the alabama abortion attack

[Foosters 17,691]

Yeah, if people like Slorch believed that the government could force you to donate an organ to a dying person, I'd have a little more respect for their position. Not much.

[M12BH 544]

13 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Yeah, if people like Slorch believed that the government could force you to donate an organ to a dying person, I'd have a little more respect for their position. Not much.

But they don't.  Because they have a fetus fetish.  Cult of the fetus.  All they can do is bleat "It's an innocent life, it's an innocent life" ad nauseam. But they don't have an answer as to why innocent fetuses are more deserving of the resources of others than innocent babies.  

[Asithappens 974]

Personally, I don't even think the "good" evangelical/Republicans even care all that much for the unborn.

They do this just because they know it pisses off the Dems.

I don't think I've ever seen such a pile of hypocritical shit as today's evangelicals.

[Continental Op 3,934]

Those fetuses need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.  

[jimmyjazz 45,513]

4 minutes ago, Continental Op said:

Those fetuses need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.  

You probably missed a golden opportunity with "stirrups", but + rep anyway.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,356]

This really about maintaining the patriarchy and keeping women down.  The Taliban does the same shit. 

[Biff Tannen 45,477]

47 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This really about maintaining the patriarchy and keeping women down.  The Taliban does the same shit. 

Yep.  Someone brought it up way earlier, but this is about bringing us back to antebellum values.  Gender and race, know your place.

[Cheeseweasel 26,437]

6 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Yep.  Someone brought it up way earlier, but this is about bringing us back to antebellum values.  Gender and race, know your place.

[Pam Cummings 9,553]

What's funny about people like slorch is that they'll tell you the government has no right to touch their guns out of one side of their mouth, but they'll support the government telling women what to do with their bodies out of the other.

 

Guns > women, in their world.

Edited May 20, 2019 by Pam Cummings

[RDCanecutter 26,239]

17 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Let's not forget Johnny Depp's New England Triangle Trade version.

[Cheeseweasel 26,437]

5 minutes ago, Pam Cummings said:

Guns > women, in their world.

Granted, they are less dangerous.

[Pam Cummings 9,553]

11 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Granted, they are less dangerous.

True, at least with those you can see where the danger is coming from.

[RDCanecutter 26,239]

13 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Granted, they are less dangerous.

The flaw in your argument is that those women can also get guns. And their little unwanted babies will be swinging derringers around so you can't even sneak up on mama's blind side.

[Cheeseweasel 26,437]

4 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

The flaw in your argument is that those women can also get guns. And their little unwanted babies will be swinging derringers around so you can't even sneak up on mama's blind side.

[GRHorn 105]

 

[Longhorn_Fan68 33,825]

[Brisketexan 104,465]

So, if abortion is murder.....and a guy offers to pay for the murder ("babe, you have GOT to get an abortion, I'll pay for it"), does that make him criminally liable for a contract killing?

I mean, obviously yes.

But do you think any of these legislatures will pass a single law that will come within 10,000 miles of creating any criminal liability for the sperm donors?  Yeah.....not gonna happen.  Because this isn't about murder, or the sanctity of human life.  Nobody with 2 functioning brain cells believes that for a second.

[Gil Bang 25,865]

On 5/18/2019 at 4:16 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Why are republicans so obsessed with rape?  It seems to come up much more than it should in national politics. 

"you said ''rape' twice"

"I like rape"

On 5/18/2019 at 4:43 PM, workswithseed said:

Awe, so just moments before it's born its okay to kill it? That's doesnt sound deranged at all.

Only if they wrap it beautifully. 

[wildcat09 29,187]

6 hours ago, slorch said:

So tell me again when life begins? I’ll hang up and listen

 

 I also do not care what other people do. That has nothing to do with my religion. It has everything to do with believing that’s when life begins. And nobody can disprove that, regardless of their degree.  

You're free to believe that. You're not free to impose that belief on the rest of society, especially in a manner that will quite literally fucking kill thousands of women you piece of shit.

[jimmyjazz 45,513]

30 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

You're free to believe that. You're not free to impose that belief on the rest of society, especially in a manner that will quite literally fucking kill thousands of women you piece of shit.

slorch is devoid of intellectual honesty.  He has been destroyed multiple times on this thread and continues to ignore all cogent arguments doing so.

Some might call it . . . trolling.

slorch'd.

[Guest]

5 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This really about maintaining the patriarchy and keeping women down.  The Taliban does the same shit. 

Sure.  keep women down...how?

 

i love the notion that pregnancy just happens like a cold or the flu.

 

It's so dignified treating them like a repeater cum recepticle, right?

 

ahhh do it with more guys.  It's so liberating.  

 

Eh, to each their own, but don't act like abortion is some celebration of liberty.

