Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well. 

OK.

THAT was fucking brilliant.  THAT'S a musician.

Without a doubt. Just fantastic.

 

Now I’ll ask the asshole question: how much does the politics of the day and the song’s subject matter play into its recognition by whoever decides who gets Grammy recognition?

Posted
2 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Now I’ll ask the asshole question: how much does the politics of the day and the song’s subject matter play into its recognition by whoever decides who gets Grammy recognition?

Probably quite a bit.  That said, I have thought that was a song for the ages from the moment I heard it.  I know I posted something to that effect when it first came out almost a year ago, maybe on the old site.  It's just an incredibly well-written, well-performed, well-produced track.  

She allegedly wrote it in less than a day to try to flesh out the album.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, LTtxfan said:

Wrong.....

You listened to the entire cardi album. Really?

color me shocked then if true. 

Edited by Pancho Negro
Posted (edited)

Only Donald Glover could upstage himself. Doesn’t show up, wins 2 Grammys, and instead is featured in a commercial during the Grammys.

Edited by mdmost
Posted
7 hours ago, spystud13 said:

That a girl, Kacey! 

"Musgraves dominated the country music categories, winning Best Country Album for Golden Hour and Best Country Solo Performance for "Butterflies."

But this morning, according to stats on Country Music stations...... Kacey's album is not country.

Posted
1 hour ago, LTtxfan said:

"Musgraves dominated the country music categories, winning Best Country Album for Golden Hour and Best Country Solo Performance for "Butterflies."

But this morning, according to stats on Country Music stations...... Kacey's album is not country.

Well what's considered country by those stations is up for the CMAs which everyone complains about also not being country. 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, Grandioso said:

When I was at the LSD Tour (Lucinda Williams, Steve Earle, and Dwight Yoakum), I got on wikipedia and did some statistical checks:

Lucinda Williams, Steve Earle, and Dwight Yoakum have a combined 49 grammy nominations and 8 grammy wins.

Taylor Swift has 10 grammy wins.

 

Taylor Swift is basically just the device through which the talent of 100 writers, producers, musicians, sound engineers, etc. is delivered. It's like someone giving out an award for the world's fastest jet and handing it to the dude who painted it. 

 

Also, Grammys don't mean shit. But I am glad they are expanding the Americana & regional genre awards.

I agree with the sentiment to some extent.  But these are not the best examples.

There are a whole lot of TS songs where she has the sole writing credit, including a lot of big hits.   And you could strip all the production out of some of those songs and IMO make them much better (see the Allison Krause and Vince Gill version of "Red" from the CMAs for proof of this).  The girl is a real talent and would have succeeded with other producers, co-writers, etc. 

Also have to point out that a large number of the "real" artists we all love from the last 5 years all work with the same producer (Dave Cobb).  That includes Isbell, Brandi Carlisle, and Sturgill (on the better of his albums). So it is not like flashy artists like TS are the only ones benefiting from talented producers who make their work better.   

As for Lucinda, she won grammys for Car Wheels on a Gravel Road and for Passionate Kisses. What else has she done that is particularly worthy of recognition.     Steve and Dwight probably should have won more than they have, but both are hurt by the fact that by far their best work was on debut albums when nobody knew who they were. 

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Grandioso said:

Taylor Swift is basically just the device through which the talent of 100 writers, producers, musicians, sound engineers, etc. is delivered. It's like someone giving out an award a blank check for the world's fastest jet and handing it to the dude who painted it. 

 

 

 

Edited by EMAWesome
Posted
13 hours ago, tbone_ said:

Without a doubt. Just fantastic.

 

Now I’ll ask the asshole question: how much does the politics of the day and the song’s subject matter play into its recognition by whoever decides who gets Grammy recognition?

Probably about as much as the politics of the day and a movie's subject matter play into recognition by whoever decides who gets Oscar recognition.

Posted
I agree with the sentiment to some extent.  But these are not the best examples.
There are a whole lot of TS songs where she has the sole writing credit, including a lot of big hits.   And you could strip all the production out of some of those songs and IMO make them much better (see the Allison Krause and Vince Gill version of "Red" from the CMAs for proof of this).  The girl is a real talent and would have succeeded with other producers, co-writers, etc. 
Also have to point out that a large number of the "real" artists we all love from the last 5 years all work with the same producer (Dave Cobb).  That includes Isbell, Brandi Carlisle, and Sturgill (on the better of his albums). So it is not like flashy artists like TS are the only ones benefiting from talented producers who make their work better.   
As for Lucinda, she won grammys for Car Wheels on a Gravel Road and for Passionate Kisses. What else has she done that is particularly worthy of recognition.     Steve and Dwight probably should have won more than they have, but both are hurt by the fact that by far their best work was on debut albums when nobody knew who they were. 

Also see Ryan Adams track-by-track cover of Taylor Swift’s 1989.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, tbone_ said:

 


This guy. Who tf is this guy? And why is he dressed like a paladin?

 

Sound engineer/mixer/producer Shawn Everett. He's awesome. 

Has worked with Musgraves, The War on Drugs, Alabama Shakes, Local Natives, Jenny Lewis, Kurt Vile, etc. 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Ollie Slatt said:

There are a whole lot of TS songs where she has the sole writing credit, including a lot of big hits.   And you could strip all the production out of some of those songs and IMO make them much better (see the Allison Krause and Vince Gill version of "Red" from the CMAs for proof of this).  The girl is a real talent and would have succeeded with other producers, co-writers, etc. 

I don't disagree, but I also love some of the production on her tracks.  "Delicate" is a great example.  It's a big, rich, fat song, with a ton of low end and a lot of sprinkles on top.  Combine that with a pretty catchy hook and . . . voila! another few million sales.  I think she's far from the biggest problem in pop music.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...