Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
It amazes me how you guys just automatically lump everyone into one of two categories, "us" or "them". Fox news, Trumpkins, GoP. The world is so so black and white to you.  The reality is that there are a full spectrum of people with various views and beliefs.  I happen to hate Trump, Fox News, and as of about 10 years ago, the GoP. But you can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that just because I dare raise a question about "your" team, it must mean I'm part of those "evil, stupid" people. 
I pointed out in my post that it would be ludicrous for her to believe that border security is not inline with our values. That means she must have been referring to something else when she said "our values". That leaves only one thing, the racist card. And my point, which of course on this board goes in one ear and out the other, is that every single time "your" party assigns someone as a racist when they have a different viewpoint, your team loses credibility. There are millions of people out there that hear that and become just as outraged as, hmmm, I don't know, let me think, oh, being called "an open borders supporter".  You see how that works? You are fully justified in being outraged at being unfairly called a supporter of "open borders", but if someone else is called a racist because they think a wall would help with border security, that's fine because, well uh, they are actually a racist.
It doesn't matter whether Trump is a racist or not. I think there's some pretty good evidence that he is a racist.  What's important is demonstrating leadership and the democratic congressional leader came across as undignified and just like all the other idiots running around calling everyone a racist. She needs to rise above it, stay focused on the facts of a wall being an ineffective tool to secure the border, and win the minds of not only her own team, but the tens of millions of us that are sick and tired of the tremendous faults of both parties.  The democrats have a chance to completely take over and dominate politics for the next 50 years. All I want to see is rational thinking and decision-making. On her first day back in charge, she tosses out the race card. 


Look everyone! It’s a Gary Johnson voter! We’re saved from ourselves!
Posted
1 hour ago, Dbeasy said:

 

It amazes me how you guys just automatically lump everyone into one of two categories, "us" or "them". Fox news, Trumpkins, GoP. The world is so so black and white to you.  The reality is that there are a full spectrum of people with various views and beliefs.  I happen to hate Trump, Fox News, and as of about 10 years ago, the GoP. But you can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that just because I dare raise a question about "your" team, it must mean I'm part of those "evil, stupid" people. 

I pointed out in my post that it would be ludicrous for her to believe that border security is not inline with our values. That means she must have been referring to something else when she said "our values". That leaves only one thing, the racist card. And my point, which of course on this board goes in one ear and out the other, is that every single time "your" party assigns someone as a racist when they have a different viewpoint, your team loses credibility. There are millions of people out there that hear that and become just as outraged as, hmmm, I don't know, let me think, oh, being called "an open borders supporter".  You see how that works? You are fully justified in being outraged at being unfairly called a supporter of "open borders", but if someone else is called a racist because they think a wall would help with border security, that's fine because, well uh, they are actually a racist.

It doesn't matter whether Trump is a racist or not. I think there's some pretty good evidence that he is a racist.  What's important is demonstrating leadership and the democratic congressional leader came across as undignified and just like all the other idiots running around calling everyone a racist. She needs to rise above it, stay focused on the facts of a wall being an ineffective tool to secure the border, and win the minds of not only her own team, but the tens of millions of us that are sick and tired of the tremendous faults of both parties.  The democrats have a chance to completely take over and dominate politics for the next 50 years. All I want to see is rational thinking and decision-making. On her first day back in charge, she tosses out the race card. 

The jokes write themselves. 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Celery Man said:

They were talking about a wall, not border security.  The reason people are treating you like a MAGA idiot is because you were asking MAGA idiot questions in preparation to make a MAGA idiot argument, which is what you just made.  That Pelosi saying "building a giant concrete fucking wall across our southern border is not in line with who we are" only has one possible meaning - race card.

No, no, don't you see? He hates the GOP! The fact that he's consistently parroting their propaganda is just a complete coincidence!

Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

No.  They're not.  We've found out who they are.  They salivate to the dog-whistles of xenophobia and demonization of the other.  They are HAPPY to create detention camps for brown kids.  They will dismiss -- in a heartbeat -- the ideals of honesty and trustworthiness in order to follow a charlatan.

