Jump to content

Donald Trump 2019

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    2695

  • 4th&Five

    1699

  • jimmyjazz

    1286

  • atomheartbevo

    1219

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

GHOSTUSER
GHOSTUSER

I fucking love this President. My 2 faves during my lifetime are Trump and Nixon. They share a lot of similarities and were besieged by the same groups of assholes. No I’m not trolling. Y’all, the lef

Francisco 2.0
Francisco 2.0
Brisketexan
Brisketexan

This.....is magnificent. The "younger generation" is going to have to work double-time to fund YOUR Social Security, which YOUR generation of elected officials raided the fuck out of.  And which,

Posted Images

Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

I can’t wait until he founds out who Italy sided with during both world wars.  This should be great.  
 

you got your axis.  Your allies.  Then the Italian-Kurdish-Normandy triumvirate. Very messy.  But fantastic.  Huge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46101

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

This is worst part of how this all played out, in terms of our shitting on the Kurds.  I generally support disengaging from active military involvement in Syria and the ME in general, but it is beyond shitty to lay a condition on the Kurds to strip their defensive positions and this abandon them. You think that based on past history they would be wise to how we fuck them over, and wouldn't let themselves get fucked again. Wrong I guess. 

So it's THEIR fault!!!  Ha ha, suckers!  Stupid Kurds!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89779

Posted
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Continental Op said:

Trump reenacting the John Wayne Gacy murders and stuffing the White House crawlspace with dead bodies wouldn't result in Trump's removal from office.  

If he is dragging down the GOP enough heading into 2020, they will ditch him and try and get another Republican before the general election.

They care more about staying in office than anything else, and we are starting to veer into territory where he's affecting some.

Edit: Hell, he's already affected dozens in the House, who chose to retire than even try and win reelection.

Edited by atomheartbevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89779

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Lobo said:

I can’t wait until he founds out who Italy sided with during both world wars.  This should be great.  
 

you got your axis.  Your allies.  Then the Italian-Kurdish-Normandy triumvirate, who sided with the Clintons and her scrolls. Very messy.  But fantastic.  Huge. 

Fixed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23481

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

So it's THEIR fault!!!  Ha ha, suckers!  Stupid Kurds!

I don't think that I would say it's their fault, but I do thing after being shit on continually by the US I'd maybe keep my head on a swivel when it comes to relying on Americans keeping their promises. The reality is that American foreign policy interests  align with the interests of the Kurd in only transient ways.  We shit on them every fucking time.  

Quote
 

THE WHITE HOUSE announced Sunday night that the United States is giving Turkey a green light to invade northern Syria, with the U.S. troops there now apparently pulling back to another area of the country. This is the scenario that Syrian Kurds have long feared. It will almost inevitably lead to a Turkish attack on Kurdish militias in Syria — fighters who loyally helped the U.S. destroy the Islamic State, but whom Turkey bogusly claims to be terrorists.

On Monday morning, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman asked why Donald Trump made this decision:

 

So did Trump just betray the Kurds because
(a) He has business interests in Turkey
(b) Erdogan, being a brutal autocrat, is his kind of guy
(c) His boss Vladimir Putin told him to

Remarkable that all three stories are perfectly plausible.

 
 
 
 

What Krugman left out, however, is the most likely explanation: (d) Trump is president of the United States. Nothing in this world is certain except death, taxes, and America betraying the Kurds.

The U.S. has now betrayed the Kurds a minimum of eight times over the past 100 years. The reasons for this are straightforward.

The Kurds are an ethnic group of about 40 million people centered at the intersection of Turkey, Syria, Iran, and Iraq. Many naturally want their own state. The four countries in which they live naturally do not want that to happen.

On the one hand, the Kurds are a perfect tool for U.S. foreign policy. We can arm the Kurds in whichever of these countries is currently our enemy, whether to make trouble for that country’s government or to accomplish various other objectives. On the other hand, we don’t want the Kurds we’re utilizing to ever get too powerful. If that happened, the other Kurds — i.e., the ones living just across the border in whichever of these countries are currently our allies — might get ideas about freedom and independence.

Nothing in this world is certain except death, taxes, and America betraying the Kurds.

Here’s how that dynamic has played out, over and over and over again since World War I.

