Jump to content

Things seem to be going quite well for Joe Biden

Parliament

By Parliament
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105161

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

You want fairy tales huh.  Well see there was this flood once that covered the earth.  This guy Noah and his buddy Jesus rode around on their jet skis and collected a bunch of animals but not dinosaurs because those aren't real kind of like polar bears.  Then Donald trump became president and we all lived happily ever after.  That should cover it.

tumblr_p89fx2Bohr1solnq1o2_500.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Thatguy
Thatguy

Alright T-tom. I am going to address this post because I am the best one for the job. I will address it number by number. 1) I am assuming that marginalized group you are talking about is us, Bla

Chooky
Chooky

Somebody should write a song about the privileged fortunes of being a senator's son because this is a totally new phenomenon.  Somebody with musical talent, because it ain't me.  

Dahobbs
Dahobbs

As you continue to ponder hypocrisy, please also refuse to address the following: T-Mobile spending over $195,000 at Trump Hotel while it lobbied for approval of its merger with Sprint, despite

Posted Images

Bateshorn

Bateshorn 9928

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

so, i'm curious, chickensandwich....every accusation levied against the biden family in this ridiculous charade has actually been committed by the trumps, and, some, in fact, proven in a court of fucking law. why is it all of a sudden this is concerning to you?

Silly bird, both are terrible, that’s why if you are a former GOP voter who is about to vote straight ticket Dem, you should just despair and stay home.  
 

Or vote Trump, cause he’s open about his criminal behavior.  Not a politician!

 

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

You want fairy tales huh.  Well see there was this flood once that covered the earth.  This guy Noah and his buddy Jesus rode around on their jet skis and collected a bunch of animals but not dinosaurs because those aren't real kind of like polar bears.  Then Donald trump became president and we all lived happily ever after.  That should cover it.

001_IMG_2625.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31507

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Bateshorn said:

By informal setting they mean they can’t rule out an incidental grip and grin at a widely attended event.  They don’t mean personal private meeting.  Every person who shook Biden’s hand and had a picture taken in 2012 had incidental contact with him. My wife’s parents had incidental contact with Barack Obama.

Don't know him.  Never met him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29936

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
3 hours ago, GRHorn said:

Maybe it’s not. 
 

looks like they’re doing a slow rollout of the laptop stuff. I’m guessing Biden and DNC know there’s some more incriminating things to come and want to attempt to discredit them preemptively.  More censoring of this stuff today. 
 

 

So they checked with some people referenced in the main email about the Ukrainian dude getting to meet Biden. They all said they never heard of him. He wasn’t on the meeting schedule. Then Biden campaign says he may have met him in an informal setting. Got it. 

Negged for not even trying to hide your role as an amateur operative trying to push a hack story from a hack newspaper promoted by Trump's hack-in-chief who is himself known to have interjected himself into the Ukraine scandal proven by the impeachment prosecutors. (Your beloved, corrupt GOP overlords can't vote away truth.)

You fervently back a man who calls the reputable press enemies of the state then you uphold the New York Post as a bastion of truth cruelly oppressed by the ebil lamestream media. 

I can, and do with much more substance, label you an enemy of the state. Anybody willfully, joyfully, and destructively promoting lies in the political discourse of a republic can be nothing other than an enemy of that republic. 

Refer to this post for any future negs from me. You know what you are. Despicable.

  • Hook 'Em 12
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34326

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, workswithseed said:

203 reform needs to happen. Either you're a platform, or you're a news paper. You can't play both.

or you can be something different like an internet message board.  applying the print distinction to the internet resulted in absolutely moronic court results. 

 

i see this was well-covered

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34326

Posted
Posted

BARR: even i can't get something to stick on unmaskgate, what have we got to bury that info?
KUSH: how about we announce that luxembourg and andorra have resolved their differences and announced an historic peace accord?
BARR: too esoteric
KIMG: WHAT ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE BURNING DOWN SUBURBS
BARR: not really working
ERIC: i must have missed it did we decide on pudding pops or cake for dessert?
DONJ: *sniff* we've still got those fake email pdfs *sniff* from that crazy dude in delaware that rudy has been sitting on for a year *sniff*
RUDY: ah, geta me zha patsie, wi pikcha off emaiw *bows with hands together*
BARR: seed it with the  usual sources
CHUDS: HAI GAIYS LOOK AT HOW CORRUPT HUNTER IS!

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mchookem

mchookem 16337

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

so, i'm curious, chickensandwich....every accusation levied against the biden family in this ridiculous charade has actually been committed by the trumps, and, some, in fact, proven in a court of fucking law. why is it all of a sudden this is concerning to you?

haha how cute.

i mean, you realize, we ALL realize bc we have all asked similar questions at varying points, that you will not get an answer,  right?

bc there IS no justification, no explanation, no defense. 

they get 'busy', they 'miss' the question, the thread moves too fast, etc...there will be no answer. 

and just by ASKING you are violating some posters' 'safe space' which is why they have sadly had to remove themselves from the horrible cloak room. 

so nice try, but don't hold your breath. 

