Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

So what Central American country was going to host this hypothetical processing center?  Because I don’t see that being high on the list of priorities of any of those countries.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

 

"What do you think POTUS is referring to there when he says "podium". 

-"Ohh he's actually referring to the podium." 

"OK, well then why would he use quotati.......you know what, nevermind" 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Democrats need to step up and pass legislation to fix this. Senate won’t pass it, but keep painting the GOP as the party of bigotry

"These people want to serve.  They want to fight for the country they love.  First the gay service members got denied; then the immigrant service members ; now the transgender service members.  Why do Republicans hate troops unless they are white straight men? Blood and sacrifice knows no race, religion or sexuality."

  • Like 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Democrats need to step up and pass legislation to fix this. Senate won’t pass it, but keep painting the GOP as the party of bigotry

They do, but it's going to be nice watching the next Democrat in the White House reverse every single one of his executive orders.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

That first tweet is a tell. He's scared shitless that some senators are going to break.

He's afraid of the senators turning on him but not over the border wall.

Trump WANTS to keep the shutdown going. 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Js1 said:

"These people want to serve.  They want to fight for the country they love.  First the gay service members got denied; then the immigrant service members ; now the transgender service members.  Why do Republicans hate troops unless they are white straight men? Blood and sacrifice knows no race, religion or sexuality."

But blood and soil does.

Edited by DDD Dad
  • Like 1
Posted

That student very much looks like an  arrogant, entitled dipshit.

But, to me anyway, the evidence coming out now shows all this in a different light, right? Sounds like the Indian guy misread the situation. He was on NPR yesterday and he didn't really make much sense, imo. 

Look, call out the assholes but get the facts right.

Posted (edited)

More evidence that Trump's White House sucks at being President:

Quote

An analysis by the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law shows that more than 90 percent of court challenges to major Trump deregulatory actions have been successful so far. By the institute’s count, 30 big rules have been challenged, and the courts have found for the litigants 28 times.

Some of those rulings may change after appeals to higher courts, but administrative law experts said even the string of lower-court rulings was unusual. In a typical administration, the government wins on such challenges around 70 percent of the time, said Richard Revesz, a law professor at N.Y.U. who specializes in environmental law. “This is truly aberrational,” he said.

The law gives federal agencies a lot of latitude to write regulations, but it says that major actions have to follow certain steps. For big changes, agencies are supposed to go through what’s called “notice and comment”: They must issue a proposal, let the public respond with ideas, then incorporate feedback into a final version.

A lot of the losses came because the administration skipped those steps, instead announcing that it would pause or reverse pending rules — or that some emergency conditions justified an instant regulatory change. An earlier version of the contraceptive rule, and several environmental rules, including a suspension of Obama-era methane standards, were attempted without notice and comment.

But even some Trump policies that have followed the usual regulatory steps have been found to run afoul of the law’s standards for administrative process. The law says that the executive branch should be allowed to interpret the law as long as its decisions aren’t “arbitrary” and “capricious.”

...

Quote

The rule-making sloppiness may reflect the president’s enthusiasm for deregulation, and the distrust of agency staff by many of his political appointees.

“It’s hard to understand as anything but a combination of haste and ineptitude,” said Nicholas Bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan, who worked in the Obama administration Justice Department defending its regulations.

In many cases, it’s easy enough for regulators to bounce back from a loss on procedural grounds. Trump administration agencies may have better luck with their subsequent efforts, which are now underway in several areas where initial rule making was rejected by courts. Mr. Bagley said he expected the administration would fare better on many rules the second time around.

 

Edited by Rimbo
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Js1 said:

"These people want to serve.  They want to fight for the country they love.  First the gay service members got denied; then the immigrant service members ; now the transgender service members.  Why do Republicans hate troops unless they are white straight men? Blood and sacrifice knows no race, religion or sexuality."

u-g-PG9Z8T0.jpg?w=550&h=550&p=0

Posted
2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

How impotent do you have to be to investigate people who have no power?

 

Well, we are talking about Lindsey Graham here. 

I think he has a case of the vapors, dear me!

Posted

FWIW

MSNBC reporting that trump and his campaign speechwriters are forming several drafts of the SOTU address, one of which will be crafted for a speech at a rally if they have to give it at that type of venue. 

 

Torbush. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

FWIW

MSNBC reporting that trump and his campaign speechwriters are forming several drafts of the SOTU address, one of which will be crafted for a speech at a rally if they have to give it at that type of venue. 

 

Torbush. 

If he has it at a moron rally, I hope all the networks refuse to show it. We know fox will, keep that drivel there b

Posted
55 minutes ago, retread said:

 

Bring it on. Keep hammering on them until nobody ever votes for them again. 

Fucking idiots. Still running plays from a playbook that's 10 years old. 

Posted
2 hours ago, David Dennison said:

They do, but it's going to be nice watching the next Democrat in the White House reverse every single one of his executive orders.

When that happens, Fox News will be hysterical with how evil EO's are.

Posted
3 hours ago, David Dennison said:

They do, but it's going to be nice watching the next Democrat in the White House reverse every single one of his executive orders.

I hope Trump is like Hector Salamanca while he watches helplessly on TV.  Will be a beautiful thing.  

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

The next president should have legislation already prepared that reverses every single one of the EOs at once.  And he should sign it as soon as he gets to a desk after being inaugurated.

Erasing the Trump years with a single penstroke would be glorious.

Edited by Chuckie Finster
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, David Dennison said:

How impotent do you have to be to investigate people who have no power?

 

EXTREMELY IMPOTENT.

Probably hasn't mustered a boner since McCain died.

Posted
3 hours ago, retread said:

 

Graham is scared shitless, but he’s doing what he’s told.  Blackmail works. And any such investigations will take up resources and time that would be spent on Trump.  

  • Like 2
Posted
On 1/20/2019 at 7:52 AM, horncyclist said:

Isn't it suspected there already overwhelming evidence that the increasingly frequent destabilization if the polar vortex is due to climate change? Such stupid.

I'm sorry I'm ten pages behind on this thread but I had to fix this.

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted

 

9 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said:

 

So literally the Democratic position for the last month. Eight hundred thousand people went without paychecks for a month for no reason. And I’m fairly certain the only reason they’re voting on it now is because Trump wants his state of the union in the House.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...