Donald Trump 2019

[bolverk 29360]

4 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

Also, this from the great @Thujone:

 

[atomheartbevo 89362]

28 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

We live in a simulation.

I'm just going to tell my kids that the reason why photos used to be in black and white, is because the world was in black and white due to the computers not being powerful enough to handle anything more than black/white/gray.

[Biff Tannen 45477]

3 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I'm just going to tell my kids that the reason why photos used to be in black and white, is because the world was in black and white due to the computers not being powerful enough to handle anything more than black/white/gray.

You're Calvin's dad?

[Jack Straw 2953]

4 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

cant wait to hear the "you're hurting the wrong people!" from the Trump bootlickers who will be impacted by this.  

 

 

[Anastasis 23375]

The new requirements apparently apply only to non-disabled individuals without children.  They require that anyone receiving more than 3 months of food stamps over a 36 month period to work at least 20 hours a week, unless the local unemployment rate is higher than a certain threshold.

I am not quite sure what I am supposed to be outraged about. Seems fairly reasonable to me.  Biggest downside would appear to be increased administrative requirements. 

[4th&Five 41457]

 

[David Dennison 18608]

14 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

The new requirements apparently apply only to non-disabled individuals without children.  They require that anyone receiving more than 3 months of food stamps over a 36 month period to work at least 20 hours a week, unless the local unemployment rate is higher than a certain threshold.

I am not quite sure what I am supposed to be outraged about. Seems fairly reasonable to me.  Biggest downside would appear to be increased administrative requirements. 

Is "work" only paid labor?

[DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt 12301]

1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

We live in a simulation.

correct.

[Anastasis 23375]

14 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Is "work" only paid labor?

make your point if you have one. 

[tx 3 putt 76159]

58 minutes ago, bolverk said:Also, this from the great @Thujone:

 

@thujune nailed this one !

[tx 3 putt 76159]

So more socialism for the farmers that won’t be selling to the SNAP program ?

[atomheartbevo 89362]

46 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

You're Calvin's dad?

I used to be Calvin, so it makes sense.

[henrygandorf 29174]

33 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

 

i feel like there's a long book called "responsibilities of nato" and chapter 1 covers dues.  then he stopped reading.  because that's all he fucking talks about.

[Grade of D as in David 13253]

53 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

 

The "only deep respect" closing tells me he knows that the clip of Johnson, Macron, etc making fun of him went viral.

 

Edited December 4, 2019 by Grade of D as in David
Cartman tears

[henrygandorf 29174]

1 minute ago, Grade of D as in David said:

The "only deep respect" closing tells me he knows that the clip of Johnson, Macron, etc making fun of him went viral.

what you're seeing is not what you're seeing.  these are tough times, and you cannot trust your own eyes.  

#onlydeeprespect

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

12 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

i feel like there's a long book called "responsibilities of nato" and chapter 1 covers dues.  then he stopped reading.  because that's all he fucking talks about.

In the NATO handbook (no longer updated) Chapter 4 discusses funded resources, budgets and financial management. No way he made it that far.

Trump picks up a few buzzwords and makes the rest up.

[AeroHorn 735]

1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

You're Calvin's dad?

 

34 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I used to be Calvin, so it makes sense.

The world is a complicated place.

[HenryJames 65868]

 

[Biff Tannen 45477]

18 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

 

See now THIS is interesting writing!

[F250 28659]

I am currently watching Amanpour interview Kay Bailey who gets to defend the Trump doctrine on TV.

Amanpour: President Trump shoved his thumb up his ass while hissing at fellow NATO leaders. Why would he do that?

Kay Bailey: What the President is saying is that the higher law argued by Cicero is the basis of the Grotian tradition of international law which is what the President wants to strengthen.

Amanpour: I see. Thank you.

[Guest Lobo]

1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

See now THIS is interesting writing!

That's perfect irony, Elaine.  

[Nivek 16808]

 
 

Seems like a lot of tv for someone who doesn’t watch tv.

[Born to Run 6524]

The new requirements apparently apply only to non-disabled individuals without children.  They require that anyone receiving more than 3 months of food stamps over a 36 month period to work at least 20 hours a week, unless the local unemployment rate is higher than a certain threshold.
I am not quite sure what I am supposed to be outraged about. Seems fairly reasonable to me.  Biggest downside would appear to be increased administrative requirements. 

Or maybe fuckface could not golf one extra day at his property on our dime.

[RPM 26185]

23 minutes ago, Born to Run said:

Or maybe fuckface could not golf one extra day at his property on our dime.

I'm pretty sure they could stop routing military personnel through his resorts and use that savings to fund SNAP. Probably have enough left over to increase benefits.

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

The President retweeted this. While I am of the opinion that underage children of a President should be off limits, the commentary surrounding this has gone off the charts but then distraction is the name of the game. The Trumps should be glad that a toy company has not created a Baron doll like Ty did when they debuted Sasha and Malia dolls in 2009. Mrs. Obama was not too happy about that...

Today the President will meet with the UN Security Council and then join the First Lady in the afternoon for the Christmas tree lighting ceremony.

 

[4th&Five 41457]

It’s clean the swamp now?