These are not good people.  They are bad people, who used to have the common sense and obedience to social order to keep their shittiness to themselves.  Now, they feel free to let their shittiness show, and they ain't shy about it.

Many?  Yes.  All?  No.

Hugo makes sense but everyone is so foaming at the mouth pissed, they won't listen.  I get the anger b/c I feel it too.  

But that ubiquitous 40% isn't going anywhere so we better find a way to figure out how to get a significant amount to tact in a different direction.  Because the other option is eliminating them....how pissed are you?

Posted
1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

Thank you for proving me right.

No shit.  For starters, it's ludicrous to claim that the only other explanation is that she was calling the opposition racists.  

Posted
1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

It's profit and nothing else. That's what their audience fails to understand.

It's profit but the picture is far bigger.  FOX News might as well be a loss leader, Murdoch doesn't care.  It's the message they push and the results on a national level that matter.

Posted
33 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Many?  Yes.  All?  No.

Hugo makes sense but everyone is so foaming at the mouth pissed, they won't listen.  I get the anger b/c I feel it too.  

But that ubiquitous 40% isn't going anywhere so we better find a way to figure out how to get a significant amount to tact in a different direction.  Because the other option is eliminating them....how pissed are you?

Tack.

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Many?  Yes.  All?  No.

Hugo makes sense but everyone is so foaming at the mouth pissed, they won't listen.  I get the anger b/c I feel it too.  

But that ubiquitous 40% isn't going anywhere so we better find a way to figure out how to get a significant amount to tact in a different direction.  Because the other option is eliminating them....how pissed are you?

Pretty fucking pissed.  But no, not that pissed.

What do we do with them?  Humiliate and shame them, relentlessly.  My FIL has ALWAYS been a racist piece of shit.  But for a long time, he knew that the existing social order would make him a pariah if he dropped N-bombs and slurred mexicans (even though he occasionally slipped on both counts).  Now, he's free to be a loathsome toad, and to wear it as a badge of honor.

Nope.  Shame them back under their rocks.  Eventually, they die out more and more.  There will always be stupid loathsome toads.  But they should hide under rocks where toads belong.  Giving them the freedom to be pieces of shit in public, and to rally other pieces of shit to their cause, is the problem.  My FIL should live under his rock, utter the N-word to himself as he watches Fox News, and then die, not having poisoned anyone else with his garbage.

But....that ship has sailed.  They are emboldened, and they aren't going back under their rocks again.  So, like I've said n other posts, there is no solving this problem.  We have a huge cancer, and it ain't going away.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

They were indeed historic, DJ.  Historic losses (largest vote margin in favor of Dems since Watergate, and got spanked in the House), but still, historic.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, retread said:

Not authoritarian at all

 

As noted a jillion times on this board, there is no party. Only Trump.  There is no identify for the GOP outside of Trump and Trumpism anymore.  To see a party go from a party to a cult in a matter of months -- well, sometimes it's amazing to watch history unfold.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, retread said:

Not authoritarian at all

 

The guy looks just like Mussolini in that pic.  Jutting out his jaw to try to look less turkey necked and all.

Apparently I'm not the only one who sees it.  Just did a quick google image search for Mussolini and there were at least a dozen comparisons out there.

Here's one.

afb95c25-c0b6-4021-ac41-6af6ccdb0dff.jpg

Edited by DDD Dad
Posted
4 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

 

The first half of that video where it shows the chaos are scenes where the is already a wall built. So obviously a wall doesn't keep any of that from happening. The other scenes would be the same with our without any wall. If you want to make a case for a wall show scenes of people swimming across the river or open lands where one border patrol car is out in the middle of nowhere. But I guess that doesn't hit the fear factor. 