Edited May 21, 2019 by slorch

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,356]

You get a woman pregnant by accident and leave her to raise the kid on her own, you’ve just handicapped her economic and political mobility while you are free to roam the earth consequence free. 

[Brisketexan 104,465]

Sure.  keep women down...how?
 
i love the notion that pregnancy just happens like a cold or the flu.
 
It's so dignified treating them like a repeater cum recepticle, right?
 
ahhh do it with more guys.  It's so liberating.  
 
Eh, to each their own, but don't act like abortion is some celebration of liberty.

Know what’s cool in this? Literally zero responsibility or consequences for the man. It’s all about her being a slut, and “doing it with more guys.” It’s all on her.

[Bama Chick 28,596]

Sure.  keep women down...how?
 
i love the notion that pregnancy just happens like a cold or the flu.
 
It's so dignified treating them like a repeater cum recepticle, right?
 
ahhh do it with more guys.  It's so liberating.  
 
Eh, to each their own, but don't act like abortion is some celebration of liberty.

You’re a pig.

Fuck off and fuck you.

[tantric superman 4,667]

24 minutes ago, slorch said:

Sure.  keep women down...how?

You play a moron on the internet.

 

[Thetexashammer 1,062]

11 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

 

You’re a pig.

Fuck off and fuck you.

 

He's really not. And you really are.

[Guest]

19 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

 

You’re a pig.

Fuck off and fuck you.

 

Not really.

 

Just don't subscribe to your brand of 'liberated woman.'  and in your alleged progressive tolerance, you'll still find my differing opinion appalling and outrageous.

 

So the fuck what... I'll tell you this:

If we treated women as a society the way i do as a man, we'd be way the fuck better off.

Edited May 21, 2019 by slorch

[Thetexashammer 1,062]

2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

So, if abortion is murder.....and a guy offers to pay for the murder ("babe, you have GOT to get an abortion, I'll pay for it"), does that make him criminally liable for a contract killing?

I mean, obviously yes.

But do you think any of these legislatures will pass a single law that will come within 10,000 miles of creating any criminal liability for the sperm donors?  Yeah.....not gonna happen.  Because this isn't about murder, or the sanctity of human life.  Nobody with 2 functioning brain cells believes that for a second.

Do you think anyone agrees with your question about "contract killing"? It's the very definition of a straw man. Which makes your argument fallacious. Its content is unimportant, I'm not disagreeing, I'm saying you're talking nonsense as a matter of logical housekeeping.

I don't enjoy the called strike followed by a walking the bases as if you hit a home run. I think more highly of you than that.

Edited May 21, 2019 by Thetexashammer

[tantric superman 4,667]

6 hours ago, M12BH said:

For argument's sake let's say you're right, and "life" begins at conception.

I really don't get the idea that we have to talk about when "life" begins.   Life is continuous woman alive, has egg, fertilized, develops, new person (woman), has egg...etc.

Similarly, all of these developmental stages are human.  As in human embryo, human egg, etc.

The nomenclature doesn't really address the privacy issue, other than to say at some point the one human becomes viable and can life apart from his or her host.

[Brisketexan 104,465]

Do you think anyone agrees with your question about "contract killing"? It's the very definition of a straw man.
I don't enjoy the called strike followed by a walking the bases as if you hit a home run. I think more highly of you than that.

If abortion is murder, then how is paying for someone to commit that murder not a crime?

If you want to own the position, own the position. Deeming a fetus a human life has broad-ranging consequences. I mean, except of course if any men would suffer those consequences. Then, nevermind.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,356]

I also think the pro-life people should have funerals for miscarriages. 

See how committed they are to this.

[TexArcher 37,455]

33 minutes ago, slorch said:

Sure.  keep women down...how?

 

i love the notion that pregnancy just happens like a cold or the flu.

 

It's so dignified treating them like a repeater cum recepticle, right?

 

ahhh do it with more guys.  It's so liberating.  

 

Eh, to each their own, but don't act like abortion is some celebration of liberty.

This is the kind of commentary I'd expect in an incel chat room.  You seriously sound like you're mad at sluts because they'll fuck everybody but you.

And your diatribe still doesn't address the 13-year-old rape victim who gets pregnant in my earlier example.  You gonna tell her she should have kept her whorish legs closed?

[TexArcher 37,455]

8 minutes ago, slorch said:

Just don't subscribe to your brand of 'liberated woman.'  and in your alleged progressive tolerance, you'll still find my differing opinion appalling and outrageous.

I'm an independent and I find it appalling and outrageous, for the record.

[hookemATL 11,596]

40 minutes ago, slorch said:

Eh, to each their own...

To each their own but lemme go ahead and make your decisions my decisions even though it has fuck all to do with me. The party of small government ladies and gentlemen. 