1 — Like many other nationalisms, Kurdish nationalism blossomed during the late 1800s. At this point, all of the Kurdish homeland was ruled by the sprawling Ottoman Empire, centered in present day-Turkey. But the Ottoman Empire collapsed after fighting on the losing side of World War I. This, the Kurds understandably believed, was their moment.

The 1920 Treaty of Sèvres completely dismembered the Ottoman Empire, including most of what’s now Turkey, and allocated a section for a possible Kurdistan. But the Turks fought back, making enough trouble that the U.S. supported a new treaty in 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne. The Treaty of Lausanne allowed the British and French to carve off present-day Iraq and Syria, respectively, for themselves. But it made no provision for the Kurds.

This was America’s first, and smallest, betrayal of the Kurds. At this point, the main Kurdish betrayals were handled by the British, who crushed the short-lived Kingdom of Kurdistan in Iraq during the early 1920s. A few years later, the British were happy to see the establishment of a Kurdish “Republic of Ararat,” because it was on Turkish territory. But it turned out that the Turks were more important to the British than the Kurds, so the United Kingdom eventually let Turkey go ahead and extinguish the new country.

This was the kind of thing that gave the British Empire the nickname “perfidious Albion.” Now America has taken up the perfidious mantle.

2 — After World War II, the U.S. gradually assumed the British role as main colonial power in the Mideast. We armed Iraqi Kurds during the rule of Abdel Karim Kassem, who governed Iraq from 1958 to 1963, because Kassem was failing to follow orders.

We then supported a 1963 military coup — which included a small supporting role by a young Saddam Hussein — that removed Kassem from power. We immediately cut off our aid to the Kurds and, in fact, provided the new Iraqi government with napalm to use against them.

3 — By the 1970s, the Iraqi government had drifted into the orbit of the Soviet Union. The Nixon administration, led by Henry Kissinger, hatched a plan with Iran (then our ally, ruled by the Shah) to arm Iraqi Kurds.

The plan wasn’t for the Kurds in Iraq to win, since that might encourage the Kurds in Iran to rise up themselves. It was just to bleed the Iraqi government. But as a congressional report later put it, “This policy was not imparted to our clients, who were encouraged to continue fighting. Even in the context of covert action ours was a cynical enterprise.”

Then the U.S. signed off on agreements between the Shah and Saddam that included severing aid to the Kurds. The Iraqi military moved north and slaughtered thousands, as the U.S. ignored heart-rending pleas from our erstwhile Kurdish allies. When questioned, a blasé Kissinger explained that “covert action should not be confused with missionary work.”

When questioned, a blasé Kissinger explained that “covert action should not be confused with missionary work.”

4 — During the 1980s, the Iraqi government moved on to actual genocide against the Kurds, including the use of chemical weapons. The Reagan administration was well aware of Saddam’s use of nerve gas, but because they liked the damage Saddam was doing to Iran, it opposed congressional efforts to impose sanctions on Iraq. The U.S. media also faithfully played its role. When a Washington Post reporter tried to get the paper to publish a photograph of a Kurd killed by chemical weapons, his editor responded, “Who will care?”

5 — As the U.S. bombed Iraq during the Gulf War in 1991, George H.W. Bush famously called on “the Iraqi military and Iraqi people to take matters into their own hands, to force Saddam Hussein, the dictator, to step aside.” Both Iraqi Shias in southern Iraq and Iraqi Kurds in northern Iraq heard this and tried to do exactly that.

It turned out that Bush wasn’t being 100 percent honest about his feelings on this subject. The U.S. military stood down as Iraq massacred the rebels across the country.

Why? New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman soon explained that “Mr. Bush never supported the Kurdish and Shiite rebellions against Mr. Hussein, or for that matter any democracy movement in Iraq” because Saddam’s “iron fist simultaneously held Iraq together, much to the satisfaction of the American allies Turkey and Saudi Arabia.” What the U.S. wanted was for the Iraqi military, not regular people, to take charge. “Then,” Friedman wrote, “Washington would have the best of all worlds: an iron-fisted Iraqi junta without Saddam Hussein.”

6 — Nevertheless, the dying Iraqi Kurds looked so bad on international television that the Bush administration was forced to do something. The U.S. eventually supported what was started as a British effort to protect Kurds in northern Iraq.

