Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, SimonBolivar said:

That is complete nonsense. 

He voted against it because he’s for it. The problem is it’s just mean and confrontational so he had to vote against it, even though he’s for it. 

Duh. 

Posted

I'm looking forward to finally getting some action on guns, climate change, poverty, and other "national emergencies" under the next Dem president now that Congress is no longer required. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Mojo Hand said:

I'm looking forward to finally getting some action on guns, climate change, poverty, and other "national emergencies" under the next Dem president now that Congress is no longer required. 

Think about all the legal weed you'll be able to buy in Mississippi with your UBI waiting on your turn at the abortion clinic!

Posted
17 minutes ago, SimonBolivar said:

That is complete nonsense. 

What you have to understand is, we cannot take any action to put out this fire until we first take real action on long-term fire prevention.  Said the fireman watching someone's house burn down while he warmed up his speech on the importance of smoke detectors and having a fire extinguisher handy.

Sasse is fucking trash and needs to go in the history books in the chapter with the rest of the fucking treasonous weasels.

  • Like 6
Posted
10 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Did he just try to veto by tweet?

Damn those drafters of the constitution who didn't give him that authority. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SimonBolivar said:

Yeah but Trump made Graham feel important and relevant so it was worth it!

He dutifully regurgitated the RushFox talking points of foreign intel report/DNC funded/etc

Posted
1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

I’m still trying to figure out when I went from seeing elderly guys wearing WWII Veteran caps to elderly guys wearing Vietnam Veteran caps.  

Somewhere in the early aught's for me.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Crazy that Hillary never publicly testified for countless hours so they could question her about it, under oath. 

A little OT, but I didn't want to hear from her. I wanted to hear from Pagliano and Combetta.

Posted
2 hours ago, 4th&Five said:

Lulz

CHEETO VETO!

I would love to see the mainstream adopt this phrase for whenever Trump threatens veto power. As the master of hilariously funny nicknames, I'm sure that fat cheeto looking fuck would laugh right along.

Posted
41 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

The least Lindsey could do is wipe Drumph's jizz from his chin before he spoke. 

Well Miss Lindsey doesn't react to that stuff the same way most people do.

DimwittedImpeccableIndri-small.gif

Posted
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

What in the motherfuck?  How does one senator have the ability to tell 420 House members to get fucked?

On the Hill, senators view themselves as being far above mere representatives in the DC political food chain. Most of them won't even appear on TV with a representative.

Posted
What in the motherfuck?  How does one senator have the ability to tell 420 House members to get fucked?

Simple. Release it anyway, unedited, and claim you sent it accidentally to the wrong email address. Quit playing by the rules in this rigged game.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

I’d prefer to see Mueller testify publicly and the report be released simultaneously. 

We are going to need some questions answered, regardless of what the report says. 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Posted
2 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Did he just try to veto by tweet?

This is the same guy that honestly thinks that he had grounds to sue a comedian for an unpaid wager that he "offered" in the form of parody on a comedy show.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nivek said:

Simple. Release it anyway, unedited, and claim you sent it accidentally to the wrong email address. Quit playing by the rules in this rigged game.

A copy gets out.  Gets dropped in the mail to WAPO.  There will be copies out there, in possession of multiple congressional offices and the like.  It WILL be leaked.  And then, the GOP -- who will have obstructed its release -- will be the party that tried to hide shit.

Good.  Keep feeding them rope.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

It shouldn't. 

Correct.

If you took away the issue of abortion, those numbers would be even harsher for DJT.  The Catholic church in the US is 1) immigrant or 1st gen American-heavy, and 2) very strong on social justice issues.  Not exactly compatible with current GOP rhetoric.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Correct.

If you took away the issue of abortion, those numbers would be even harsher for DJT.  The Catholic church in the US is 1) immigrant or 1st gen American-heavy, and 2) very strong on social justice issues.  Not exactly compatible with current GOP rhetoric.

Does not compute with Louisiana Catholics

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...