Doot doot doot I’m a dumb motherfucker and I vote  

 

 

[henrygandorf 29,174]

15 minutes ago, slorch said:

Not really.

 

Just don't subscribe to your brand of 'liberated woman.'  and in your alleged progressive tolerance, you'll still find my differing opinion appalling and outrageous.

 

So the fuck what... I'll tell you this:

If we treated women as a society the way i do as a man, we'd be way the fuck better off.

solid edit.

[M12BH 544]

11 minutes ago, tantric superman said:

I really don't get the idea that we have to talk about when "life" begins.   Life is continuous woman alive, has egg, fertilized, develops, new person (woman), has egg...etc.

Similarly, all of these developmental stages are human.  As in human embryo, human egg, etc.

The nomenclature doesn't really address the privacy issue, other than to say at some point the one human becomes viable and can life apart from his or her host.

That's my whole fucking point.  When "life begins" is irrelevant to whether a woman should be forced to carry it inside her. Which has yet to be addressed by anyone who insists that "it's an innocent life so we can't kill it".  If there's no difference between a life inside a uterus and outside, then forcing some people to provide support and not others is absurd.  

[henrygandorf 29,174]

1 minute ago, M12BH said:

That's my whole fucking point.  When "life begins" is irrelevant to whether a woman should be forced to carry it inside her. Which has yet to be addressed by anyone who insists that "it's an innocent life so we can't kill it".  If there's no difference between a life inside a uterus and outside, then forcing some people to provide support and not others is absurd.  

it lets the r's paint the dems as the "pro-murder" party.  super effective.

[M12BH 544]

17 minutes ago, slorch said:

Just don't subscribe to your brand of 'liberated woman.'  and in your alleged progressive tolerance, you'll still find my differing opinion appalling and outrageous.

 

Yeah but she still supports your legal right to have your appalling and outrageous opinion.  See how that works?  No, I didn't think so. 

[Enchubben 5,509]

12 minutes ago, hookemATL said:

To each their own but lemme go ahead and make your decisions my decisions even though it has fuck all to do with me. The party of small government ladies and gentlemen. 

Doot doot doot I’m a dumb motherfucker and I vote  

 

 

Elections have consequences. 

[henrygandorf 29,174]

2 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

Elections have consequences. 

unlike supreme court decisions.

[tantric superman 4,667]

Lotta people on this thread subscribe to a certain kind of woman.

And by that I mean subscribe to hoes.

 

[hookemATL 11,596]

5 minutes ago, M12BH said:

Yeah but she still supports your legal right to have your appalling and outrageous opinion.  See how that works?  No, I didn't think so. 

You gotta go slower and use smaller words man. 

[austingirl 2,184]

53 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

 

You’re a pig.

Fuck off and fuck you.

 

I, for one, love your brand of liberated woman. Surly bitches unite.

[Guest]

16 minutes ago, austingirl said:

I, for one, love your brand of liberated woman. Surly bitches unite.

It isn't.

[Bama Chick 28,596]

I, for one, love your brand of liberated woman. Surly bitches unite.

[scottsins 1,953]

1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

If abortion is murder, then how is paying for someone to commit that murder not a crime?

If you want to own the position, own the position. Deeming a fetus a human life has broad-ranging consequences. I mean, except of course if any men would suffer those consequences. Then, nevermind.

It is 100% culpability under the law of parties.

[Thetexashammer 1,062]

1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

 Deeming a fetus a human life has broad-ranging consequences. 

Who "deems" the fetus a human life? Nobody.

It's not mom or dad, it's alive, it's human. Do you have a problem with that? It's got arms and legs, a brain, a heartbeat. Of course it's a human life. 

If it were dead, it would not respire. It would not grow. It would not be a human. Dead things don't come back to life. I'm sorry you are confused, The Princess Bride is not a documentary, it's a work of fiction.

 

[fattyflattie 4,636]

2 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

 

You’re a pig.

Fuck off and fuck you.

 

I’m guessing it was 2?  

[HenryJames 65,868]

1 hour ago, Enchubben said:

Erections have consequences. 

More apropos.

[workswithseed 2,033]

13 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

That verse doesn't counter my point whatsoever.  Furthermore, Adam was a fully formed adult man in every physical way and yet he was not a human until God breathed life into him.  An infant doesn't breathe until it is out of the womb.

Don't take my word for it -- study Southern Baptist teachings on the subject pre-RvW.  They clearly felt that life began at birth.  So again, I ask -- what changed?  It wasn't the scripture.  It was a power grab.

Catholics believe the Pope has final say on bible, what does it matter to me what the Southern Baptist believe. 

So you believe you're not a person until take a breath? So if a child is born but isnt able to breath, then was it ever human?