Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, irishtexan said:

So according to uslakes.com, Travis went from 667 to 691 yesterday. Twenty four fucking feet in 24 hours. Is that the largest single-day rise in history? Even the memorial day flood didn't put this much water in the lake. Did the Lake Travis basin just get hammered in a way that we didn't get it in Austin? It's been raining on and off, sometimes heavy, but it hasn't seemed like this has been a particularly catastrophic amount of rain. Was it just that the ground was already saturated? This seems like a lot of water from not a "noah's arc" amount of rain. 

LBJ Basin (Llano) took the brunt of the rain it seems. Wirtz dam is not designed to hold that amount of water though, so it gets sent downstream to Travis.

Posted
So according to uslakes.com, Travis went from 667 to 691 yesterday. Twenty four fucking feet in 24 hours. Is that the largest single-day rise in history? Even the memorial day flood didn't put this much water in the lake. Did the Lake Travis basin just get hammered in a way that we didn't get it in Austin? It's been raining on and off, sometimes heavy, but it hasn't seemed like this has been a particularly catastrophic amount of rain. Was it just that the ground was already saturated? This seems like a lot of water from not a "noah's arc" amount of rain. 

b7445ac60368be98afdfbaca6a59a886.png

 

Those are two week totals only west of Travis. Short answer is yes, much more rain west of Austin and these totals were after 3-4 weeks of ground saturating rain in September.

 

You can actually see the totals dropping east and even within the LT basin but marble falls, inks and LBJ are constant levels essentially so the tan basin totals end up in Travis without much hold back.

Posted
Just now, troph said:


b7445ac60368be98afdfbaca6a59a886.png

Those are two week totals only west of Travis. Short answer is yes, much more rain west of Austin and these totals were after 3-4 weeks of ground saturating rain in September.

Is that an unprecedented amount of rain? I understand it's a whole lot. But this just seems crazy.

Posted
6 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

So according to uslakes.com, Travis went from 667 to 691 yesterday. Twenty four fucking feet in 24 hours. Is that the largest single-day rise in history? Even the memorial day flood didn't put this much water in the lake. Did the Lake Travis basin just get hammered in a way that we didn't get it in Austin? It's been raining on and off, sometimes heavy, but it hasn't seemed like this has been a particularly catastrophic amount of rain. Was it just that the ground was already saturated? This seems like a lot of water from not a "noah's arc" amount of rain. 

IIRC, Travis caught 40 feet of water in one day back in the 1950's. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

So according to uslakes.com, Travis went from 667 to 691 yesterday. Twenty four fucking feet in 24 hours. Is that the largest single-day rise in history? Even the memorial day flood didn't put this much water in the lake. Did the Lake Travis basin just get hammered in a way that we didn't get it in Austin? It's been raining on and off, sometimes heavy, but it hasn't seemed like this has been a particularly catastrophic amount of rain. Was it just that the ground was already saturated? This seems like a lot of water from not a "noah's arc" amount of rain. 

The elevation change doesn't really reflect the true change.  If the lake were empty when this flood hit, it would have come up way more than 24 feet. I would be interested to know what the greatest 24-hr inflow volume was.

Posted
27 minutes ago, HOOKEM4 said:

I would think a basic requirement would be to know what an acre foot equals

I'm an engineer.  An acre is 43,560 square feet.  Multiply by "1 foot" to get acre-feet (in cubic feet), which is the approximate number he used, save a typo.

Posted
Just now, UTEX_ME said:

LT expected to rise between 705 and 710 by Friday. This will be Christmas 1991 flood territory. 

Yikes. Gotta go check on the lake house again. According to neighbors it's never had water in it, but in Christmas flood the house next door had 4 inches in it. 

Posted
Just now, UTEX_ME said:

LT expected to rise between 705 and 710 by Friday. This will be Christmas 1991 flood territory. 

Where are you seeing this projection. If that is true, one more strong rain event into any of the basins and we could threaten the spillway. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, HOOKEM4 said:

The elevation change doesn't really reflect the true change.  If the lake were empty when this flood hit, it would have come up way more than 24 feet. I would be interested to know what the greatest 24-hr inflow volume was.

Which, with the lake being at 667 feet as opposed to 630 that it was before the memorial day flood, makes this even more mind-boggling.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Where are you seeing this projection. If that is true, one more strong rain event into any of the basins and we could threaten the spillway. 