During the Clinton administration in the 1990s, these Kurds, the Iraqi Kurds, were the good Kurds. Because they were persecuted by Iraq, our enemy, they were worthy of U.S. sympathy. But the Kurds a few miles north in Turkey started getting uppity too, and since they were annoying our ally, they were the bad Kurds. The U.S. sent Turkey huge amounts of weaponry, which it used — with U.S. knowledge — to murder tens of thousands of Kurds and destroy thousands of villages.

7 — Before the Iraq War in 2003, pundits such as Christopher Hitchens said we had to do it to help the Kurds. By contrast, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg had this dour exchange with neoconservative William Kristol on C-SPAN just as the war started:

Ellsberg: The Kurds have every reason to believe they will be betrayed again by the United States, as so often in the past. The spectacle of our inviting Turks into this war … could not have been reassuring to the Kurds …

Kristol: I’m against betraying the Kurds. Surely your point isn’t that because we betrayed them in the past, we should betray them this time?

Ellsberg: Not that we should, just that we will.

Kristol: We will not. We will not.

Ellsberg, of course, was correct. The post-war independence of Iraqi Kurds made Turkey extremely nervous. In 2007, the U.S. allowed Turkey to carry out a heavy bombing campaign against Iraqi Kurds inside Iraq. By this point, Kristol’s magazine the Weekly Standard was declaring that this betrayal was exactly what America should be doing.

With Trump’s thumbs-up for another slaughter of the Kurds, America is now on betrayal No. 8. Whatever you want to say about U.S. actions, no one can deny that we’re consistent.

The Kurds have an old, famous adage that they “have no friends but the mountains.” Now more than ever, it’s hard to argue that that’s wrong.

Edited by Anastasis
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13050

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Lobo said:

I can’t wait until he founds out who Italy sided with during both world wars.  This should be great.  
 

you got your axis.  Your allies.  Then the Italian-Kurdish-Normandy triumvirate. Very messy.  But fantastic.  Huge. 

 

25 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Fixed.

All he has to do now is name drop Mercury, the god of thieves, and it will be the dawning of the Age of Precarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13050

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

They need to stream all these meetings on Youtube.

I think it's on C-Span right now, or it was a while ago.  I was folding laundry and missed a lot of except for when the translator was reading and Trump started making faces at someone off camera because he was bored. If he'd have sat next to my late mother and done that he would have only done it once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23481

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

I think it's on C-Span right now, or it was a while ago.  I was folding laundry and missed a lot of except for when the translator was reading and Trump started making faces at someone off camera because he was bored. If he'd have sat next to my late mother and done that he would have only done it once.

I was referring to the Pelosi Trump dustup this afternoon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dewey

Dewey 3286

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:

 

First, a lot of people know who the sick person is and second, more are finally beginning to see it. Guy is so wrapped up in greed and power, he's a blind man, a tragic fool. He and his people have sold our country for their own personal gain. They should be locked up, all of them. 

Then we should work on making Russia as small as possible and make fox news obsolete.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
swraith

swraith 347

Posted
Posted

I am coming around to the idea that those who worked in this WH claiming they were moderating Trump for the past 3 years have done the greatest harm to the US. Mattis,Tillerson, and others should have refused the job outright or resigned much sooner.

Keeping this administration in the realm of partially dysfunctional merely extended the Trump timeline. Leaving Trump to only the boot lickers like Mulvaney and the corruption of Rudy earlier, likely would have hastened Trump’s downfall.

If Trump completely came off the rails 12+ months ago...damage would have been done then. But at least the country could have had a fair assessment of Trump and potentially forced the GOP to abandon Trump. As of now...I am still not convinced the GOP will abandon Trump...but we are starting to see the smallest of cracks in their support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lemonlime

lemonlime 5503

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I love Pelosi's new twitter header

spacer.png

Holy shit, is that a lot of old, white men in the trump admin.  They really couldn't find a single woman or person of color to add to that picture?

Then again, I guess that's the point.  Gotta put the womenz and minorities in their place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brandywine

Brandywine 1316

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Dewey said:

First, a lot of people know who the sick person is and second, more are finally beginning to see it. Guy is so wrapped up in greed and power, he's a blind man, a tragic fool. He and his people have sold our country for their own personal gain. They should be locked up, all of them. 

Then we should work on making Russia as small as possible and make fox news obsolete.

The thing that pisses me off about that tweet is that our President makes that shit up and gets away with it. He’s navel lint. 

Edited by Brandywine
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...