Posted

Trump clearly does that on purpose, he sets his face that way all the time. He swings from senile grandpa promoting good times and love to senile dictator demoting "all the best people" because SAND and DEATH!.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

 

It amazes me how you guys just automatically lump everyone into one of two categories, "us" or "them". Fox news, Trumpkins, GoP. The world is so so black and white to you.  The reality is that there are a full spectrum of people with various views and beliefs.  I happen to hate Trump, Fox News, and as of about 10 years ago, the GoP. But you can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that just because I dare raise a question about "your" team, it must mean I'm part of those "evil, stupid" people. 

I pointed out in my post that it would be ludicrous for her to believe that border security is not inline with our values. That means she must have been referring to something else when she said "our values". That leaves only one thing, the racist card. And my point, which of course on this board goes in one ear and out the other, is that every single time "your" party assigns someone as a racist when they have a different viewpoint, your team loses credibility. There are millions of people out there that hear that and become just as outraged as, hmmm, I don't know, let me think, oh, being called "an open borders supporter".  You see how that works? You are fully justified in being outraged at being unfairly called a supporter of "open borders", but if someone else is called a racist because they think a wall would help with border security, that's fine because, well uh, they are actually a racist.

It doesn't matter whether Trump is a racist or not. I think there's some pretty good evidence that he is a racist.  What's important is demonstrating leadership and the democratic congressional leader came across as undignified and just like all the other idiots running around calling everyone a racist. She needs to rise above it, stay focused on the facts of a wall being an ineffective tool to secure the border, and win the minds of not only her own team, but the tens of millions of us that are sick and tired of the tremendous faults of both parties.  The democrats have a chance to completely take over and dominate politics for the next 50 years. All I want to see is rational thinking and decision-making. On her first day back in charge, she tosses out the race card. 

Fighting a bullshit wall that will do nothing to keep us safer and would be a tremendous waste of taxpayer money during a time of extraordinarily large deficits (caused by republicans by the way) is "rational thinking and decision-making." It's the same bullshit slorch and others put out there. They say don't like Trump but then says "the democrats just aren't giving us any good  alternatives." Of course, any democrat is worse than Trump in your eyes because even reasonable democratic positions have been demonized as "socialist" or even "evil," and of course most democrats will support some of the more left-leaning proposals that, you know, democrats have supported for a long time. You'll gladly pull the lever for Trump when the democrats nominate a centrist who will be labeled an "Obama-loving socialist" and you'll eat it right up and claim that you just couldn't support "left wing extremism" and that it's the democrats fault that you just had no other option but to vote for Trump. But you hate him, promise!

Edited by 'stache
  • Like 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, 'stache said:

They say don't like Trump but then says "the democrats just aren't giving us any good  alternatives." Of course, any democrat is worse than Trump in your eyes because even reasonable democratic positions have been demonized as "socialist" or even "evil," and of course most democrats will support some of the more left-leaning proposals that, you know, democrats have supported for a long time. You'll gladly pull the lever for Trump when the democrats nominate a centrist who will be labeled an "Obama-loving socialist" and you'll eat it right up and claim that you just couldn't support "left wing extremism" and that it's the democrats fault that you just had no other option but to vote for Trump. But you hate him, promise!

Yes.  Bottom line is they are liars and they DO like him.  They know it's uncouth to own up to it, but inside they love it.  Not good people.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Big Orange Baby couldn't stand Pelosi having the spotlight for a day.

That's all that was about. What a fucking clown. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

From the DOTARD’s instagram -

78cf7aaf2a074e572439db33092095f5.jpg

Can HBO or George RR Martin sue him for copyright infringement?

So he's using a tagline from a show in which a wall doesn't work to try and sell a useless wall.   Interesting strategy there. 

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

From the DOTARD’s instagram -

78cf7aaf2a074e572439db33092095f5.jpg

Can HBO or George RR Martin sue him for copyright infringement?

<not an IP attorney>  There is probably some level of protection on the font that doesn't fall under "fair use".  I'm not sure about the phrase.  They could argue that it's satire.

