Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For the love of Jesus, I can’t turn the channel without seeing this fucko in a movie. I get he’s the only action star under 55, but calm it the fuck down. 

I don’t even dislike him, or the type of mindless jaunt he produces, but everyone has their exposure limit. 

 

 

  • Like 7
Posted
49 minutes ago, RexWilson said:

Just wait until he announces he is running for President.

He's clearly more qualified to do that than act.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Parliament said:
16 hours ago, Surlybastard said:
He's the only guy in Hollywood that movie execs trust to star in an action movie that isn't a comic book movie. So that's what we get.

Bro do you even Gerard Butler?

I should have said trust to make action movies which actually make money.

Posted

He would be so much more interesting if you played a bad guy for once.  A legit bad guy.  Even in that Pain and Gain movie where he played a murderer (based on a true story) he was still the All American Good Guy.

 

Posted

It could be worse, remember when there was a new action movie starring either Jean Claude Van Damme or Steven Seagal coming out every month in the early 90's?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
22 hours ago, PilotsError said:

He would be so much more interesting if you played a bad guy for once.  A legit bad guy.  Even in that Pain and Gain movie where he played a murderer (based on a true story) he was still the All American Good Guy.

 

He was the bad guy in DOOM.

Posted
20 minutes ago, F250 said:

It could be worse, remember when there was a new action movie starring either Jean Claude Van Damme or Steven Seagal coming out every month in the early 90's?

 

How dare you insult the great role of Col. Austin Travis who died less than 1/3rd into the film.

Posted
34 minutes ago, HornsOverIthaca said:

How dare you insult the great role of Col. Austin Travis who died less than 1/3rd into the film.

I was glad he died. It was bad enough they casted him but at least he was bumped off early in the movie. Would have been better without John Leguizamo as well.

Posted
On 2/5/2019 at 5:34 PM, Herpa Derpa said:

O1DkCuvsgTs.jpg

 

Meh.  He pretty much makes the same movie/plays the same character every time now.  And it's getting pretty unbelievable watching a 70 year old beating up guys half his age.

I would have accepted Denzel.

Posted
On 2/4/2019 at 7:56 PM, Surlybastard said:

He's the only guy in Hollywood that movie execs trust to star in an action movie that isn't a comic book movie. So that's what we get.

Well, about that. 

The movie Black Adam (starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson) is in pre-production, a DC comic book villain from Shazam.

Also, it's been announced that he'll star in "Doc Savage"

for those that don't know, 

Quote

Doc Savage, the man of bronze, was raised from childhood by a team of scientists to become the original "super" hero of the 1930s. A man of great mental and physical strength, he went around the world battling larger-than-life villains.

 

Posted

The Rock is passable to very good in all of his movies since Get Shorty (where he was very understated and very good).  Too much hate for a dude that is ultimately, at worst, a lot of fun.  

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Parliament said:

Dwayne Johnson playing Doc Savage is worse than Tom Cruise playing Jack Reacher.

Well, his skin tone would be closer to the bronze skinned Doc Savage than a white actor. He has the size and muscles, just put golden contacts on his eyes and a blond wig, cut short, and he would be a better representation of the Doc Savage description.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...