Donald Trump 2019

[David Dennison 18,867]

14 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

You literally don’t know what your talking about.

Tell me how I’m stupid. 

Can you give me a situation where it would be appropriate, and somehow better for the mom, to abort a viable fetus in the third trimester rather than simply delivering it? Be as specific as possible. 

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/late-term-abortion-29-weeks-dana-weinstein/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/19/abortion-mother-life-walsh/1644839/

Edited February 12, 2019 by David Dennison

[Bookman 4,639]

11 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

You literally don’t know what your talking about.

Tell me how I’m stupid. 

Can you give me a situation where it would be appropriate, and somehow better for the mom, to abort a viable fetus in the third trimester rather than simply delivering it? Be as specific as possible. 

Yes. Say it’s some Eurotrash whore carrying Donald Trump’s baby.

[WhatTheBuck 28,783]

1 minute ago, Bookman said:

Yes. Say it’s some Eurotrash whore carrying Donald Trump’s baby.

You think they should've aborted Barron?

[Gil Bang 25,960]

1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Call me Du'Vonta Lampkin if  you must, but I don't know what that sign says.

[Bama Chick 28,596]

Someone get Sean Spicer and his ill fitting suit on the phone, stat!!

[Radical Larry 28,625]

7 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

Call me Du'Vonta Lampkin if  you must, but I don't know what that sign says.

Fuck your wall. 

[horn4life 3,761]

We know exactly what Donald J. Trump knows tonight. A losing candidate for Texas Senator outdrew the sitting President of the United States in a head to head rally attendance count.  Trump's lies about his crowd size, hand size, and below the waist size are simply once again confirmed. 

I guess my only question is if Cornyn was honest with himself about the President's rally and Beto's rally.  I have little doubt that like most Trump rallies a lot of folks traveled to attend.  This could also be true of Beto, but not near to the extent of a typical Trump rally.  Overall I think today was a huge loss for Trump and the GOP.  Not that the dolts won't keep genuinely believe the lies they oh so want to believe.  But for me the reality of crowd size and the NECESSITY for Trump to lie his ass off regarding his own crowd is very telling.  El Paso fire department has already confirmed Trump was full of shit.

Now I guess I look forward toe Trump tweeting during his endless "executive time" trying to refute facts on Morning Joe... a show he swears he doesn;t watch,...

[Planet Houston 4,930]

36 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

You literally don’t know what your talking about.

Tell me how I’m stupid. 

No need to tell you, obviously. 

[ChiTownDoc 21,154]

Was at a conference at Trump Doral this last week.  Holy hell was the mood somber amongst the employees, many of whom are minorities.  

Also the place is a shithole if you’re judging it vs other 5 star resorts.  We were at Faena before the conference and you can’t even compare the two.  If his other properties are hurting anywhere near as bad as this, I’d say Eric better learn to make his own PBnJ sandwiches.  Yikes

[Texas73 421]

2 hours ago, GRHorn said:

Third trimester abortions are less popular than the wall. Rs would be smart to get every Dem on the record on that one and play off that as much as possible. 

1. What percent of abortions are third trimester?

2. Are you against abortions when the mother's life is in danger or the fetus is damaged? 

3. What do you think "every Dem" would say about third trimester abortions? 

I'm a Democrat  and I am not FOR abortions, but rather for freedom of choice. And I only support third trimester abortions when the mother's life is in danger or the fetus is damaged.

[RomaVicta 29,909]

2 hours ago, GRHorn said:

Maybe. Maybe not. Ds in blue states around the country seem to be wanting to reaffirm their support of it. People are talking about it more now. 

So, you really care more about strategies for your team to win than actually dealing with policies and plans that will help the country? Nice. Homo marriage is another winner for you guys. And don't forget those dangersome transexuals.

Let's spend all of our time talking about that in the newly arranged deckchairs on this sinking ship. 

Partisan fuckwads.

[RomaVicta 29,909]

1 hour ago, Hank Kingsley said:

 

He left out the best part: Eating the babies by grinding them up and having M-13 illegals make holiday tortillas out of them.

[atomheartbevo 89,682]

Trump was smart to pick out a venue that was small enough, that he could fill it up. 

Edited February 12, 2019 by atomheartbevo

[ChiTownDoc 21,154]

1 hour ago, GRHorn said:

You literally don’t know what your talking about.

Tell me how I’m stupid. 

Can you give me a situation where it would be appropriate, and somehow better for the mom, to abort a viable fetus in the third trimester rather than simply delivering it? Be as specific as possible. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/1644839

How about some examples from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists?   Does that work you ignorant fuck?

