Jump to content

How Fox News works

retread

By retread
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Horn Dog

Horn Dog 9855

Posted
Posted

"Fox guest: There's just no health risk...We have this kind of air in India and China all the time, no public health emergency... this doesn't kill anybody, this doesn't make anybody cough, this is not a health event... particulate matter is just very fine soot, they're innocuous."

 

Hey law dogs, is it possible to file a defamation lawsuit on behalf of "Black Lung Disease" ?? 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

I know you’re joking about the military and “wokeness” but let me tell y’all a little story. My son has been in the Marines around 18 months. COVID absolutely destroyed his path at Troy - he’s ADHD

The Royal We
The Royal We

1. No one from the Trump campaign ever had any contact with Russia. 2. Well, someone may have had contact with Russia, but the campaign/Trump didn't know about it. 3. Actually, there was con

TexArcher
TexArcher

I'm saying I'd like to get in my car and ram it into Sean Hannity at high speed.

Posted Images

Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted
On 6/6/2023 at 11:31 AM, atomheartbevo said:

Scott Bakula, and he's 68 so if he only looks like he's 60 and that's a recent photo, he's not doing too bad.

I didn't picture Bakula as a Trumper type though.

 

 

Lol wut? That's james van der beek bro. Different movie QB entirely. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89668

Posted
Posted

She can be furious all she wants, but all of these talking heads and people in Congress trying to pretend to be shocked and outraged, not a single fucking one of them will actually jeopardize their lives or careers over Donald Trump.  They'll all be Josh Hawleys.

But they will try and rile up the MAGA crowd and get them to risk their lives and careers in order to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

She can be furious all she wants, but all of these talking heads and people in Congress trying to pretend to be shocked and outraged, not a single fucking one of them will actually jeopardize their lives or careers over Donald Trump.  They'll all be Josh Hawleys.

But they will try and rile up the MAGA crowd and get them to risk their lives and careers in order to find out.

Hawley is a good comparison for Pirro. Both constantly make legal arguments they absolutely know are total bullshit. Like Pirro here saying this is a civil, PRA matter. 

Teddy Cruz is also of that ilk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
horn4life

horn4life 3760

Posted
Posted

I tape Fox News Sunday every week and watch it religiously, because it will save me time talking to most Republicans already knowing what they were told to think this week.  But it is always interesting to see how well Fox balances endless non-fact based suppositions, with actual fact based reporting.  You know Trump was indicted for factually doing a lot of stuff that is illegal.  There is also an accusatory memo on Hunter Biden. SEE!!!! LOOK!!!!

Does it matter if the negative coverage is accurate? Factual? Dishonest?  Silly you, if you actually thought I was asking a question!  Negative suppositions are given equal or greater weight than actual factual negatives of Republicans.  And that my friends is not a news network, it is a self serving propaganda media outlet, designed for those that do not know and do not want to know factual information.  They want their non-fact based opinions confirmed with lies.  And that is the secret code Fox has broken, they found the rubes and the rubes are Republicans.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 54230

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, horn4life said:

I tape Fox News Sunday every week and watch it religiously, because it will save me time talking to most Republicans already knowing what they were told to think this week.  But it is always interesting to see how well Fox balances endless non-fact based suppositions, with actual fact based reporting.  You know Trump was indicted for factually doing a lot of stuff that is illegal.  There is also an accusatory memo on Hunter Biden. SEE!!!! LOOK!!!!

Does it matter if the negative coverage is accurate? Factual? Dishonest?  Silly you, if you actually thought I was asking a question!  Negative suppositions are given equal or greater weight than actual factual negatives of Republicans.  And that my friends is not a news network, it is a self serving propaganda media outlet, designed for those that do not know and do not want to know factual information.  They want their non-fact based opinions confirmed with lies.  And that is the secret code Fox has broken, they found the rubes and the rubes are Republicans.

jim carrey disbelief GIF

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45685

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SmokeyTheBear said:

Hannity got a bit flustered there. Newsom is making a compelling argument to be the fighter and communicator the Dems need moving forward. 

I'm not opposed to Newsom running in 2028.  That said, I think he will need to be a bit harsher.  Yes, come at them with stats and facts, but also call them liars.  Call them out for trying to hurt people.  Call them out for being grifters.  They have to be called out.  Loudly and publicly, every day.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 54230

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, SmokeyTheBear said:

Hannity got a bit flustered there. Newsom is making a compelling argument to be the fighter and communicator the Dems need moving forward. 

"Let me stop you a second...because I'm getting fucking owned and need to regroup."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89668

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

The problem with Newsom is that he's at least once showed terrible terrible judgement.  Not only did he date that troll, he married her as well.  This has me concerned about his overall decision making abilities.

Well....she was quite different back then.  Can't quite put my finger on it....

EgRy6D3VAAshkzR.jpg

 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nivek

Nivek 16930

Posted
Posted
The problem with Newsom is that he's at least once showed terrible terrible judgement.  Not only did he date that troll, he married her as well.  This has me concerned about his overall decision making abilities.

Meh, dick in crazy can be fun if its contained. JFK and Clinton managed alright despite their side piece issues.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NameAlreadyInUse

NameAlreadyInUse 5112

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Nivek said:


Meh, dick in crazy can be fun if its contained. JFK and Clinton managed alright despite their side piece issues.

Yeah, I'm not saying he made an error in judgement in deciding to fuck someone that's crazy.  I get that.  Hell I've done that too.  I'm saying that he wasn't smart enough not to marry the crazy and bring it home to meet the family.  That's the error in judgement that he's going to have a hard time justifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...