Posted

I think the wall stuff is encouraging.  He seems to be losing the public debate over it.  I think that speaks to higher order thinking than most political issues these days.  It takes 1 second to say why a wall is good -- "Stop 'em from coming!" -- and a minute to see through it, and people are largely choosing the 1 minute option.

Posted

There will never be a fucking wall. No more so than an upgrade of the shit which already exists.

The American people by a 2/3rds majority do not want it, it would be hideously ugly and symbolically repugnant, TEXAS DOES NOT WANT IT (would destroy the economy of the state and the scenery and culture of Texas' fucking beautiful border areas) , it would probably cost ~ 100 billion to build and maintain ( not a paltry 5 ) and, most importantly, it would be logistically and physically impossible to build where walls aren't built already.

It would be a grotesque and costly scar across the new world.

It is not going to happen. Ever. Forget about it. You're much better off with a high tech, job intensive, comprehensive, culturally and historically sensitive DACA solution which builds up Mexico and The United States congruently. 

Besides if we better merged Mexico and America together we'd have a final 4 World Cup team instantly. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

I think the wall stuff is encouraging.  He seems to be losing the public debate over it.  I think that speaks to higher order thinking than most political issues these days.  It takes 1 second to say why a wall is good -- "Stop 'em from coming!" -- and a minute to see through it, and people are largely choosing the 1 minute option.

The fact that he's using terms like "steel slats" and "barrier" now is proof enough that he knows he's losing.  For two years it was nothing other than "A BIG BEAUTIFUL CONCRETE WALL!!!!"

Posted
1 hour ago, Hank Kingsley said:

"Alexa, show me Trump's worst nightmare."

 

That is crying out for the gavel to be replaced by a large dildo. Or have somebody’s head on the end of it. 

Posted
Kinda regret giving you the benefit of the doubt in my previous post.  The fact that you saw "the race card" in Pelosi's comments is incredibly unfortunate and telling.
Tip for the future: If you have to write 500 words about how you aren't a racist when nobody has come close to calling you that, well.... 
AND TO BE CLEAR: I am not calling you a racist.  I just think the "what do you guys expect when you call of us racists" card is incredibly overplayed and used to justify shitty politics.


I thought that’s what you implied she meant. What was she implying by using the term “values” then?
Posted
Fighting a bullshit wall that will do nothing to keep us safer and would be a tremendous waste of taxpayer money during a time of extraordinarily large deficits (caused by republicans by the way) is "rational thinking and decision-making." It's the same bullshit slorch and others put out there. They say don't like Trump but then says "the democrats just aren't giving us any good  alternatives." Of course, any democrat is worse than Trump in your eyes because even reasonable democratic positions have been demonized as "socialist" or even "evil," and of course most democrats will support some of the more left-leaning proposals that, you know, democrats have supported for a long time. You'll gladly pull the lever for Trump when the democrats nominate a centrist who will be labeled an "Obama-loving socialist" and you'll eat it right up and claim that you just couldn't support "left wing extremism" and that it's the democrats fault that you just had no other option but to vote for Trump. But you hate him, promise!

News flash hoss. I voted democrat most recently and never voted for Trump. Your narrative is crumbling.
Posted
image.png
 

image.png


I actually thought of this very specific item. It’s a fair thought. The problem with it is that it has nothing to do with a border security. It’s already been established that pelosi must care about border security and she was referencing border security in her statement. So again, what “values” was she referencing?
Posted
1 hour ago, retread said:

image.png

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

image.png

 

Dude that only counts when they look like us.

Seriously, if we had a caravan of hot Swedish women, do you think there'd be talk of them bringing disease, etc.?

Posted
There are times I feel like the only O&G guy that voted for Hillary.  I know a lot of Trump voters that got laid off and probably can’t afford $2.00 gas.  Fuck ‘em.

You ain’t.
Posted
On 1/1/2019 at 8:01 PM, Brisketexan said:


You won’t see it.
Gutless treasonous coward is the brand.

Gutless Old Pussies you say?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...