Edited by mchookem
  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
staboner

staboner 4984

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

Negged for not even trying to hide your role as an amateur operative trying to push a hack story from a hack newspaper promoted by Trump's hack-in-chief who is himself known to have interjected himself into the Ukraine scandal proven by the impeachment prosecutors. (Your beloved, corrupt GOP overlords can't vote away truth.)

You fervently back a man who calls the reputable press enemies of the state then you uphold the New York Post as a bastion of truth cruelly oppressed by the ebil lamestream media. 

I can, and do with much more substance, label you an enemy of the state. Anybody willfully, joyfully, and destructively promoting lies in the political discourse of a republic can be nothing other than an enemy of that republic. 

Refer to this post for any future negs from me. You know what you are. Despicable.

this is how you deal with Tahoehorn. well done sir, well done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unoriginal

unoriginal 55

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Aqua Buddha said:

What caught my eye immediately was the tremendous clarity of the text, when compared to the “VP” gmail icon in the upper right-hand corner. Something appeared to be off, and upon further examination, it was. Look what happens when you zoom into the PDF file (see image below). The text in the file remains crystal clear, yet the gmail icon for “VP” gets extremely pixelated. Even in the un-zoomed version, the icon is blatantly pixelated.

1*1Qh34WXG2pe9TsEYNhd-TQ.png

 

This is the hallmark of email alterations. There is no reason that the gmail icon should be of a different resolution than the text on the same document, unless of course the icon or the text were photoshopped in.

But to make matters even more interesting; if you view the “VP” icon, you will also notice that the right side of it is flat, and there is a very light gray color around it which does not match the background of the document. The gray background aligns perfectly with where the would-be circle is abruptly squared off. This confirms that someone used an editing tool to cut this icon out and then paste it onto a new document.

https://eddiekrassenstein.medium.com/alleged-hunter-biden-email-from-giuliani-appears-forged-2d55b08140cc

Pixelization could be due to any number of reasons (innocent or otherwise). Grab the email headers and DKIM them for cryptographic proof of whether they are authentic emails.

Either the FBI has the emails (and headers) and can validate them, or they don't have them and are choosing not to refute the statement by repair shop guy that they do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17625

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, unoriginal said:

Pixelization could be due to any number of reasons (innocent or otherwise). Grab the email headers and DKIM them for cryptographic proof of whether they are authentic emails.

Either the FBI has the emails (and headers) and can validate them, or they don't have them and are choosing not to refute the statement by repair shop guy that they do.

 

Sure, grab the headers from [checks notes] a pdf print out of an alleged email. Makes sense. Also, expect the justice department ran by [checks notes] Bill Bar to refute a story that the Trump wants to push. This is all very reasonable. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27234

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

You want fairy tales huh.  Well see there was this flood once that covered the earth.  This guy Noah and his buddy Jesus rode around on their jet skis and collected a bunch of animals but not dinosaurs because those aren't real kind of like polar bears.  Then Donald trump became president and we all lived happily ever after.  That should cover it.

milehigh_moments_from_airplane_15.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unoriginal

unoriginal 55

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Sure, grab the headers from [checks notes] a pdf print out of an alleged email. Makes sense. Also, expect the justice department ran by [checks notes] Bill Bar to refute a story that the Trump wants to push. This is all very reasonable. 

The FBI either has the laptop with original emails and headers (not just pdfs) or it doesn't. Those emails can be validated.

As for FBI refuting DOJ/Pres, it's happened before: FBI chief Wray refutes Barr, says no 'spying' on Trump campaign

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17625

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, unoriginal said:

The FBI either has the laptop with original emails and headers (not just pdfs) or it doesn't. Those emails can be validated.

As for FBI refuting DOJ/Pres, it's happened before: FBI chief Wray refutes Barr, says no 'spying' on Trump campaign

 

Or, here is an idea, if original emails exist on the laptop, why not release those instead of the weird pdf ones? It is all bullshit and anyone selling it or justifying it is selling bullshit. Dude was lying his ass off in the interview, and nothing about the story makes any sense. At any rate, I'm sure Bill Bar is just rushing to refute the President's personal lawyer. Here is my prediction: it'll get slow played and then dropped like everything else (unmasking! greatest scandal ever!). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unoriginal

unoriginal 55

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Or, here is an idea, if original emails exist on the laptop, why not release those instead of the weird pdf ones? It is all bullshit and anyone selling it or justifying it is selling bullshit. Dude was lying his ass off in the interview, and nothing about the story makes any sense. At any rate, I'm sure Bill Bar is just rushing to refute the President's personal lawyer. Here is my prediction: it'll get slow played and then dropped like everything else (unmasking! greatest scandal ever!). 