[Bama Chick 28,596]

Totally cool and normal.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,367]

 

[RPM 26,322]

4 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said:

 If his other properties are hurting anywhere near as bad as this, I’d say Eric better learn to make his own PBnJ sandwiches.  Yikes

There's always money in the banana stand.

[Bookman 4,639]

6 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

You think they should've aborted Barron?

I didn't say that.

Edited February 12, 2019 by Bookman

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,367]

“Un-wittingly” LOL

 

[Pancho 44,825]

6 hours ago, GRHorn said:

You’re not as smart as you think. 

Neither are you

[G650 14,263]

7 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said:

 

Also the place is a shithole if you’re judging it vs other 5 star resorts. 

They always have been. They are like Trump, a poor person's idea of what rich people do.

[Homercles 10,206]

 

NPR said the POLICE estimated about ten thousand+ for Beto. Same police said 6,500 in the building and about 10k outside for Trump. Sounds like a wash to me but a quick glance at the enemy on T_D at reddit naturally shows them parroting dear leaders assertion of hundreds at Beto.

Those people are unreachable.

[Blotto 23,525]

8 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

You think they should've aborted Barron?

 

1 hour ago, Bookman said:

I didn't say that.

Barron probably wishes they aborted Barron.

[Bozo_Casanova 26,472]

Was at a conference at Trump Doral this last week.  Holy hell was the mood somber amongst the employees, many of whom are minorities.  
Also the place is a shithole if you’re judging it vs other 5 star resorts.  We were at Faena before the conference and you can’t even compare the two.  If his other properties are hurting anywhere near as bad as this, I’d say Eric better learn to make his own PBnJ sandwiches.  Yikes

Agree about the Trump Doral, but the “naked burger” they serve at the sports bar there is one of the best hangover lunches I’ve ever had.

[Chad Fuck 17,684]

For a rich kid from NYC, Don Jr really embraced the white trash worldview well. 

Proof money doesn’t buy class.

[Francisco 2.0 32,395]

 

Yeah.  History does repeat itself.

https://uni-watch.com/

Quote

The marquee shown above was photographed at Madison Square Garden in Manhattan on Monday, Feb. 20, 1939 — almost exactly 80 years ago. As you can see, there was a Rangers/Red Wings game coming up the next day (the Rangers won), and a Fordham/Pitt college hoops game the day after that (Pitt won).

But the real story is the event at the top of the marquee — “Pro American Rally.” It was actually a Nazi rally, held by the German American Bund. Nearly three years before America entered World War II, 20,000 New Yorkers showed up and gave Nazi salutes while Bund leader Fritz Julius Kuhn railed against the “Jewish controlled press” and demanded a “white, Gentile-ruled United States.” The backdrop behind him featured a huge portrait of George Washington flanked by swastikas.

This event has largely disappeared from New York City history, and even from American history. I’d heard mention of it now and then but didn’t really come to grips with it until I learned about the recently released short movie A Night at the Garden, which has been nominated for Best Documentary Short at the upcoming Oscars. You can see the entire film — it’s only seven minutes long and consists entirely of footage from the rally — here:

 

 

 

[WhatTheBuck 28,783]

2 hours ago, Bookman said:

I didn't say that.

When you said, "some Eurotrash whore carrying Donald Trump’s baby," I just assumed you were talking about Melania. 

[GRHorn 105]

9 hours ago, David Dennison said:

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/late-term-abortion-29-weeks-dana-weinstein/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/19/abortion-mother-life-walsh/1644839/

I’ve been in situations like the first. What happens is you induce labor and the child passes peacefully after delivery. 

8 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/1644839

How about some examples from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists?   Does that work you ignorant fuck?

I’m acutely aware of the different disease processes that can cause a danger to a mother during a pregnancy and I’d guess you are more ignorant than me on this subject. This isn’t about 2nd trimester or earlier abortions.

You both cited Dennison’s second link. In that case the baby was less than six months and had not reached viability so yes the second baby would have to be delivered with no chance of survival. When I have been in/seen this situation then you deliver both the premature fetuses via a c section.  But again, that is second trimester.

If it’s a true emergency the baby or babies are expected to be out within 10 minutes of the c section being called. 

Mom in 3rd trimester gets sick—->we must kill this baby to save mom, is just not true.

You can always deliver the baby live before you could kill it and deliver it.  

[Steamboat1874 4,067]

12 hours ago, GRHorn said:

Even if the mother’s life is in “imminent danger” there’s no reason to kill the baby.

