Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.ncaa.com/news/football/article/2019-04-23/targeting-protocols-approved-football

On targeting:

Quote

Beginning in the fall in games using video review, instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the targeting foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field “stand” during a targeting review — it must either be confirmed or overturned. Games using the halftime video review procedure will continue to use the current process.

On overtime:

Quote

Panel members approved a tweak to the overtime rules. If a game reaches a fifth overtime, teams will run alternating two-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line. This rules change was made to limit the number of plays from scrimmage and to bring the game to a conclusion.

On kickoffs:

Quote

The panel approved a rules change to eliminate the two-man wedge formation on all kickoffs. 

On blindside blocks:

Quote

The panel approved a new rule relevant to blind-side blocking techniques. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be a personal foul with a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.

 

  • Like 1
  • Machinator changed the title to NCAA rule changes to overtime and targeting
Posted
5 minutes ago, Machinator said:

Panel members approved a tweak to the overtime rules. If a game reaches a fifth overtime, teams will run alternating two-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line

A&M's 2018 win over LSU is hereby vacated

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, SwanderedTalent said:

A&M's 2018 win over LSU is hereby vacated

If they had followed the rules that were already in place, aggy would have lost.

  • Like 8
Posted
25 minutes ago, Machinator said:

On overtime: Panel members approved a tweak to the overtime rules. If a game reaches a fifth overtime, teams will run alternating two-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line. This rules change was made to limit the number of plays from scrimmage and to bring the game to a conclusion.

Dumb.  Just move it back to the 35, and the number of overtimes would go way down.

  • Like 7
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nueces River Rat said:

Good on the targeting rule.

But does a new can worms get opened on the blindside blocking penalty?   

of course.   its almost guaranteed to happen- and since its almost always done on offense, you may end up losing your most important linemen/ WR/ TE to the process.

and of course, they didnt fucking say it was reviewable (unless targeting), so we are right back to the first games of the targeting rule where everyone lost their shit when a ref called targeting and it was clearly not targeting, yet the penalty stood along with the suspension.   

  • Like 1
Posted

Make overtime resemble real football, you know like the NFL does. Starting at the 25 is just fucking silly. I was hoping to see a real change take place before opening this thread but nope. Most games don't even reach that many OTs so that change is pointless. If you are going to go to the NFL's model, then have them start at the 50yd line minimum. But it would be better served on their own 40. 60 yards in front of you.

  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AUS-97HORN said:

of course.   its almost guaranteed to happen- and since its almost always done on offense, you may end up losing your most important linemen/ WR/ TE to the process.

and of course, they didnt fucking say it was reviewable (unless targeting), so we are right back to the first games of the targeting rule where everyone lost their shit when a ref called targeting and it was clearly not targeting, yet the penalty stood along with the suspension.   

Exactly what I was thinking...

Why couldn't they just wrap it all  under the jurisdiction of targeting and treat as such under the new rules?   Most of those blind side blocks I've see over the years are similar to defensive targeting.  Call it offensive targeting subjected to the same review process.  

Posted
30 minutes ago, AUS-97HORN said:

of course.   its almost guaranteed to happen- and since its almost always done on offense, you may end up losing your most important linemen/ WR/ TE to the process.

and of course, they didnt fucking say it was reviewable (unless targeting), so we are right back to the first games of the targeting rule where everyone lost their shit when a ref called targeting and it was clearly not targeting, yet the penalty stood along with the suspension.   

Yep.  Receivers/TE coaches are going to have to coach the guys to set basketball style picks on a blindside block play.   Run up and get in the way, don’t initiate the contact.   

 

Going to be a plethora of horrific calls the first few weeks of the season 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, J.R. Juniors Junior Jr. said:

Dumb.  Just move it back to the 35, and the number of overtimes would go way down.

This is the correct answer.  

Posted

OT start from the 25, no FG, no 1st downs you have 4 plays to score. After 2 OT possession for each team first team to score wins

Posted (edited)

Yes, overtime in CFB needs an easy tweak where a team isn't in decent field goal range when they get the ball.

Instead of the 25, start the possession at the 35. 

Edited by Wally Pryor
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Blindside blocking penalty is dumb.  As long as it’s not targeting, it should be legal.

Yeah I don't get it.  Couldn't every variation of counter-trey be called blindside blocking?

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Machinator said:

On blindside blocks:

that’s fucking unbelievable.  so if the pursuing defender can’t see you coming to block him he has a free path to make the tackle.  unless you block him, for which you will be penalized.  

this fucking game...

Posted
A&M's 2018 win over LSU is hereby vacated
Herb Alpert is gonna be pissed.

Oh wait, you mean aggy!

Good job. Here's a cookie.

1b618656b056a0d15b5c3599f407deec.jpg
Enjoy!



Yo, aggy bakers, we need moar cookie dough!





0e7949b4c81e87f7a309e1f1d4876cca.jpg24c11cd86a375ef664850899162b9250.jpgba96f29ff0ebc54fca3365d39a30c9cd.jpg
  • Haha 1
Posted
Quote

The panel approved a rules change to eliminate the two-man wedge formation on all kickoffs. 

While it's true the committee were told there would be no maths, a two-man wedge is not possible regardless of one's arithmentical [sic] skills. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unless one player outweighs the other by 250+ pounds, and even then, it's questionable.