Guliani says he wants to slow roll it so your prediction may be right. The article above claiming fake emails based on some amateur analysis of a pdf is what I was responding to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16110

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, unoriginal said:

Guliani says he wants to slow roll it so your prediction may be right. The article above claiming fake emails based on some amateur analysis of a pdf is what I was responding to.

If these things really bother you, no need to wait.  Trump has already been found guilty and admitted to in court of worse.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/nyregion/ny-ag-underwood-trump-foundation.html

 

The foundation was accused by the attorney general, Barbara Underwood, of “functioning as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr. Trump’s business and political interests,” and of engaging in “a shocking pattern of illegality” that included unlawfully coordinating with Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
 

Trump and his shitbag kids are so corrupt they can’t run a charity any longer.   The whole trump family is corrupt to the core.  And it’s actually been proven. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2112

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

Partly correct, partly wrong. The problem, dear reader, is that the government wanted publishers to moderate, specifically, to moderate out illegal content (e.g., child porn). However, under First Amendment jurisprudence, any moderation, even of illegal content, would result in potential liability for the content that was posted. And platforms wanted to moderate too because allowing anything and everything was bad for business. Take the old site as an example. There is apparently not a very large market for a Longhorn sport's forum that is filled with scat porn. In order to actually have a platform of any business value, moderation is required. Section 230 allows that moderation to take place without thrusting civil liability upon the platform. 

So, the law, as it current exists, allows platforms to host pretty much any content without fear of civil liability. And, it allows them to moderate that content so as to allow business to flourish.

So, here is the puzzle for you: if you take away the protections from liability, is a platform going to be more or less likely to host questionable content?

The answer: given that the platforms must do moderation for business reasons, what will happen is that platforms will actually moderate even more so as to avoid hosting potentially libelous content. That means that all the right wing bullshit that you want them host will go away completely, precisely because it is bullshit and would subject the platforms to potential liability.

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about.  

I get it, they should keep drowning down legal speech for thier quarterly gains. Seems like a terrible practice as other sites like Bitchute and Parler have grown, and they keep having legal battles to keep suppressing legal free speech (not kiddie porn) to make sure that advertisers can make a buck.

You're right though, I just don't know what I'm talking about. @StassneyHorn got me pinned that I'm a big dumb poor person, but Justice Thomas seems to be a person that has some power that agrees with me. 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/clarence-thomas-suggests-section-230-immunities-applied-too-broadly-to-tech-companies/

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31507

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, unoriginal said:

The FBI either has the laptop with original emails and headers (not just pdfs) or it doesn't. Those emails can be validated.

As for FBI refuting DOJ/Pres, it's happened before: FBI chief Wray refutes Barr, says no 'spying' on Trump campaign

 

There is zero credible evidence that the FBI has this laptop or the "emails."

So far, this is 100% cooked up bullshit from private parties and the NY Post and other "media" outlets.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aqua Buddha

Aqua Buddha 14598

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Conservatives have been telling me for 20 years that businesses should be allowed to discriminate because the "free market" will straighten things out.

I wonder what changed?

 

It’s like the “FAKE NEWS!!!!” crowd being upset there’s not fake news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31507

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I get it, they should keep drowning down legal speech for thier quarterly gains. Seems like a terrible practice as other sites like Bitchute and Parler have grown, and they keep having legal battles to keep suppressing legal free speech (not kiddie porn) to make sure that advertisers can make a buck.

You're right though, I just don't know what I'm talking about. @StassneyHorn got me pinned that I'm a big dumb poor person, but Justice Thomas seems to be a person that has some power that agrees with me. 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/clarence-thomas-suggests-section-230-immunities-applied-too-broadly-to-tech-companies/

Clarence Thomas is a nincompoop when it comes to the First Amendment.  A complete braying jackass.

He wants to sue anyone and everyone who has said something bad about him, including the US Senate circa 1991 and Anita Hill, and wants to undo any restrictions on defamation law that get in his way.

I kind of joke about repealing Section 230 because it would kill social media dead, including this site.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted (edited)

Clarence Thomas is by far the greatest potted plant to ever set foot in the Supreme Court. He just sits there and used to just concur with everything Scalia said. Now that Scalia is dead he just sits there and concurs with everything Alito says. Apparently he likes Italian men. 

Edited by JimmyJames
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17625

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I get it, they should keep drowning down legal speech for thier quarterly gains. Seems like a terrible practice as other sites like Bitchute and Parler have grown, and they keep having legal battles to keep suppressing legal free speech (not kiddie porn) to make sure that advertisers can make a buck.