LCRA just updated their flood op report

Edited by UTEX_ME
Posted
22 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

So according to uslakes.com, Travis went from 667 to 691 yesterday. Twenty four fucking feet in 24 hours. Is that the largest single-day rise in history? Even the memorial day flood didn't put this much water in the lake. Did the Lake Travis basin just get hammered in a way that we didn't get it in Austin? It's been raining on and off, sometimes heavy, but it hasn't seemed like this has been a particularly catastrophic amount of rain. Was it just that the ground was already saturated? This seems like a lot of water from not a "noah's arc" amount of rain. 

every year there's a little more impermeable ground cover too, so more gets sent to the lakes instead of being absorbed.

Posted
5 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

Which, with the lake being at 667 feet as opposed to 630 that it was before the memorial day flood, makes this even more mind-boggling.

Certainly. I wonder what the Christmas flood, or any of those Memorial day floods brought in. I remember moving docks all night years ago and water coming up 2-3 foot an hour most of the night. One of the Memorial day floods I believe.

Posted

Lake Travis is expected to rise to 705 to 710 feet msl by Friday, Oct. 19.  No changes to current gate operations are planned at Mansfield Dam at this time.  Forecasts for Lake Travis may rise with additional rainfall, upstream or downstream of Mansfield Dam.

 

From the LCRA op report that was referenced earlier. They also point out that rain basically anywhere, upstream or down, is going to have potential impacts. 

Posted
Just now, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

every year there's a little more impermeable ground cover too, so more gets sent to the lakes instead of being absorbed.

Theoretically that storm water is attenuated, but this is certainly a factor since the water is coming in from the wild west.

Posted

holy shit.

 

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/man-rescued-after-going-over-starcke-dam-and-floating-downstream/1529689463

 

Quote

MARBLE FALLS, Texas (KXAN) — A man survived going over the Starcke Dam and floating downstream Tuesday.

Neighbors in Spicewood who happened to be in the right place at the right time came to the man's rescue.

"I heard 'help, help me.' It was real faint. It was like, did I just hear that?" said Spicewood resident Mike Zsembik.

Zsembik and two other neighbors spotted the man fighting to stay afloat in the Colorado River.

Luckily for the man, the currents pushed him close enough to the shore where Zsembik and others could throw him a life preserver.

"He's trying to start the boat, and the next thing you know, he said he just went over, over the dam. He said he went under like five or six times. He said I was about ready to give up. I said I'm glad you didn't," said Zsembik.

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, UTEX_ME said:

LCRA just updated their flood op report

Daaamn.  Sent my mom to look at our marina on lake Travis since we are on vacation in Mexico and West Beach road already had 4’ of standing water on it this AM.  Another 10’ would be nuts.  

Posted
Daaamn.  Sent my mom to look at our marina on lake Travis since we are on vacation in Mexico and West Beach road already had 4’ of standing water on it this AM.  Another 10’ would be nuts.  
#humblebrag
Posted
49 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

So according to uslakes.com, Travis went from 667 to 691 yesterday. Twenty four fucking feet in 24 hours. Is that the largest single-day rise in history? Even the memorial day flood didn't put this much water in the lake. Did the Lake Travis basin just get hammered in a way that we didn't get it in Austin? It's been raining on and off, sometimes heavy, but it hasn't seemed like this has been a particularly catastrophic amount of rain. Was it just that the ground was already saturated? This seems like a lot of water from not a "noah's arc" amount of rain. 

Far from it.  I believe the record is almost 50’ in a 24hr period.  

Regarding the rainfall, it just takes the right amount of rain to fall in the right places.  Twelve inches in 48-72 hours in the L.T. basin and City of Austin (not unlike two years ago,) and the lake barely moves.  But you get that same rain only a few miles north and west and it’s historic increases.     

Holy moly: the latest from LCRA is projecting 705’-710’.  That’s incredible.  

Posted
31 minutes ago, USCATX said:

I think the real humblebrag is a flooded lake house.  Or maybe not.  

Damn this thing may eventually affect all three of my lake Austin houses. I’m writing off my lake Travis house obviously. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, HornsOverIthaca said:

The real humble brag would be “I’m being driven by my chauffeur to my flooded lake house.”

1234.  

I don’t know why he cares that much.  Most of us would have sent a manservant or two. 

Posted
1 hour ago, hornian said:

IIRC, Travis caught 40 feet of water in one day back in the 1950's. 

According to the lcra, the lake rose 57 feet in 14 hours in Sept 52.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, LonghornJones said:

4 ft per hour? I'm having a hard time with that.

The lake was also really low at the time, something like 30% full.  Inflows at a low lake level will fill the lake much faster as opposed to when the lake is mostly full already. I bet the inflows we were seeing yesterday are not drastically below the 1952 levels... 

Edited by texhorn
  • Like 1
Posted

Lakeway Marina sent pics via email. Crazytown. Boat ramp under water, tram submerged, another 10 feet will crush that cove but they have the boats well cared for. Staff was there all night managing the docks and slips.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...