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Vic Mackey said:

Make overtime resemble real football, you know like the NFL does. Starting at the 25 is just fucking silly. I was hoping to see a real change take place before opening this thread but nope. Most games don't even reach that many OTs so that change is pointless. If you are going to go to the NFL's model, then have them start at the 50yd line minimum. But it would be better served on their own 40. 60 yards in front of you.

I like the college version of OT better than that of the NFL. Football s the ultimate team sport, butNE never had to face Mahomes in OT because of the NFL’s fucked up rules.

Edited by slorch
Posted
OT start from the 25, no FG, no 1st downs you have 4 plays to score. After 2 OT possession for each team first team to score wins
That's good except you should be able to get a first down.
Posted
4 hours ago, Trey3216 said:

Yep.  Receivers/TE coaches are going to have to coach the guys to set basketball style picks on a blindside block play.   Run up and get in the way, don’t initiate the contact.   

 

Going to be a plethora of horrific calls the first few weeks of the season 

And call a charging foul on the defensive player.

Posted
2 minutes ago, sdm said:

And call a charging foul on the defensive player.

It’ll be holding, once the defensive players learn to flop.   Holding penalties everywhere!

Posted
5 hours ago, Vic Mackey said:

Make overtime resemble real football, you know like the NFL does. Starting at the 25 is just fucking silly. I was hoping to see a real change take place before opening this thread but nope. Most games don't even reach that many OTs so that change is pointless. If you are going to go to the NFL's model, then have them start at the 50yd line minimum. But it would be better served on their own 40. 60 yards in front of you.

NFL OT is largely over after the coin flip. 

Posted
2 hours ago, MrPhlegm said:

Herb Alpert is gonna be pissed. Oh wait, you mean aggy!

Yo, aggy bakers, we need moar cookie dough!
0e7949b4c81e87f7a309e1f1d4876cca.jpg24c11cd86a375ef664850899162b9250.jpgba96f29ff0ebc54fca3365d39a30c9cd.jpg


Fistin' For Dollars!!

aggy's favorite game show.

Posted
7 hours ago, Nueces River Rat said:

Good on the targeting rule.

But does a new can worms get opened on the blindside blocking penalty?   

Quote

The panel approved a new rule relevant to blind-side blocking techniques. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be a personal foul with a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.

1. line up for goalline or other short yardage situation

2. OL except center do a landry flexset then standup and do an about-face and go in to a passprotect stance facing away from opponent

3. snap ball

4. walk backwards

5. ?

6. profit

Posted
6 hours ago, Born a Longhorn said:

Overtime: what if each team got five 2-point conversion attempts, alternating.

"Longhorns beat the Sooners 4-3 on conversions"

 

Box score would say "Texas 28 - 28 OU (4-3)"

we never shuold have gotten rid of penetrations

Posted
4 hours ago, MrPhlegm said:
7 hours ago, BB65 said:
OT start from the 25, no FG, no 1st downs you have 4 plays to score. After 2 OT possession for each team first team to score wins

That's good except you should be able to get a first down.

 

4 hours ago, MrPhlegm said:
7 hours ago, BB65 said:
OT start from the 25, no FG, no 1st downs you have 4 plays to score. After 2 OT possession for each team first team to score wins

That's good except you should be able to get a first down.

The reasons to eliminate 1st downs is because defense is football too. I would be ok starting from the 30 and giving a 1st down after crossing the 15. 

Posted

So you don't understand what a first down is in American football.

 

Tell us more...

Posted
11 minutes ago, slorch said:

So you don't understand what a first down is in American football.

 

Tell us more...

Uh yes I do understand what a first down is in American football. You don’t seem to understand making changes to the OT rules to shorten the game. 

Posted
Just now, BB65 said:

Uh yes I do understand what a first down is in American football. You don’t seem to understand making changes to the OT rules to shorten the game. 

no, i got it bro.

15 yards for a first down is dumb as hell without first incurring a penalty.

Leave it the fuck alone.  Don't overthink it.

Posted
12 hours ago, Vic Mackey said:

Make overtime resemble real football, you know like the NFL does. Starting at the 25 is just fucking silly. I was hoping to see a real change take place before opening this thread but nope. Most games don't even reach that many OTs so that change is pointless. If you are going to go to the NFL's model, then have them start at the 50yd line minimum. But it would be better served on their own 40. 60 yards in front of you.

It’s a dead heat between which of these I find most impressive: (1) you can do basic math and (2) your hot takes are consistently trash.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

These fucking assholes just can’t help but fuck up the rules. What constitutes “forcible contact” on a blind-side block? Fuck, what constitutes a blind-side for that matter? So you can “blind-side” block with contact, as long as it isn’t forcible? This is another shit rule that is rife for abuse from referee interpretation, and of course, it won’t be reviewable. And it means we will never again see a block like the one Cosby laid on that fucking sooner bitch.

Though upon further review, that was not the blind side. Or was it? 

tumblr_na49hmKUuu1tj4h5io1_540.gif

Edited by Sejjr
  • Like 4
Posted
21 hours ago, J.R. Juniors Junior Jr. said:

Dumb.  Just move it back to the 35, and the number of overtimes would go way down.

I like this idea.  Or eliminate extra points/field goals - go for it on 4th and run 2 point conversions after every td.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...