the easy Vandy win and  the usually easy UK win

that is a fucked division for Texas and Texas does not need the bullshit of the SEC SEC SEC to end up with that

I don't agree that they'd move Alabama and Auburn.

[ButtFumble 5161]

9 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I don't agree that they'd move Alabama and Auburn.

what do you think they would move the Mississippi sisters and Missouri or do you think they would attempt to split up Alabama and Auburn and keep their game as the rivalry game and then not move Missouri

I doubt that would happen especially to appease Texas and OU......the SEC SEC SEC does not care what Arkansas thinks, they are not going to bend over for Texas and OU, the east hates playing Missouri and Alabama and Auburn have as much pull as anyone in the conference and the east teams would love to have them....that leaves only LSU to be concerned about because lets face it everyone else is trying to get as far away from aggy as possible

they are not going to go with some stupid ass divisions again when they have the chance to correct things and only leave LSU butt hurt....and the Mississippi Sisters that they do not care about hearing from either.,..aggy, Arkansas and Missouri can eat a dick right back with Texas and OU where the others think they belong and LSU can just accept it 

I suppose you think the Big 10 would not just shove Texas and OU in the shit half of the conference either and move Wisconsin and someone else back east (to the leaders or no is it the Legends)....or you think the PAC 12 would somehow split up the old PAC 8 schools so there would not be divisions of the PAC 8 plus the 8 others......not happening

Edited December 8, 2018 by ButtFumble

[David Dennison 18694]

9 minutes ago, ButtFumble said:

what do you think they would move the Mississippi sisters and Missouri or do you think they would attempt to split up Alabama and Auburn and keep their game as the rivalry game and then not move Missouri

I doubt that would happen especially to appease Texas and OU......the SEC SEC SEC does not care what Arkansas thinks, they are not going to bend over for Texas and OU, the east hates playing Missouri and Alabama and Auburn have as much pull as anyone in the conference and the east teams would love to have them....that leaves only LSU to be concerned about because lets face it everyone else is trying to get as far away from aggy as possible

they are not going to go with some stupid ass divisions again when they have the chance to correct things and only leave LSU butt hurt....and the Mississippi Sisters that they do not care about hearing from either.,..aggy, Arkansas and Missouri can eat a dick right back with Texas and OU where the others think they belong and LSU can just accept it 

I suppose you think the Big 10 would not just shove Texas and OU in the shit half of the conference either and move Wisconsin and someone else back east (to the leaders or no is it the Legends)....or you think the PAC 12 would somehow split up the old PAC 8 schools so there would not be divisions of the PAC 8 plus the 8 others......not happening

The only game in the Big 12 that is comparable to an SEC football game is Texas/OU. We get that once a year. I'd love to also play LSU, Arkansas, and Ole Miss every year even if it means we have to play aggy.

It's never going to happen, but it's what I would prefer to our current conference schedule, which is trash.

[clapclapclap 9000]

If we go B1G (or Pac16 or ACC, we wont go slumming in the SEC) they'll just split 4 divisions instead of 2 and pick the best two div champs for the CCG.  And keep 9 conf games because it pays more.

 

Edited December 8, 2018 by clapclapclap
Now go away

[Doze 1322]

Conference realignment talk not going away.

 

 

[David Dennison 18694]

How is going to the SEC slumming?

[Michael Knight 12908]

It's cool you this are still talking about this bullshit 8 years later as if it's ever gonna happen

[David Dennison 18694]

2 minutes ago, Michael Knight said:

It's cool you this are still talking about this bullshit 8 years later as if it's ever gonna happen

It's never going to happen.

We're stuck with this shitty conference.