 

[BrickHorn 18176]

54 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

The President retweeted this. While I am of the opinion that underage children of a President should be off limits,

How so?  Should it be off limits to utter the names of the President’s children?  Because the professor did little more than that, and this manufactured Republican outrage is ludicrous.  These assholes support locking children up in cages, yet are morally incensed at the mere mention of one kid’s name?  Just more GOP self-righteous hypocrisy.  

Edited December 5, 2019 by BrickHorn

[Biff Tannen 45477]

2 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

How so?  Should it be off limits to utter the names of the President’s children?  Because the professor did little more than that, and this manufactured RepublicN outrage is ludicrous.  These assholes support locking children up in cages, yet are morally incensed at the mere mention of one kid’s name?  Just more GOP self-righteous hypocrisy.  

Well, you have to remember, these are the worst people.

[BrickHorn 18176]

Just now, Biff Tannen said:

Well, you have to remember, these are the worst people.

They’re gaslighting fucks is what they are.  

[Guest Lobo]

30 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

It’s clean the swamp now?

 A lot of cock-eyed optimists rush into Washington and think they are just gonna drain it on day one.  But you see, we have to build to that

[WhatTheBuck 28700]

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

23 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

How so?  Beyond official events scheduled with the parents, the press should keep their distance. Should it be off limits to utter the names of the President’s children?  No, that would be weird. Because the professor did little more than that, and this manufactured Republican outrage is ludicrous.  Yes, it is, and this is part of what I'm alluding to in that the media is going to whirl this up into something the child had nothing to do with. The prof apologized, it is over. These assholes support locking children up in cages, yet are morally incensed at the mere mention of one kid’s name?  Just more GOP self-righteous hypocrisy.  

 

[troph 24548]

 A lot of cock-eyed optimists rush into Washington and think they are just gonna drain it on day one.  But you see, we have to build to that

There is only one way to drain it - one elected official at a time that refuses to participate. Career state department, intelligence community, staffers at all the various agencies, etc aren’t the problem, the problem folks are elected leaders and the entourage of appointed and hired loyalists that come with elected officials. Anyone that claims they can drain the swamp - meaning they will control others - is full of it. Focus on your own self and who you bring to DC and support others who commit to govern with real integrity.

[jimmyjazz 45513]

1 hour ago, BrickHorn said:

How so?  Should it be off limits to utter the names of the President’s children?  Because the professor did little more than that, and this manufactured Republican outrage is ludicrous.  These assholes support locking children up in cages, yet are morally incensed at the mere mention of one kid’s name?  Just more GOP self-righteous hypocrisy.  

You're exactly right.  It was a trifling comment uttered by a political amateur.  In no way did it do anything to call her testimony in question.  It was ill-advised, but that's what happens when you put people up on testimony for 8 hours.  It's not like we didn't already know her politics.

I wish she hadn't have said it because it just created a talking point that the right can run with, but ultimately, they would have picked a talking point, regardless, and it would have been deflective in nature.  This one was just served right over the plate.  It happens.  

[Hugo Stiglitz 23356]

Barron better be some John Conner rebel leader in the future or this is all a complete waste of time. 

[4th&Five 41457]

 

[BrickHorn 18176]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

I wish she hadn't have said it because it just created a talking point that the right can run with, but ultimately, they would have picked a talking point, regardless, and it would have been deflective in nature.

That’s the key.  The right answer is not to self-censor.  That only prevents you from making the points you need to make in the way you think is best to make them.  The right approach is to tell the GOP to fuck off when they go into their faux outrage routine, and to point out their hypocrisy and snowflakery.

[jimmyjazz 45513]

3 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

That’s the key.  The right answer is not to self-censor.  That only prevents you from making the points you need to make in the way you think is best to make them.  The right approach is to tell the GOP to fuck off when they go into their faux outrage routine, and to point out their hypocrisy and snowflakery.

We should note that the right wing fauxrage of the day makes no note of her subsequent apology.

[Irwin F Fletcher 3550]

 

It's starting to make more sense.


Munchausen syndrome, named for Baron von Munchausen, an 18th century German officer who was known for embellishing the stories of his life and experiences, is the most severe type of factitious disorder.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23356]

 

[4th&Five 41457]

Nah, once a Dotard always a Dotard. 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23356]

 

[jw4381 3063]

23 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

And grocery stores and their employees.

And plenty of Trumpists will be impacted, they just don't care. realize it yet.

There we go.

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

 

[Thrawn 538]

I'm pretty confident that labeling Trump a dotard will be the single greatest thing that POS contributes to this world.

[4th&Five 41457]

Why not done?

 

Edited December 5, 2019 by 4th&Five

[Biff Tannen 45477]

1 hour ago, 4th&Five said:

Why not done?

 

Pretty sure McConnell and Gaetz (at least one, if not both) were lamenting that they could be working on this very thing if not for impeachment.  Weird.

[DixonHur 11074]

7 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

Well, at least we're respected again

[Hugo Stiglitz 23356]

Okay then...

[Tuco 5076]

Okay then...

If you look at the rest of her Twitter feed, she’s just crazy. She has a similar message for the police about a traffic ticket.