Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh I’ll play. If it can be proved that the president directed his lawyer to commit a felony (which it seems like it can) then the president should be impeached. Seems simple enough

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Here's a poll...

Donald Trump should be impeached for:

A) collusion with Russia

B) obstruction of justice

C) violation of the emoluments clause

D) commission of a campaign finance violation felony

E) being unfit to serve

F) all of the above

Edited by TexArcher
  • Like 3
Posted

"Treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors."  I doubt the founders ever expected to have an elected official that could cover all three categories.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Impeach him. Then re-elect him for no other reason than to break the impeachment record. Everyone wins.

If the Senate impeaches him, they'll disqualify him from holding public again.  It's their option, but there's really no reason not to do it.

Edited by Yuk
Posted
8 minutes ago, Yuk said:

If the Senate impeaches him, they'll disqualify him from holding public again.  It's their option, but there's really no reason not to do it.

The House impeaches; the Senate tries the case.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Impeach him. Then re-elect him for no other reason than to break the impeachment record. Everyone wins.

Saying this.  It would not surprise me at all if the Dems impeach, get shot down, impeach again, rinse and repeat, and draw it all out through the 2020 elections.  There are so many qualifying avenues that this is going to make for an interesting reelection campaign for sure.

Posted
1 hour ago, Radical Larry said:

No impeachment, elected to a second term, then has the 22nd amendment repealed and becomes president forever after finding out the secret to eternal life. Enjoy! /brisket

That’s beyond idiotic. He would let Ivanka takeover. All hail the Orange Queen.

Posted

With mounting evidence of felony crimes I can see a scenario where house votes to impeach.  This makes the senate decide what lengths they will go to to support this dipshit.  Behind closed doors senate leadership realize this gives them a chance to get out from under Trump and they vote to convict.  Then they start a campaign actually highlighting the evidence so as to prove why they had no choice in order to try and save some of the Trump base.

Posted
11 minutes ago, TexEx15 said:

With mounting evidence of felony crimes I can see a scenario where house votes to impeach.  This makes the senate decide what lengths they will go to to support this dipshit.  Behind closed doors senate leadership realize this gives them a chance to get out from under Trump and they vote to convict.  Then they start a campaign actually highlighting the evidence so as to prove why they had no choice in order to try and save some of the Trump base.

Senate would never convict, at least not on facts that have come out so far.

Posted
7 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

While better than Master of Puppets, it’s beaten by the Black Album.

This is the most disturbing opinion in the cloak room. 

The order is:

1. Master of Puppets

2. ...and Justice for Jason

3. ...and Justice for All

4.  Black album

  • Like 1
Posted

Impeach him the day after he wins the Republican nomination. Then complain about McConnell refusing to start the trial in the Senate. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Bookman said:

Senate would never convict, at least not on facts that have come out so far.

Senate (R)s will not convict under any set of facts.  They are traitors, straight up.  

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Ride the lightning was better than the black album too. It’s amazing how often the took a massive step backwards in quality.

Edited by Mole
Posted
37 minutes ago, Jack Straw said:

Senate (R)s will not convict under any set of facts.  They are traitors, straight up.  

I think "treason" is being used too loosely. Trump *may* have committed treason. But it's not apparent that Trump is an enemy of the U.S., so his supporters aren't committing treason.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Bookman said:

I think "treason" is being used too loosely. Trump *may* have committed treason. But it's not apparent that Trump is an enemy of the U.S., so his supporters aren't committing treason.

that's a fair point and distinction in that technically, Trump's supporters (in the Senate and otherwise) are complicit in his treason, as opposed to having independently and actively committed treason themselves.   Trump is absolutely an enemy of the U.S., however.  

Posted

Impeach - eventually.  First about 18 months of hearings and Mueller related info releases to stain and torture the pubs into ignominy.  So the 2020 elections can then ... drain the swamp.



×
×
  • Create New...