You're right though, I just don't know what I'm talking about. @StassneyHorn got me pinned that I'm a big dumb poor person, but Justice Thomas seems to be a person that has some power that agrees with me. 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/clarence-thomas-suggests-section-230-immunities-applied-too-broadly-to-tech-companies/

Again, what do you think happens if the liability protections of Section 230 go away? Do you think that means less moderation of content or more moderation of content? 

The whole fucking point of section 230 is let platforms host whatever content their users desire without liability for the libelous things their users may say. If that goes away, platforms WILL heavily moderate content in order to avoid libel claims or they will simply shut down. That's it. It wouldn't create a free space for your right wing peeps, it would eliminate it all together. 

And, let me be clear. None of these private entities are suppressing free speech in the constitutional sense. That restriction applies to the government. If you want to start WorkswithSeed's blog and spout off all sorts of crazy stories about Biden and Obama and whatever evil leftist you think exists, you are free to do it that right now. The government isn't going to stop you. But, you may be liable for libel if your stories are untrue. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TornACL

TornACL 7721

Posted
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I get it, they should keep drowning down legal speech for thier quarterly gains. Seems like a terrible practice as other sites like Bitchute and Parler have grown, and they keep having legal battles to keep suppressing legal free speech (not kiddie porn) to make sure that advertisers can make a buck.

You're right though, I just don't know what I'm talking about. @StassneyHorn 

I mean, I guess you could say that Parler has grown, in the technical sense. 

It has an average of 100,000 weekly downloads, down drastically from June when it had its brief moment in the spotlight.

At that rate, to catch up with Twitter it will only take Parler 57 years to match Twitters user count, if no one new signs up for Twitter. 

Growing, indeed!

Edited by TornACL
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
StassneyHorn

StassneyHorn 6618

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, workswithseed said:

I get it, they should keep drowning down legal speech for thier quarterly gains. Seems like a terrible practice as other sites like Bitchute and Parler have grown, and they keep having legal battles to keep suppressing legal free speech (not kiddie porn) to make sure that advertisers can make a buck.

You're right though, I just don't know what I'm talking about. @StassneyHorn got me pinned that I'm a big dumb poor person, but Justice Thomas seems to be a person that has some power that agrees with me. 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/clarence-thomas-suggests-section-230-immunities-applied-too-broadly-to-tech-companies/

No I think you’re naive and a completely average in every way, young male that the GOP can get to regurgitate BS talking points.

“My taxes are too high!” yet you aren’t rich and income tax differences are probably negligible for you. “Antifa is in my parking lot burning trash dumpsters and looting!” = some random fuck making a literal dumpster fire in the vicinity of whatever 5-10 story apartment complex you live in near downtown. “They’re censoring everyone with a dissenting view” yet everyone knows exactly what the dissent is online.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29355

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dahobbs said:

Again, what do you think happens if the liability protections of Section 230 go away? Do you think that means less moderation of content or more moderation of content? 

The whole fucking point of section 230 is let platforms host whatever content their users desire without liability for the libelous things their users may say. If that goes away, platforms WILL heavily moderate content in order to avoid libel claims or they will simply shut down. That's it. It wouldn't create a free space for your right wing peeps, it would eliminate it all together. 

And, let me be clear. None of these private entities are suppressing free speech in the constitutional sense. That restriction applies to the government. If you want to start WorkswithSeed's blog and spout off all sorts of crazy stories about Biden and Obama and whatever evil leftist you think exists, you are free to do it that right now. The government isn't going to stop you. But, you may be liable for libel if your stories are untrue. 

1 hour ago, workswithseed said:

I get it, they should keep drowning down legal speech for thier quarterly gains. Seems like a terrible practice as other sites like Bitchute and Parler have grown, and they keep having legal battles to keep suppressing legal free speech (not kiddie porn) to make sure that advertisers can make a buck.

You're right though, I just don't know what I'm talking about. @StassneyHorn got me pinned that I'm a big dumb poor person, but Justice Thomas seems to be a person that has some power that agrees with me. 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/clarence-thomas-suggests-section-230-immunities-applied-too-broadly-to-tech-companies/

You didn’t bother reading what Thomas actually wrote, did you?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GhostOfTomJoad

GhostOfTomJoad 9339

Posted
Posted

Biden is killing it tonight. Actively engaging questioners, citing multiple details behind specific laws & actions he was involved in over his senate career, & reinforcing the 3 levers of the US government.

Nobody's watching because they'd rather hear the rantings of a lunatic, but here we are.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32395

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, GhostOfTomJoad said:

Biden is killing it tonight. Actively engaging questioners, citing multiple details behind specific laws & actions he was involved in over his senate career, & reinforcing the 3 levers of the US government.

Nobody's watching because they'd rather hear the rantings of a lunatic, but here we are.

Biden can do no wrong, but Trump gonna suck all the oxygen out of the room, because reasons.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...