You deliver it. Mom survives. Simple. 

And you will adopt it....right?

 

You are a fucking moron.

[David Dennison 18,867]

17 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

You can always deliver the baby live before you could kill it and deliver it.  

So you just want the mother to have to go through the birth for no reason.

Edited February 12, 2019 by David Dennison

[sachick 1,189]

I’m waiting for Trumps mine was bigger than his tweet.

[Js1 85,353]

3 minutes ago, Pokemon said:

No, they will complain about paying for welfare babies, cut health care access for all, put GOD in schools, defund schools, arm teachers and then build prisons. 

Can't kill it in the womb, but if it gets shot and dies in 1st grade by some crazy gunman, so be it.  God's will.  

[DixonHur 11,314]

2 minutes ago, Pokemon said:

The precise point of a late term abortion is that delivery will probably harm if not kill the mother. Same with the child.

A C section then let it pass IS IN POINT OF FACT AN ABORTION though with a needless dangerous medically negligent very expensive barbaric surgery.

God aborts more babies than anyone, when are you guys gonna take him to task?

[shnsajax 3,591]

“Un-wittingly” LOL
 

Getting ahead of some breaking news?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[happyfunball 481]

Getting ahead of some breaking news?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1234

[GRHorn 105]

34 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

And you will adopt it....right?

 

You are a fucking moron.

We were talking about maternal “imminent danger”. Presumably adoption or not has been decided already by this point. 

 

26 minutes ago, Pokemon said:

The precise point of a late term abortion is that delivery will probably harm if not kill the mother. Same with the child.

Not it’s not the point actually. Leaving the mother pregnant is what harms them. Delivery cures them. Try again.

26 minutes ago, Pokemon said:

 

A C section then let it pass IS IN POINT OF FACT AN ABORTION though with a needless dangerous medically negligent very expensive barbaric surgery.

No it’s not. You’re not killing the baby. It’s happening as naturally as it can while being safe for mom as well. It’s called comfort care. And you can do it as fast and as safely as a crude D&C. 

A nice analog would be an ICU patient that you withdraw support for vs the doctor walking in and slitting the patient’s throat.

[GRHorn 105]

33 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Can't kill it in the womb, but if it gets shot and dies in 1st grade by some crazy gunman, so be it.  God's will.  

Never go full retard. 

[Red Five 40,859]

Start an abortion thread.

[Brisketexan 105,151]

1 minute ago, Red Five said:

Start an abortion thread.

Perhaps you didn't see the title of this thread?

[Biff Tannen 45,691]

3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Perhaps you didn't see the title of this thread?

Well played.

[jimmyjazz 45,963]

This is a spot on commentary by British writer Nate White when asked the question "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" :

Quote

A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.

For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.

I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.

Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.

Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.

He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.

After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

'My God… what… have… I… created?

If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.

 

[Chuckie Finster 22,694]

Quote

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.

Not one to stick up for Trump, but this was legitimately hilarious.  The rest of that piece is spot-on, though.

Edited February 12, 2019 by Chuckie Finster

[DixonHur 11,314]

4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace

Yeah, but besides that...

[GRHorn 105]

14 minutes ago, Pokemon said:

C sections are very dangerous as are deliveries. Moreso when the jeopardy to either is heightened enough to merit emergency intervention.

How many deliveries have you performed?

If it's zero, STFU.

You’re out of your element, Donnie. 

 

28 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Start an abortion thread.

No thanks. I’ll just drop it. 

 

26 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Perhaps you didn't see the title of this thread?

Bravo. 

[Winona's Big Orange Bevo 197]

5 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

This is a spot on commentary by British writer Nate White when asked the question "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" :

 

[Burt 4,080]

11 hours ago, GRHorn said:

Tell me how I’m stupid. 

Alrighty then - https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/index.php?/profile/1446-grhorn/content/

[jimmyjazz 45,963]

16 minutes ago, Winona's Big Orange Bevo said:

I was particularly fond of the 3rd act, and especially the comment about the fractal nature of Trump's flaws:

Quote

After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

'My God… what… have… I… created?

If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.

 

[WhatTheBuck 28,783]

24 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

This is a spot on commentary by British writer Nate White when asked the question "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" :

 

Got a link for that?

[jimmyjazz 45,963]

10 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Got a link for that?

No, just a cut & paste from Facebook crediting a question on Quora.  I don't really care if the author was correctly credited . . . it's the writing itself that I admired.

[Brisketexan 105,151]

Some turns of phrase should be framed.  This is one of them:

Quote

If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.