Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:

Gawd, you're a beating. We get hit, you don't like Hinch

Has nothing to do with Hinch.  Some people are just smarter than MLB managers.   We are lucky to have them around to let us know.  

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, perfectchaos007 said:

Why? We don't face the Dodgers nearly as many times as the Angles

The Angels will have too much $$$ tied up between Cole, Trout, and Pujols while the Dodgers have a lot of rookie talent and are far closer to winning it all.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Pimphand said:

Much rather it be the Angels than the Dodgers...

Yes. They will spend $300M on Cole and still not be anything more than a .500 club, when they are still paying Pujols and Upton $131M.

Trout and Cole will both be in their 30s by the time both of those guys are done.

Edited by HtownHorn
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, hookem48 said:

why would you want him in the division?

If winning the world series is the goal then the Dodgers are the greatest obstacle in the NL by far out west. Ideal state would be the Padres followed by the Giants but I don't see him going to either of those teams.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...